2/10
Infuriatingly Misleading
27 April 2022
After sitting thru all episodes, listening told one bold assertion after another with no supporting evidence and then having each crazy theory dismissed based on logic fallacies, i finally made it to the end of the series where the host and ATTORNEY, repeatedly lies about what a police officer and a mysterious document actually states. Both state that a software program flagged a potential ballistic match, then the host / ATTORNEY continues to repeatedly state that it says the LAPD determined the ballistic match. Those are very very different things ! A computer program which uses a photo to find a match is not the same thing as an expert comparing a ballistic signature and determining it a match. This didn't stop host (and did i mention an ATTORNEY) from stating a human a the LAPD determined it ! It was absolutely infuriating to hear OVER AND OVER AND OVER. The show was centered about conspiracies, how conspiracies are bad, and this idiot attorney creates a new one based on his incessant lying....
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed