It's a story we've seen before: a family that's down on their luck stumbles upon something unexpected, but their sudden good fortune produces its own can of worms. There are very familiar themes and story beats - hard work, school bullies, capitalist temptations, learning what's most important, and so on and so on. I'd swear we've even seen this same story in another movie with Graham Greene, pleasant and ubiquitous character actor that he is. It's more than a little predictable, for that matter, from start to finish. Still, if unremarkable, 'A lobster tale' is solidly made, and enjoyable enough.
It's well made from a technical standpoint; everything about the production design is smartly considered, and every little detail that goes into making a movie is on point. The music is fine, and the direction, and the minimal special effects. As far as the writing goes, we've seen all these characters, lines of dialogue, scenes, and story beats before - but it's okay. If we can get a new exorcism flick every few years, and if major studios can churn out 3-4 superhero movies in a year, why not a recognizable family-friendly drama every few years?
It's fair and valid to deduct points for lack of originality, though in fairness, if originality were a great concern for movie-goers, far more pictures would bomb at the box office every year than not. More substantial than this, however, the chief criticism I have with 'A lobster tale' is that the entire length is painted with the same even-handed tone. No matter what the mood or content of any one moment may be - (low-key) suspenseful, heartfelt, humorous sad - all these 90 minutes feel identical. There is no rise, no fall; no crescendo, no climax, no denouement. It's competently made in every single way, except for that it fails to meaningfully resonate on any level.
This is particularly unfortunate because I recognize strong capability in the cast, not least of all star Colm Meaney, but their performances are almost uniformly reduced to a single shade of grey for the entire runtime. That hardly seems fair to them, or to we viewers. None of this is to say that this film is bad; on the contrary, I like it more so than not - but only just. It's just that given a choice between 10 pictures with the same narrative, there's no specific reason why you should choose this one, save for that you're an especial fan of someone involved in the production.
'A lobster tale' is a decent way to pass a lazy afternoon, if you happen to come across it. Just don't feel like you need to go out of your way for it.
It's well made from a technical standpoint; everything about the production design is smartly considered, and every little detail that goes into making a movie is on point. The music is fine, and the direction, and the minimal special effects. As far as the writing goes, we've seen all these characters, lines of dialogue, scenes, and story beats before - but it's okay. If we can get a new exorcism flick every few years, and if major studios can churn out 3-4 superhero movies in a year, why not a recognizable family-friendly drama every few years?
It's fair and valid to deduct points for lack of originality, though in fairness, if originality were a great concern for movie-goers, far more pictures would bomb at the box office every year than not. More substantial than this, however, the chief criticism I have with 'A lobster tale' is that the entire length is painted with the same even-handed tone. No matter what the mood or content of any one moment may be - (low-key) suspenseful, heartfelt, humorous sad - all these 90 minutes feel identical. There is no rise, no fall; no crescendo, no climax, no denouement. It's competently made in every single way, except for that it fails to meaningfully resonate on any level.
This is particularly unfortunate because I recognize strong capability in the cast, not least of all star Colm Meaney, but their performances are almost uniformly reduced to a single shade of grey for the entire runtime. That hardly seems fair to them, or to we viewers. None of this is to say that this film is bad; on the contrary, I like it more so than not - but only just. It's just that given a choice between 10 pictures with the same narrative, there's no specific reason why you should choose this one, save for that you're an especial fan of someone involved in the production.
'A lobster tale' is a decent way to pass a lazy afternoon, if you happen to come across it. Just don't feel like you need to go out of your way for it.