Someone has to put a stop to this lack of investigation being put forward by these supposed journalists. If the man has kinks and the women consented and later didn't like it, is that not just a change of heart? I didn't see one illegal thing that Armie did per this series. Then I find out that the supposed "proof" (it being the bite mark) was a stock image found online and claimed by these directors to have been from Armie (lmao!) Have these people not learned anything from the JD/Heard trials!? Then the disgruntled aunt coming out of the woodwork to complain about Armie BECAUSE she was left out of the will? The one "victim" that never met him in person.. the lawyer that defended Weinstein in this series - that is also representing the "victim" not in this show? All in all to conclude that no charges have been brought against this man. Soooooo ... then what is he being accused of, exactly? If I could negative stars, I would, smh.
Review of House of Hammer
