This documentary doesn't bring much to the table, there's no groundbreaking discoveries nor major new evidence. But to say it's biased towards Amber is just plain stupidity; reviewers here do not have a basic understanding of law and justice.
What they do is simply show both defenses versions of the events, and visibly Johnny's defense has a much better and credible version.
They show Amber's defence and claims with no support because they believe in a minimal common sense to the viewer to make its own conclusion, that should be obviously tilted towards Johnny; but these reviewers are clearly too emotional.
There are many other flaws in this documentary though: they repeat sequences of the first episode in the second, wich is just lazy. The editing is very bad in some points and the writing gets very repetitive, and you usually are left thinking that different people are making the same argument over and over again since often there's not much left to say but they have to meet a minimum time requirement because of the format.
Not a very good documentary, but it's worth to watch it if you don't know the basics of this lawsuit.
What they do is simply show both defenses versions of the events, and visibly Johnny's defense has a much better and credible version.
They show Amber's defence and claims with no support because they believe in a minimal common sense to the viewer to make its own conclusion, that should be obviously tilted towards Johnny; but these reviewers are clearly too emotional.
There are many other flaws in this documentary though: they repeat sequences of the first episode in the second, wich is just lazy. The editing is very bad in some points and the writing gets very repetitive, and you usually are left thinking that different people are making the same argument over and over again since often there's not much left to say but they have to meet a minimum time requirement because of the format.
Not a very good documentary, but it's worth to watch it if you don't know the basics of this lawsuit.