6/10
Edmund Lowe's turn at playing Philo Vance
18 June 2023
This mystery involves the death of three people that may be suicides and again might be murder. The dead are - a jockey, a wealthy corrupt man who was hated by many, including his own family, and a woman who called the police and said she could tell them something about the death of the corrupt man.

These Philo Vance mysteries from 1930 to 1940 are all over the place as far as the persona of the titular character, the pace, and even the studio at which they were made. In this entry, Philo Vance is played by Edmund Lowe who gives a dapper and restrained performance, much along the lines of William Powell's interpretation of the character in the four Philo Vance films in which he starred. Lowe's portrayal brings out the detective's wit, charm, and sharp intellect, capturing the essence of Vance's original literary persona. Also, this Philo Vance loves dogs!

A negative aspect of the production is the pacing occasionally slows down in certain scenes. Additionally, a few characters receive less development than others, leaving their motivations feeling slightly underexplored. A positive aspect is that in this film Vance's resolution to the mystery does come from the various clues he uncovers, not pulled from almost thin air as was the situation in the Dragon Murder Case.

I really liked the performances in this one, especially Edmund Lowe as Vance although I couldn't figure out why he would begin to fall for the murdered Hammle's niece and heir, Zalia. At best she is someone who blows hot and cold on relationships - she impulsively breaks an engagement with somebody because he is a bit naive. And at worst she could be the murderer!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed