"Article 20" is a major disappointment. From the plot, logic to character development, there are serious problems.
In the first half, the endless quarrels between the couple make the audience irritable, which seriously affects the viewing experience. A movie should attract the audience with exciting plots, not rely on quarrels . The development of the character relationship lacks depth, making the whole story appear shallow and powerless.
The speech in the second half is even more ridiculous. In reality, it is hard to imagine that a speech can easily change the judge's verdict. Such a plot setting not only lacks logic, but is also too idealistic. The screenwriter's level is also poor, and there are too many flaws in the script. In the movie, Prosecutor Han Ming actually took over the lawyer's job, which is completely unreasonable! Life is not like this!
In the first half, the endless quarrels between the couple make the audience irritable, which seriously affects the viewing experience. A movie should attract the audience with exciting plots, not rely on quarrels . The development of the character relationship lacks depth, making the whole story appear shallow and powerless.
The speech in the second half is even more ridiculous. In reality, it is hard to imagine that a speech can easily change the judge's verdict. Such a plot setting not only lacks logic, but is also too idealistic. The screenwriter's level is also poor, and there are too many flaws in the script. In the movie, Prosecutor Han Ming actually took over the lawyer's job, which is completely unreasonable! Life is not like this!