Review of A Walton Wedding

I won't add substantially to anything already written other than to whine about why such a great writer like Earl Hamner allowed the inconsistencies in these movies? There are too many to enumerate. I realize that they were trying to shoehorn pivotal events in US history as a backdrop for some of them, but to do violence to certain established characters biographies to achieve these ends? One reviewer said Grandma would be 108, but actually the character of Esther Walton was born in 1866, which would make her 98, but it's still too much of a leap even at that. Everything timeline-wise was messed up with these movies made in the 90s-everything. John and Olivia were married much longer by now. Couldn't they have picked something from a decade earlier to build on? And, what was the point of disappearing Charlie Walton? Or killing off Virginia Walton? Or not even writing in where John-Curtis was? He didn't need to be IN the movie, just ONE LINE acknowledging his existence. Five stars because it's the Waltons. Otherwise, kinda disappointing...but not nearly as much as the New Waltons that was made over the last few years...