The first "action sequence", two lancrusers are pursued by a pick-up truck with a machine gun.
This scene shows that the director has no idea how to stage action. The sequence has nothing. Then a completely uninspiring sex scene that contributes absolutely nothing to the story. (And I like a good sex scene. ) At this point I ask myself. A woman in "Wages of Fear". Okay, we're in the woke age, maybe it has to be. I'm almost gone after 4:26 minutes. (!)
You have to come up with the crazy and stupid idea of remaking one of the greatest classics in film history. Hello Netfelix? Do you fancy a remake of "Casablanca"?
After 6 minutes we are now in a flashback and it is clear that we have landed in a French-Arabic migrant milieu film.
Everything is full of stereotypical little gangster types, or something like that. I turn it off.
This scene shows that the director has no idea how to stage action. The sequence has nothing. Then a completely uninspiring sex scene that contributes absolutely nothing to the story. (And I like a good sex scene. ) At this point I ask myself. A woman in "Wages of Fear". Okay, we're in the woke age, maybe it has to be. I'm almost gone after 4:26 minutes. (!)
You have to come up with the crazy and stupid idea of remaking one of the greatest classics in film history. Hello Netfelix? Do you fancy a remake of "Casablanca"?
After 6 minutes we are now in a flashback and it is clear that we have landed in a French-Arabic migrant milieu film.
Everything is full of stereotypical little gangster types, or something like that. I turn it off.