The Mystery Train (1931) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Poorly Directed
boblipton6 April 2019
Hedda Hopper has been speculating in the market and lost everything. Bryant Washburn says his trust for millionaire Nick Stuart is about to be dissolved. They decide a niece for Mrs. Hopper will repair the holes in each of their finances by marrying young Mr. Stuart. Fortunately(!) the train they are on has a wreck, and Marceline Day escapes custody. Mrs. Hopper immediately adopts her and the plan moves forward.

It's a good set-up, although fans of old movies will find few novelties in its execution. The senior pair are good in their acting; the youngsters a bit stiff. Although Hampton Del Ruth inserted several funny bits in the movie, like Al Cooke and Carol Tevis as quarreling newlyweds, director Phil Whitman doesn't seem to integrate them into the story. Even the title seems to have been chosen to suggest thrills that never appear; the only mystery having to do with trains here is why they keep crashing when the principal actors are on them.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Truly taken in by Auntie Hedda.
mark.waltz14 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
What does a socialite do when she finds out that her investments have caused her to go bust? Take in a pretty female who is a suspect in a crime, and being arrested on a train that crashes, supposedly killing the sheriff she's attached to, make her your niece, and try to find a wealthy husband for her to bail you out, that's what. Here, it's none other than the future "Queen of Hollywood Hats", Hedda Hopper herself, hopping into one of her few leading roles, and being bad to the bone, albeit with a charming demeanor on the outside. But inside, she's rotten-lying every step of the way to keep her name in the blue book, even throwing lavish parties knowing that her bank account is collecting dust mites. And when she finds out the truth about "niece" Marceline Day's guilt or innocence, she continues to hold it over Day's head, just so she can get her hands on ultra-wealthy Nick Stuart's extremely valuable Stanhope diamond which Day will inherit if they marry.

Hedda is having a grand time here, enjoying her amoral character's decent into damnation, yet playing every moment as she did when she stepped into the spotlight as the co-queen of Hollywood gossip, rivaling Louella Parsons, yet occasionally still acting when the right part came along and time permitted. She is so gracious as she throws society parties, having gotten her name in the paper by surviving a train crash. But does lightning strike in the same place twice? For her and Day it does as the train where she reveals everything becomes loose from the caboose (and the engine) and heads towards its own destructive destiny. While made on a very low budget at a poverty row studio, it still is a ton of fun to watch, knowing that Hedda's sins will catch up with her, that love with the misunderstood heroine and handsome hero will triumph, and there's even a sense of retribution and atonement. I could have done without the annoying dumb blonde and her much older new husband (whom she obviously despises and has no intention of sleeping with), but that's minor.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A "B" film that doesn't get on track
SimonJack18 April 2014
"The Mystery Train" is an alluring title for a movie. And it has the premise for a good plot. Unfortunately, it goes the way of so many other poverty row productions of the early Hollywood years. The screenplay is poorly done, and the script is very weak. The technical aspects are poor, the cinematography is low rate and the directing and acting are examples of why so many lesser studios and would-be stars didn't last long.

The only person of any stature in the film is Hedda Hopper. She never attained stardom as an actress, but kept plugging away with small roles into old age. She had 146 film credits in her lifetime. Of course, she was most known as a Hollywood gossip columnist. That was from the mid- 1930s to the mid-1950s. And she kept doing small parts in movies here and there while peddling her popular and lucrative gossip business.

Hopper had a rival – Louella Parsons, who came on the gossip scene much sooner. But, Parsons didn't have an acting career. The interest in this film is mostly to see Hopper in one of her roles. She wasn't in any major hits or high quality movies. So, movie buffs might have to look hard to find films in which she has a role.

I was curious about some of the actors, so I looked them up on IMDb. Some of them had long stints in silent films, but didn't go much beyond that. Al Cooke had 152 film credits but his last appearance was in a 1933 short. Bryant Washburn had 377 credits, mostly bit parts through the 1940s. Marceline Day, the heroine in this film, had 64 credits but had a short-lived career of just 25 years. Nick Stuart, a Romanian born actor, had 52 credits – all small roles and bit parts through the 1950s.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Runaway Train
AAdaSC13 March 2019
Wealthy Hedda Hopper (Marian) isn't so wealthy anymore and needs money. She discusses her predicament with her lawyer friend Bryant Washburn (William) whilst on a train journey. He suggests that it is a pity she doesn't have a daughter as the current case he is working on could prove fruitful for her if she had one. There is a valuable diamond to be passed on to whoever marries bachelor Nick Stuart (Ron) and this provides the basis for the wicked scheme. What Hedda needs is to find a 'daughter' from somewhere and set up a marriage to this rich youngster in order to get the diamond into her position. Once that is completed, job done - welcome back wealthy lifestyle.

The film has interesting beginning and ending sequences that are set aboard a train, and in between we get the trickery associated with the romance. Whilst it isn't the best acted film - Marceline Day (Joan) as the 'daughter' character has some pretty dreadful intonation and line delivery - there is still an element of tension to proceedings that keeps you watching. It gets a bit confusing at the end once the jewel goes missing and then the film resolves itself rather conveniently but it retains a dramatic interest as the audience wants to know what will happen next.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Thrilling "B", Especially for Train Buffs!
JohnHowardReid7 April 2010
Like "Defenders of the Law", this is another interesting "B" scripted by Hampton Del Ruth (this time in collaboration with skillful director Phil Whitman). As the title implies, this one is an absolute must for railroad buffs – and unlike some other "B" movies which promise much but deliver little, this one doesn't disappoint, with some terrific train footage at both the beginning and the climax (which will have most fans on the edge of their seats). Queenly villainess Hedda Hopper is top billed over the lovely Marceline Day, Nick Stuart makes a more-than-adequate hero, Bryant Washburn of course is a collaborating heavy, while Al Cooke and the super-attractive Carol Tevis play a comic groom and bride.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Delightful little snack
Goingbegging10 March 2015
Hedda Hopper's movie career was basically a lifetime of bit-parts (147 credits on IMDb, most of them forgettable), and no-one ever claimed she was a great actress, except in her other career as a gossip-columnist, where she could be highly convincing as a helpless little frilly female, to whom men would confide their secrets - only to find them plastered all over next morning's paper. (Spencer Tracy was so furious, he kicked her in the pants.) So this is one of the few opportunities to see her in a starring role, though at just 62 minutes, it's obviously a B-film and the low budget does show through.

When you hear that it's a story of mistaken identity, involving the theft of a priceless diamond, you can't help thinking of Wodehouse, who had a surprisingly strong influence on Hollywood, and that is the kind of light snack we're talking about. (Why it needed four writers is anybody's guess.)

The date of 1931 signals the first shock of the Depression, so the unremarkable footage of the rich at play would have provided much-needed escapism for hard-up viewers in a thousand small-town cinemas. There is topicality in Hopper's character losing everything in a stock-market gamble. And film-buffs will note the signs that we are just pre-Code, with a distinctly suggestive passage where a young man teaches the girl golf by reaching around her from behind.

This was a pretty foggy print, and the sound is a bit dim too. The climactic fight-scene is so fake and feeble, you can almost hear John Wayne sneering "Fight-scene? Heck, I thought it was a love-scene." But at least Hopper is looking her best - a distinguished beauty, however widely disliked.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A sleazy woman and a sleazy lawyer (I am being redundant) scheme to make a fortune.
planktonrules13 February 2016
Marian Radcliffe (Hedda Hopper) is an awful person. She's lost her fortune and with her lawyer friend she's scheming to find a way to get back on easy street. When their train wrecks, a woman who is a prisoner chained to an officer finds the man dead...and manages to get out of the cuffs. Marian sees this and takes full advantage-- convincing the lady to pose as her daughter or else! The plan is to get this pretty young lady to use her charms on a young heir the lawyer is working for...and marry him for the money. And, since Marian knows the lady is a fugitive, she can then bleed the young lady.

Soon after this scheme is put into place, the Sheriff arrives. He's gone through all the information on the passengers and didn't see a ticket for the daughter! However, he's NOT there to arrest her. It's turned out that she wasn't guilty of a crime after all and he wanted to let the lady know she was free...but Marian promises to tell her 'daughter' but says NOTHING!!! What's next? See the film and find out for yourself.

The plot, according to IMDb, is all about a runaway train...but that is only in the final portion of the film. This is a very exciting and action-packed portion, though, and the film was far, far better than I expected from some poverty row B-movie. The acting was only fair but the writing and action were both exceptionally good...making the movie worth seeing--especially if you like Bs.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hedda Hopper in Charge in Quickie Entertaining Programmer!
JLRMovieReviews26 September 2016
Hedda Hopper, respected and feared Hollywood gossip columnist, began her Hollywood career acting in bit parts. In this pre-Code quickie, she has a rare leading role as a society lady whose estate is dwindling fast and in order to save her "assets," she hatches a plan to inherit money. The train she's on derails and she befriends and uses a young lady who is running from the law. She vouches for her and makes her masquerade as her niece to marry into a wealthy family. Therefore, as the Aunt, she will then come into some very valuable jewelry she has been coveting. This exciting and fast-paced programmer has some predictable complications as the young man/victim and the "niece" fall in love, and she doesn't like lying to him. But Hedda threatens to expose her if she doesn't comply with this temporary deception. Logic flies out the window here. What does Hedda expect to happen – to get away with her shenanigans? But this little film is long on entertainment and has a very exciting finale on a runaway train. Every once in a while, I find a film I love to talk about and recommend to real film lovers; this is my latest one! "Mystery Train" is a long- lost film classic that should be discovered today!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of those very special 'Poverty Row' movies...
binapiraeus24 April 2014
'Poverty Row' doesn't always mean 'poor quality', we know that very well. It may mean modest means of production, maybe a lower quality of picture and sound and even directing - but it VERY often means an unexpectedly good cast, and a really suspenseful, unusual and original plot. And "The Mystery Train" certainly has got both: Hedda Hopper (who later became Hollywood's most famous and feared gossip columnist), young Marceline Day, who'd already been a star in silent dramas as well as comedies, and Nick Stuart, always a reliable 'handsome young man' in B movies... And as for the plot - now, a B movie with a running time of just a little over an hour seldom gets boring; but THIS one keeps you fascinated for EVERY single moment...

It's the story of how fate often puts things in the right - or the wrong - place: on a train, a middle-aged businesswoman (Hopper) has just learned that she's lost all her money on the stock market, while her lawyer tells her about one of his clients, a young man who's just inherited a large fortune; and she remarks what a shame it is that she hasn't got a daughter to marry that rich young fellow... While in the next compartment, a cop is just taking a young girl handcuffed to the jail, while she keeps swearing that she didn't commit the crime she's been convicted for - and then the train jumps off the tracks, and in the ensuing chaos, the girl manages to free herself from the handcuffs and the unconscious cop; while, when the survivors are all asked for their names, the crafty lady reacts quickly and presents the girl as her niece - pretending to be wanting to help her, but in reality hoping that SHE'll be the one the rich heir will fall for and marry, bringing an immensely valuable diamond that's part of the heritage into her possession...

This movie is so full of suspense, romance and action that it'll surely enthrall EVERY fan of classic crime and romance films - most of all because the cast, namely the two 'lovers', are so engaging and sympathetic that you simply can't HELP feeling with them, hoping and fearing for them... Something that MANY a highly praised A movie doesn't manage to achieve!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very enjoyable movie
Bill-1611 December 2015
This movie is apparently in Public Domain and I downloaded it from Jimbo Berkey's fantastic site. I then uploaded to the Cloud and watched in on TV with my Streaming Media device (can I say Roku?).

I love anything to do with Railroading's Steam Days, so this would at least be a time killer on a rainy day.

However, it turned out to be a pretty darn good movie, with a neat story, good acting and GREAT railroading scenes.

Hedda Hopper was a better actress than you might have thought, if you even ever heard of her. She may even be better than her Son William, TV Perry Mason's Private Dick, Paul Drake. All the other actors were fine too.

I especially liked the Newlyweds on the Train, who along with the Porter supplied the Comic Relief. That and some genuine Hair Raising Train scenes really added to the movie.

I plan on watching this movie again and I think lots of other people might want to give it a look.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well! Who'd a thunk it...
jerann16 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Hedda was a hotta :)From picture on the DVD cover. That's all I have to say until I watch the film on YouTube. I wanted to see what IMDb had to say about it. I have to write ten lines to make this review so will say a few things about IMDb. It's ONE of the most important sites on the internet. Since I was a little kid, I've always preferred old movies to most of today's movies. I love finding out about the stars of the classic films and this is the place that has it all. I'm so grateful to IMDb for all the work that they do to make it possible to find out if it's worth the time to watch. As a Christian, I try to keep to what the Bible says; whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things. And IMDb helps me do that. Thanks IMDb.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed