Wives Never Know (1936) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
...How to tell the husbands how clueless they are..
mark.waltz25 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
...When it comes to keeping the romance alive in their marriage...

Wealthy botanist Charlie Ruggles calls his wife Mary Boland everyday at 10am and 4pm. So she knows that he's thinking about her. Flowers, candy, pistachio nuts. But is that really romance or just a routine? It is to Ruggles' old college rival (Adolph Menjou) who puts it into her head that Ruggles only does it out of obligation, sending Boland into a depression. Too lame to see the truth, Ruggles strives to make her jealous, and oh what a mistake that is. For a lovable but dizzy woman like Boland, L'Amour is a complicated thing, and they are going to both come to grips with their differences.

For a good portion of the 1930's, the light comedy of Charlie Ruggles and Mary Boland provided a ton of laughs. They weren't your typical screen team, playing both leads and supporting parts, but often together. Vivienne Osborne is the eccentric stage actress who flirts openly with Ruggles and provides a brief unfulfilled temptation for Ruggles. As for Menjou, he's as dashing as ever, a reminder of the well dressed man about town whose image was made fun of in "Sunset Blvd." Also providing laughs is the forever lovable Louise Beavers, cast as (what else?) the lovable maid, advising Boland based on her own experience with her many husbands.

Not quite a "B" film (but not a blockbuster either), this succeeds on the merits of its easy to take screenplay, art decco sets, sophisticated costumes and a reminder of the glamorous days of the depression era 1930's. There's enough subtle insinuation that keeps this clean without insulting the story. This is a delightful forgotten screwball comedy that covers a lot of ground and finishes the race a winner.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
What were they thinking??
planktonrules27 May 2021
In "Wives Never Know", Homer and Marcia Bigelow (Charlie Ruggles and Mary Boland) are devoted to each other and act like honeymooners even though they've been married for years. Those around them see them as the ideal couple...except for an idiot author (Adolph Menjou) of the book "Marriage, the Living Death". This knucklehead somehow convinces the Bigelows that what their marriage needs is excitement and that excitement will be provided by having Homer cheat on his wife...just a bit! How they believe this hooey is beyond me, but soon Homer is forcing himself to drink, smoke and chase another woman...and he's miserable throughout the experience. And, instead of making the Bigelows happy, it naturally causes all sorts of problems.

The plot is simply bizarre to say the least. In fact, I'd say it's contrived...something that simply makes no sense to anyone except Hollywood folks! Because the plot is so ridiculous, you can't help but be turned off by the movie even though the acting is quite nice. Plus, it's nice to see Ruggles playing against type, as he OFTEN played husbands who strayed during this era. But the plot just bogs it all down and offers the actors little with which to work. Watchable but it simply should have been better and more enjoyable.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Forgotten And Astonishingly Funny Comedy
boblipton1 July 2019
Charlie Ruggles and Mary Boland have a dedicated if somewhat banal marriage in Topeka. He brings home his old college buddy, Adolphe Menjou, who has just written a book titled "Marriage, The Living Death." The high-living bachelor convinces Mary that their marriage lacks zest. If Charlie never cuts loose, she can never have the joy of jealousy and the pleasure of forgiving him. So Charlie goes out to fulfill his part of the deal with Vivienne Osborne, and comes home with a black eye, pneumonia and one of Miss Osborne's garters in his pocket, triggering off a hilarious third act to this absurd comedy.

The parts must have been written for the performers, and Elliott Nugent directs them to a tee; the absurd interplay between Menjou and Ruggles suits their screen characters to a tee; Miss Boland is perfect, looking goggle-eyed and confused with Mr. Menjou and ordering an ice cream soda from bartender Tom Kennedy in an illegal saloon. Even the small roles, like Frank O'Connor, who wants to arrest Ruggles for impersonating himself, have never been better.

I had never heard of this movie before it turned up, and it's a shock to me how good this unremembered comedy is. In terms of story, jokes and just plain comedic shtick, it is a masterpiece of its type.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pitiful screenplay, humorless and tedious three-fourths story sink this film
SimonJack17 May 2020
Occasionally, one comes across a film that's virtually unknown -- all but forgotten, but that turns out to be a gem. On the other hand, many forgotten films are more often unknown for the opposite reason. They're either stinkers or just not very good. Allowing for the difference in taste among reviewers - and possibly the degrees of sobriety, consciousness and/or sanity when viewing one of these films, some may find gems in stinkers and others stinkers in gems.

Well, "Wives Never Know" isn't exactly a stinker, but it's sure not a gem. First, it has no witty or humorous dialog. Not until near the very end does it have any funny antics, and it's a strain to get any humor out of the situations until the very end. So, it has about one quarter of each of two elements that make up comedy. That's about one-sixth of comedy, at the best.

The leads in this film - Charles Ruggles, Adolphe Menjou and Mary Boland all played in some wonderful comedies. And the fault in this film isn't anything to do with their acting. It's just a weak, long drawn-out story sans humor, with a terrible screenplay. This film suffers from a poor story, lousy script, and weak direction. Elliott Nugent directed some good comedies in his day, but he got saddled with a screenplay and story that drags on and on in the first three-quarters without anything funny at all. What there is of comedy the last 15 minutes can't save this dud.

Paramount was known for some smashing comedies throughout Hollywood's golden era. One suspects this is one film the studio brass didn't mind sliding into oblivion.

Here's an example of the dialog that's supposed to pass for humor in this film. Menjou's Hugh Ramsey, "Does a vegetable ever think of itself as a vegetable? No."
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed