Fast and Loose (1939) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The script and direction are fast and loose
krorie1 February 2006
This is the second installment of a series created by Harry Kurnitz from his book "Fast Company," featuring a husband and wife team, Joel and Garda Sloane, rare book dealers who were amateur detectives. The first outing was "Fast Company" starring Melvyn Douglas and Florence Rice. "Fast and Loose" came next. Then the Sloane's misadventures came to a screeching halt with "Fast and Furious" featuring Franchot Tone and Ann Sothern." One reason for the demise was the rapid turnover in the lead roles with different actors playing Joel and Garda in each film. A common thread for all three was the writing of Harry Kurnitz which accounts for the similarities in dialog and story structures.

True, the series may remind viewers of Nick and Nora Charles but in reality there are many husband and wife flicks from the period that were somewhat patterned after the successful and popular "The Thin Man." These three films can stand on their own without such comparisons being necessary. Of the three, the first "Fast Company" is possibly the best with Douglas and Rice making a fine pair of sleuths. But the other two have merits of their own.

Robert Montgomery and the indomitable Rosalind Russell interact well with each other. The story about a forged Shakespeare which leads to murder with a whole gallery of suspects isn't always easy to follow but it's worth the time and effort. Montgomery and Russell share many a witty line and comeback, not quite as fast, nor as cutting, as the repartee between Russell and Cary Grant in "His Girl Friday" which was released the following year but still enough gibes to keep all fast and loose. There is also a running joke that carries on to the end involving a donut cushion from a previous case when Joel Slaone was shot in the tush.

The title is apt for the script and direction which are fast and loose. Not on a par with "The Thin Man," but still an entertaining piece of fluff.
28 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Nick and Nora Charles knockoff
planktonrules20 August 2007
During the 1930s and 40s, MGM produced many successful "Thin Man" movies starring William Powell and Myrna Loy. They were wonderful little mystery films with a very strong emphasis on humor and the banter between the two leads. Here, MGM tries to make the formula pay off again, but this time with Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell in the leads. In so many ways the film was this old formula all over again, but somehow despite their best efforts the two leads just don't make it work as well as Powell and Loy--partly because the Thin Man films are so good it's hard to match them and partly because the script just isn't as good as the Thin Man scripts--it's just too complex and not all that interesting. Still, considering the Russell and Montgomery still are wonderful actors, the film pays off well enough to recommend it. I especially liked Montgomery's easy-going manner, though unfortunately the usually strong characters Russell plays aren't as evident here and she's rather over-shadowed by Montgomery.

So overall, it's not a bad little film--just don't expect the magic of Nick and Nora Charles.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
OK, but "The Thin Man" it ain't.
makeminegreen21 May 2002
Serviceable part-time-detective story set in the world of rare-book collecting and presented in the Thin Man style. (The writer, Harry Kurnitz, later contributed to the 4th and 5th Thin Man movies.)

Points for premise and some good one-liners ("I request the pleasure of your absence"); unfortunately, the leads wear their roles with all the comfort of sackcloth. Robert Montgomery's transitions between lighthearted husband and tough-guy sleuth are awkward -- like he was just rehearsing to be Lord Peter Wimsey in "Haunted Honeymoon" a year later -- and the usually superior Rosalind Russell as a "wifey" isn't sharp enough for the Nora Charles league.

Otherwise, it's an OK way to kill some time on a rainy afternoon ... but I wouldn't waste 1.5 hours of videotape to watch it later.
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Thin Man ripoff doesn't fly
blanche-23 January 2006
It's a good thing Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell were the stars of "Fast and Loose," otherwise, there would be nothing to recommend it. They are wonderful as a sort of penniless Nick and Nora hot on the trail of a stolen Shakespearian manuscript. I found it a little hard to follow as far as who killed whom and why.

Both actors were excellent at both comedy and drama, and in fact, right before seeing this, I saw them in "Night Must Fall." What a difference! And really, it is a tribute to the talent of both that they could do such different types of films so easily.

I wish they'd had a better script to work with. This film is too long and too confusing. But if you want to see two masters at work, by all means, check it out.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slow and Tedious
hernanjp7 June 2002
I love the films with Robert Montgomery. There was no one better at light comedy roles. And Roz was no slouch either. That's why this picture was so disappointing.

This picture is about two murders and 40 minutes too long. Don't try to keep up with who killed whom and why-you'll get a headache! Normally with a 30's whodunit you wouldn't expect to keep up with the plot twists. But here they just bog down the lifeless story more. It's dull and formulaic. Only the charm, wit and affection of the stars make this watchable at all.

But still, I'm not sorry I saw It-because as a film "buff," I wouldn't have believed otherwise that Montgomery and Roz had made such a stinker!
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Mystery of the Shakespeare Manuscript
movingpicturegal26 October 2006
Comedy/murder-mystery with a plot that's a bit rambling, but the action is considerably boosted up by the smart, snappy patter and chemistry between the two leads, Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell. They play a husband/wife duo who own a rare book business, sleep in twin beds, and soon get themselves mixed up with a house full of murder, intrigue, and the constant back and forth of characters appearing in satin robes or satin gowns as our couple plays detective to try and find out who is behind the mystery of a forged Shakespeare manuscript.

This film is fun, though the plot is sort of hard to follow, and there are too many boring side characters that don't really add anything to the mix. But - Rosalind Russell is smart and funny, as usual, and gets to appear in lots of gorgeous dresses and gowns, as usual. Robert Montgomery, well, is just so darn charming and attractive, how can he miss (okay, I admit I have a crush - I'm afraid my feelings about this film may have been altered based on the fact I'm still swooning over him). Mediocre story, but nicely played by the two leads who really seemed like a married couple to me (I thought it was cute when she tied a little ribbon into a bow around a strand of his thinning hair).
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Brush up your Shakespeare
TheLittleSongbird22 July 2020
'Fast Company' (already reviewed a few months back), 'Fast and Loose' and 'Fast and Furious' have been inevitably been compared to the generally superior Thin Man film series, also featuring husband and wife sleuths and mixing comedy and mystery with some of the biggest stars at that point in film history. Of the three 'Fast...' films, my personal favourite is 'Fast Company', which fared the best at balancing comedy and mystery and has the most eventful and most cohesive story although the two leads' chemistry is better here in 'Fast and Loose'.

The second film 1939's 'Fast and Loose' is a fun and inoffensive enough entry in the series but despite preferring the chemistry here and the female lead is superior here, as said already comedy and mystery were balanced better in comedy and mystery and did prefer the story in 'Fast Company'. Not that those elements were done badly here in 'Fast and Loose', just that they were done better before. This is a very watchable film if not a must watch.

Will begin with what is good. Fred MacMurray is charming and commands the screen very well, with strong comic timing. Rosalind Russell is even better when it comes to the comic delivery, never looks ill at ease, looks great and very easy to like, to me she has more presence here than Florence Rice did in 'Fast Company'. They have a very endearing and witty chemistry together that really helps lift the film, of all the 'Fast...' films this is the film for me that had the most spark between its two leads. It is slickly directed and the supporting cast do well, the standout being Etienne Giradot.

Generally the script is snappy and sophisticated enough and the story does intrigues. The production values are slick and have some elegance and William Axt's score has some moodiness and light-hearted edge.

At times though, the film could have gone at a tighter pace and could have been shorter as there isn't enough plot structurally to sustain the film. There are also a few too many twists and characters which made it not always easy to follow, parts are downright confusing. The ending seemed rushed and could have been a little more suspenseful.

Not all the characters seemed necessary to the story and seemed there to pad things out.

Decent film overall but not great. It does well in the comedy and falls a little short when it came to the mystery. 6/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Another entry in the Joe Sloane mysteries...
Doylenf26 October 2006
Neither ROBERT MONTGOMERY nor ROSALIND RUSSELL can do much to raise this above an average Nick and Nora type of mystery as they try to solve a crime involving a stolen Shakespearean manuscript worth a fortune. Montgomery and Russell are both adept at this sort of comedy and make an excellent pair in the leads, so different than the roles they played in NIGHT MUST FALL.

The wealthy household where the first murder takes place is full of suspects, including RALPH MORGAN, JOHN HOWARD, REGINALD OWEN, ALAN DINEHART and TOM COLLINS. SIDNEY BLACKMER does a nice job as a crooked gambling house owner.

With Montgomery and Russell as the husband and wife team, the accent is more on comedy than mystery when Ralph Morgan is found murdered near the open vault in his library. As Montgomery investigates, there are plenty of red herrings that seem to plant suspicion on every member of the household.

Despite all the A production trappings, there's no way this can be considered anything more than a mildly entertaining programmer.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
for a 40's mystery - it's a 10
eflapinskas26 October 2006
"Fast and Loose" is a pleasant surprise. It is a well written who done it. I like the character portrayed by Robert Montgomery a part time investigator named Sloan. The role of Sloans wife is aptly played by Rosalind Russell who ' helps' her husband in his case solving endeavors. The cast is full of veteran character actors such as the venerable Ian Wolfe who can be seen in some Rathbone / Bruce type Sherlock Holmes films of the '40's. The fact that this mystery movie was written well enough to keep you guessing till the very end adds to it's charm. The setting of social muckity - mucks adds a nice flavor to the film also. In 1939, when this film was released, many landmark films crossed the silver screen. That same year Tyrone Power made an appearance as Zorro. Rathbone and Bruce started the Holmes series. As for classic mystery movies I think "Fast and Loose" was made in the right year. The film is not available on DVD, yet. It may never be. If I see it aired on TV again I WILL copy it for my archives. It is worth seeing again.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
sequel to a copy
SnoopyStyle13 July 2019
Quick-witted rare book seller couple Joel and Garda Sloane occasionally dabbles in the dangerous world of detectives. Absent-minded Mr. Oates tells them that cash-strapped Nicholas Torrent is looking to sell a rare scrap of a William Shakespeare manuscript. They track down Nicholas for Oates and they uncover a mystery of missing books.

A fast talking couple solving mysteries is almost a genre of its own with William Powell and Myrna Loy as the movies gained sound. This is a sequel to a movie from a year earlier although that one stars two different actors. The mystery genre owes a lot to Agatha Christie. In many ways, it's a copy of a copy, a sequel to a follower. I hate to say it but it reminds me a lot of all the Lifetime mystery solving people whether they're book sellers, gardeners, or bakers. The quick retorts have moments of almost humor. I don't mind the leads although I don't see how people can develop attachments to a constant rotation of actors for the same roles. I would rather have more of the rapid fire dialogue between the married couple than the slow moving mystery.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The second in MGM's "Fast" Trilogy.
cgvsluis27 September 2020
My second and surprisingly my least favorite of MGM's "Fast" Trilogy based on the popular Marco Page (pseudonym for Harry Kurnitz) Book. I say surprisingly because I truly love both Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell, who play our leads Joel and Garda. I would have thought they would be my favorite of the three couples to play Joel and Garda, our married Rare Book Dealers turned detectives who have a very banter and alcohol-filled marriage ala Nick and Nora of The Thin Man fame. This script/film was the driest of the three films with the least amount of humor and witty dialogue, but what was really a miss was the fact that Montgomery and Russell seemed to have no chemistry. Rosalind Russell actually seemed miscast in this role. There are still some funny lines and it is probably still worthy of a watching as Joel and Garda somehow get roped in to helping solve a murder yet again. Fast Company and Fast and Furious are the better films in my opinion.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Lots of fun! Montgomery and Russell are Wonderful
bozo-595 December 2007
Here's the story of the entertainment industry; if something works then copy it. What was working back in the 30's was The Thin Man, the very popular series with William Powell and Myrna Loy. So, every other studio including the poverty row ones cranked out clones featuring husband and wife teams solving mysteries. The best of these, in my opinion were the three films featuring book seller and part-time detective Joel Sloane and his wife Garda. Each of the three films featured a different set of actors playing the Sloanes. The first film, "Fast Company" starred Melvyn Douglas and Florence Rice followed by this film with Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell. The last of the films, "Fast and Furious" had Franchot Tone and Ann Sothern. I like all three films, but this one is my favorite probably because I really like Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell, but also because the supporting cast was also good displaying the talents of Reginald Owen and Sidney Blackmer. It's also a good story and nice mystery with some great comic relief. The chemistry between Montgomery and Russell seemed genuine to me and unlike one other reviewer I thought Mongomery transitioned well between the comedy and action elements of the story. Any comparison between this film and the disappointing Lord Peter Wimsey story "Haunted Honeymoon" is way off base. Again, I like all three of the films and would recommend them to anyone who enjoys the mystery films from this era. I've watched this one many times and continue to find it funny and entertaining with each viewing. This may not match the best of the Thin Man movies, but it's far better than a couple of the weaker entries.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Polished But Predictable
zardoz-1318 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
"Fast and Loose" was one of the many husband and wife murder mysteries spawned by the success of "The Thin Man" franchise. Living up to its title at 80 minutes, this lighthearted contemporary M-G-M crime story featured a married couple forged in the mold of Nick and Nora Charles. Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell were ideally cast as an amusing couple of amateur detectives, Joel, and Garda Sloane, investigating the theft of the only existing excerpt of a genuine William Shakespeare manuscript valued at half-a-million dollars. At least three people die under mysterious circumstances because of this priceless manuscript. Since this is an M-G-M effort, the production values are glossy, the cast immaculate, with glamor in every department, particularly the villainous gambling entrepreneur. Indeed, everything is its proper place, and the amusing banter between Joel and Garda Sloane is more fun than the formulaic plot. Rare book dealer--and resident smart-aleck--Joel Sloane (Robert Montgomery of "The Lady in the Lake") is approached by a client, Christopher Oates (Etienne Girardot of "The Kennel Murder Case"), who wants him to buy a scrap of Shakespearean manuscript from a wealthy gentlemen desperately needing money. The economy of Edwin L. Marin's invisible direction is surpassed only by charisma of the two leads. Montgomery and Russell belong together. They have rhythm. Like traditional heroes and heroines, they don't blunder into this investigation from the get-go, they are desperate for work themselves. The office landlord has threatened to evict them if they don't pay up in ten days. Joel and Garda are in their office surrounded by book shelves bristling with valuable texts when she utters forbidden sentiments. "Too bad they abolished slavery, you'd bring a nice price," quips Garda flippantly. I'm surprised that comment didn't spark some controversy.

You can tell "Fast and Loose" is an M-G-M film because even the police look like they have better salaries. Mind you, this murder mystery unfolds in a large house, and everybody here had been there when the murders were committed. Furthermore, this crime follows infighting among the wealthy Torrent family. Nicholas Torrent (Ralph Morgan of "Strange Interlude") suspects that his son, Gerald Torrent (Tom Collins of "The Secret of Dr. Kildare"), may be stealing his prized books from his collection and selling them to pay off his gambling debts to 'Lucky' Nolan. The father plans to cut his son out of his will because of his son's larcenous spree. Joel phones one of his close friends, Phil Sergeant (John Hubbard of "The Mummy's Tomb"), who works for Torrent, Phil gives Joel nothing. Everything kicks into gear after Joel's insurance agent friend Dave Hilliard (Alan Dinehart of "Hotel for Women") asks him to visit Torrent and snoop around for him. The agent shows Joel a rare hardback copy of a book that Hilliard's company obtained. Hilliard and company are suspicious about what is happening out at the Torrent estate.

Joel Sloane isn't a defenseless amateur. He pulls some mighty slick moves, especially when he disarms Nolan in the gambling house. Garda ridicules Joel about his rush to heroism and wishes that he would refrain from it. You'll chuckle when you see what condition Joel is in at the close of "Fast and Loose." Even if the climactic payoff isn't as surprising as it is, "Land of the Pharaohs" scenarist Harry Kurnitz parcels out the appropriate scenes in agreeable order. Light comedy is the order of the day. Indeed, Kurnitz would later pen the stage play "A Shot in the Dark" that would become the basis for an Inspector Clouseau comedy. Anyway, Garda needles her impetuous husband about what happened when he got in the way of a crime investigation. We learn that Joel was shot in the buttocks. Garda wiggles a finger through the bullet hole as she holds up his pants and reminds him how painful the aftermath was with an inflatable donut tube. When Joel and Garda aren't picking at each other, Joel interferes with Nolan's dame, Bobby Neville (Joan Marsh of "Anna Karenina"), to question her about her presence at the house. Harry Kurnitz provides swell dialogue, interesting characters, but the revelation about the villain's identity isn't startling. This individual was fairly smart, but like all villains tripped himself up in the long run. "Fast and Loose" doesn't wear out it welcome.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Fast and Loose" is neither...
moonspinner5527 July 2008
One of several films Robert Montgomery did with Rosalind Russell; they're a chummy couple, they interact well on-screen, but this is one of their weaker efforts. A book expert plays part-time sleuth when a handwritten manuscript by Shakespeare is stolen; his wife inadvertently helps. Some smart jabs at the economy (circa 1939) and the playful repartee between Montgomery and Russell make this watchable, but nothing more. The scenario is too cluttered with suspects, and no one in the large supporting cast makes much of an impression (except possibly Sidney Blackmer playing a sinister gambling czar, his steely eyes just as chilly here as in 1968's "Rosemary's Baby"). Hectic, somehow tolerable, yet imminently forgettable. ** from ****
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun and loose. Fast, not so much
gridoon202413 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell take up the roles that Melvyn Douglas and Florence Rice had in "Fast Company" (made just one year earlier), and although they do a thoroughly professional job of it, I felt that the relationship portrayed by Douglas and Rice was a tad sweeter; in "Fast And Loose", there is a little too much "Go out now darling, I have to take care of business all by myself" attitude by the husband. Nonetheless, there are some funny moments (the perfume, the closing gag, etc). The mystery itself is thicker than that of the first film and demands your full attention if you want to keep up with all the different characters. The film feels a bit drawn-out at times, however the ending does provide a jolt! **1/2 out of 4.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
1939 Film Classic
whpratt120 August 2007
Enjoyed this gem of an old film from the past with Robert Montgomery,(Joel Sloane) who deals with rare books and his business is rather slow and he is in need of trying to sell some of his rare books. Joel is married to his wife, Garda Sloane, (Rosalind Russell) and has to sleep in separate beds because of the Moral Code established in the 1930's. Joel finds a client who is interested in obtaining a very valuable manuscript of Shakespeare and needs Joel's assistance in this matter. This film then proceeds to become a mystery with Joel becoming a detective something like the "Thin Man Films" with William Powell and Myra Loy.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Attractive stars carry lightweight mystery-comedy
csteidler6 December 2015
Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell just fit their roles as Joel and Garda Sloane, witty rare book dealers who dabble in detective work on the side. The book business is apparently not that good— Montgomery wishes that somebody would steal a lot of rare books so he could recover them and get the reward. Also, detective work is a lot more fun than book selling.

The plot, which gets rolling quickly, involves a Shakespeare manuscript and a Paradise Lost first edition, as well as a rival book dealer, an absent-minded client, and some family intrigue. As Russell sums up neatly at one point: "What a spot for that girl. Her father murdered and her brother and her sweetheart probably all mixed up in it." It's fairly complicated but the story moves along plenty fast enough that we don't have much time to wonder whether it makes sense.

The banter between Montgomery and Russell is the picture's main attraction, and both stars are appealing and funny. The supporting cast is also good and features such familiar faces as Reginald Owen and Ralph Morgan.

It's no masterpiece but never boring for a minute; it's certainly a solid entry in the husband-and-wife-amateur-detectives genre.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Rare Books are Interesting; but this Film? No. - Fast and Loose
arthur_tafero1 April 2022
This minor sleuth drama features Robert Mongomery and Rosalind Russell, two distinctly B actors, in a whodunnit about rare books being stolen from a private library; not exactly earth-shattering stuff. The film is watchable for the book angle, but that's it.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Almost as good as Fast Company
JohnHowardReid30 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know why M-G-M decided to exchange Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell for the amazingly successful team of Melvyn Douglas and Florence Rice who debuted as Joel and Garda Sloane in 1938's Fast Company. Mind you, Robert and Rosalind actually do very good jobs, although the chance to act in a superior screenplay – which is actually even more exciting than the original – helps too. Also of immense assistance here is a really outstanding support cast led by Sidney Blackmer as the evil, stop-at-nothing "Lucky" Nolan – no, I'm not giving away an essential plot twist. Lucky's just one of the suspects so far as the main murder is concerned. Also tops in the support cast are Jo Ann Sayers as Christina, Joan Marsh as Bobby, and Tom Collins as Gerald. I know these are not household names, but it goes to show what an enormous pool of talent was hanging around Hollywood in 1939 (often described as Hollywood's greatest year). And I can't leave off praising the acting without mentioning Etienne Girardot who is absolutely priceless in the role of Christopher Oates. This one was produced on a bigger budget than Fast Company and is well directed by the usually unexciting Edwin L. Marin, who never surpassed A Study in Scarlet (his second film); but this entry comes close! Available on an excellent Warner Archive DVD.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Meet the Sloanes
bkoganbing12 July 2019
With Fast And Loose, it looks like MGM was trying to create another Thin Man type series with a husband and wife mystery solvers. Robert Montgomery plays Joel Sloane an expert on forgery of all kind who dabbles in detective work and Rosalind Russell plays the helpful wife. She's as helpful to Montgomery as Myrna Loy was to Willam Powell.

In this case Montgomery is called in to authenticate the sale of a rare Shakespeare manuscript that Ralph Morgan owns. Only Morgan turns up dead and his son and Montgomery's friend is looking good for it. Naturally it isn't him, but Montgomery has a lot of suspects just as there are in any Thin Man film.

In the supporting cast best in it is Joan Marsh who plays gambler Sidney Blackmer's moll. Her performance has some real zip to it and she dominates every scene she's in.

Though Montgomery and Russell were good I guess the movie going public created no great demand for a sequel.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fast for its scene changes but otherwise a dull script and film
SimonJack7 September 2021
"Fast and Loose" is the second of three films in a short series MGM made about Joel and Garda Sloane, dealers of rare books and sometimes detectives related to such. The first one, "Fast Company" of 1938 starred Melvyn Douglas and Florence Rice, and was a very good comedy crime flick. But this one, with Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell can't hold a candle to the original, and surely doesn't live up to its billing.

This is a typical case of Hollywood ballyhoo in promoting a film. The trailer shows a couple of action scenes and reads across the film, "Faster than Fast Company - and twice as Funny." Since there is a short car chase and accident, and much switching between scenes, I'll grant that this one is faster than the first film. But for comedy it's a dud. I kept waiting but didn't hear a single funny line or see a single humorous scene.

Robert Montgomery may have been a leading man in many romance films of his time, but I think his smirkish persona tends to deflate the occasional clever or funny line he has in most film. But this film doesn't even have a single funny line for him. The first film used a second writer who no doubt livened up that script.

The lack of comedy is so obvious, that this film wouldn't even rate five stars. But I give it that based on the fairly good mystery aspect of the film, and Rosalind Russell's effort to liven it up.

Here are the best couple of lines that pass for comedy.

Garda Sloane, "Joel! Joel! The phone is ringing." Joel Sloane, "Well, what'd you expect it to do - sing?"

Garda Sloane, "I don't want you getting into trouble. I worry when somebody shoots you."

Garda Sloane. "And when that didn't work, they lit matches to my butt, and then they tried the Chinese water torture." Joel Sloane, "You know, darling, you haven't visited your mother in a long time."
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
kind of a nick & nora mystery...
ksf-25 June 2018
Sixth and final film with Montgomery and Russell. Kind of a Thin Man knockoff, but both were from MGM, so no-one's going to complain. Robert Montgomery is Joel, married to Garda (Rosalind Russell). Joel is hired on to figure out why books from a rich guy's collection are mysteriously appearing on the street, and no-one is reporting them missing. Keep an eye out for Ralph Morgan, as Nick Torrent, owner of the collection. You probably know Morgan's BROTHER, Frank, who was busy making Wizard of Oz, around the same time! Sound and picture are pretty good...looks like it has already been restored. You'll see the same recipe they used in Thin Man... clever but antagonistic banter between hubby and his feisty wife, and they slowly but steadily try to solve the mystery at hand. Reginald Owen is "Charlton", probably best known as the cult leader in Rosemary's Baby. Étienne Girardot is the nervous, little twitchy guy, "Oates", who seems to be mixed up in here, somehow. Girardot was already 82, and he died soon after this came out. some good chemistry between Monty and Russell, who had already worked together so many times. It's fun. shows on Turner Classics here and there.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The roles of Joel and Garda Sloane are now being played by...
mark.waltz7 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Brush up your Shakespeare, 'cause you may need it for clues in solving this murder involving original Shakespeare manuscripts replaced by phonies. Well, MGM thought its original stars of the first entry in this three part series to be phonies, too, and out were Melvyn Douglas and Florence Rice, and in were Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell. Roz's addition was fine, but Montgomery seems slightly out of his element replacing Douglas. He's great in romantic comedy or drama and even in action, but after terrorizing Roz in "Night Must Fall", seems to be a desperate choice. The chemistry might have worked had Douglas been back, but he got Garbo that year, so he didn't loose in the deal. There is a bit more intrigue here, including an attempt to kill the couple in a car accident which ends up being played for laughs. Etienne Girardot is amusing as a little sprout of a man whom Montgomery orders to keep an eye on Roz. Other than the typical MGM gloss, there is nothing really remarkable about this, which comes as a major disappointment considering the talent involved. Russell gets a few opportunities to show off her comedic skills but is lost amidst the many convoluted plot twists which may make you lose attention and miss important clues in order to solve the crime. Something is definitely rotten in this state of confusion!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The film studio responsible for the reprehensible . . .
oscaralbert1 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
. . . "Picturization" (to use ITS word) of GONE WITH THE WIND, REBECCA, and shelves of other books lets slip its True Colors with FAST AND LOOSE. The whole theme of FAST AND LOOSE is that Literature exists ONLY to enable Fat Cat One Per Center Studio Heads to rake in scads of Quick Bucks from a Lazy Public too inert to actually READ a book (which allows said studio to play FAST AND LOOSE with the content of said books). Only ONE book is mentioned by name during the entirety of a flick supposedly ABOUT books! Aptly enough, PARADISE LOST is the is the name of that tome. As soon as this Hollywood Hack Shack opened for Business, America's Paradise for Authors (think Irving, Cooper, Melville, Poe, Alcott, Whitman, Emerson, Thoreau, London, James, Dreiser, Twain) Truly was Lost. An otherwise undescribed "Shakespeare" page is given a value here of "$500,000" (or $21 million, adjusted for inflation) simply as a backdrop for a few murders among the Rich and Famous under the nose of a failing gambling casino owner who is NOT President of the United States. If the Bard were around now to view FAST AND LOOSE, he'd surely shave his beard in humiliation!
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed