Spy Train (1943) Poster

(1943)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Bad, even for a B-movie
Win-510 April 2008
Perhaps it can be chalked up to the wartime shortages - all the good actors were fighting WWII, as were all the good directors, screenwriters, set builders, sound recorders, etc. They started with a bad story containing far too many contrivances, requiring the first ten minutes to be non-stop exposition which then had to be repeated a few times throughout the film to make sure we all understood. Then they brought in the uninspiring leading man, and the blocky staging by the director, and put them on a minimal set (a train's dining car and sleeping car). Add a few shuffling black porters and some classic wartime German stereotypes, and not a lot of imagination, and the result is this time-filler.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Leave this train on a siding
LCShackley4 May 2008
I've watched a lot of movies lately that were made during WWII and deal with Nazis and spies. Some are clever and engaging; this one is a by-the-numbers plot with the cheap production values you've come to expect from Monogram.

The "McGuffin" of the plot is a bomb in a suitcase, which has been mistakenly switched with a suitcase full of Nazi spy information. Of course, the bomb ends up on a moving train, which the director reminds us of incessantly with shots of the bomb-laden suitcase superimposed over a moving train. There is little actual tension on board; it's more like a commedia dell'arte farce with people moving in and out of various rooms, carrying suitcases, tying people up, etc.

The Nazi spy ring is full of dopey-looking American actors. How can we tell that they are Nazis? Why, they use the required words "dummkopf" and "schweinhund," and do a lot of bossing other people around.

The B-grade cast has virtually no chemistry. The "romances" and "buddy plot" never really click. There are so many GOOD WWII spy films; don't waste your time on this predictable potboiler.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid wartime thriller
dbborroughs5 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Contrived but enjoyable war time espionage thriller about a reporter and his buddy getting on a train with the publisher daughter while German spies are wandering about. The plot is complicated by the addition of two identical bags, one that contains incriminating evidence and the other a bomb set to go off at 1022 or if the bag is opened.

Its a solid little film which suffers because its a little too workman like in its production, hitting all of the required points too cleanly and too effortlessly and too obviously. One some level I think this might have been a minor classic if the film had managed not to be so predictable. Still its worth a look.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
All Aboard the SpyTrain to Corn-fusionville...
Jaaayyy19 May 2008
This Nazi train 'drama' is nearly unwatchable.

Watch this movie right before you drink the poison or pull the trigger. Otherwise skip it and just slam your finger in the door instead.

This movie is in black and white, the lighting is uneven and the sound is messed up in most places. The acting is stiff and mostly bad and the writing is worse but I still hate it for some reason.

If somebody would have blown up the train at the start it would have improved this dog by only a hair.

Jane Thornburg should have never read Bruce's book - it only made her life more complicated than necessary. Even Bruce hadn't read it or he would have known how the movie ends.

I'll give it a 2 because of the dead guy falling out of the closet twice.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
How can anybody like this movie?
mgconlan-117 April 2008
I didn't think anybody could have taken such an inherently suspenseful and exciting situation as a time bomb on a public conveyance and made a dull, stupid movie out of it until I saw "Spy Train." While not quite Monogram at its absolute cheesiest (I watched this not long after catching a download of the Mystery Science Theatre 3000 version of the awful Bela Lugosi vehicle "The Corpse Vanishes" and that one's even worse than this, though this is bad enough the MST3K crew could have done a great number on it), "Spy Train" has all the hallmarks of a bad "B" movie: a plot that makes utterly no sense (didn't the four writers ever talk to each other?), slovenly direction by Harold Young (who has a place in my particular cinematic circle of hell for making the 1934 Leslie Howard "Scarlet Pimpernel" far less fun than it had a right to be), cheap sets, almost incoherent editing and wildly inappropriate music. (Some films of the period staged scenes of suspense, violence or crime to swing music to create an ironic effect; this one did so only because that was what was in Monogram's rent-a-score that week.) I'm giving this a 2 instead of a 1 (you guys don't have a zero, which is what "Smokin' Aces" really deserved) because Richard Travis and Catherine Craig are at least personable and pleasant as the leads; they clearly deserved (and Travis eventually got) better parts than these. This film is trying SO hard to rip off Hitchcock (mostly "The Lady Vanishes" with the bomb gimmick from "Sabotage") and falling so far short of the Master it's rather pathetic, actually.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Why would you trust an important mission to Warren Hymer?
bkoganbing24 May 2014
Spy Train is a World War II era where reporter Richard Travis and sidekick photographer Chick Chandler are pursuing heiress Catherine Craig and maid Thelma White on a cross country train where most of the film is set. Craig is the daughter of newspaper publisher Herbert Hayes who was until recently publishing expose articles from Travis about Nazi Germany and has stopped without reason and is holed up on his estate.

At the same time some Nazis are aboard the train played by Paul McVey and Evelyn Brent and they've got a pair of suitcases on their. But when you trust Warren Hymer to do a job you've got to expect the inevitable results. One contains a bomb, an act of terrorism more familiar with today's times and the second a list of underground contacts in the USA.

Now McVey and Brent have to stop the bomb until they can get the baggage with the list. As for Travis, he's seen those two before, but it takes him the whole film to remember where and when.

Everybody just goes through the motions here. What can I say, cheap sets, sloppy editing, and perfunctory performances. A typical Monogram Picture.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable Monogram WWII Era B-Picture!
trw333200020 March 2002
The B-picture industry had a lot of material to work with during WWII.

Spy Train shows how a lot of story can be done with a small budget. The romance and mystery aboard a train serves as a great backdrop for Nazi spies, a dashing leading man(Richard Travis), his comical sidekick(Chick Chandler)and a good supporting cast. The tension of the ticking bomb in the baggage car and the race to stop the spies makes for an entertaining hour! I like Travis' line when the conductor held him for the stabbing of his pal: "..are you blowing your top?.." The only blooper noticeable is the sound of a diesel locomotive horn on a steam train.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
wartime spy thriller
ksf-210 April 2008
"Spy Train" opens in the train station with two reporters talking about getting the scoop on a famous rich girl. Then we overhear a conversation between a gang of thugs planning trouble at 10:22 that night. Catherine Craig plays Jane Thornwall, the girl that the reporters are chasing, while Richard Travis is Bruce Grant, traveler and author. They all get on the train, and the bodies start piling up. No real big names in this Monogram Pictures shorty (61 minutes) a spy thriller from 1943. Keep an eye out for Thelma White (plays Millie the maid)... who had played Mae in Reefer Madness. At one point, the author has to look up something in one of his own books while trying to solve the crime... a little strange. With a little spiffing up, this could easily be a Hitchcock film. and that darn horn on the train.... it was tooting almost the entire 61 minutes... for those who hadn't ridden a train before, one might think the horn had to be tooting in order for it to move... and at another point, someone magically decodes a secret message, although we don't know just how they did it. If you overlook some of these little quirks, one can easily buy into the plot of spies and international intrigue which was all the rage in the early 1940s. Looks like they don't show this one very often; as of April 2008, not even five votes yet on the star-rating in IMDb.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed