One More Tomorrow (1946) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A bit of wrangling from RKO
bkoganbing19 January 2019
Someone over at Warner Brothers thought that Philip Barry's play The Animal Kingdom might make a good vehicle for their new male buddy team of Dennis Morgan and Jack Carson. So in roles pioneered by Leslie Howard and William Gargan on stage and in the RKO original film, Morgan and Carson took over the parts and did well with them as the playboy and the butler.

The story is updated to reflect wartime conditions. Morgan is an affable sort of playboy who likes giving parties and one time his little clambake is covered by photographers Ann Sheridan and Jane Wyman. Both are from a liberal type magazine that sounds a lot like PM which was in vogue at the time. Morgan who despite his affluence and his playboy lifestyle is a decent sort. He pulls the magazine out of red ink and takes over as publisher.

But on the homefront scheming society girl Alexis Smith has set her cap for Morgan. When he marries her Sheridan is heartbroken but that sure isn't the end of the story.

Fans of Philip Barry's work will also recognize items in the plot from The Philadelphia Story and Holiday. One More Tomorrow was filmed during the war years, but civilians didn't get to see it until the end of World War II. I imagine our Armed Forces saw it in the interim.

To get the rights to it the Brothers Warner had to buy them from RKO who I am sure was grateful for the coin as it always had financial problems until Howard Hughes bought the studio.

One More Tomorrow holds up well over 70 years later, the performances are fresh and strong and the quintet of leads is cast impeccably. What was interesting was Jane Wyman who in those years went from playing girl Friday roles which she had at Warner Brothers became a serious dramatic actress as she had gotten great reviews for The Lost Weekend and The Yearling. One More Tomorrow fit well into the collection of films that Dennis Morgan and Jack Carson were doing at the time. Alexis Smith got a real juicy part and made the most of it as a woman you really love to hate. This also fits in well with Ann Sheridan, it's a part she gave a lot of Oomph to.

I think Philip Barry fans will be pleased as One More Tomorrow keeps the spirit and message of The Animal Kingdom well intact.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Far Better than I Expected
Jed from Toronto26 December 2007
This film is a lovely find. The story line is not particularly original: selfish-wife-tangles-with-selfless-rival. Ann Sheridan is beautiful and performs wonderfully as the woman who regrets having turned down Dennis Morgan's marriage proposal at the start of the film. Alexis Smith certainly holds her own as the cold, haughty and spoiled woman who stalks and marries the wealthy Dennis Morgan soon after. The story line has Morgan as the publisher of a "liberal" magazine - in the olden days "liberal" had as illustrious a reputation in the U.S. as it continues to maintain in the rest of the world today. Sheridan researches a story involving wartime graft among industrialists which Morgan feels compelled not to publish in his progressive magazine after his wife, anxious to maintain her social standing, lies to him about his own father's involvement and certain prison sentence if the story is exposed. Comic relief in the storyline is provided by Jack Carson as the oft-inebriated pal of Dennis Morgan - who "buttles" for the upper class couple. Well worth a watch!
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Warners film, good basic cast
blanche-212 July 2016
This is a good Warners film with a cast of their second-tier stars: Dennis Morgan, Alexis Smith, Jack Carson, Jane Wyatt, and Reginald Gardner. It was held for three years before release. Not sure why.

Tom Collier (Morgan) is from a wealthy family but not happy being a playboy or entering the family business. He wants to build something on his own. He purchases a liberal magazine instead.

Money-hungry Cecelia (Smith) has set her cap for Tom. He's in love with the magazine's photographer, Christie (Sheridan), but she shoots him down. Cecelia makes her move, and the two marry.

She's trouble from the beginning as she agrees with Tom's father about keeping the status quo. She certainly doesn't want Tom's best friend (Carson) around, who actually works for them as a butler.

Tom has to make a decision about who he is. One of the reviewers here thought it was unrealistic because Cecelia is a horrible person. Obviously he hasn't been exposed to what I have - and in my own family. Guys like the Tom character are absolute set-ups for these vipers, who will cut them off from their families and make them do things they don't want to do. Frankly they're a dime a dozen - snobby, patrician, and concerned with appearances.

Morgan, Sheridan, Carson, and Wyman as Christie's friend are very likable. We know how this film will end though it does push the envelope of the code.

Life's funny - Carson and Sheridan died in their early fifties, while Wyman and Morgan lived to ripe old ages. Here they're young, attractive, and working very well together. Pleasant film despite that mean Alexis Smith.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This is a surprisingly good film.
adamj-45 September 2003
This was a surprisingly good film. I expected a tear jerker but instead found a pleasent, entertaining story. Although, I must confess what makes the movie so entertaining for me is the role of Jack Carson. Jack Carson and Dennis Morgan made several movies together, and they were never better. I am a big Jack Carson fan. He can play a villain or a buffoon and make the character believable. He usually played, as in this film, second banana to the star of the movie, and like all great second bananas, he steals every scene he's in.
25 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Movie cars
dhermann1-126 July 2006
Just wondering if anyone noticed the dark Buick convertible driven by the hero in this film. It's not conspicuous. It's a 1941 Buick Super convertible. I'm wondering if it's that same one Gary Grant drove during his 1948 film, Mr Blandings Builds his Dreamhouse. If this was a car on the Warner lot, the it might have gotten into other films, and might have survived to this day in some collectors collection. I'd love to know the story of this car, and its present whereabouts, if it still exists. Very nice car for the time. It's an exceptional car of the era. Buick had the most powerful engines of the day, and this model had a 125 HP engine with dual carburetors, that jazzed up its performance considerably.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
pretty good love triangle...
ksf-223 April 2015
Some great, fun Hollywood stars in this one! Jack Carson, Ann Sheridan, Dennis Morgan, Jane Wyman. Keep an eye out for John Loder as "Owen".. who looks and sounds EXACTLY like Laurence Oliver. Who copied who? Tom (Dennis Morgan) needs to choose between Christie (Sheridan) and Cecelia, but "stuff" gets in the way. Jack Carson is along for comic relief. Also watch for Reginal Gardiner.. plays Jim Fisk here. Sheridan and Gardiner will work again together in "The Man WHo Came to Dinner", a better film x 1000. Tom's father, played by Thurston Hall, (was in Topper..) steps in and interferes with the works. Some fast talking. Things move along, kind of. Based on the play "Animal Kingdom". The same guy, Philip Barry, wrote "Philadelphia" and "Holiday", both of which starred Katherine Hepburn, and were HUGE successes. Same fast plot, fast talking, good rapport between the actors. A fun watch, but not quite as solid plot as those two other stories. Directed by Peter Godfrey. Story starts out strong, but kind of loses steam about half-way through. Gets a bit maudlin.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
one more tomorrow
mossgrymk23 March 2021
Yet another of Philip Barry's attempts to exorcise that bug up his rectum concerning the idle rich this is about half as good as "Holiday" and a fourth the quality of "Phil. Story" despite a quartet of Warners best scenarists (The Epsteins, Catherine Turney, Chas Hoffman) trying to pump life (and laughs) into a rather caricatured, tired assemblage of situations and characters...the stuffy lawyer, the wisecracking working gal photographer, the wisecracking working guy butler, the predatory beauty, the charming playboy with depth...all looking like holdovers from the 1930s. No wonder they don't quite fit the mood of 1946, the year this film was made. Audiences full of postwar exuberance (think Astaire's shoeshine number in "Bandwagon") sure weren't interested in a story set in 1939 dealing with the Fascist threat and high society's indifference toward it. Ergo, it didn't do particularly well at the box office and has gone down in Hollywood history more for its launching the De Havilland Rule (i.e. Olivia refused to be in it and successfully went to court to block Jack Warner from forcing her, at financial peril, to play Christie Sage) than for its wit or verve. C plus. PS...Alexis Smith is a poor man's Eleanor Parker.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If only it had remembered it was a drama
vincentlynch-moonoi28 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, that's the one real problem with this film. Too much humor between Dennis Morgan and Jack Carson. Far less of it would have been appropriate since this really is a drama.

Once we get beyond that, it's a good film and one where the good guy (actually good girl -- Ann Sheridan) wins out over the bad guy (actually bad girl -- Alexis Smith). In the middle is the very likable Dennis Morgan.

I always felt that Dennis Morgan is an underrated actor. He could sing, do light comedy, and could be dramatic. And I always enjoyed his performances...and did here. It always seemed like it was hard not to like him.

Ann Sheridan shines here. I had forgotten just how good she could be. This was a good reminder. And, I had forgotten just how bad Alexis Smith could be...and here she was aat her nastiest. In other words, all 3 main characters do exactly what is needed for the story.

Apparently Morgan and Jack Carson were buddies. And in some films that worked. I didn't feel it did here. Carson was a distraction. Jane Wyman is along in her "pre-fame" period, and does just fine, although I thought she really had only one really good scene as "the best friend". Reginald Gardiner's character here seems very unrealistic, and again was more a distraction than anything else. The father is ably played by Thurston Hall, a fine character actor.

As to the story line, boiy meets girl, they fall in love, but their idea of what a marraige should be separates them. But the scheming other woman strikes and temporarily wins the day...but in the end heads for Reno. Okay, nothing very unusual here, but, except for the comic instrusions, it's handled nicely.

This is not "great" cinema, but it's a decent flick.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Quite good....not perfect...but quite good.
planktonrules30 June 2016
Warner Brothers studio apparently had little confidence in this picture and apparently shelved it for three years before ultimately releasing it. Interesting, as it's one of the better Warner films of the era! I think the studio was uncertain about the film because the film does question conventional morality...even pushing the Production Code about as far as anyone did at the time. The other reason I think they sat on the film is that the movie starred many of the second-tier actors-- Jack Carson, Dennis Morgan, Alexis Smith and Ann Sheridan. Had it starred bigger names, I doubt if it would have sat as long...and I don't think the film would have been quite as good. It's hard to imagine Cagney, Bogart or Bette Davis in this film!

When the film begins, you learn that although Tom Collier (Morgan) is from a very wealthy family, he's not content to live the indolent life of the rich or go into the family business. He wants to make it on his own and soon buys a struggling magazine that is considered liberal and on the fringe. It's NOT what the family wants but his father loves him and doesn't press Tom too often to change jobs. But Cecelia (Smith) has every intention of changing him and making him exactly what sort of rich man she demands. Fortunately, Tom has instead fallen for a less conniving and more loving lady, Christie (Sheridan). But when Sheridan rejects Tom, he is easy pickings for Cecelia and they soon marry. However, problems clearly are looming as she's intent on breaking Tom and Tom is determined to be his own man. What's to become of them?

This is a very good film and brings up some great moral quandaries. However, the movie has one problem...Cecelia is just too obviously a horrible person. Had she been a bit more subtle in her machinations, the film would have been even better. Despite this, the acting is excellent, direction quite good and the story quite original and challenging. Well worth seeing.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
wants to be better
SnoopyStyle14 January 2024
It's 1939 Connecticut. Wealthy playboy Tom Collier (Dennis Morgan) is tired of his father's jobs and the social elites. His best friend Pat Regan (Jack Carson) is his butler. Activist photographer Christie Sage (Ann Sheridan) and her assistant Frankie Connors (Jane Wyman) sneak into his birthday party. He buys a failing liberal magazine to work with Christie. While he's on the rebound from Christie, he marries gold-digger Cecelia Henry (Alexis Smith).

This is considered an inferior adaptation of the Philip Barry play The Animal Kingdom. I don't know enough about the play to make that assertion. It does have three beautiful ladies and some snappy lines. I like the first half as Tom and Christie build some chemistry. I am a little annoyed that Jane Wyman gets pushed to the side. They could have paired her up with the butler. The movie loses me after the marriage to Cecelia. I get the plot progression, but a romance needs the couple to be on the screen together. By the time of her return, the heat has dissipated somewhat. This is still a fine melodrama even if it could be better.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
One Less Tomorrow
mls41828 March 2021
Surprisingly bad. An incredibly talented all star cast - all wasted. This was dull, unfunny and you never end up caring about any of the characters or their relationships. Not even wise cracking beauty Ann Sheridan makes this worthwhile.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Give Us One More Tomorrow (1946) ***1/2
edwagreen22 July 2006
...And they lived happily ever after. You know this is not the case with Dennis Morgan and Alexis Smith in "One More Tomorrow." Marrying Smith, when Ann Sheridan says no, can only lead to trouble.

We have an impressive cast here. Jack Carson is fabulous in bringing comic relief as the butler. Jane Wyman plays Sheridan's friend and she evokes her usual sympathy when she tells a married Morgan that Sheridan no longer wants to see him.

Smith plays a conniving, vicious woman to the hilt. Morgan is the righteous guy who turns his back on his father's wealth and goes to work for a magazine that will eventually uncover corruption on the part of the father (Thurston Hall's) friends. Smith and father-in-law Hall cook up quite a scheme to keep Morgan from publishing the stories. While it doesn't work, the picture sure does.

Marjorie Gateson briefly appears as Aunt Edna. I thought her part would be much bigger and important but she quickly disappears. Don't let this film pass you by.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Flaming Food Stick Triangle
learningwithmrsmith17 March 2022
Right off, we're driving in a neighborhood of no lights and entering a party where everyone's voice is straining under the challenge to sound as uppity as possible. Professional vixen Alexis Smith longs to "walk into any restaurant and know that every woman envies me." Alexis Smith gets the bulk of my attention, walking around with her shoulders thrown back, dragging hard on her omnipresent cigarette. Her hair is a different work of sculpture in each scene.

I find her character completely believable. Is she pure gold-digger or a more complex figure? They marry at the end of the whirlwind montage and she takes over the house by "taking advantage of the late Summer sales." It's housewives of Connecticut-1946.

Part of what makes Alexis' character so vile is that she openly shuns parenthood. She thinks children are for other people and is called selfish for that opinion. Once she told her husband she was too ill to go out so he and apparently the people doing the background music think her swoon might be because of pregnancy. She slaps this idea down like a mosquito. Later in the film it is this non-mom determination that sends her husband ping-ponging within their triangle.

This film is about...

This relationship between Morgan, Sheridan, and Smith? YAAAAAHHNNN The challenge of journalist who want to print the truth? I'm awake, go on... The class struggle between rich and poor in life and Communism in theory? I'm supposed to eat popcorn with this?

Other strange background stuff...

Moneybags Sr. Hears his sister scream in the background while playing "Puss in the Dark." I wonder if that involves a blind fold?

A liberal magazine is defined as one that accepts no advertising.

Sheridan is memorably fierce in the restaurant dumping "I'd know it if I was in love with you." Ouch.

Morgan tells Carter "there's not much future in BUTLING." And nobody laughed.

When it sounds like the new servant couple are throwing punches off stage, Morgan says "the best I can do is give her a long count." It's so NOT the year 2022.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A sad waste of talent
richard-178719 January 2019
This movie has a half-dozen fine actors who, in other movies, have given great performances. And in this movie, they do their best. But there is no talent at the helm, either in the director or the script writer, so despite the actors' best efforts, this movie is pretty bad.

The dialogue in a movie derived from a Philip Barry play should be scintillating. Believe me, that's not the case here.

And yet, there was so much potential. There's a scene between the gold-digger wife (a thankless role played very well by the breathtakingly-beautiful Alexis Smith) and Ann Sheridan, who in *The Man who Came to Dinner* had shown that she could deliver clever, biting dialogue with the best of them. But the scene goes nowhere.

There is Reginald Gardner, who has been so devastatingly funny in other movies. He's given nothing funny to work with here.

There is Dennis Morgan and Jack Carson, a great comedy duo. They don't have any good material here either.

And Jane Wyman is completely wasted.

In short, this movie is a waste of film and, if you watch it, your time.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Remake of the infinitely superior THE ANIMAL KINGDOM (1932) suffers the comparison.
a_viewer11 June 2003
Warner Bros. apparently tried to buy up and/or surpress all existing prints of the zingy pre-code classic THE ANIMAL KINGDOM (1932) when they decided to remake it as ONE MORE TOMORROW (1946). ANd no wonder--this turgid remake definitely suffers the comparison. While adding a bit of the Warner Bros. panache and moving a bit more quickly (the earlier version was more faithful to the original stage play, and thus more talky), ONE MORE TOMORROW takes out all the zing, bite, and--most disturbingly--the very real human grappling with opposite desires--that THE ANIMAL KINGDOM managed to transpose so successfully to the screen from Philip Barry's equally successful play. Barry, the author of such gems as HOLIDAY and THE PHILADELPHIA STORY, seemed fascinated with the moral dilemmas faced by the rich and the not so rich as they struggle to come to terms with who--and what--is the most important guiding principle in their lives. Unfortunately, the production code forced Warner Bros. to temper the life out of Barry's still timely ideas about the perils of "selling out" in love and business. The result is, sadly, a film that plays as a standard Warner Bros. soaper, with little emotional or mental involvement involved. If you're a fan of stars Smith, Morgan, and Sheridan (who all do the best they can with the material), you'll want to see this one. If you're more interested in the idea behind it, or in Philip Barry, check out the infinitely superior THE ANIMAL KINGDOM--an unjustly forgotten precode classic guaranteed to appeal to heart and mind.
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of my Favorite 40's films
rsda072329 April 2015
I always curl up with a good glass of Merlot when I watch this great Warner's comedy-drama. The cast alone is worth opening up the bottle for. Ann Sheridan, Dennis Morgan, Alexis Smith, Jane Wyman, and Jack Carson couldn't be better. Ann still reminds us what a great underused screen miracle she was and Dennis Morgan was so versatile and sturdy as a leading man. Alexis Smith did a bit of a Bette Davis turn in this and was quite good. Wyman and Carson added just the right touch of humor. The title song leaves one longing for a soundtrack release and the Steiner score (though sometimes too comedic) is excellent. A remake of Philip Barry's ANILMAL KINGDOM has nothing to be ashamed about. Love this film and you will too.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watchable only for the Warner players...another Philip Barry misfire...
Doylenf26 December 2007
Based on a lesser known Philip Barry play called THE ANIMAL KINGDOM, ONE MORE TOMORROW was held back three years by Warner Bros. during the war years (much like DEVOTION and THE TWO MRS. CARROLLS), at a time when the studio had a backlog of films on hand that they were in no hurry to release.

This one is a passable comedy that relies on star talent to make it watchable. ANN SHERIDAN is her usual spunky self as the independent photographer, DENNIS MORGAN is charming as the playboy she spurns, and ALEXIS SMITH does her catty best as "the other woman", while JANE WYMAN and JACK Carson lend some cheerful support.

The dialog strives to be smart and sophisticated. Typical scene: JOHN LODER says to ALEXIS SMITH: "You are the most selfish woman I ever met." She replies coolly: "Thanks for the compliment."

The cast is very good, including THURSTON HALL as Dennis Morgan's wealthy father and everyone handles the material with a deft enough touch. But there's nothing special about the story, another example of Barry's infatuation with telling stories about the idle rich but with less wit than usual.

The pleasure of watching Morgan, Sheridan, Wyman, Carson and Smith at work is the only possible reason for spending time with this light hearted but dull Philip Barry comedy that never really comes to life, not even when REGINALD GARDINER shows up with a discourse on liberal magazines.

Peter Godfrey directs the whole thing in sluggish fashion.
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"I'm Going Back To My Wife...My Real Wife"
davidcarniglia19 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
A very entertaining romantic drama. The cast artfully plays off one another: Christie (Anne Sheridan) and Alexis Smith (Cecelia) are the women in Tom's (Dennis Morgan's) life, with Pat (Jack Carson) as Tom's wingman. Tom and Christie spend most of the movie longing for each other in a very appealing state of unrequited love. Christie's skittishness about marrying Tom initiates their dilemma. Cecelia swoops in like a vulture and steals him. It's agonizing to see Cecelia more or less pick away at Tom's pride and independence that he's has worked hard to create.

Cecelia is possibly too good at being bad--she's controlling, manipulative, scheming--a Pandora's box of emerging personality disorders. Meanwhile, Christie is going nuts kicking herself for refusing Tom in the first place, and then having to deal with the fact that she still loves him. The scene in her studio when he sneaks in front of the camera is fascinating visually, and playfully dramatizes their emotional distance. Pat thankfully relieves the tension here and there with his quips and antics to the extent that even Cecelia misses him after she petulantly sends him packing.

The subplot implicating Tom's father in wartime profiteering gives a backdrop to the personal drama. Tom undergoes a sea-change from a happy-go-lucky playboy to a responsible professional; more or less repudiating his background, his family, and, eventually Cecelia. He really hasn't burned any bridges. I've got to admit that things work out snugly for Tom and Christie. But, his dad and Cecelia aren't any worse off as a result of Tom's and Christie's happiness. It might've been more intriguing if Tom's dad is indicted, or Cecelia refuses Tom a divorce. Still, there's enough dark spots in One More Tomorrow to keep this out of sentimental territory.

It's a very talky, nuanced, emotional movie. It works because the cast builds up believable characters--the simple plot keeps the emphasis on acting. Sheridan and Smith are both extremely attractive; with Sheridan's soft features, against the more severe, angular Smith telling us a lot about their character's personalities. Wearing their hair up accentuates their very different faces. The guys are also opposites, the suave Tom playing well against the sometimes goofy Pat. The supporting cast highlights the main characters convincingly.

Great stuff for fans of these actors, this era, and romantic dramas. 9/10.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This was way too long, boring and disjointed
keatsy926412 February 2018
I'm giving this one star to even out the current 6.5 rating it definitely does not deserve. Maybe Dennis Morgan fans came here and rated - and to his credit - Dennis Morgan carried this move,along with the minor role of the great actor Jack Carson. This screenplay should have been flushed down the toilet. It's a rewrite of The Animal Kingdom from 1932 with Leslie Howard, Myrna Loy and Ann Harding. Ann Sheridan does the Harding part here - and Ann Sheridan does a HORRIBLE job. It's like watching paint dry. Ann Harding was a "laid back" actress, but she conveyed her passion from the screen in a tremendous and unprecedented way. Maybe somebody told Sheridan "be laid back like Harding was" and it failed, I don't know. But boy nothing can beat the sexual manipulation that played such a large part in the 1932 pre-code original , nor the interplay between Howard, Loy and Harding. This movie was way too long - was disjointed - the "liberal" newspaper part of the plot doesn't play well today - the paper seems like it's supposed to be a kind of Washington Post - which most Americans hate as fake news now. And was Sheridan a photographer? Because she suddenly became a writer at the end of this movie! Sheridan's friend was played by Jane Wyman - another great supporting part that was better than the main actors - but she disappeared in the film like she'd fallen down an open sewer grate. I only watched this to see if they brought all the loose, poorly written threads together for the same ending line as Animal Kingdom - and they did. Don't waste your time on this one - watch 1932's The Animal Kingdom!
2 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alexis tries...but Ann wins at the end!!!
steveareno2 May 2000
This was a dramatic film that was very excellent,but predictable.With that cast,who cares!!Alexis is money hungry and out to marry Dennis.Dennis is in love with Ann.When Dennis asks Ann to marry him she says....well I won't spoil it.I recommend you see it.It's a great movie worth sitting through. Any Dennis Morgan,Alexis Smith or Ann Sheridan fan should see it.I highly recommend it!
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Is there a ballroom with three balconies in this movie?
flossiebosslady11 June 2005
I'm sure I've seen this picture, but I wondered, does Christie walk into a ballroom, that has three balconies, with white background and gold leaves and trim, and says to someone, "just a minute, I just have to take this picture?" Then she walks past the bar and up the stairs to the top balcony, and takes a picture of the GI's and ladies at the dance? The picture that was taken, I have seen in a book on film-making, and one of ballrooms and balconies. I think my parents met at the ballroom portrayed in the film. I wish TCM would show the movie again soon. I would love to watch it again. If anyone knows if this is the movie for sure, I would appreciate hearing from you. Thanks!
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"You are the laziest liberal I've ever known."
utgard1414 August 2014
Wealthy playboy Dennis Morgan meets and falls for politically-minded Ann Sheridan. When Morgan proposes, she says no because she doesn't believe she will like it in his world or vice-versa. Feeling rejected, Morgan breaks things off and winds up in the clutches of gold digger Alexis Smith. Lame remake of The Animal Kingdom. It's hard to dislike Ann Sheridan but she's such a pill in this that I couldn't care about her character at all. Morgan's not much better. Smith is fine as the villainess. As the friends of Morgan and Sheridan, Jack Carson and Jane Wyman come off as the most likable and authentic people in the movie. Not worth your time unless you're a big fan of the actors and curious about anything they're in. Filmed in 1943 but not released for three years!
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Remake of the infinitely superior THE ANIMAL KINGDOM (1932) suffers the comparison.
a_viewer11 June 2003
Warner Bros. apparently tried to buy up and/or surpress all existing prints of the zingy pre-code classic THE ANIMAL KINGDOM (1932) when they decided to remake it as ONE MORE TOMORROW (1946). And no wonder--this turgid remake definitely suffers the comparison. While adding a bit of the Warner Bros. panache and moving a bit more quickly (the earlier version was more faithful to the original stage play, and thus more talky), ONE MORE TOMORROW takes out all the zing, bite, and--most disturbingly--the very real human grappling with opposite desires--that THE ANIMAL KINGDOM managed to transpose so successfully to the screen from Philip Barry's equally successful play. Barry, the author of such gems as HOLIDAY and THE PHILADELPHIA STORY, seemed fascinated with the moral dilemmas faced by the rich and the not so rich as they struggle to come to terms with who--and what--is the most important guiding force in their lives. Unfortunately, the production code forced Warner Bros. to temper the life out of Barry's still timely ideas about the perils of "selling out" in love and business. The result is, sadly, a film that plays as a standard Warner Bros. soaper, with little emotional or mental involvement involved. If you're a fan of stars Smith, Morgan, and Sheridan (who all do the best they can with the material), you'll want to see this one. If you're more interested in the idea behind it, or in Philip Barry, check out the infinitely superior THE ANIMAL KINGDOM--an unjustly forgotten precode classic guaranteed to appeal to both the heart and mind.
11 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mediocre
dougdoepke16 August 2014
Rather turgid mix of comedy, romance and drama. The movie starts off well enough with the addled staff (Gardiner & Abbott) of an iconoclastic magazine. Their eccentric antics suggest a madcap approach is coming up. Trouble is this promising part gives way to overdrawn romantic middle that's sluggishly paced and loosely scripted. Seems Tom has to decide between Cecilia's refined, icy beauty and the head-strong, working class Christie. One thing for sure, the statuesque Smith gets to model high fashions in eye-catching style. Too bad Sheridan's brand of charm is buried beneath a consistently dour demeanor. Final part is an interesting conflict between family loyalty and civic responsibility, when Tom must decide between welfare of his upper-class peers versus that of the general public.

What the movie really needs is sparkle or at least more energy. Instead, events too often plod along in uninspired fashion (director Godfrey) despite an A-list Warner Bros. cast. Jack Carson does supply some spark in a supporting role as an inept butler. But it's all too brief. Still, I suspect it was Morgan and Carson's chemistry that prompted the studio to pair them in a later series of comedies (e.g. Two Guys from Texas, {1948}). Nonetheless, the subtext of class privilege remains an interesting and revealing one-- especially the effort to quash an embarrassing article on war profiteering by pulling strings behind the scenes. That could be a topic plucked from today's list of timely issues, and also one that's too often buried.

All in all, the movie's an interesting but rather flat mix, best viewed for fans of Smith's leggy appeal.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed