Another Part of the Forest (1948) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The Early Years of the Hubbards
bkoganbing16 January 2013
Watching Another Part Of The Forest tonight I was struck at how well Vladimir Pozner captured the characters of the young Hubbards. the subject of Lillian Hellman's classic The Little Foxes. If I didn't know better and maybe I don't Pozner might have had Hellman looking over his shoulder during the writing of the script.

It all begins with old Marcus Hubbard played by Fredric March, patriarch of the Hubbard clan who made his fortune running the Yankee blockade during the Civil War and then charging exorbitant prices for the goods he brought in. He's not a beloved man by his neighbors in 1880 Alabama, but March has a terrible secret that if the good people knew he'd be lynched on the spot.

The Hubbards are rich and despised and March's children take right after the old man. Dan Duryea who played idiot nephew Leo in The Little Foxes plays Oscar Hubbard and Edmond O'Brien plays Ben who is a real chip off the old block. It's March and O'Brien and their conflict which drives the whole film.

Scheming herself is young Regina Hubbard played by Ann Blyth a few years older than when she played the spoiled Veta in Mildred Pierce. She's as spoiled as Veta, but a lot craftier. She plays on daddy's affections which border on incest to the hilt. O'Brien keeps trying to match her up with young Horace Giddens who is never seen here, but was played by Herbert Marshall in The Little Foxes. We know that eventually happens, but right now Blyth is looking to trade up in respectability and marry young John Bagtry, scion of an old plantation family and Confederate veteran.

Bagtry is played by John Dall and he maybe respectable, but he's totally living in the past. As is sister Birdie played with a flair by Betsy Blair. We see the genesis of the character that Patricia Collinge plays in The Little Foxes who marries Oscar Hubbard and then just pines for the good old days of gracious living and people being kind to each other.

March however dominates things, in some ways he's admirable because he wants class and respectability. He's taught himself Latin and Greek and is disappointed his kids have no pretensions to culture though Blyth plays on him with pretending. But all that culture and all that money can't get him into the best homes and the second generation doesn't even care to try.

Another Part Of The Forest is a real classic with great performances all around by a fabulous cast. The spirit of Lillian Hellman's earlier work is only enhanced by this film.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The fascinating Hubbards
TheLittleSongbird25 May 2020
'Another Part of the Forest' has been compared often inevitably and for good reason to 1941's 'The Little Foxes', a great film with one of legendary Bette Davis' best performances. The reason for the comparison is that this is a prequel to that film despite being made seven years later. It sees a fascinatingly evil and ruthless family and the source material was shocking at the time and with the portrayal of such ruthlessness in just one household still has the ability to shock.

Have actually seen mixed reviews for 'Another Part of the Forest'. It is very positively received here and a number of classic/Golden Age film fans like/love it too. At the same time, there have been criticisms from some critics, mostly trusted ones from personal view but they're not without dubious opinions every now and again, of 'Another Part of the Forest' being static and that the stage origins are obvious. Actually lean more towards the former and it is great to see people here fond of it. To me, it was very good even if there is a preference for 'The Little Foxes'.

The direction could have been sharper in places, parts of it tend to be on the limp side and lacks William Wyler's imaginative use of camera and atmosphere a little.

Did think too that Ann Blyth's acting, though she does absolutely have great moments, didn't quite gel with that of the rest of the cast. She didn't quite seem monstrous enough and could have gone for it more, Davis was so toweringly monstrous in 'The Little Foxes' and there didn't quite seem to be enough here of how the character came to be the way she became.

However, the cast on the most part are wonderful. Fredric March is perfectly cast and he was never more chilling than here. Dan Duryea does calculating in a way that is very sinister and Florence Eldridge is effectively dotty. Edward O'Brien is a great and more sympathetic contrast to March, their conflict is not just ruthless but also very interesting. The father-daughter chemistry also unsettles and although the characters are with few redeeming qualities and very unsympathetic they are interesting and didn't come over as too over-written, motivations take a lot of unpredictable turns but they were at least buyable.

It, 'Another Part of the Forest' that is, moreover looks great. Very sumptuous and atmospheric, with eerie shadowy lighting and elegant costuming and settings. The music is haunting without over-shadowing or being over-bearing orchestrally. The script thought provokes and bites and doesn't feel too overly talky in the way a lot of other stage to film adaptations do, found it quite vicious too. Personally didn't think it was static or stagy at all, the character interactions were very believable, there were tension and chills in the atmosphere, it was darkly dull and it didn't feel that much of a filmed play or get too melodramatic again like some stage to film adaptations do and also considering the subject. If there was an improvement over 'The Little Foxes' it was the ending, it was the one weak spot in that film whereas it was unpredictable and didn't come over as abrupt.

On the whole, very good. 8/10
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Little Foxes when they were smaller still.
MOscarbradley28 August 2018
"Another Part of the Forest" is a prequel to "The Little Foxes" but made seven years later and it feels like an attempt to do a reprise of Wyler's classic with Ann Blyth, Edmond O'Brien and Dan Duryea trying to fill the shoes of Miss Davis, Charles Dingle and Carl Benton Reid. Actually O'Brien is very good and Duryea, who played the son of the character he's playing here in Wylers film, isn't bad. Only Blyth lets the side down. Their parents are a gruff Fredric March and a dotty (and excellent) Florence Eldridge.

The movie purports to show how the nasty Hubbards got to be so nasty but there really isn't anything here we haven't seen before. This is more like a remake than a prequel and under Michael Gordon's limp direction it's hard to tell if this would have been any good on the stage. What's fairly clear is that this is second-rate Hellman and Gordon does nothing to make it cinematic. Still, in its fevered bad movie kind of way it's actually quite entertaining. No family ever had so many skeletons rattling around in the cupboard and letting skeletons loose can be good fun. Of course, perhaps Hellman intented it all as a joke or maybe the humour was simply unintentional.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Greed to an all time low...
the lioness20 February 2002
Another Part of the Forest tells the story of a patriarch of a very wealthy southern family & the constant powers struggles he endures within his own family.

There are some very interesting elements of this story that keeps one guessing. For starters, how did the family make their money is one. Two: why does the matriarch of the family keep herself locked away not only from the rest of the world but her family, too.

Another interesting plot is the relationship between the father & his only daughter. There are some incestuous overtones there.

I love this film. Screen writer Lillian Hellman was very good at dealing with human emotion, interaction & confrontation. For those of you that enjoyed "Little Foxes", you will enjoy this film because its the prequel to it.

This film has a very strong cast which is headed by Fredric March. All the cast members hold their own very well. Even though this film is play, it translates to the screen very well.

Now for the bummer:This film never made it to video for some odd reason. I only have it because I recorded it on cable one night. For those of you that have cable, I would check with your local listings.

If you love good drama, you won't regret it.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I liked it better than the original
HotToastyRag19 May 2019
Even though this is a prequel to 1941's The Little Foxes, you don't have to know the original story to appreciate the back story behind the characters. In fact, I was mostly confused during the first half, trying to piece together what I remembered from the earlier movie, and once I stopped trying, the movie became much more enjoyable.

If you do know The Little Foxes, this movie shows you how Bette Davis's and Charles Dingle's characters became conniving and evil in their youth. Still living under their parents' roof, they long to break free and live their own lives, and money, power, and status threaten their journey to the top. Ann Blyth plays a young Bette Davis and Edmond O'Brien plays a young Charles Dingle. Vladimir Pozner's screenplay shows great parallels to Lillian Helman's story and characters, but even if you're not familiar with them, it's still an entertaining movie with backstabbing and double-crosses galore. As you might remember from 1941, Charles Dingle was married to the unhappy, repressed Patricia Collinge. While we do see Patricia's younger self portrayed by Betsy Blair, it's an even more interesting parallel to see the family's matriarch, Florence Eldridge, and how similar those two characters are. Fredric March plays the family patriarch, and he's extremely effective as overbearing, stubborn, and mean. A very cute tie to both versions is Dan Duryea, who plays his own father - or his own son, depending on which movie you watch first. In Another Part of the Forest, Dan plays the young, irresponsible brother recklessly in love with a can-can dancer. In The Little Foxes, he's the slimy young son who also does something reckless that affects the rest of the family.

Believe it or not, I liked Another Part of the Forest far better than The Little Foxes. The acting is splendid, and everyone tries very hard to mirror their predecessors, with the exception of Ann Blyth. Had she put on a Bette Davis impression, it would have been too comical, so instead she's a beautiful Southern belle in her own right whom audiences can imagine later turned into Bette Davis. The plot is easier to follow, and while it's still a very heavy drama, it's not as upsetting as watching Herbert Marshall in a wheelchair back in 1941. Check this one out, and think about skipping the original.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A terrific film
byoolives6 August 2005
If you think that the Hubbard's of "The Little Foxes" were decadent , then you will see that they have mellowed , compared to this fantastic prequel , also written by the wonderful Lillian Hellman. The cast works extremely well together . This is the only movie that i know of where Fredrich March plays a villain (Jekyll and Hyde doesn't count) and does he do it to the limit . During a night of musical entertainment in is home, he cruelly insults and humiliates one of his guests, his son's (Duryea) girlfriend, by insinuating that her father played Mozart on a little drum. The girl had said that her father played a little drum and at Duryea's insistence drew attention to Mozart in an attempt to please patriarch Hubbard. The humiliation comes complete with facial disdain and tone of voice that only the cruelest of men could provide . The rest of the family with the exception of Hubbard's wife played by the real Mrs.March (Florence Eldridge) is each in their own way a monster . Edmond O'Brien is wonderful as the "chip off the old block" son , and Dan Dureyea is a great contrast as the half fool and half idiot other son. Ann Blyth who plays daughter Regina is captivating as the only one in the world to whom patriarch Hubbard shows any affection . To state any more of this father daughter relationship would reveal to much of the story in the event you are privileged to see this magnificent film . This film is just one of those cases when a chemistry between the cast was achieved , and the result is riveting . This chemistry is in no small way attributable to the great March , who was able to weave a similar magic in "The Best Years Of Our Lives" . Unfortunately my attempts at seeing this movie again , have failed . It seems as though it has disappeared and if it has , it is a shame . This film is a horror story , where the monsters are human beings . They wear no gruesome masks (exept in one Klu Klux Clan scene) or torment anyone Freddy Kruger style . Their horror and ours , is in men and women's souls .
34 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
story of post-civil-war family
ksf-220 March 2019
Ann Blyth, a couple years after her Oscar nomination for "Mildred Pierce". Lots of big names... Fredric March, John Dall, Edmond O'Brien, Whit Bissell. A period piece, not my favorite. Lots of family things buried deep. Regina (Blyth) keeps talking about going off to chicago, but this is post-civil war, and some things just aren't proper. and each member of the family has its secrets.... but they aren't so secret. and the kkk. it's all going to hit the fan. a bit sensational, but tells a true story, none-the-less. Generational story... kind of goes on and on. Directed by Michael Gordon. It's okay. they keep saying Carpetbagger. Written by Lillian Hellman, who hooked up with Dashiell Hammett for many years.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fascinating study of a despicable family
mlraymond3 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Vladimir Pozner's skillful adaptation for the screen of Lillian Hellman's original stage play Another Part of the Forest is an almost forgotten classic, that deserves a wider audience. Performances are uniformly excellent, even in the smaller roles. Superb editing helps to create an absorbing and compelling drama of a particularly nasty family in post-Civil War Alabama.

Fredric March nearly steals the picture, with his malevolent portrayal of a tyrannical father, who enjoys pitting his offspring against each other. Ambitious older son Benjamin ( Edmond O'Brien) wants to get up in the world and make money, something his controlling father Marcus is determined to prevent. Weakling younger son Oscar ( Dan Duryea) is a joke to everyone else in the family. Spoiled daughter Regina ( Ann Blyth) is the only one of the three children to win any favor from their dictatorial father, but she is also expected to remain under his thumb. Both Regina and Ben have big plans they are keeping secret from Marcus. But a family as full of intrigue and conspiracy as this one is like a bomb with a slowly burning fuse. Eventually, there is going to be an explosion.

There are fine supporting performances by John Dall as the restless former soldier John Bagtry, who wishes to find a war somewhere to go fight in, Betsy Blair as his nervous, fragile cousin Birdy, Dona Drake as the floozy girlfriend of the weaselly Oscar, Fritz Leiber as the sadly dignified Colonel Isham, and most of all, Florence Eldridge as the ignored and ill-used wife of Marcus Hubbard, Lavinia.

Razor sharp dialogue and performances makes this a true delight to savor. Hard to find, but well worth the effort.You won't like this family, but you won't forget them.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Start of the Horrible Hubbards
theowinthrop11 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Lillian Hellman, wrote her dramatic masterpiece, THE LITTLE FOXES, in 1940. It is about Regina Hubbard, her brothers Ben and Oscar, her husband Horace Giddens and daughter Alexandra, and Oscar's wife Birdy and son Leo, and how the entire Hubbard clan (except for the husband and daughter and Oscar's sad misused wife) are corrupt. The first play shows how Regina manages to allow her husband to die so that she can end up richer and more powerful (out of a questionable business deal) than her two brothers who are her partners in it. On stage it was a great dramatic triumph for Tallulah Bankhead. In 1941 it was an equally affective film directed by William Wyler, and starring Bette Davis, Herbert Marshall, Theresa Wright, Charles Dingle, Carl Benton Reid, Dan Duryea, Richard Carlson, and Patricia Collinge.

A few years later, Ms Hellman decided to return to the story of the Hubbards, but this time with a "prequel": How did this wealthy southern family turn out to be so rotten?

ANOTHER PART OF THE FOREST goes back to 1880 (THE LITTLE FOXES actually is set about 1905). Marcus Hubbard (Frederic March) was what used to be called "poor white trash" (another example of this type is the slave overseer turned carpetbagger Victor Jory in GONE WITH THE WIND). He is not a polished Southern Gentleman, but an opportunistic snake who lives and breaths to snatch his fortune in the potentially rich South. But along comes that unpleasantness of 1861 - 1865, and Marcus does not consider it his war - why should it be, he's been too poor to fight for the right to own slaves? Instead, he makes a small fortune buying and selling commodities that are in short supply or are considered contraband. In particular salt. Using the money, and the corresponding collapse of various gentleman's estates due to the reverses of the war, Marcus becomes a post-Civil War landowner. All of this has made him also the most hated man in the state.

His oldest son Ben (Dingle in the other movie - here Edmond O'Brien) is his clerk (not chief clerk, but clerk) in his store in town. Ben is treated as a clerk (and a poorly paid one at that). Ben is close to his mother Lavinia (Florence Eldridge), who was married to Marcus for financial reasons by her father, and whom Marcus considers (with some reason) simple minded (actually she is the most honest member of the bunch).

Marcus' second son Oscar (Reid in the other movie - here Dan Duryea) is a sullen sort, except he has joined the K.K.K. (but is dumb enough to be the only one who's identifiable), and he is romancing a local "actress" at the town's dance hall (Laurette Sincee - played by Donna Drake).

Marcus favors his daughter, Regina (Ann Blythe), who realizes he likes her and thinks she can manipulate him. To an extent she can - but there is a point he refuses to be manipulated. You see, she wants to marry John Bagtry (John Dall), a member of a former Governor's family who are on hard times. Actually, Marcus would have none of this.

Marcus is not adverse to further wealth and acquisition, but as he is now a large property owner (and the richest man in town) he's more pretentious. He is self taught, and he prides himself on teaching himself how to read Greek and Latin (which does not impress Ben, Oscar, or Regina). He also tries to compose for the cello, and once every couple of months has two musicians (Don Beddoes and Whit Bissell) come down to play his latest compositions.

The issues of the drama are 1) Ben seeking to find a way to break out of his unendurable bondage as his father's cheap clerk; 2) Oscar's hope to run off with the attractive but socially disgraceful Laurette; and 3) Regina trying to convince Marcus to give her his okay to marry the socially proper but dirt poor Bagtry. The three siblings are constantly sniping at each other, making cooperation impossible (particularly Regina and Oscar with their separate prospective mates). The only thing that might unite them is Daddy's tyrannical approach to handling all three of them, two of whom he holds in total contempt.

Lest it seems pure soap opera (of the "Dallas" or "Falconcrest" variety), ANOTHER PART OF THE FOREST actually gave Hellman a chance to do some comedy scenes. Marcus has a large dinner party in Act II, and has to suffer the mortification of Oscar's drunken girlfriend, and the chattering of the prospective fiancé (John Bagtry's sister Birdie) that he wants Oscar to marry. He also learns what John Bagtry's big desire is: he is going to enlist in the Brazilian Army because in 1880 only the Empire of Brazil still has slavery! Marcus comment about that is quite droll. There is also the fiasco of Hubbard's Opus #2 for strings.

In the end we see how Ben finds Marcus's one Achilles heel - an unforgivable act to his fellow townspeople which can cost him his life. And we see how Ben takes his place, for the moment at any events, as head of the Hubbard Family enterprises.

ANOTHER PART OF THE FOREST is a good film that deserves to be better known. Well played, and carefully laid out (with Dan Duryea here playing the father of the character he played in THE LITTLE FOXES) we watch how power rots a family's morality, but does not necessarily weakens it. For the Hubbards remain rich and powerful, and aim to become more so as this story ends. Whatever lost dreams are seen by the audience, the damage is done and the gangrene remains to grow more threatening.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
family drama
RanchoTuVu5 May 2005
Destined for the stage, but somehow ingeniously made into a movie, this heavy drama about an ostracized family and there internal implosion gets better with each passing minute all the way up to its smashing ending. The superb cast includes an impressive list of names, but even the lesser roles (Dona Drake in particular) contribute significantly, while the story is nearly flawlessly presented, with a few touches that take advantage of the cinematic medium, especially a terrifically edited sequence with Drake doing a Can-Can in a dancehall while out in the woods the KKK is beating a carpetbagger senseless. But what gets the most attention is the constant state of maneuvering between three siblings for the father's favor and his money, and the father's utter disdain, brilliantly portrayed by Frederic March, for his two sons, the hardworking Edmond O'Brien and his lazy younger brother played by Dan Duryea. What stands out is the consistent level of fascination and intensity that the film maintains from start to finish, and the fact that it (this film) seems all but lost today.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Good acting but terrible people
Angel_Peter25 March 2016
The story is about a dominating self made man that rules the family and fortune brutally and the other family members on their own way trying to get their share of the fortune. The Father made his fortune during the civil war selling at high prices and therefore the family is disliked of the whole local community. Besides that there are some love stories that have influence on the story.

When I watched this movie I could not complain about the acting which seemed fine from everyone.

I just have to say that I did not find any of the people likable or interesting enough for the movie to entertain me. I would say there are far better dramas out there.
2 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not to be taken with a grain of salt
mls418231 December 2021
Avarice, backstabbing and conniving under a thin layer of gentility.

What an undiscovered jewel. A perfectly executed prequel to The Little Foxes. A grade A cast at the top of their game, well written and directed.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
a wonderful addition to Little Foxes
planktonrules9 June 2005
This is one of the most wicked and dysfunctional families ever to make it to the big screen during the 1940s. Of course, by today's standards they would seem a bit tame! This is the same sick, backstabbing, conniving family seen in little foxes. Some of the original actors are here (such as the slimy Dan Duryea) and some new ones are along for the ride (Edmund O'Brien, Ann Blythe and Frederick March). So why did I like the movie? Well, the evilness of the characters and how deliciously they scheme and change sides when it best suits their needs make it a very mesmerizing film. Also, because the schemes change A LOT, it's tough to predict where the movie will end.

This movie, though made AFTER Little Foxes, is the prequel. So after seeing this, see Little Foxes and hold on tight!
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Just as Magnificent as it's "sequel"!!!
kidboots3 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Lillian Hellman's play "The Little Foxes" was the sensation of Broadway's 1939 season and starring Tallulah Bankhead, it ran for 410 performances. It was later made into a magnificent film that picked up 9 Oscar nominations. In 1946 Lillian Helman directed "Another Part of the Forest" - a prequel, showing how Regina, Benjamin and Oscar inherited their evil and immoral ways from their father. Patricia Neal made her Broadway debut as Regina and won a Tony award for Best Performance. When a film was made in 1948, Ann Blyth, who a couple of years before had created a sensation as Veda, Mildred Pierce's venal daughter, was given the role of Regina. Ann had had musical training and started out in a few forgettable low budget musicals. After "Mildred Pierce" she was heralded as a major find and you would have thought she would have been one of the big stars of the 50s - but you would have been wrong. After superb performances in "Another Part of the Forest" and "Our Very Own" she became trapped in a series of leaden musicals ("Rose Marie", "The Student Prince") and she was never again given a role worthy of her talents.

Marcus Hubbard (Frederic March) has always been rotten to the core. Although born into poverty, he was self educated but made his fortune as a war profiteer by exploiting his fellow "Southerners" during the Civil War by selling salt to them at an over inflated price of $8 a small bag. That is why his son Oscar (Dan Duryea) is not welcome at the Veteran's Day Parade and why Lavinia (Florence Eldridge) Marcus's long suffering wife will not use salt on that particular day. There is also a secret scandal that is only hinted at, until being revealed at the end of the film it changes the dynamics of the family. Benjamin (Edmond O'Brien) is the only member of the family who treats his mother with any type of kindness but he is also self serving. After a depressing family luncheon when only the servants remember Lavinia's birthday, Benjamin reminds Regina that papa's unhealthy fondness for her will force her to spend the rest of her life looking after him and suggests she should pay more attention to besotted Horace Giddens if she wants to escape. Horace, who was played in the earlier film by Herbert Marshall, is never seen in this film, only talked about.

Oscar is infatuated with local can can dancer Laurette (Dona Drake). Her character is worthy of the Hubbards - she will have nothing to do with Oscar unless he gets money from his father. When he finds her flirting with a patron, he and some friends don "night rider" sheets and badly beat him up. The other family of note in the town are the Bagtrys, who have been made penniless, trying to grow cotton on their plantation. Regina is in love with Ben Bagtry (John Dall) but it is clear he doesn't care for her family's ways. Birdie (Betsy Blair) is a faded Southern belle who is desperate to return the plantation to it's former glory. By the end of the film the stage is set for "The Little Foxes" - Marcus is a broken man, Lavinia is going to return to her childhood home and Benjamin, Regina and Oscar are facing their future with steely ruthlessness. The characterisations of the three siblings are spot on - you can see the traits that are in their characters in "The Little Foxes", here in embryo.

Betsy Blair who was a standout in "Marty" showed how talented she was in this movie. Her "Birdie" is heartbreaking and a tribute to Patricia Collinge.

Highly, Highly Recommended.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
'Foxes' fans, check this out.
ksdilauri29 October 2019
I wasn't aware that this prequel had even been made. It helps to be familiar with the later story (filmed 7 years earlier-so Hollywood) and I'm glad I came across it. It has the same general feel as 'Little Foxes', so if you want to see how the older Regina and her slithery brothers got to be the way they were, see this very well acted and written flick.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The quicksand sneaks up to bury this doomed family.
mark.waltz15 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Ah, now it all makes sense. How Regina, John and Oscar Hubbard all became so power hungry and greedy and controlling, a gift from papa Frederic March and the hatred but fear from the locals, furious that during the civil war, Papa Hubbard made his fortune overcharging southerners for goods in his store, the only way the public could get what they needed. It's 15 years after the civil war, reconstruction is not without its problems, and Mother Hubbard (Florence Eldridge) is neglected by pretty much everyone except the loyal servants and oldest son John (Edmund O'Brien).

Daughter Regina (Ann Blyth) is unnaturally close to her father who tells Regina that she's the son he never had, considering the characters of his amoral male offspring. John is good to his mother, but enjoys playing his siblings against each other and against their father. Throw in plane jane Betsy Blair ("Marty") as neighbor Birdie whom John forces on brother Oscar (Dan Duryea) for financial gain. The stage is set for family hatreds of Claudian and Borgia proportions, a brilliant analogy that can be compared to powerful families who have risen in power since this was written.

While it's obvious that the Hubbard blood is bad from the start, the younger Hubbards show signs of morality here and there that dwindles as soon as March turns down the loan for Blair's family. Even though he's not there, the character of Horace Giddens is mentioned quite often as a suitor for Regina's hand. Duryea plays the father of the character that he played in the film version of "The Little Foxes", and like father, like son, it's a fascinating performance.

But acting honors go to the real life married couple of March and Eldridge, not really sharing a lot of scream time together because they're married characters obviously are not in love with each other, even though the Marches in real life were married for nearly 50 years and practically inseparable. It really is a long day's journey into a nightmare for this tragic pair, and equally as memorable as its predecessor.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
another part of the forest
mossgrymk31 March 2024
This prequel to "The Little Foxes" is, like its predecessor (and successor), an acute examination of the Post Reconstruction, Jim Crow South where the old planter class, fallen upon hard times, and the rising merchant class both despise and are dependent on each other. The once proud plantation owners need the newly rich's money while the bourgeoisie needs the veneer of "class" that only a connection to the Confederate aristocracy will provide. The one thing that unites the two classes is white racism toward the former slaves, paternalistic in the planters' case, more crude in the merchants.

Guiding us through this hellscape is a waspish, sassy, at times perceptive and, at times, overly melodramatic screenplay from her stage play by Lillian Hellman, good nor-ish cinematography from Hal Mohr that helps to make this a film rather than a filmed play and good to excellent performances from the entire cast. Actors who I usually dislike, such as Ann Blyth and Edmund O'Brien, do solid work and actors I admire, such as Frederic March and Dan Duryea, approach career best levels. I was especially taken with March's interpretation of the venal Marcus Hubbard, a man who, in pursuit of profit, cheated people out of salt during wartime and is now trying to buy back his guilt ridden soul through an equally slavish pursuit of Culture. I also liked the subsidiary character of Laurette, wonderfully played by Dona Drake, a mindless floozie who, ironically, manages to nail Marcus more effectively than anyone else. And when the entire cast is commendable then one must also acknowledge the director, Michael Gordon, whose best film this is ("Pillow Talk" fans be damned!). Give it a B plus.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Solid prequel to LITTLE FOXES
adrianovasconcelos13 April 2023
I do not know as much as I would like about Director Michael Gordon, but ANOTHER PART OF THE FOREST is probably the finest opus in his directorial output, surpassing gems like AN ACT OF MURDER, THE LADY GAMBLES or UNDERGROUND AGENT. It is the prequel to THE LITTLE FOXES (US 1941), which boasted a fantastic cast that included Bette Davis, Herbert Marshall, Dan Duryea and Charles Dingle at the very top of their superlative acting powers.

Duryea is the sole survivor of that cast, and he delivers yet another superb performance, not the inferior of his outing in THE LITTLE FOXES, as the useless hollow-head son who has fallen for a woman who keeps flirting with other men, and who thinks nothing of begging father, brother and anyone else for money,

Gordon's direction is greatly helped by Hal Mohr's cinematography, even if the latter falls well below the quality of Gregg Toland's camera work in THE LITTLE FOXES; and by the acting of Fredric March, Edmond O'Brien, Dan Duryea, Betsy Blair, and Dona Drake, who has a small but eye-catching role as the cancan dancer who winks at just about any moving male.

The script, off a Lilian Hellman play, is very good, improving as the film progresses and reaching its zenith in the final 30 minutes, with zinging, intelligent dialogue that sees Birdie really fly in spiritual terms over the rest of her family because she has nothing to hide and no weight on her conscience.

From my standpoint one of the few letdowns comes from Ann Blyth. She had risen to considerable visibility as Veda in Mildred Pierce (1945), but her Regina lacks the cutting, unfeeling and vindictive edge of Bette Davis' Regina in FOXES. Above all, she is no acting match for Bette, even less so in the face of what I rate as the latter's best, most rounded performance ever.

Fitting, pleasant soundtrack by Amfitheatrof.

If you like quality cinema, ANOTHER PART OF THE FOREST and, especially, THE LITTLE FOXES, warrant watching.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great Prequel to Little Foxes
jaddeo30 April 2024
ANOTHER PART OF THE FOREST, 1948. This is the prequel to THE LITTLE FOXES, both written by Lillian Hellman.

Though not nearly as well known as its predecessor it's still a riveting movie about some really nasty people. The Hubbards of Alabama are a ruthless scheming family and the wonderful cast plays it to the hilt.

Fredric March is the patriarch, Florence Eldridge plays his long suffering wife (they were real life husband and wife). Ann Blyth plays a young Regina and though not as villainess as Bette Davis gives a performance to rival her turn as Veda three years earlier in MILDRED PIERCE. Rounding out the cast are Dan Duryea as Oscar, Edmond O'Brien as Ben and Betsy Blair as Birdie. All are excellent.

Michael Gordon is not William Wyler but his direction is excellent and he keeps the camera moving supplying some needed action to a very dense script.

It plays out like a combination between a Greek tragedy and Eugene O'Neill.

If you like your drama heavy, dark, nasty and dripping with moss, molasses, maple and magnolia then check this out.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed