Sin of Esther Waters (1948) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Excellent acting all around.
planktonrules16 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The film begins with Esther (Kathleen Ryan) arriving at a new job as a cook for an upper-class family. Things do not go smoothly at first--mostly because Esther is a very moralistic woman. However, her high ideals change when she meets William, a man who also works on the estate (Dirk Bogarde). His life is horse racing and he's rather worldly--much the opposite of Esther. Yet, oddly, they have a relationship. Esther learns she is pregnant at the same time William leaves with another woman! The next several years are very, very tough on Esther and her child--with extreme poverty hardship.

Out of the blue, William sees Esther and only then realizes he has a son. During the intervening years, he'd apparently been abroad with the horses. He's now reasonably well off--owning a pub and doing some bookmaking. This is not the most admirable of jobs, but he seems like a decent man who wants to do what's right by his son and Esther. While she initially rejects any attempts for William to help, eventually she relents and they marry.

Several uneventful years pass. Eventually, the bookmaking business begins to sour and so does his health. William cannot seem to stop with gambling and is still hoping for a big killing so he can afford to move his family to Egypt for his health. They never say what ailment he has--and you assume it must be Tuberculosis (due to the need for a dry climate). Will he succeed and change their lives for the better or will the family face financial ruin and disaster? Tune in to this working-class tale to find out for yourself.

While this is not the most exciting film I have ever seen (it definitely is a bit uneven dramatically speaking), I really liked the acting. The film was not sensationalistic--it just seemed to feature real people in real situations and there is a lot to admire in this 19th century tale. Also, while a subplot involving a preacher who has fallen in love with Esther and asks to marry her is not a major part of the film, it is very much like a working of "Jane Eyre". The choice between a flawed man she loves and a safe but passionless preacher is in both stories (although in most movies, this important subplot is omitted in "Jane Eyre").
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good production; excellent scenes on Derby Day
bob-790-19601818 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This is a forgotten movie based on an apparently forgotten novel by George Moore. It is actually rather enjoyable. The two Derby Day sequences in the second half of the film are richly detailed and capture the excitement of the crowds and the horse races themselves very well. There is excellent camera work here and throughout the film.

The plot of the film is drastically simplified from what occurs in the novel--even by movie standards. In the one review of the film that I have been able to track down (Leonard Maltin's Guide to Classic Films), the story is criticized as being essentially soap opera. Actually, everything that happens in the movie also occurs in the novel. It's just that the novel is so much richer in incident, detail, and significance.

Dirk Bogarde has his first starring role in the movie, playing a rogue-like character of the sort that he would play again in some later films. His is moving in his final scenes, when he is mortally ill with tuberculosis and bets all of his money on a horse that would lose the big race. Kathleen Ryan, as Esther, is suitably sympathetic. Cyril Cusack is given a wimpy role as a preacher who loves Esther, and it is no wonder that Esther chooses to go with Bogarde, in spite of his previous abandonment of her.

The movie is a very good period piece that is interesting in spite of its simplistic story.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Twenty Years
richardchatten3 June 2020
Remembered today solely for containing Dirk Bogarde's first lead (actually second billed to Kathleen Ryan). This screen version of George Moore's socially concerned 1894 novel starts well with a wonderful opening pan across the Wessex countryside, like most postwar British films looks lovely and has an interesting supporting cast (including Cyril Cusack, Ivor Barnard and a young Pauline Jameson). But one's attention starts to wander as the heroine's fortunes eventually pick up...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Handsomely mounted Victorian drama
ottoflop19 February 2003
I waited up until 2:00 am to see this film back in 1964. Very well done and I was surprised with all the attention paid to "Upstairs;Downstairs" that this film has not made it to video.

The period detail is outstanding and Dirk Borgarde gives a very good performance as does Kathleen Ryan. I have read that Dirk's younger brother played his "son" in this film. By all means, if you have a chance to view this, do so.
22 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty good Victorian Melodrama
ldeangelis-7570831 January 2023
If you like racing, this movie is for you (though I could have done without it, as that dragged on too long) and if Victorian melodrama's your thing, then you've come to the right place as well.

Kathleen Ryan does a good job in the title role, a young woman, working as a servant, who finds herself "in the family way", after being seduced by footman William Latch (Dirk Bogarde), who then elopes with a young woman of means. Esther faces tough times, harsh attitudes, almost loses her baby boy to unscrupulous black marketers, and an eventual reunion with William (who didn't know about their son), whom she prefers to the local preacher (Cyril Cusack) who's willing to marry her and help raise her son.

Life changes for the better, but not for long. But one thing stays the same: her deep and abiding love for her child.

It's a good movie and doesn't get either too maudlin or too sentimental.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Esther Waters
CinemaSerf5 January 2023
This is quite a decent Victorian melodrama that sees naive housemaid "Esther" (Kathleen Ryan) fall for the mischievous charms of "Latch" (Dirk Bogarde). Left high and dry - with their baby - after he absconds with another woman, she must struggle to hold down a job and make ends meet at a time when there was no such thing as maternity leave. It is just when she seems to be making some progress that her nemesis turns up again - by now a quite successful pub owner and gambler with underlying health problems - and when he realises that they had a child together, he wants to try to help - and their drama intensifies. There are some lovey scenes set around the famous Epsom Derby horse race and when both actors are on screen at the same time, there is a distinct and quite engaging chemistry between Ryan and Bogarde. Sadly, though, the screenplay isn't up to much and though the support from the likes of Cyril Cusack and the rather matter-of-fact Nuna Davey as the matron tries it's best, the drama itself is actually quite weak and predictable. Keep an eye out for the zip on her frock - a woman well ahead of her times!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not the best example of its type
wilvram28 January 2016
I have always been fond of the British costume dramas and melodramas of the immediate post-war period, but this is a decidedly lacklustre example of the breed. Rank had undertaken an ambitious production schedule but was sorely lacking in talented and experienced directors; nor did Dirk Bogarde have the experience to carry the male lead, a role crying out for the likes of Stewart Granger, who apparently turned it down.

Opportunities are missed in the early scenes in the Barfield country house, with those in the middle of the picture, depicting poor Esther having her child in the workhouse, her encounter with the sinister baby farmer, and the slave labour conditions of her work as a domestic servant, being considerably more resonant. Then, around the time of the introduction of Cyril Cusack as a rather wet lay preacher, it all starts to go down hill. Though evident that a great deal of time, expense, and attention to detail was expended on the racing scenes toward the end, the prolonged business with Bogarde's gambling cronies struck me as monumentally tedious. Kathleen Ryan as Esther is one of the few saving graces and, according to Bogarde, she gave him a silver brandy flask after shooting was over, engraved with 'To hell with Esther Waters!' I had a similar sentiment.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Esther Waters
Prismark105 June 2020
Esther Waters is a turgid costume melodrama that is only brightened by the presence of Dirk Bogarde and Cyril Cusack.

Set in in 1875, it is fallen woman story. Esther (Kathleen Ryan) is employed as a maid in a country house and falls for the smoothie footman William Latch (Dirk Bogarde).

Latch is interested in his employer's horses and gambling. Not knowing that Esther is pregnant he abandons her and runs off with the daughter of their employer.

Esther a strong willed religious woman is now alone. She decides to raise her baby son and moves from a workhouse to other jobs as a maid. At times walking out because of her employer's attitudes.

Esther is a forthright woman that will not stand for any nonsense. She gets an offer of marriage from a preacher Fred (Cyril Cusack) but some years later William returns to her life.

Now William wants to be with her and her son. He has money from being a bookmaker and also has a pub which Esther decides to run.

Adapted from a novel, it comes across as a tawdry soap opera. Bogarde is a cad but he is also genuinely fond of her. Esther decides to be flexible about her religious beliefs as she decides to run a pub but will not allow gambling to take place.

Esther rises above her circumstances but it is a heavy handed film and Ryan is not suited in the title role. It should had been more lurid but probably held back by the censorship laws of the time.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Authentic British horse racing drama.
michaelchurch23 December 2005
For me, the strength of this film is in the accuracy of the racing details, the costumes and the culture of the time. The racing scenes, shot on Epsom Downs recreate the Derby's of 1881 and 1885, and have been thoroughly researched, even the jockeys used for Fred Archer and Fred Webb show an amazing likeness. Also, the scenes in the streets, on the racecourse and in the public house are totally believable.

This is a film made by those who love and cherish the subject. Although to my knowledge, having worked at Racing Post for many years and, written the history of the Derby, very few people today know of the this film. Strangely, a few years ago, I awoke at 4 am, unable to sleep, to find the film just starting and have never seen it since! However, this film has much to offer - a Victorian romance, the struggle of conscious, excitement and, a ripping gambling yarn.

Michael Church.
30 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Major disappointment.
shelly8 July 2010
This film is interminable. And I usually love period pieces. The pace is extremely sluggish and only Dirk Bogarde brings some life to the proceedings. This film is perfect for insomniacs. However the racing scenes are well done and the design is quite good.

I would love to have seen Vivien Leigh in the title role. She would have added the necessary fire.

The supporting cast, especially Cyril Cusack and Fay Compton are fine.

I think better direction would have aided this film tremendously.

The story itself is quite interesting. It's the execution that's the problem.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Little Wonder This Is Long Forgotten
malcolmgsw9 August 2012
Whilst Gainsborough was turning out racy melodramas Rank was producing dull turgid costume films such as this.It seems to be a compendium of the worst parts of contemporary films.the only originality is in the horse racing scenes.However if like me you have absolutely no interest in horse racing then these scenes become an utter bore.All they manage to do is to extend this film to at least 30 minutes over its natural length.This film was made at the time of the Hollywood boycott of the UK due to the high ad valorem duty the Chancellor imposed on imported films.Rank decided to take up the slack.The problem was that the Chancellor and the US film industry reached a compromise and films such as this were left floundering in the wake of the flood of Hollywood films back into this country.Whilst the acting is quite good it does not in itself compensate for sitting through this yawn inducing bore.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great costumer
calvertfan30 May 2002
If you like the British costume dramas of this era, then Esther Waters is for you. Set in the 1880s it follows a servant girl as she meets and falls in love with a young man whose mother she works for - then is shattered when he goes off with another woman, leaving her pregnant and broke. She endeavours to raise the child on her own, finding it difficult because the general public is extremely biased against young unwed mothers. The movie drags a bit, but it is worth a watch!
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Dirk Bogarde brilliant as a dashing dandy bookie taking his ladies for a ride...
clanciai12 April 2017
Kathleen Ryan is the poor and innocent young maid who gets the normal treatment of a lady and ends up down to her neck in trouble, and she is illiterate at that, but you can't really dislike him since he plays it so well, and he honestly makes an effort. It all ends up in the great Derby, the festivity crowd scenes are the treat of the film, and they are several, including the great rural party in the beginning. It's a Dickensian story convincing enough in its realism of the 1870s to 80s including a long dying scene, of which Dirk Bogarde was such an expert and made so many of, usually coughing to death, while Kathleen Ryan in spite of her hardships actually gets along quite well, not actually needing the sympathetic support of Cyril Cusack as the would be catcher in the rye. It's a lovely film of a serving maiden's tale and particularly a film for horse lovers - the final race is a killer.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Neglected Gem
aifsim21 October 2017
Another little triumph for the marvellous 'Talking Pictures TV', this was a complete revelation. One of the most effectively set and shot costume dramas and a tour de force of a performance from a young Dirk Bogarde (his first starring role) and ably supported by Kathleen Ryan. The racing scenes are absolutely first-rate - as the authority, Michael Church, says above) with Derby Day as well evoked as I've ever seen it. Even a nod to Frith's 'Derby Day'. Made me want to read the novel. What a treat on a Saturday afternoon!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Most highly recommended.
JohnHowardReid26 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Producers: Ian Dalrymple, Peter Proud. Executive producer: Ian Dalrymple. Made by Ian Dalrymple's Wessex Film Productions. Presented by J. Arthur Rank.

Copyright 1948 by Independent Producers Ltd. Never theatrically released or broadcast in the U.S. (but made available to Canadian television stations through T. of C.). U.K. release through General Film Distributors: 11 November 1948. Australian release through G-B- D/20th Century-Fox: 6 October 1949. 9,738 feet. 108 minutes (Available on a very good Spirit Entertainment DVD).

SYNOPSIS: The period is the eighteen eighties. Primly brought up Esther takes a job as servant in a country estate where racehorses are trained. Esther succumbs to the 'racier' atmosphere and also to the charms of footman William Latch, son of the housekeeper. She becomes pregnant, but Latch has eloped with the niece of his employer. Esther is forced to have her baby in the workhouse and brings him up alone despite the condemnation of respectable society. Eventually, she agrees to marry good Fred; but Latch turns up again, and persuades Esther to marry him for the sake of their son Jackie. Always a gambler, his fortunes decline.

NOTES: Bogarde's third film. He appeared as an extra in a crowd scene of the 1939 George Formby comedy Come On George, and had a bit part as a policeman in the 1947 Dancing With Crime.

COMMENT: I love this film. Although it received mixed - verging on negative - reviews and was none too popular at the almighty box- office, I think it a grand realization of Moore's crowded-with- fascinating-characters, incident-paced yet enthralling and realistic novel. Most expansively produced too on a scale seldom seen in British films.

Although Bogarde claims he received no guidance from either director, he gives to my mind the best performance of his entire career. It's a difficult role with many facets, but Bogarde always plays with such complete assurance and conviction, sincerity and charm that we are completely won over -- even when the character does and says things that are not wholly engaging.

Kathleen Ryan also manages the transition from youthful innocence to a more jaundiced maturity with total credibility, whilst always engaging our total sympathy.

It would be wrong to single out one or two – or even five or six – in the long roster of brilliant support players. Even the crowd artists carry off their fleeting cameos with such flair it's hard to believe this rowdy, jostling Derby Day is not the real thing. Technically Esther Waters is a marvel of fine craftsmanship. Superb photography, breathtaking sets, forceful direction and astute film editing join with the superlative efforts of the players to bring this teeming script to vivid life.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Managing a household
jarrodmcdonald-116 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Dirk Bogarde made his motion picture debut in this British melodrama based on George Moore's classic novel. He had replaced Stewart Granger who bowed out at the last minute. Bogarde won over critics and audiences with his performance as a rascal gambler who causes hardship for the title character (Kathleen Ryan).

This is really Miss Ryan's film, a starring vehicle for her after earning plaudits for her work a year earlier in ODD MAN OUT, supporting James Mason. Here she is a young servant whose religion and steady hand make her an ideal gentlewoman helping manage a nouveau riche household.

One thing that probably comes across better in the novel than it does on screen is how limited her opportunities in life seem to be. The movie starts with her arriving at the Barfield estate, but the source material details the death of her father and her illiteracy before going into service.

Another interesting aspect of the character and her story, which is somewhat glossed over by the filmmakers, is the connection she has with a supervisor who happens to be Bogarde's mother. The two form a strong bond, when Bogarde is one of the first members of the staff to show kindness towards Ryan. At the same time Ryan also develops a strong bond with their female employer, Mrs. Barfield (Fay Compton), who practices the same religion.

Most of the film focuses on the troubled relationship between Ryan and Bogarde, who plays a footman that helps with the family's horses. Bogarde is prone to betting, and he intends to make a fortune his own way. He runs off with a rich relative of the Barfields', but not before getting Ryan pregnant and leaving her to fend for herself.

There is a sense of family among the servants, and they want what's best for her and the unborn child. However, when her pregnancy becomes apparent and she is without the benefit of marriage, she must leave the estate. She ends up giving birth at a workhouse infirmary. The middle portion of the story is straight out of Dickens. After the workhouse, she goes back into service as a wet nurse for a wealthy woman who doesn't want to breastfeed her own newborn.

Meanwhile the crooked couple watching Ryan's son offer to kill him and save her the responsibility of childrearing...for a fee. These horrors pass, and Ryan eventually finds regular employment as well as romance with an evangelist (Cyril Cusack). Unfortunately this stability is short-lived when Bogarde boomerangs back on to the scene.

While I don't think Bogarde and Ryan exhibit any real chemistry together, their moments as a couple on screen are well-acted. Marriage occurs on a festive Derby Day, one of the film's best sequences. Bogarde is now a bookie who also runs a pub, which Ryan oversees. I thought Bogarde's character would be unfaithful again, but luckily that doesn't happen. Yet there's considerable drama when police shut down his betting operation.

As if this were not enough, he develops a bad cough. And in a tale like this, it's only going to mean one thing-- tuberculosis. Soon Bogarde is dying in hospital, with plans to place one more bet with all their savings...which he loses, before taking his last breath. A memorable death scene.

I especially like how everything comes full circle. After Bogarde's death, Ryan goes back into service-- at-- you guessed it, the Barfield estate. The last scene has her serving tea to her old employer while receiving a visit from her now adult son. This is a very good movie that leaves the viewer with something to think about when it's all over...and those feelings linger for quite some time.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed