House of Strangers (1949) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
73 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Edward G. At The Top Of His Form.
jpdoherty26 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
HOUSE OF STRANGERS is another classic from the Noir vaults of 20th Century Fox and is one of their very best. Under the guiding hand of the brilliant director Joseph L. Mankiewicz the film emerged in 1949 and remains to this day a remarkable piece of cinema! All credit must go to the excellent screenplay by Philip Yordan, the masterful low key black & white cinematography of Milton Krasner and the atmospheric score by the Russian composer Daniele Amfitheatrof.

The stellar cast is headed by the great Edward G. Robinson. Fresh from his wonderful Johnny Rocco in Houston's "Key Largo" Robinson plays Gino Monetti, the Italian immigrant who runs the bank he founded in New York's lower east side. He runs it with an iron fist as he does his family of four sons who work for him. Three of whom are resentful of him because of the poor wages he pays them and the domineering way he treats them. Robinson's Gino Monetti is a deftly crafted and skillful piece of acting and with just the right Italian accent the actor once again demonstrates that he was one of the finest players in American cinema. Watching him here one can't help but think what a fine Corleone he would have made had he been around (he died in 1972 the year "The Godfather" was released)

Richard Conte, in one of his best parts, plays the loyal and favoured son Max Monetti with his trademark serious look and in his best oppressed hero style. The other siblings are played by Luther Adler as the oldest and meanest, Efrem Zimbalist as the ladies man and Paul Valentine excellent as a slow witted amateur pugilist. Romantic interest is supplied by the ever lovely and vivacious Susan Hayward whose star at this time was about to start its rise. But it is Robinson's movie from the moment he comes into it - you simply cannot take your eyes of him!

Five years later the studio re-fashioned Yordan's screenplay (itself loosely based on Shakespeare's "King Lear") and turned it into a splendid western called "Broken Lance" with Spencer Tracy. This fact is strangely omitted from any text on the DVD?

A curious footnote: At the end of the picture we don't hear Amfithetrof's finale music! What we get instead is the end title from Alfred Newman's score for "The Razor's Edge" (1946). Why and how this should be is anybody's guess! Apart from this sloppy denouement it is still a fine movie in a fine package which has a commentary,a trailer and a good behind the scenes still gallery.

Classic line from "House Of Strangers".......... When one of Robinson's errant sons declines to help his father during his trial - "I'm sorry pop I don't want to stick my neck out" to which Robinson wryly inquires "Why - what's so good about your neck".
41 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Superb
blanche-216 August 2006
An Italian-American family is the subject of "House of Strangers," a 1949 film starring Edward G. Robinson, Richard Conte, Susan Hayward, Luther Adler, Debra Paget, Hope Emerson, and Efrem Zimbalist, Jr. Being of Italian extraction myself, I actually thought this film was written by an Italian and was surprised to see it wasn't. It was dead on.

Edward G. Robinson is Gino Monetti, who owns a bank in the '30s. He runs it like he's selling items out of his garage, with lousy bookkeeping, some people being charged interest up front on loans and some getting more money than they asked for. He has four sons, three of whom he treats like second-class citizens: Pietro is a guard at the bank by day and an amateur boxer by night, Joe is a teller, and Tony is a clerk. When Joe, who married a woman from a good Philadelphia family, asks for a raise he was promised, he gets a lecture from Gino about how the family lived in the back of a barber shop when Gino made $15 a week. When Pietro loses a boxing match, Gino takes the jacket off of his shoulders that says "Monetti Bank." Gino runs his home with more rigidity than he does his bank: His wife doesn't say much, and he has mandatory Wednesday night spaghetti dinners during which he plays opera recordings such as "Il Barbiere di Siviglia" starring Lawrence Tibbett.

Gino has a favored child, and that's Max, his lawyer son. When the Feds start investigating Gino, Max comes up with a solution. If all the brothers will take responsibility for the sloppiness at the bank, the Feds won't be able to pin anything on anybody. But the sons refuse to lift a finger to help their father, ultimately forcing him out and starting their own bank. Max goes to prison for attempting to bribe a juror, and when he gets out, he's bent on revenge against his brothers.

The acting is this film is nothing short of fantastic. Robinson is perfect as the dictatorial, ruthless Gino. Conte is totally believable as the favorite son - efficient and slightly to the right of slimy. Luther Adler gives a brilliant performance as the henpecked Tony. The rest of the cast is uniformly excellent. Susan Hayward plays Max's love interest, a woman who gives as good as she gets. She looks sensational and does a terrific job in her role. Stardom is right around the corner for her, and it's no surprise.

With a great pace kept by Joseph Mankiewicz, this is a film that I'm surprised we don't hear more about. It just goes to show that there were so many great films made in Hollywood in the past that even some marvelous ones are overlooked. "House of Strangers" is definitely one to see and remember.
49 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's still being done you know, outside the jungle.
hitchcockthelegend9 September 2011
House of Strangers is directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz and adapted to screenplay by Phillip Yordan from Jerome Weidman's novel I'll Never Go There Any More. It stars Edward G. Robinson, Susan Hayward, Richard Conte, Luther Adler, Paul Valentine and Efrem Zimbalist. Plot finds Robinson as Gino Monetti, an Italian American banker who whilst building up the family business has ostracised three of his four sons. When things go belly up for Gino and the bank, the three sons turn against their father, the other, Max (Conte), stays loyal but finds himself set up for a prison stretch. Untimely since he's started to fall in love with tough cookie Irene Bennett (Hayward).

Jerome Weidman's novel has proved to be a popular source for film adaptation, after this 20th Century Fox produced picture came the Western version with Broken Lance in 1954 (Yordan again adapting), and then Circus set for The Big Show in 1961. While its influence can be felt in many other, more notable, crime dramas along the way. The divided clan narrative provides good basis for drama and lets the better actors shine on the screen with such material. Such is the case with House of Strangers, which while hardly shaking the roots of film noir technically, does thematically play out as an engrossing, character rich, melodrama.

Propelled by a revenge core peppered with hate motives instead of love; and dabbling in moral ethics et al, Mankiewicz spins it out in flashback structure. The primary focus is on Max and Gino, with both given excellent portrayals by Conte and Robinson. Gino is a driven man, very dismissive towards three of his boys (Adler standing out as Joe) who he finds easy to find fault with. But Max is spared the tough love, Gino admires him and sees him very much as an equal, which naturally irks the other brothers something rotten. This all comes to a head for the final quarter where the pace picks up and the tale comes to its prickly, if not completely satisfactory, ending.

In the mix of family strife we have been privy to Max's burgeoning relationship with Irene (Hayward sassy), which positively simmers with sexual tension, or maybe even frustration? This in spite of the fact he is engaged to be married to the homely innocent Maria (Debra Paget). So with dad Gino proving to be, well, something of an ungrateful bastard, and Max cheating on his intended, clearly this is not a film about good old family values coming to the fore! Then there's the small matter of brother betrayal and the case of the foolish decision making process, all elements that keep the viewer hooked till the last. 7/10
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Every once in a while a great film comes along, and is somehow forgotten over a period of time...but is still well worth watching!
wgie31 May 2004
This film appears in John Springer's movie book "Forgotten Films to Remember" by Citadel Press, and certainly lives up to it's name! It is a dark movie about the dysfunctional Monetti family. The late great Edward G. Robinson portrays Gino Monetti, the controlling patriarch banker father that rules his family with an iron fist. Richard Conte gives a sterling performance as the well meaning faithful son, Max Monetti. He takes a prison rap for embezzlement for his aging father. While he is in prison he helplessly learns that his brothers Joe (Luther Adler), Tony (Edward Zimbalist Jr., and Pietro (Paul Valentine plan to take over the family banking business. As a result of this his father dies. Max returns home from prison focused on revenge. Fortunately, Max's girlfriend (Susan Hayward)convinces him that the revenge he seeks is not worth it. Realizing that his father Gino was the real source of hatred and evil in the family, he decides to peacefully leave town with his girlfriend, but is soon confronted by his evil brothers.

Amazingly this 1949 film was re-made in 1954 as a Western of all things! The title of the re-make was "Broken Lance". Same story different setting. Spencer Tracy (Controlling Rancher Father) plays the Robinson (Controlling Banker father) part, Robert Wagner plays the Conte part (Faithful son), Richard Widmark plays the Adler part (Ambitious older brother), Hugh O'Brien plays the Zimbalist part, and Earl Holliman plays the Valentine part (strong arm brother). Both films share a powerful script and good performances. Worth seeing!
39 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Dysfunctional Family.
rmax30482328 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Pretty interesting story, and adult too. Robinson is Pa Minetti, an Italian immigrant, formerly a penurious barber, now the prosperous president of his own bank. He has three older sons -- Luther Adler, Valentine, and Zimbalist. And he favors his youngest son, Max (Richard Conte), who is a lawyer and has his office in Pa's bank.

All kind of cozy, like the warm Italian family in The Godfather. But there's a problem. Robinson has brought his old-world ways to the new world. He's not only the president of the bank, but president of the family too, and nobody elected him. Someone calls him "Il Duce." (Kids, that was the title of Benito Mussolini, the Italian dictator in the 1930s and the early 1940s, when his subjects hung him out to dry.) But Pa has, in fact, absorbed some of the ways of the new world, only it's the wrong philosophy. The philosophy can be summarily described as, "Dog Eat Dog." Boy, does Pa browbeat his three older sons, both at work and at home. He has Luther Adler, his first born, working in a teller's cage. Efram Zimbalist, Jr., has some menial position too. And the biggest and strongest, Paul Valentine as Pietro, wears a guard's uniform. He's constantly ordering them to get back to work. And he refers to Valentine as "dumbhead" repeatedly. Even at the weekly family dinners, when the sons bring their families over for Ma's spaghetti dinners, he plays opera on the phonograph -- and LOUD, so nobody can hear anybody else. And Pa makes everyone wait at the table until Conte arrives. "Nobody's eat untilla Max gets ahere." The three elder sons don't care much for the kind of humiliation that Pa is dishing out, though he's rarely mean about it. He just takes it for granted that they know they'll inherit the bank one day when he's gone, and meantime they'll have some notion of what he himself went through, as they crawl on their bellies like dogs and can't afford decent apartments for their wives and kids.

How does Conte treat all this? With aplomb. He speaks up for his brothers when they ask him to but he doesn't take it all too seriously. I mean, what the hell, he's a lawyer and Pa's favorite son.

A run on the bank (this is 1932) exposes a few weaknesses in Pa's book keeping. He doesn't know the meaning of the word "collateral." He lends money based on his reckoning of whether he'll get it back, accompanied by usurious interest. He keeps money stashed in a cigar box and writes his records on napkins, things like that. So he's brought to trial and is about to be convicted. The older brothers don't care. Pa's just getting what he deserves. But Conte is representing him in court and, seeing the guillotine blade about to fall, interferes with a juror and is sent to prison for seven years. The cops were tipped off by the other brothers, which annoys Conte no end.

So when Conte is finally released from jail he intends to take care of them but, due to the seasonal interposition of an adventitious girl friend, Susan Hayward, he decides not to because that would have represented the worst of Pa's desires. A free man, he leaves with Hayward for San Francisco and the brothers get the bank. So long, Pa.

Joseph L. Mankievicz directed it efficiently and the script is occasionally very keen. An example of what I mean. Susan Hayward calls Conte and tells him to come to her place; it's a legal emergency. Well, it isn't. She just wants to have some fun with him. He turns her offer down but she says, "Let's go to dinner. I'll get my wrap." Conte walks to the door and opens it, then looks back at her. She drops the wrap on the couch and they stand there silently. Fade out. There's a marvelous scene in a seedy bar. Mankievicz's camera glides along from booth to booth, passing one in which a fat, older man with a cigar is sitting next to a frozen young lady. Neither says a word. A few minutes later, Conte and Hayward look up from their drinks when they hear a slight sob, and there is a cut to the other couple. The girl has covered her face with her hands and the fat man is looking around self consciously. A vignette whose character we can fill in with our imaginations.

I said it was an adult movie but that hint of premarital intercourse isn't why. The characters are ambiguous, as people in real life would be. In some ways, for instance, Pa is a lovable old patriarch, but he's also monstrously insensitive to the feelings of others. And the murderous resentment of the older kids is made understandable too. And Richard Conte's character is aggressive and domineering at the beginning, just as a spoiled youngster might be, but he develops into a Mensch by the end of the tale. Hayward develops too, from a whimsical high-end nympho to a woman mature enough to settle for one man, even if he's broke.

I don't know why this had to be an Italian family, though. The Italianate elements seem superimposed on the family dynamics, like one of those nude celebrity photos in which the face of the actress or model has been placed on a fake body. Sure, they eat spaghetti and Pa listens to The Barber of Seville. So what? The writers have resorted to stereotypes. I hate stereotypes. Furthermore, no Italian boy has ever been named "Max". They are all named "Tony" and when born are not wrapped in swaddling clothes but dressed in iddy biddy suits of rubbed silk.

But that's a small thing in this big, complicated, and largely successful tale of power and jealousy.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Never Forgive, Never Forget
claudio_carvalho1 December 2012
In New York, after seven years in prison, the lawyer Max Monetti (Richard Conte) goes to the bank of his brothers Joe (Luther Adler), Tony (Efrem Zimbalist Jr.) and Pietro Monetti (Paul Valentine) and promises revenge to them. Then he visits his lover Irene Bennett (Susan Hayward) that asks him to forget the past and start a new life.

Max recalls the early 30's, when he is the favorite son of his father Gino Monetti (Edward G. Robinson), who has a bank in the East Side. Gino is a tyrannical and egocentric self-made man that raises his family in an environment of hatred and Max is a competent lawyer engaged with Maria Domenico (Debra Paget). When Max meets the confident Irene, he has a troubled love affair with her. In 1933, with the new Banking Act reaches Gino for misapplication of funds. Max plots a plan to help his father but is betrayed by his brothers.

Now Max will see his brothers that have also being raised under the motto "Never Forgive, Never Forget".

"House of Strangers" is a magnificent film-noir by Joseph L. Mankiewicz with a great story of hatred and forgiveness. Edward G. Robinson has one of his best performances (if not the best) and wins the Best Actor award in the 1949 Cannes Film Festival. Richard Conte has one of his best roles (if not the best) in his well-succeeded career. Susan Hayward is very beautiful and elegant and performs a strong female character. My vote is ten.

Title (Brazil): Not Available
28 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The sins of the father
jdfin229 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Edward G. Robinson, who in my opinion can be hammy at times, really nailed this role as the controlling Italian patriarch. This is a psychologically straightforward film that is nevertheless satisfying on more than an entertainment level.

Conte and Hayward, both fine, have some snappy noirish dialog, and their relationship, like most of what occurs in the plot, is on a visceral emotional level, without any deep explanation except "this is what the heart makes people do." And as the film shows it is often to their own pain.

The height of this is what happens to Conte after an act of extreme (though extremely misguided) loyalty to one he loves, which ultimately makes him pay a great price.

The production values of this film are very fine; the forward narrative motion of the story held my interest to the very end. And even though there seemed to be a bit of trimming of exposition -- with the introduction of the Hayward character here and there being a bit awkward and lacking explanation and motivation -- there were enough superior moments to raise the film above the ordinary.

And Luther Adler's performance as brother "Joe" was fantastic.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Little Caesar Owning a Bank
bkoganbing5 January 2006
Try and imagine Little Caesar getting out of the rackets and taking his hard stolen loot and setting up a bank. Then Mr. Bandello marries and has four sons.

You've got Gino Monetti who now that he's no longer terrorizing citizens confines his terrors to his own family. He's got four grown sons and he treats them like the hired help. All except Richard Conte who instead of working for him directly at the bank uses the bank's space for his law office.

I think that's the key to this film. The other three sons Luther Adler, Efrem Zimbalist, Jr., and Paul Valentine all do work for him and he can treat them like dirt. Conte on the other hand, does not work for him, he's made his own career. By Robinson's logic, he's earned a certain amount of respect.

So he pits them against each other. Unfortunately Robinson's banking practices which are not exactly legal catch up with him. He's forced to turn the bank over to the three sons in an effort to save the bank.

Conte also tries to bribe a juror to save dear old Dad and gets disbarred and a stretch of seven years in prison for his troubles. Conte's out now and looking to even things up with his siblings.

Robinson who's played all kinds of immigrants of many nationalities has covered the Italian ground before. But he's real good as the scheming, sadistic patriarch who in fact gets a deserved comeuppance from his sons. All four sons are fine in their roles with Richard Conte and Luther Adler deserving particular attention.

Susan Hayward is the girl who waits for Conte. She must be in love with him. A disbarred attorney isn't exactly a dream prospect. She was just entering into the height of her career and this role was a career boost.

House of Strangers is far superior to the western setting remake that 20th Century Fox did five years later entitled Broken Lance
36 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Darn good movie
alice-enland6 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This is a darn good movie. Thought provoking on many levels. If you've ever worked for a family owned business you know that the internal struggles are often deep and can cause mayhem. Conte is a fine actor and in the beginning you'll think he will be the heavy throughout since that is his metier. Not a big fan of Susan H but I like her here. I thought EGR was too over the top but I got the point. Zimbalist stayed in the background so much he might as well have been left on the cutting room floor. Maybe he was just there to explain what happened to Conte's fiancee, Debra Paget. As is often the case the character actors were very good such as the bartender. I felt the middle act moved too slowly and we saw too much of the developing relaltionship between Conte and Hayward. Other than one kiss I never saw a relationship between Conte and Paget. Overall a fine film and the print off You Tube is top notch. Almost HD.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Banking in Little Italy in the 1930s
theowinthrop12 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Edward G. Robinson played many ethnic types in his career, including sinister Chinese types in THE HATCHET MAN and Greek seamen in TIGER SHARK. But he played many Italian - Americans, mostly involved in criminal activities. Best known is his Rico Bandello in LITTLE CAESAR, but he also did Remy Marko in A SLIGHT CASE OF MURDER. And there is the more respectable, but still illegal gentleman in this film, Gino Monetti. Living in the middle of Little Italy in a mansion, Monetti started out as a barber, living in a single room with his wife Theresa (Esther Minciotti), and his four sons. They grow up to be Joe (Luther Adler), Max (Richard Conte), Tony (Efrem Zimberlist Jr.), and Pietro (Paul Valentine).

Monetti's views of his Italian heritage and his adopted land's culture are mixed. He loves the music of his homeland - he's frequently playing opera (Rossini's THE BARBER OF SEVILLE sung by Lawrence Tibbett is heard at one point on his record player). He does have a sense of tradition: every Wednesday Theresa cooks a big dinner for the family, and everyone has to come (including Max's fiancé Maria Domenico - Debra Paget - and her mother Helena Domenico - Hope Emerson - and Joe's wife Elena - Diana Douglas). Gino will talk about how different life in America is, where a man does not have to forever be in the same job as his father, or where cities grow upward due to skyscrapers. But he treats three of his sons as servants. Joe, who is his oldest, is asked to scrub Gino's back in the bathtub, or has to chauffeur his father around, and is only a clerk in the bank (although called first Vice President). Pietro is referred to as "dumb-head" because he likes to work on a boxing career rather than an office job. Tony is a lady's man, always quiet and well dressed, and dismissed by his father as a weakling. Only Max has gained the old man's respect - he became an attorney (and a pretty good one).

The bank itself is a mixed concern. When Frank Puglia asks for a $150.00 loan to buy a horse, he only gets $120.00 as $30.00 is taken off the top as interest on the new loan (later the loan has escalated to being $280.00). A poor woman needing money, however, gets the money without any interest being given. It later develops that Gino is lousy with bookkeeping, and resents government interest in his bank, but he is an intelligent banker, on the whole a decent guy, but he occasionally turns into a usurer.

Max, although engaged to Maria, meets a socialite named Irene Bennett (Susan Hayward), who initially hires him to help an ex-boyfriend who robbed her. They gradually get into an affair, which threatens the engagement to Maria. Hayward's jealousy eventually leads to a break in it. At just that time, government actions close the bank and lead to a trial for Gino on serious fraud charges. Max tries to defend him, but he finds Gino too hot-tempered on the witness stand. He talks about the case with Joe (who is not too interested in whether the old man goes to jail or not), and says that possibly if they bribe a juror they can save Gino. Joe refuses to help. Max tries to bribe the juror, but finds himself arrested instead. It results in his disbarment and seven years in prison. Gino is not sent to prison, but finds the bank reorganized by Joe, Tony, and Pietro, and he is put out to pasture. Still Gino encourages hatred in Max to his brothers, pointing out that Joe probably tipped off the police about the bribery attempt.

So Max leaves prison to confront his three siblings, and to see if he can resume life with Irene. And Joe, Tony (who has married Maria), and Pietro wonder if Max is going to be a troublemaker.

The film captured an aspect of life on the lower East side rarely shown in films - how did banks work in those immigrant enclaves? This was before major banks had branches around the cities, and small local banks (like Monetti's) were common. And were run in the same haphazard manner until the Depression made the government take a closer look. The film, directed by Joseph Mankiewicz, crackles with good dialog (and steamy lines too - particularly between Conte and Hayward). Robinson's Gino is memorable - not a really bad man, but one who forgot certain simple family rules regarding his sons. Even minor characters have good moments: Hope Emerson's fury at Conte's flaunting his affair with Hayward leads to a confrontation scene, and the dinner at the Monetti's reveals how Diana Douglas (Kirk's wife) is a non-Italian mainliner that Luther Adler married, who barely likes her in-laws (she can't stand spaghetti dinners, and wants him to have a promised raise so she can entertain HER friends). It is a rewarding movie about social mobility and it's pitfalls in the urban immigrant circles.
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A family drama with a powerful noir touch and one of the best vocabularies. Joseph L. Mankiewicz rules, Period.
SAMTHEBESTEST18 December 2022
House Of Strangers (1949) : Brief Review -

A family drama with a powerful noir touch and one of the best vocabularies. Joseph L. Mankiewicz rules, Period. I carry loads of expectations before watching any Joseph L. Mankiewicz film. He has a filmography such that I want to see more and better of his works. Believe it or not, but there hasn't been a single occasion when he has disappointed me, at least from whatever those 10-12 flicks I have seen so far. This man is a genius and on a different level. How did he manage to triumph in every genre by delivering something new every single time? It wasn't just that he mastered the genre's basics; he added something extra and extraordinary to it. House of Strangers is also in the same league. There is so much in this film, and that too after being a family drama. Complex relationships, love, hatred, parental advice, human values, revenge, forgiveness, old culture vs new culture values, an exchange of generations, and what not. House of Strangers got a house full of content. Above all, it has smartly written dialogues. What a fantastic vocabulary and what rapid-fire conversations! The conversations between Max and Irene will blow your mind-you can have my word on it. The screenplay is so engaging that I didn't even realise when those 100 minutes passed. Bow down to the great Edward G. Robinson. The legend at one of the finest workshops on the silver screen. That Italian accent (deliberate grammar mistakes) is top-class. Susan Hayward and Richard Conte's chemistry reminded me of the burning chemistry between Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall. Yes, it has those "To Have and Have Not" (1944) vibes. Lastly, a big salute to the master of the craft, Mr. Joseph L. Mankiewicz. You were, are, and will always be one of my top directors of all time. The more I see of you, the more I want to see. Only God knows when this hunger will stop. Someday, it will, but I will have had my stomach full of great films by that time.

RATING - 7.5/10*

By - #samthebestest.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wow.
tomprovost9 August 2006
This movie is just superb. I can't believe I had not even heard of it, hopefully this DVD release will help it find a new audience and some deserved critical acclaim. It's billed as film noir, but it really isn't; it's more an extremely complex, suspenseful family drama. But that doesn't even do it justice. The screenplay is terrific, subtle, thoughtful, and at the same time, razor sharp. Some of the exchanges between Conte and Hayward in particular are electrifying. Talk about two 'tough cookies' that ignite when they get together. And you really begin to care deeply about what happens to them. (All of the acting is top notch, across the board.) And then there is the direction by Joseph L. Mankiewicz. The movie is so beautifully crafted and feels as if it could have been made yesterday, it's gritty and urban and fresh. The composition in the movie has deep meaning in just about every shot, and is gorgeous to behold besides. Watch this movie.
29 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Monetti and his spaghetti
AAdaSC30 June 2013
Edward G Robinson (Gino Monetti) is head of a bank and a family of four sons, three of whom work for him, but none of whom are shown any respect by him. The only son he seems to value is Richard Conte who has his own legal practice, albeit with dodgy customers. One of his customers is Susan Hayward (Irene) who gets the love interest role.

Robinson rules as a dictator. although he does have a funny scene where he compares the old world to the new world, and his business practices come under investigation. As a result of this, Conte tries to protect him but doesn't get very far. The majority of the film is told in flashback, on either side of which we follow Conte as he seeks out his mission of revenge to those who encouraged the downfall of his father.

Keep a look out for the best plate of spaghetti ever filmed. Robinson presides over his family every Wednesday evening when they are required to attend a family meal. They take their places around the table, sit in silence and wait for everyone to arrive before they can start to eat while listening to Robinson's opera records at a volume of 3 million decibels. On this particular occasion, they wait for Conte to arrive. It's a strained atmosphere but definitely worth the wait when that pasta shows up.

The film gets you involved in a family drama that throws in an un-anticipated end sequence that pushes the story to another level. It's an entertaining film that emphasizes dialogue and drama more than action. All the cast do well with a special mention to oldest brother Luther Adler (Joe). Not sure why Susan Hayward is billed above Richard Conte, though.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
NOT A LIKEABLE CHARACTER IN THE BUNCH
breemoria31 August 2019
I don't get the glowing reviews. The tyrant was betrayed by his wife who created a triumvirate of tyrants and she lost them all. The antihero was a narcissist and his girl was "complicated". If this were the Mob, there would have been blood everywhere. A sad story about sad people.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Smoothly crafted studio product.
gregcouture21 March 2004
This is one of those well-crafted films from Twentieth-Century Fox when that studio employed some extraordinary talents both before and behind the cameras. Although he wasn't a Fox contractee, Edward G. Robinson gives a great performance as a wealthy Italian family's patriarch and he is well-matched by everyone else in the cast, especially Richard Conte, Luther Adler, and Susan Hayward, looking terrifically classy. The script bears some obvious signs of being polished by the director, Joseph L. Mankiewicz, and the technical credits are absolutely top-drawer.

Remade as a Western in CinemaScope and Color by DeLuxe in 1954, entitled "Broken Lance" with Spencer Tracy cast as the domineering father, the direction by Edward Dmytryk was not up to the standard of this earlier film with its then contemporary setting. This one is available on video (and seems to be very rarely exhumed on TV now) and is definitely worth a look.
27 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
95+ minutes of verbal pugilistics
Lennie_G6 January 2023
The screenplay here, especially the dialogue is sparse. There are tense scenes of disagreements, insults, and arguments. That's where most of the drama lies. There is an undercurrent of the mafia, especially that seen in mafia gangster movies. Intimidation, threats and insults, predominate. Indeed, it reminds me much of the movie The Godfather, though I haven't read Mario Puzo's book. After a while, however, the insults and arguments grow tiresome, and it needs to have been broken up by some genuine feelings. There is some redemption near the end of the movie which saves it from being a disaster.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
What a movie !
richardskranium19 November 2018
This film is intense. The story is solid. The acting is riveting. There is nothing slow or lukewarm about this film. In my opinion this film is much better,realistic and poignant than the entire bloated 'Godfather' trilogy. It will stick with you I promise.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a gripping tale at large under Mr. Mankiewicz's proficient supervision
lasttimeisaw1 September 2017
In 1949, the soon-to-be Hollywood dignitary Joseph L. Mankiewicz, who would win 4 Oscars within two consecutive years (2 for directing and 2 for writing), knocks out two features, while A LETTER TO THREE WIVES takes all the spotlight in January (and the paycheck is Mr. Mankiewicz's first two Oscars, a full-year after), HOUSE OF STRANGERS, released five months later after its debut in Cannes, is ill-fatedly pigeonholed and regarded as a trou normand before the advent of his unqualified pièce de résistance ALL ABOUT EVE (1950), garnering another 2 naked golden statuettes for the champ.

Based on Phillip Yordan's novel I'LL NEVER GO THERE ANY MORE, the film is a studio-bound feud within the Monetti family, the patriarch Gino (Robinson) is an Italian banker in the East Side of New York, who starts his enterprise from scratch, begets four sons and his druthers is the second-born Max (Conte), who is a lawyer by vocation, whereas the other three work for the family bank.

The film starts on the day Max is released from prison after a 7-year stint, bays for blood after an altercation with his brothers and rebuffs the proposition to start anew in San Francisco with his old flame Irene Bennett (Hayward), at that point Gino has already been pushing up daisies. Then the flashback prompts to dwell on the familial tension from its initial stage, how Gino's preferential disposition detrimentally splinters his family into the titular "house of strangers" and causes deep rift when the family bank clashes with government investigation, and the story cogently flags up the capitalistic avarice, posits Gino as an usurious tyrant squeezing pecuniary gain out of the have-nots. Max is the only son who is spoiling for extricating Gino from the legal mire, but he is hoisted by his own petard when he tries to bribe a juror while his eldest brother Joe (Adler) has already secretly shopped him, that costs him a good 7-year and now he is back for vendetta, implanted by a vengeful Gino before his demise, can the ominous fratricide be averted in the eleventh hour?

Edward G. Robinson meritoriously won the BEST ACTOR trophy in Cannes and here his pompous mien writs large through the most compelling register, his Gino is an unrepentant egoist, a terrible father, paternalistic and uncouth, sticks to the value of family and tradition but has no clue that poison has already been interjecting into his progeny through their upbringing: the wicked, the spoiled, the dumb and the craven, here is the Monetti Quartet.

Max, played by a shifty-looking Richard Conte, is at first, nothing less repugnant than his magisterial father (both have the dastardly proclivity for laying their hands on women when confronted, can Mr. Robinson vanquishes a towering Hope Emerson in real life? The odds are not good on him!), but he is bestowed with a redeeming factor that he is the most upstanding one among the offspring to deserve a brighter future, but bemusing still, Max's final change-of-mind is cavalierly oversimplified. Susan Hayward, whose star was rising at then, channels a femme-fatale mystique on top of Irene's lonesome dame cliché, and Luther Adler, nearly upstages the rest with his fiendishly self-seeking turn as the nefarious Joe.

Honestly, HOUSE OF STRANGERS is a gripping tale at large under Mr. Mankiewicz's proficient supervision, on the technical level, it is as good as any top-drawer monochromatic studio fare of that time, only the shady nuts-and-bolts of the doctrinaire story take the shine off the outstanding teamwork.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It's directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz....need I say more?!
planktonrules10 December 2011
Joseph L. Mankiewicz had an amazing run in Hollywood during the late 1940s and into the 50s. Aside from his HUGE misfire later in life ("Cleopatra"), he had an incredible string of successes--one brilliant film after another. Just think about it--he directed "A Letter to Three Wives", "House of Strangers", "No Way Out", "All About Eve" and "People Will Talk" all one after the other! Any one of these films would make a director proud--and yet Mank also wrote these films! Wow.

"House of Strangers" is unusual for me because I rarely watch a movie more than once (this could explain part of how I've reviewed so many movies). But, because I loved it so much the first time, I thought I'd watch it again. The film was remade only a few years later as "Broken Lance"--also a good film but not in the same league as "House of Strangers". It was also remade only a few years after that as "The Big Show". Obviously, it was an awfully good script.

The film begins with one son (Richard Conte) arriving at his huge family home. It seems he'd just completed a stretch in prison. Why he went to prison and what's happened in this family unfolds slowly through the course of the film. I really like this style. Instead of telling a straight sequential narrative, this approach increases the suspense greatly.

As for the rest of the cast, the film is filled with some great talents. Edward G. Robinson is at his best as a manipulative and dictatorial family patriarch--and proves he was much more than a one-note actor who played gangsters. Luther Adler, Susan Hayward and even a young Efrem Zimbalist Jr. are on hand to round out the cast. And, although I mentioned him earlier, Conte is great--and it's one of his best roles (along with the highly underrated "Thieves' Highway").

The bottom line is like the best of Mankiewicz's films, it's all about PEOPLE and ACTING. You don't watch a Mankiewicz film for spectacle or action (thus the failure of "Cleopatra") but for dynamite acting, great characters and dialog--fantastic, fantastic dialog. For example, watch the scene where Hayward and Conte first meet--it's brilliant and memorable. Also, the ending is just great--very tense and very brutal--sort of like a 'family noir' picture!
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Conte and Hayward make a great team
kidboots19 January 2008
"House of Strangers" has done me a great service. Richard Conte has always been in my mind as the sadistic husband in "I"ll Cry Tomorrow" - the chap who trips Susan Hayward up so people will think she is drunk, the one who doesn't call her up when he says, so, (he hopes) she will start drinking again. I have seen him in other films but none was able to erase that memory.

So seeing him and Susan Hayward in "House of Strangers" as a fiery but decent couple has softened him in my eyes.

The story is told in flashback as Max (Richard Conte) goes to the bank, after years in prison, to have revenge on his family. Later at the family home he thinks over past events.

Edward G. Robinson plays Gino Monetti a powerful banker whose sons have to do his bidding. Richard Conte plays Max, who is an attorney, instead of following his brothers into the bank. He is also the only son who is treated with respect by the father and the other brothers resent it.

He also begins a tempestuous affair with Susan Hayward while his fiancée (Debra Paget) sits meekly by. The father is bought to trial for "cooking the books" and Max goes to jail for 7 years for trying to bribe a member of the jury. From his cell he is inundated with letters from his father filling him with hatred for his brothers.

The last 15 minutes are a real shock and brings the film up a few notches. Susan Hayward is her typically fiesty self and does a lot more with the character than is written. Edward G. Robinson over-acts as the larger than life Italian banker.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A great 1949 drama
AlanSquier28 March 2007
This masterful adaptation of Jerome Weidman's novel stars Edward G. Robinson (arguably his best performance) as an Italian immigrant turned successful and wealthy banker. His hard-nosed attitude alienates three of his sons (portrayed by Efrem Zimbalist Jr., Paul Valentine and the always superb Luther Adler). His fourth son (the film noir regular, Richard Conte) however worships the ground his dad walks on. This doesn't go over so well with his brothers.

Although billed as a film noir, the film is as much a family drama as a thriller - and an extremely good one. Excellent screenplay by Philip Yordan. Robinson won the best actor award at the Cannes Film Festival for his performance.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great dramatic, meaty parts
HotToastyRag2 August 2018
If you're not told House of Strangers is an Italian-American reboot of King Lear, you might not catch on. But once you figure it out, the similarities will be extremely apparent. Starring Edward G. Robinson, a man's family dynamic is in jeopardy as his four sons, Richard Conte, Luther Adler, Paul Valentine, and Efrem Zimbalist, Jr., grow up and turn against each other.

If you're an Edward G. Robinson fan, you'll definitely want to rent this movie to see him in a very meaty role. He's larger than life, warm, strong, forceful, and as always, has a huge heart. If you're a Richard Conte fan, you'll also want to rent this movie. He usually plays a bad guy, but in this movie, he has the biggest part and it's clear from the get-go you're supposed to root for him. Everyone in the film has a natural chemistry together, and the explosive tempers make it very believable they're all one "happy" family. And if you'd liked this version, check out Broken Lance, another modern King Lear adaptation starring Spencer Tracy and Richard Widmark!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Superb Robinson role of a tyrant and a dysfunctional family
SimonJack8 December 2021
"House of Strangers" clearly is a film noir drama and crime story. But more than anything else, it's a showcase for the talent of Edward G. Robinson. This is a great performance by a great actor who never got so much as a nomination from any of the major groups in the film world. It always strikes me as a bit strange - maybe even a picture of a hypocritical and belatedly humiliated and humbled Hollywood, when it gives an honorary award for someone "who achieved greatness as a player, a patron of the arts, and a dedicated citizen, etc." But the person was never great enough to even be nominated once? Especially, when there's a list of outstanding films that he or she appeared in, either in a leading role or in a major supporting role.

Well, Mr. Robinson got his honorary Oscar in 1973. The fact that this took place at the March 27 Academy Awards ceremony -- two months and one day after Robinson died, further suggests the idea that the moguls of Hollywood (actors, directors and producers) were a little shame-faced and trying to save face. For posterity, the records would show that they did indeed honor this great actor. The albeit is that it was with a guilty conscience and almost in hindsight after he had died.

Edward G. Robinson has played a crook, a conman, a cop, a comic, and a crime boss. He was the consummate tough guy whether in a gangster movie, a war film, or a caper comedy.. Whatever role he had, Robinson was a fine actor and entertainer.

In this movie, Robinson plays Gino Monetti, an Italian immigrant who has made good. The uneducated tough guy worked hard to get where he is. Now he has a significant financial operation in a tough neighborhood of New York City. Many people rely on Monetti and his bank to help them in crises and their small businesses The trouble is, Gino doesn't know the rules - or the law and the regulations governing banking. So, he operates on the basis of handshakes, oral agreements and hand-scribbled notes. We see him as a kind-hearted guy helping out a widow who needs train fare for a dying relative. And, we see him taking a big cut of a loan to a street merchant who needs to buy a new horse to pull his wagon.

But the main story is about his family,. He has four sons. It's a very dysfunctional family. He treats three of the sons like dirt while favoring one of the younger of the two, Max, who has become a lawyer. The others are lackeys working as window clerks and guards in the bank.

All of this will lead to family disputes and conflicts that tear the family apart. As the matron of the family says, when times were tough and they had a barbershop they were a family and happy. But now they have nothing in the midst of plenty. After Gino dies, she says she no longer has four sons. The plot in which all of this comes about is noir and high grade drama.

Besides Robinson's central role, Richard Conte shares the limelight as Max. And, after he meets Susan Hayward's Irene Bennett, sparks of a sort fly hither and thither. Max and Irene have a running feud of words that are put-downs, insults, jabs and dismissals. So, naturally, they fall in love. Indeed, it isn't natural and it's the hardest subplot of this film to swallow. While such a relationship between two such personalities surely does happen sometimes, it would have to be extremely rare. Their spatting dialog maybe was intended to put some spice and wit into this film, but I think it's mostly a deviation from the Monetti family collapse.

Those who enjoy noir films should go for this one in a big way. Those who don't care for the sub-genre should probably skip it entirely. For other fans, it depends on what else may be appealing or not so - family dysfunction, tyrannical family head, very disrespectful treatment of a woman, etc. My eight stars are for the acting - not only by Robinson, but by most of the rest of the cast as well.

Here are a couple of the better lines in this film.

Joe Monetti, "A man who throws away money is a big worry. A big problem."

Max Monetti, "Vengeance is a rare wine, a joy divine, says the Arab."
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Involving gangster story
Leofwine_draca6 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A pretty good gangster movie from 1949. The interesting part of the tale is told in flashback and benefits from a typically larger-than-life performance from Edward G. Robinson playing a kind of kingpin. The familial relationships that make up the crux of the story are handled in an interesting way, and it's nice to see Richard Conte given a bigger role than usual to get his teeth into. Involving stuff.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An Early Example of Nontraditional Casting
Handlinghandel2 February 2006
Edward G. Robinson is all wrong as the patriarch of an Italian-American family. He was a marvelous actor -- one of my favorites. And this was not his first Italian. But the pigeon English is so overdone as to be preposterous. The makeup, with a dark mustache, is no help either.

True, other (presumably) non-Italians are in similar roles here. But they underplay. Hope Emerson, Debra Paget, and (as one of his sons) Luther Adler are among these.

Richard Conte is excellent as the son who appreciates the father's efforts and goes to jail for doing so. But think of Conte, cast slightly against ethnic type, in "Thieves Highway" and his father -- Lee J. Cobb -- there. Cobb does not affect a Vaudeville show Greek accent there and it's a shame that Robinson was directed to here.

The story is compelling but it's hard to get past this.

Susan Hayward plays Susan Hayward. In early scenes between her and Conte, he seems to be picking up her mannerisms as they spit consonants at each other.

The role she plays doesn't seem to me to have much to do with the rest of the story. Using "Thieves Highway" as a comparison again -- and I admit it is somewhat arbitrary to do so -- Valentina Cortese's character is more organic to the plot. Here, the Hayward/Conte romance is more like a separate picture than like a subplot.
10 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed