Napoléon II, l'aiglon (1961) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Broken wings.
dbdumonteil2 October 2006
France had begun its first experiments in Cinemascope : these (still rare) movies all dealt with historic events: there was Dreville's "LA Fayette" ,Gance 's "Austerlitz" and this one "Napoleon II :L'Aiglon".But these works had more in common: the lead was not really a big star ,even by France's standards :Michel LeRoyer as the NEW World's hero,Pierre Mondy as Napoleon the Father and Bernard Verley as Napoleon the Son.And these leads were given support by stars by the dozen (Orson Welles was featured in the first two works).

"L'Aiglon " was once played by Sarah Bernardt on stage.But here ,it's an actor!Bernard Verley has enough romanticism in him to succeed in his portrayal.Around him,much more celebrated actors appear in two or three scenes :Jean Marais (during an intermission in the opera theater),Georges Marchal,Jean-Pierre Cassel .Josef Meinrad as Granddad and François Maistre as the mischievous Metternich play more prominent parts.

Directing is not up to scratch and the love affair with Thérèse Pêche was not really one in real life:historians often wrote that "L'Aiglon" died a virgin man.And Sophie ,whose part is boiled down to a walk on ,was his real confidant.It's that Sophie who grew up into Sissi's mother-in-law fans of Marischka 's trilogy know well.

L'Aiglon was a prisoner.And in a prison you can't escape from cause your prison is your own family.He underwent a brainwashing: he had to forget everything from the French language to his Tuileries memories.The film was watered-down for that matter.On the other hand,Marie-Louise's obnoxious behavior is not passed over in silence.

But a romantic hero such as l'Aiglon should attract a director in search of a remake: he could do much better.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Great cast for a low budget costume stinker
braniki5 March 2009
I was looking forward to watch this rather unknown historical tale. Especially when I saw on the packaging of the old tape I came across that there would be no less than Jean Marais, George Marchal and Jean Pierre Cassel as supportive actors for what was about to be an ambitious film adaptation of the short lived heir of the Emperor Napoleon.

Alas! they all do some short appearances and the whole thing has to be born on the poor Bernard Verley's shoulders. The uncharismatic young actor can hardly deliver a line without wining (even if it has to be typical of the character). You just can't wait to see him die, which takes more than 100 minutes to happen, by the way. All in all, production values are pretty lame in spite of the fact that most of the film was shot in some genuine historical settings, which ARE really impressive but don't do the trick though.

Sacha Gutiry would probably have done something interesting out of this subject. Dialogues establish historical facts, but no humanity actually comes out of this poorly done puppet play. Hardely good enough to make a decent TV movie of the 60s. Even colors are not so good (maybe the copy I watched was to blame). Not much recommended... only to go to sleep maybe.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed