The Very Edge (1963) Poster

(1963)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not exactly cutting edge
melvelvit-116 March 2014
A sex maniac (SHERLOCK HOLMES' Jeremy Brett) breaks into the home of happy housewife Tracey Lawrence (Anne Heywood) to assault and almost rape her which causes the girl to miscarry and become frigid. This, of course, is a problem for her husband, Geoffrey (Richard Todd), who finds solace in the arms of his sympathetic secretary (Nicole Maurey) but that's the least of Tracey's worries because the pervert makes it clear he'll stop at nothing to have at her again...

Britain was way ahead of the U.S. when it came to tackling adult subject matter in a mature manner beginning with THE VICTIM but that isn't always the right approach as THE VERY EDGE proves. Although marketed as exploitation ("No Woman Should See This Film Without A Man!"), it's actually a rather subdued "thriller" that comes perilously close to "timid" so don't expect many surprises. Unlike similarly-themed Hollywood exploitation shockers such as THE BEAT GENERATION and WHO KILLED TEDDY BEAR?, Tracey isn't raped in lurid fashion, just chased around the living room a few times but that said, the film's ahead of the curve on "stalking", a crime that wouldn't register on public consciousness until decades later.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Very Thought Of You
boblipton9 June 2019
When Jeremy Brett assaults Anne Heywood, the aftermath has longterm effects on her and husband Richard Todd in this well wrought thriller.

This movie tries to say something real about the mental issues involved in stalking: the stalker's obsession, the victim's fears, the ancillaries victims' suffering. It's a matter that has consumed Western lawmaking for millennia, with no clear consensus yet in sight. What are we to conclude when Jeremy Brett's character says he is consumed with thoughts of Heywood? Blaming the victim may be satisfactory from the criminal's viewpoint, but my brand of libertarianism includes personal responsibility and the assertion that criminals, whether they commit crimes because of mental illness or conscious decision, should bear the burden of their transgressions; every time I watch a movie and the perp announces that the next crime is the fault of the victim or the police officer who has failed to shoot him.... puh-leeze!

Such issues are not going to be solved, or even adequately addressed in 90-mnute second features like this. Good performances, like those here, may make an entertaining thriller, but they butter no parsnips.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
There's nothing left to be afraid of
kapelusznik189 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
****SPOILERS***The love sick chain smoking and mentally unhinged Charlie Mullen, Jeremy Brett, has been stalking Tracey Lawrence, Anne Heywood, for months and finally got his chance to get her alone when her husband Geoffrey, Richard Todd,was out to work. That only for him ending up to get splashed in his face with a chemical mixture that Tracey mixed up for a neighbor, little Silina- played by 7 year old Verina Greenlaw- who fell and scraped herself, when he tried to attack and grab on to her. That not only resulted in Tracey going into shock but also losing her baby due to a miscarriage. With her husband Geoffrey and the police trying to apprehend the fleeing Mullen Tracey now loses all interest in men as well as her husband Geoffrey in him trying to comfort her in him reminding her of Mullens' attempted assault on her.

What also happened is that incredibly Tracey developed a feeling for her attacker that kept her from helping the police from capturing hi. That even when he was caught and she was told to identify him in a police line up which she refused to do. This not only freed Mullen but emboldened him to continue his stalking of her that lead to the films shocking final. That's when Mullen caught Tracey alone on a roof and almost childishly tried to make up for all the trouble her had caused her!

****SPOILERS**** Ahead of its time movie about a sexual predator that in fact shows his side, as crazy as it is, of the story. Mullen as we find out really didn't want to hurt or rape Tracey but just get to know and be friendly with her. The fact that she was married and he was unstable didn't come into the equation with him that lead to his tragic end. Not by the police or even Tracey, who's attempt to kill herself stopped Mullen dead in his tracks, but when knowing its all over Mullen took a flying leap that finally ended his obsession about her!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth seeing for Jeremy Brett
Tinlizzy18 September 1999
This is a mediocre film which contains a remarkable performance. Jeremy Brett is scary and pitiable as a stalker who is obsessed with Anne Heywood's helpless housewife. I found his performance absolutely convincing and incredibly intense. The subject matter of the film is certainly timely, but the rest of the performances are workmanlike at best and no one else seems to have any particular passion in their role--though Anne Heywood is at least watchable.
15 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wasted opportunities.
hitchcockthelegend20 February 2014
The Very Edge is directed by Cyril Frankel and written by Leslie Bricusse and Vivian Cox. It stars Richard Todd, Anne Heywood, Jack Hedley, Jeremy Brett, Nicole Maurey, Maurice Denham, William Lucas and Patrick Magee. Music is by David Lee and cinematography by Robert Huke.

After she is assaulted in her own home by unhinged admirer Mullen (Brett), Tracey Lawrence (Heywood) struggles to keep control of her marriage to Geoffrey (Todd), who himself doesn't quite know how to react to Tracey's trauma. More pressing is that Mullen is still on the loose and clearly isn't going to go away...

It should be better, there is so much promise on offer of a real frightening "stalker" movie, but it ultimately ends up as a standard meller. Where it does score favourably is with the character strands that deal with a once happy marriage coming apart at the seams post the trauma incident. Things are further complicated by husband Geoffrey's French personal assistant, Helen (Maurey), who senses the time is right to confess her passions for Geoff!

Lurking around the dark corners of this emotionally bubbling human stew is Mullen, a genuinely twitchy and edgy menace of frightening capabilities, with the character brilliantly realised by future Sherlock Holmes, Jeremy Brett. It's all built competently by Frankel, brick by formulaic brick, right up to a roof top finale which brings the audience of the time the expected results. Magee is unfortunately only used sparingly, but with Heywood and Brett giving riveting readings, the staid acting elsewhere doesn't hurt the picture. While David Lee's music is excellent, a constant low tone plinking of foreboding menace.

A wasted opportunity? Yes, pretty much, but some value to be found in certain quarters. 6.5/10
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very Edge of Blandness
Chrid-9096 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
With all respect to another contributor's otherwise decent review, I would like to point out that this is certainly not a 'noir' picture. It is a straightforward modern (in 1963) drama/thriller. There are few dark shadows and there are not meant to be.

The setting is a newly built middle-class estate of which there are thousands like it in Britain. These kinds of estates usually have quite wide streets and the houses are often fairly widely spaced. The interior of the house is bright and airy. This does not give a gloomy noir type location and that is the whole point. The setting SHOULD be innocuous.

Neither are the main characters in the least bit noirish. The principle lady is not a femme fatale, she is an attractive housewife who is expecting a child and who is shown to be a kind auntie figure to the little neighbour girl.

The husband is not a figure of doom and destiny, he is a rather staid architect who only begins to look at his secretary after a long period of denial by his wife. The secretary, who by the way, COULD have been cast as a femme fatale, is an efficient but lonely divorcée played by an actress who is rather plain and certainly less attractive than the wife.

It is not the locations and characters that are meant to represent the darkness in this film; it is the male intruder who attacks the wife. As other reviewers have pointed out, this intruder is played with a convincing mixture of menace and vulnerability by a young Jeremy Brett.

As no other reviewer has touched upon it, I would like to mention a point that struck me, namely the odd performance by Jack Hedley in the role of the inspector who is brought in from the Yard to supervise the case. In the scene where he first appears, where he visits the couple, the camera rather lingers on his face and he seems to be having strange thoughts.

Perhaps the actor was merely trying to convey worry or hesitation about warning the couple that the attacker is a stalker whose only agenda is the wife but I can't help getting the feeling that the director wants us to see something more to it than that. This feeling is reinforced in the rooftop finale at the end of the movie.

After the husband has lifted his wife to safety, instead of ending with a conventional shot of the couple kissing or hugging, the director allows them to leave the shot and the last thing we see is the inspector picking up the wife's high-heeled shoes and holding them at his chest as he looks away into the distance and the frame contracts to black.

All in all, not a bad film, but one would have preferred another actor to Richard Todd, who seems to have been rather typecast in this sort of role, and the secretary could have been more alluring.

On a comical note, look out for a shot of the couple running along a beach in swimsuits in which the bodily proportions of Todd - big head, little body - are on rather unflattering show!
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
That dreadful music
malcolmgsw21 March 2016
One gets the impression that when they hired David Lee to compose the music they just told him that they wanted it loud so people wouldn't take too much notice what was going on on the screen.This film just piles on cliché after cliché.The dye which Brett manages to cover with makeup.He manages to follow Heywood to the zoo.Then,like all screen maniacs he escaped from prison,totally unexplained.Every character in the film seems to have a screw loose.What is the final shot of the film all about,why does he clasp Heywoods shoes to his chest?Is he a secret foot fetishists? Richard Todd,approaching the end of his film career looks rather bemused by it all.Anne Heywood does the best she can with a fatherless part.Brett does what all screen sex maniacs do,he looks very maniacal.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Jeremy Brett plays a psychopath? I gotta see this...
planktonrules24 February 2017
Many folks remember that Jeremy Brett was made famous by starring in a ton of wonderful Sherlock Holmes episodes in the 1980s up to his death in 1995. For Conan Doyle fans like myself, they are simply the best versions of the classic tales. So when I saw that Brett played a crazed intruder in this 1960s film, I had to see it! The only other film I recall seeing him in was "My Fair Lady".

Tracey (Anne Heywood) is a married lady who has done some modeling. A crazed man (Brett) has apparently seen her photos in magazines and has convinced himself that they are in love and he MUST possess her. She learns of this when he breaks into her house and attacks her. She is able to fight him off and her husband's arrival home results in his running. After, he continues to watch and follow her as well as make threatening phone calls to her. This has all made her life a living hell and the marriage is suffering as well. Ultimately, the man is caught...but this isn't a complete end to her problems.

I appreciated that this film was not just a thriller but focused a lot on the psychological damaged done to the victim. The effect on her sex life, the marriage and her depression are shown very well in this movie and this impressed me about the film. It had surprising depth and realism. It also showed the degree to which the marriage disintegrated...a sadly overlooked problem in cases involving some rapes. attempted rapes and the like.

By the way, according to IMDb, Miss Heywood was Miss Britain in 1949 or 50 (it says both years).
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boring!
RodrigAndrisan30 May 2019
Nicole Maurey was very good in the role of Elena Antonescu in "Secret of the Incas" opposite Charlton Heston. Here too she is the most compelling, she does the best role. The other actors, Richard Todd, Anne Heywood, are not in their best form. Because the story is boring, uninteresting.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed