Guess What We Learned in School Today? (1970) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Guess What We Learned in School Today? was a very uneven Generation Gap/Sex comedy from John G. Avildsen
tavm15 December 2009
Just watched on YouTube this rarity from one John G. Avildsen before his fame from Joe, Save the Tiger, Rocky, and the Karate Kid movies. This is a comedy about the Generation Gap and the ridiculous reactions among the middle agers of sex education for young kids being some kind of Communist plot. Rita and Lance Battle (Jane McLeod and Zachary Hains) are the parents of a teenage boy, Robbie (Devin Goldenberg), who happens to have a crush on his babysitter, Lydia (Diane Moore). Their neighbors are police Lt. Roger and Eve Manley (Dick Carballo and Rosella Olsen). Both Roger and Lance are against a psychiatrist, a Dr. Lily Whitehorn (Yvonne McCall), teaching sex education at her school for underage kids. It should be noted that both men have hangups as Lance can't bed his wife and Roger seems to be bi as evidenced by his relationship with female dresser Billie (Stanton Edgehill). I'll stop there and just say that the whole thing has a jump cut structure meant to emphasize some jokes that mostly don't work but is fascinating to watch. The discussions of Dr. Whitehorn with various students about sex and certain words are perhaps the most compellingly naturalistic dialogue of the entire thing that one gets the feeling that that was improvised while the other scripted parts seem obviously contrived. And then there are some stupid characterizations like that of a stuttering mailman (Jan Saint) who likes looking at "dirty" pictures or the aforementioned husbands. I did, however, like the nude bodies of the blondes, Ms. Olsen and Moore with the redhead Ms. McLeod not looking so bad, either. In summation, Guess What We Learned in School Today? gets some points in conception but almost nothing in execution. P.S. The little girl voicing the opening credits is the director's daughter, Katherine, and if I didn't read the cast list on IMDb, I wouldn't have recognized the first radio voice as that of Bret Morrison who I knew played Lamont Cranston/The Shadow on the old radio program, "The Shadow". Oh, and he's also a native of the same city I was born in, Chicago, Ill.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
YOU CAN'T PEEP AT WHAT NO ONE IS HIDING
nogodnomasters5 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This is a campy film about how sex education was viewed as a communist plot. The film had dated gags and political incorrectness. There is a scene where a man in the shower asks his wife to toss him the shampoo. She picks up the Prell and tosses it in the shower as we hear glass break. The Prell ads of the era showed that Prell came in a plastic container and could be tossed without breaking, one of the first shampoos to use a plastic container as opposed to glass. I would think half the population would miss that one. They also ate "Uncle Tom's Pancakes." Ouch!

The film simply isn't that funny anymore. It includes many 1 credit actors.

Guide: F-bomb...maybe 2. Nudity (Jane McLeod, Rosella Olsen, Dianne Moore, Sandra Wolfe + others)
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It never pays off
iamshawnieb28 June 2021
It's like an X-rated movie from the 70's that caused all the controversy this film talks about. But it never takes that step forward to be as daring as they were. Those movies, while most were not great as films, have a place in film history challenging the rating system, censorship and societal norms. This movie falls well behind in that.

As a film, it doesn't work because the story is all over the place. The points it tries to make are often undermined by stupid cuts and plot devices. From the director of one of my favorite films ever, Rocky, I expected more competency.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uneven but still fascinating capsule on early '70's
The Hoyk9 January 2003
John G. Avildsen, before becoming the respectable director of uplifting "climb to victory" tales like ROCKY and 8 SECONDS, made this scattershot counterculture comedy about sex and suburbia. Like many movies of this period, including Brian DePalma's GREETINGS and Aram Avakian's END OF THE ROAD, the movie clumsily copies the jump-cutting, "fourth wall" breaking, and blackout staging of Jean-Luc Godard's inflential films previous to this, which may have seemed daring but serves now only to alienate the initial viewer of today. While there is the hint of a plot -- a community's resistence to sex education -- ultimately this is a clothesline to hang running gags: a too-vigilant vice cop, a suburban mom who talks in TV commercial jargon, a sheltered teen attracted to his babysitter, etc. Some gags are effective, others tedious. What does hold up in this movie is the actual sex education advice provided by the would-be visiting educator. It is honest, direct, and still relevant today. It stands out amid the ham-handed comedy antics. However, the message loses some effectiveness among the easy stereotyping of the middle-aged "squares." One cannot ask everything to be written as dryly and facutal as the average ABC Afterschool Special, but a little more realism and a little less condescending caricature would have given this the kind of longetivity that would make it better known, instead of the curious video obscurity it is now. Recommended primarily to those either nostalgic or curious about the early '70's.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Tries to be funny and sexy and well...you know...
BandSAboutMovies14 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Made before Joe but distributed by Cannon thanks to that movie's success, director John G. Avildsen's film - he wrote the story as well, which was screenwritten by Eugene Price (Smash-Up on Interstate 5) - has a small town believing that sex education is part of a Communist plot. So, you know, 2022 fifty-two years early.

There are three main characters here:

Roger (Dick Carballo, the second unit director of Avildsen's Cry Uncle) is a cop who may be gay, definitely entraps women and gives them tickets and then finds love with an African-American transsexual.

Lily Whitehorn (Yvonne McCall) runs a clothing-optional sex institute that drives the town into a maniacal mob.

Lance Battle (Zachary Hains) is a former Marine against sex education whose wife Rita (Jane McLeod) is obsessed with her son Robbie (Devin Goldenberg, who would go on to write The Happy Hooker Goes Hollywood) to the point that she pays for babysitter Lydia (Diane Moore, Vampire Trailer Park) to read pornography to him and give him hand pleasure, followed by her sending neighbor Eve Manley (Rosella Olsen, I Dismember Mama) to take her son's virginity while across the street, her husband takes her from behind - all while she moans her son's name.

Obviously, the satire is quite sledgehammer.

Also known as Guess What!?!, Sex-Sex-Sex and I Ain't No Buffalo, this movie is charitably a mess, but the end of the 60s, the start of Cannon and the fact that this played Cannes all make it worth a historic watch.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
1971 Take On Sex Education? Hahahaha.
So funny. Skin shown which is great. So many jokes that would be cancelled in todays' cancel culture. I thought it was fun and stylish!!! Funny.

7/10.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Amusing oddball comedy romp
Woodyanders6 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The uptight grown-ups in a stuffy small town try to prevent their kids from receiving a proper education on sex. That's about it for the admittedly flimsy plot, but fortunately director John G. Avidsen keeps the pace moving along at a brisk clip and maintains an amiably inane'n'irreverent tone throughout. Meanwhile, the disjointed narrative structure and occasional breaking of the fourth wall give this screwball outing an engaging "what the hell?" experimental countercultural bent that's very indicative of the sunny carefree innocent vibe of the early 1970's. Eugene Price's breezy off the wall script happily pokes fun at puritanical middle class sexual mores and conservative small town values in a pleasant and good-natured way. Granted, the characters are broadly drawn caricatures and the satire is decidedly less than subtle, but overall it's just too bubbly and goofy to dislike. Moreover, it's acted with zest by a lively cast, with especially energetic contributions from Zachary Hains as gung-ho military freak Lance Battle, June McLeod as Battle's frustrated wife Rita, Dick Carballo as killjoy vice cop Lt. Roger Manley, Yvonne McCall as chipper sex ed teacher Dr. Lilly Whitehorn, Rosella Olsen as the daffy Eve, Diane Moore as attractive spunky blonde Lydia, and Iris Brooks as the brash Lulu. Of course, the generous sprinkling of yummy female nudity certainly doesn't hurt matters any. Good zany fun.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Guess What We Learned in School Today is a random and entertaining film that's worth a watch if you're seeking something different
kevin_robbins11 February 2024
I recently watched Guess What We Learned in School Today (1970) on Prime. The storyline follows a community that views sex as evil, and a school teacher who aims to prove them wrong with examples.

Directed by John G. Avildsen (Rocky), the film stars Jean David (Born to Win), Dick Carballo (Cry Uncle), Jane McLeod, Zachary Haines, and Yvonne McCall.

This movie excels in not taking itself too seriously, with random dialogue, circumstances, and comedy. The "water is good, water is life" pool scenes were particularly hilarious. Featuring a plethora of nudity in various shapes and sizes, the carefree elements maintain a light and enjoyable atmosphere.

In conclusion, Guess What We Learned in School Today is a random and entertaining film that's worth a watch if you're seeking something different. I'd score it a 5.5/10 and recommend seeing it once.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed