Scream of the Wolf (TV Movie 1974) Poster

(1974 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
39 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"Werewolf Killer" on the loose!
moonspinner5530 August 2015
A rural community is shaken by gruesome killings in the woods by what appears to be a werewolf (the tracks near the bodies shows four paw prints that soon become two, and then disappear); former hunter-turned-writer Peter Graves assists the local sheriff in unraveling the mystery. Not-bad TV-made thriller has interesting subjective camera-work along with the proverbial fog in the woods and snarling sound effects. Graves is solid, as usual, and has a few intense scenes with maniacal 'old friend' Clint Walker, but it's too bad writer Richard Matheson felt the need to cover all his bases plot-wise. The more explanations we get in the finale, the more ridiculous it all begins to seem. Director Dan Curtis also produced, in what appears to be a case for The Night Stalker. Robert Cobert is responsible for the erratic music score.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointing Dan Curtis TV Film.
AaronCapenBanner23 August 2013
Director Dan Curtis had an impressive track record after developing the memorable character of Carl Kolchack, played wonderfully by Darren McGavin, in both "The Night Stalker" and "The Night Strangler", and also the one-off "The Norliss Tapes" with Roy Thinnes.

Unfortunately, he doesn't have the same success here, though it does start off strongly with an innocent motorist being killed by a mysterious creature(a werewolf, perhaps?) Several more murders occur, until the twist at the end which is...underwhelming, to say the least. Peter Graves and Clint Walker face off as uneasy friends on opposing sides, since Walker's big game hunter is coldly indifferent to the deaths. He plays it menacingly, but his character(as well as Graves') come off quite flat, and there is little else to distinguish this film and make it memorable. Too bad.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
When one's strange fantasies takes over one's life
sol121819 March 2004
++Major Spoilers++ Former big game hunter and now deranged lunatic Byron Douglas, Clint Walker, comes up with some far-out ideas about life death and the human condition as well as how to bring a little life and excitement into the lives of the people in town by savagely murdering them and at the same time making it look like some kind of werewolf did it.

Even though the movie tries to be suspenseful and keeps you guessing to who the killer is as soon as you see Douglas and how crazed and unstable Douglas is. Just by listening to his off the wall philosophy by talking about how one is most alive just when he's at he moment of death. This makes you almost look over his shoulder to see if you can catch a glimpse of the men in white with stun guns and butterfly nets ready to grab and restrain Douglas in a padded room at the local loony bin.

You watch the movie hoping that whats on the screen is not really happening. In that that those making the film are just trying to keep you off the track by making you think that Douglas is the killer when the real killer is really someone else in the cast that you don't suspect. Still you just can't convince yourself that there's anyone more certain to be the killer then Douglas is and you end up being right.

Were told that Douglas was attacked by some super wolf some time back in Canada which almost killed him and left him in the condition that he's in now. Trying to explain his mental and emotional state and at the same time throws off suspicion about him being the killer but even that falls apart at the end of the movie.

The only way I could follow the story is by realizing that Douglas is crazy, which wasn't hard to do, so whatever he said and did in the movie made sense only to himself not to anyone else. The end of the film ripped off the movie "The Most Dangerous Game" by Douglas pitting friend and former hunting buddy now writer Peter Graves, John Wetherby, against himself in a life and death struggle to see who's fit and strong enough to survive. Even then Douglas cheated by having a vicious wolf as a partner and leaving Wetherby with a rifle with no bullets in it.

Wetherby had to run for some distance to find a box in the woods with only two slugs that Douglas left for him. When it came to the hand to hand combat that Douglas craved for Wetherby pulled out a gun that he secretly had on him a blew Douglas away. Since Douglas murdered six people there was no point for all that ridicules game playing with him.

A major flaw in the movie was why the police never thought of arresting Douglas even though he was the most evident and conspicuous suspect in town. It was nothing but a waste of time trying to figure out Douglas' weird philosophy and sermonizing during the movie because it was just that, weird.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"His Whole Face Is Gone!"...
azathothpwiggins8 September 2018
A series of grisly attacks has the police stumped. So, they call in expert John Wetherby (Peter Graves), who calls in big game hunter Byron Douglas (Clint Walker) who is basically a turtleneck-wearing block of granite with enormous sideburns.

When more deaths occur, Wetherby tries without success to convince Byron to help him track down a creature that defies classification. Byron tries to convince Wetherby that mankind is useless and weak, even terrifying a restaurant patron to prove his point.

When Wetherby's girlfriend, Sandy (Jo Ann Pflug) is nearly killed, he decides to hunt the beast. When Wetherby asks Byron for help again, Byron challenges him to arm wrestle. His misanthropic machismo knows no bounds! Can the monster be stopped, before it mutilates more emasculated milquetoasts of modern mankind?

SCREAM OF THE WOLF is another made-for-TV horror movie from Producer / Director Dan Curtis. While not as stellar as some of his other offerings, it's certainly worth a viewing or two. Be sure not to miss the big, semi-shock finale!...
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not Much Balance
chanvat18 August 2003
This film would have been much better if it had some balance. There were no strong supporting actors at all, with Graves and Walker providing outstanding roles and the rest just falling flat on their face.

Graves worked well as the slowly weakening ex-hunter, while Walker did an amazing job portraying the evil and creepy (and still strong) wolf hunter. However, the rest of the actors (especially Graves' girlfriend and the police chief) did a horrible job with their characters.

The fact that the kills really arent portrayed in a gory fashion makes the film feel like less a horror movie and more of a suspense/murder mystery, which bothered me a bit. Additionally, the ending, though a double twist (from not surprising to surprising to not surprising again) was a bit hard to swallow, that and it ends much more abruptly than I would have wished. Overall, not a high recommendation, but still a fairly good representation of low budget 70s fare 5/10.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Let's cut to the chase....is this weirdo a werewolf or not?!
planktonrules16 October 2016
This made for TV movie is from Dan Curtis...and that should come as no surprise as Curtis made a living making low-budget horror films and TV shows--such as the original "Dark Shadows" as well as excellent made for TV films about Dracula, Kolchak (the reporter that investigates monster sightings), possessed African dolls, Frankenstein and others. Most of his work was very good though I wouldn't place "Scream of the Wolf" among his best films.

Some creature has been tearing folks to pieces and John (Peter Graves) is a hunter who's been given the task of killing whatever it is. However, he soon notices that the footprints go from a wolf-like creature to human...but he won't allow himself to believe it's a werewolf. When he tries to get help from a clearly nutty associate, Byron (Clint Walker) has a strange reaction--he's totally disinterested in killing the creature and even seems to be completely ambivalent about all the deaths!! Clearly the viewer is being led to believe that Byron is most likely the wolf-man. And, clearly, Walker's character is about as subtle as a 2x4 upside your head! He's a super freaky weirdo and Walker looks as if he had fun playing this guy. And, although Graves is the leading man in the film, your attention is drawn to Walker whenever he's on the screen. So is Byron the werewolf or is there some other explanation? And, how does this movie end up being very much like the classic film "The Most Deadly Game"?

Considering the budget for this film was pretty low and the ABC movies were made quickly, how they handled the whole werewolf aspect of the story was an interesting idea that worked very well. Not the best movie of the week I've seen but very memorable and fun...in a kooky sort of way. Well worth seeing...and a lot better than the surprisingly low overall score of 5.1 (as of this review).
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
so so
KDWms7 April 2003
If any comments are recent, I usually keep my mouth shut. But, because the reviews of Scream of the Wolf are so few, I'll offer my opinion. I'd say that this is "not bad...not good" (purposefully put in that order): right down the middle. The "not bad" part, I thought, describes the acting. But there are parts of the writing and costuming that I found to be "not good," i. e., too illogical. The plot is suspenseful (and uncomplicated) enough: Catching the culprit(s?) responsible for what becomes six killings in a California town, which includes as its residents (1) a corvette-driving, used-to-be-quite-a-nimrod, bachelor/author (Graves); and his buddy, who he's spending decreasing time with - (2) a turtleneck-wearing, weird-philosophizing, big-game hunter (Walker). (He dresses that way even when splitting wood!) Pflug is Graves' love interest. I wonder if that's the relationship between Walker and his butler (McGowan)? Less veiled is Walker's crush on Graves, in whom the arm-wrestling Walker wants to restore the macho-ism and take to South America. A fifth main cast member is the sheriff (Carey), who would LIKE to benefit from the tracking expertise of BOTH Walker's AND Graves' characters. But only Graves assists. Is there anything supernatural to all this? You'll have to watch the movie to find out. It's an adequate use of your time. Just don't blow too much money.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Is Byron a Werewolf?
krorie17 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is another winner from the pen of sci-fi master writer Richard Matheson, author of the classic film "The Incredible Shrinking Man," though "Scream of the Wolf" plays more as a murder mystery than as a traditional werewolf flick. Made-for-TV on a limited budget, almost nothing is shown in way of special effects, which on the positive side leaves more room for suspense and less room for gore and guts.

It seems some huge wolf is the culprit in a series of murders taking place in the woods around Byron Douglas'(Clint Walker) lair. As Sheriff Vernon Bell (Philip Carey) investigates he uncovers strange tracks indicating a four-footed creature; then the markings become those of a being walking upright; finally, the prints suddenly end as if erased. When dogs are brought in to trail, the scent changes unexpectedly when the tracks end.

Local hunter, now adventure writer, John Wetherby (Peter Graves) is turned to for assistance. He is unconvinced that a werewolf is to blame, determining that either a monster wolf or a human monster is responsible. When he calls on his former hunting buddy, Byron, to participate in the track down, Byron refuses, maintaining that it's time for his old partner to renew his interest in the pursuit of the kill. John's girlfriend, Sandy Miller (Jo Ann Pflug), is partly accountable for his giving up the hunt. She now helps him to catch the perpetrator of the dastardly deeds, placing herself in death's jaws.

The primary suspect from the beginning is weird glory hunter, Byron. But is he really the killer and if so, is he really a werewolf? Another suspect is Byron's man servant, or is he a red herring? He was hired on the basis of his ability to successfully arm wrestle Byron. Or could it be the star of the show, former trophy hunter John Wetherby?

Clint Walker, usually a wooden actor, gives one of his best performances in a different type role. He is convincing as the macho hunter intent on bringing his erstwhile friend back into the game. Peter Graves makes a good foil for him. The rest of the cast is above average for a TV movie from the 1970's.

A major criticism of Matheson's story is toward the end when "Scream of the Werewolf" almost becomes yet another retelling of Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game." Otherwise, this little movie is a gripping murder mystery filled with thrills and chills, with a few frightening scenes, especially if you're watching alone in the dark with dogs howling outside.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Just your run of the mill TV thriller. Nothing very special.
mark.waltz14 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The TV movies of the 1970's, particularly those featuring horror elements, are a mixed bag, with a dozen or so that are now considered cult favorites ("The Initiation of Sarah", "The Devil's Daughter", to name a few) or forgotten sleepers that are worth discovering, like "Crowhaven Farm". "Scream of the Wolf" seems to be of the "Night Stalker" variety, directed by Dan Curtis of "Dark Shadows" fame. He returns to the werewolf theme, but it seems very similar to the 1972 TV werewolf film "Moon of the Wolf" even with obvious differences. Peter Graves and Clint Walker make great adversaries, and Philip Carey is also very good as the local sheriff. However, Joanna Pflug is rather dull as Graves' girlfriend, and there really isn't much mystery. The weak script and predictability is a major problem, and within a half an hour after watching it, I had completely forgotten what the purpose of it was supposed to be.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
ABC Movie Of The Week: SCREAM OF THE WOLF (TV) (Dan Curtis, 1974) **1/2
Bunuel197611 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
While not bad for TV, the final twist reveals this not to be a werewolf film after all (though the medium had dabbled in the subgenre with MOON OF THE WOLF {1972} and even an episode from the KOLCHAK: THE NIGHT STALKER TV series, actually emanating from the same stable and year as this) but Richard Matheson's script - foregoing the generics (the attacks usually involving both an anonymous victim and an unseen assailant, every time the Police converge en masse and to the same pounding score upon the scene of the crime) - is both thoughtful and gripping. The narrative only really supplies a couple of human suspects but, even if the identity of the villain is pretty obvious, it is the reason for his actions that compels attention (ironically, that is what he had intended himself - to rouse the citizens from their placid existence through terror!). Incidentally, I have often remarked about how these kind of urban locations are simply too exposed to make for safe and comfortable living: the curtains are invariably never drawn and houses are shown as being extremely easy to break into!

The cast is headed by Peter Graves (displaying much of the characteristics that made his name in the long-running MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE TV series - being both brawny, a former hunter, and brainy, a writer) and Clint Walker (in what must be one of the best roles he ever had as his ex-buddy who still lives only for the chase, claiming that a prey and its predator are never more alive than at the moment immediately prior to the kill!). Also on hand are Don Megowan (from TV's TALES OF FRANKENSTEIN {1958} and CREATION OF THE HUMANOIS {1962}) as a man who had so impressed Walker, by giving him a hard time at arm-wrestling, that he is hired as his personal manservant(!) and bartender Jo Ann Pflug as Graves' romantic interest (who instantly distrusts Walker and is eventually almost killed herself by the 'monster'). For what it is worth, the way in which Walker taunts Graves to leave Pflug and rejoin him gives this an unintended gay subtext! Needless to say, Graves eventually regains his old form (after having been humiliated by a dismally short bout of mano a mano!) and overcomes the conditioned wolf Walker used in the attacks, after which he is provoked into shooting the man himself in the back.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Fair Made-for-Television Production
Uriah4321 July 2014
When a couple of people are killed in the woods by what appears to be a very large animal a retired hunter by the name of "John Wetherby" (Peter Graves) is asked by the local sheriff, "Vernon Bell" (Philip Carey) to lend his expertise. What he discovers is that the large wolf tracks start off with 4 footprints and then mysteriously dwindle to 2 footprints and then disappear. Additionally, the tracking dogs lose the scent at this point as well. Feeling quite baffled John goes to visit an extreme hunting guide named "Byron Douglas" (Clint Walker) to ask for his help. Surprisingly, Byron refuses even though they are very good friends. Meanwhile, the killings continue and soon there is talk of a werewolf running around which terrorizes the entire town. Now, rather than give away any more of the story and risk ruining the film for those who haven't seen it, I will just say that this was a fair made-for-television production which manages to keep the mystery and suspense going throughout most of the movie. The acting was decent with Peter Graves probably giving the best performance of all. Again, while it's certainly not a blockbuster by any means it's decent enough and I rate it as average.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best made for television movies EVER!
rs297 December 2002
This is an exceptionally well made for TV movie that has your standard werewolf movie stuff,but yet its a strange kind of duck,with a surprise twist.The acting is done extremely well,especially by Graves and Walker,who absolutely steals the show as a big game hunter with a rather interesting philosophical point of view about life and a grim,yet at the same time, happy go lucky kind of personality.Some of his lines are quite memorable{"Look at the terrified faces of these people.They feel alive in the face of danger".].The film has convincing moments of tension and the story moves along at a steady pace with a convincing feeling of mystery.Peter Graves is brilliant,too, as the retired hunter coming out of retirement to track down an apparent werewolf on the loose.All in all,this film is done with a certain amount of style and flair rarely seen in made for TV movies these days.This is a great one to watch late at night.If you like horror/mystery types of movies,I highly recommend this.Its worth seeing just for Clint Walker"s character and the great job he does portraying him!
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Scream of the Wolf
rochericky18 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Distributor: DollarDVD

Plot: Adventure writer is called in to investigate a series of brutal murders that has investigators confused. The clues are not clear and leave no clear trail. The tracks left at the murder site appear to be of a wolf. The suspense and terror builds as danger lurks in the shadows of the night.

Audio/Video: The quality of the DVD was actually better then I thought it would be considering the distributors are called Dollar DVD and the damn thing only cost a buck.

Extras: Movie trivia, the only weird thing is that it is trivia from other movies.

Final thoughts: ABC movies of the week were all pretty good, some were better then others. This one was an average made for TV movie. If you see it then get it. It is pretty good.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Good for Clint Walker
QueenoftheGoons16 March 2022
Watched this for Clint Walker and Phil Carey. Never cared for Graves. Its predictable and doesn't much separate from others, and what a shame the woman lives. Lord she was annoying. The foggy atmosphere was from what broken down used up sets? Love the Bronco in it - gotta look quick but its there. Clint can't act on here, i wonder now if he ever could.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nice TV Movie That's Worth Watching
Michael_Elliott23 October 2012
Scream of the Wolf (1974)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Made-for-TV horror film from Dan Curtis has a game hunter (Peter Graves) coming out of retirement to track down a wolf that has been killing people but he soon fears that it's actually a werewolf. Another game hunter (Clint Walker) in town refuses to help in the case and obviously suspicion falls on him. SCREAM OF THE WOLF isn't a masterpiece by any stretch of the imagination but with such a short running time, a great atmosphere and some fun performances there's no question that fans of the genre should enjoy it. I'll give Curtis a lot credit because he really does quite a bit with obviously very little money. I thought the director did a really good job at building up a rather dark atmosphere and this is especially true during the attack sequences. Another good aspect of this happens with the beautiful scenes in the darken woods with the fog machines doing their job. Graves offers up the laid back type of performance we'd expect from him and he does a nice job with the role. Walker easily steals the film as the main suspect and I really liked how he played guilty so obviously well. Jo Ann Pflug is good as the love interest and Philip Carey is nice as the sheriff. The one major problem with the film is that the screenplay makes it clear who the killer is and if this doesn't turn out to be the case then there's an obvious twist. I won't ruin which way the film goes but I think more of a mystery would have helped things especially since we never actually see the wolf as the film wants to keep us in the dark as to who or what is doing the killings. Still, SCREAM OF THE WOLF has enough going for it to make it worth viewing.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Tick-in-the-Box TV-movie
Coventry3 March 2022
The 70s brought forward a lot of excellent TV-movies, some of which even rank among my all-time favorite movies - like "Duel" or "Where have all the people gone?". Admittedly, however, a whole lot of them are very standard, mundane, and run-of-the-mill productions like thirteen in a dozen.

"Scream of the Wolf" belongs in the latter category, sadly. Although certainly decent and mildly enjoyable, it's an unmemorable thriller/creature-feature. Director Dan Curtis, as well as writer Richard Matheson and lead actor Peter Graves, are on complete autopilot in this tale about a ravenous (were-)wolf terrorizing a small Californian coastal town. When several people are found viciously mauled beyond recognition, the local sheriff calls in the assistance of a former big-game hunter turned writer. He - Graves - also doesn't have a clue, so he asks an even better hunter (Clint Walker) for help, but that guy refuses and acts even more eccentric than usually.

The pacing is good and the nightly attack sequences- although quite blurry - are atmospheric enough, but the plot and especially the ending are too obvious and derivative.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A low budget and thin script yields decidedly modest results
TheWelshRagingBull14 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This 1974 mystery thriller sets it's stall out very early on with a reasonably nerve-jangling beginning as a stranded motorist is murdered in a grisly manner on a mist-shrouded,isolated road by someone or something lurking in woods of rural Los Angeles.

The plot quickly develops as the baffled police turn to an ex-game hunter (Peter Graves) to assist them with the search of an "animal", who leaves both four-legged and two-legged tracks (never seen by the viewer, by the way, and indicative of the budget restrictions that prevail in this film). One ex-game-hunter goes to an old friend who is still plying his trade as a hunter (Clint Walker) but he oddly backs off and refuses to help anybody track down the killer.

At just over 75 minutes running time, the whole thing virtuously floes at a brisk pace, but saying that the early part of the film is rather repetitious in portraying the murders. Furthermore, some sequences are too short and/or choppily edited so the overall smoothness of what is being viewed is compromised.

Budget restrictions place a heavy emphasis on mystery and suspense, rather than horror and gore, and with Dan Curtis (of Night Stalker fame) at the production/directorial helm, the whole thing was potentially in safe hands. Nevertheless, there is only decent nail-biting scene in the rest of the film: at the home of the leading character's girlfriend's house where the murderer tries to strike.

The script also spends an inordinate amount of time building and playing on the cold-hearted, egocentric and humourless characterisation of Clint Walker's role: whilst Walker carries this off very effectively it becomes rather mind-numbing and tiresome as the film shifts towards its conclusion, even within the confines of the aforementioned running time. What this does is imply considerable guilt on the part of this character and puts all the film's "eggs in one basket." When the conclusion comes it comes with twists that are perfectly explicable in terms of what the viewer has seem beforehand, if not entirely satisfactory.

Overall the performances of Peter Graves and Jo-Ann Pflug are merely adequate, but Walker merits more praise for his consistently poker-face portrayal of his character. The film itself carries an element of intrigue that makes it worth watching but many aspects of the script don't translate particularly well to the screen, so it's lasting impact is unfortunately rather Luke-warm.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dull mystery -horror flick, but not as bad as it could have been
mstomaso21 May 2006
Acting: mostly OK (Graves and Pflug are decent)

Camera-work: Pedestrian - passable for TV

Plot: Predictable but interestingly carried out

Directing and editing: Mediocre at best.

Peter Graves makes an unconvincing action star in this horror film which seems to be mostly lacking in horror. He is ably supported by Jo Ann Pflug and somewhat over-supported by Clint Walker. Apparently the southern USA was the setting of a slew of wolf, wolfman, werewolf and lycanthrope flicks in the 1970s (somehow I missed all of them until recently), mostly starring out-of-work TV actors. Among these, Scream of the Wolf is unique for a couple of reasons:

First, its unusual title.

Second, it's somewhat unique (and interesting) plot.

Graves is an older local dude (it's never really clear what he does or did), Pflug is his love interest, and Walker is a hunting buddy with somewhat extreme Hemingwayian view of life and society. People start dying, and a wolf - or something like a wolf, appears to be the culprit. Soon, it becomes apparent that there is a pattern to killings, and it increasingly centers on Graves.

This is a low budget, intelligently plotted and scripted film. The death scenes are the usual genre cop-outs: Point of view scenes shot from the perspective of the attacker. With just a little more thoughtful camera-work and editing, it could have been a good film.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than it should be
slayrrr66631 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Scream of the Wolf" is one of the more fascinating stories from the 70s.

**SPOILERS**

Driving along a lonely road, a man is attacked by a strange creature. Sheriff Vernon Bell, (Phillip Crane) is sent out to investigate the incident, and finds strange tracks in the woods. He goes to old friend John Wetherby, (Peter Graves) an expert tracker who just entered retirement, to get some help on the case. John agrees, and he begins to search around the area of the attack. He runs into Byron Douglas, (Clint Walker) another local animal tracker. Douglas doesn't provide any support for John, and he decides to finish investigating. Another attack brings a news report on the attacks, which brings the attention to Sandy Miller, (Jo Ann Pflug) an old friend of John's. After the creature is found to be a werewolf, it attacks Sandy in her home, forcing John to finally track down the werewolf and kill it.

The Good News: I know it doesn't seem like that long of a film, but this is far more entertaining than it should be. I don't know if it's the 70's tone that it has, or if it manages to actually be that entertaining, I haven't found out yet. This is a film that I can repeatedly by on and enjoy it all the way through. Few movies can actually do that continuously, as you become more and more accustomed to them. I have even grown too actually like the design of the werewolf in here after initially hating it. The werewolf is only seen in a few quick shots, but that was enough to know that it is a pretty frightening creature. It does feature a very wolf-ish look. It also looks like a cross between the two previous werewolf classics, "The Wolf Man," and "Curse of the Werewolf," with that of a more traditional-looking wolf. There is also a lot more suspense than you would expect in the film. The best part has to be the raid the wolf has on Sandy's cabin. That is a spoiler moment, so I can't reveal too much, but it does provide a very original jump that has since been copied in just about every other werewolf film since. It may not affect too many because you have seen it many times before, but this is the oldest film I have seen with that particular jump. It is also good to see genre veteran Peter Graves in here, as he hams it up like he does in so many of his films. He plays a regular role for him, and he plays it like he normally does in lots of movies. It was a nice surprise to see him in here.

The Bad News: As usual, we hardly get to see the werewolf, which I don't know why as it is a very good design for a werewolf, but they kept it limited to a few scenes at the end. Another thing that annoyed me with the film is that it is pretty short. Even for a TV movie, this is still a lot shorter than it could've been. The plot does allow for some more time to chase after the wolf.

The Final Verdict: If you can ignore the fact that they have a cool wolf that is hardly used, this is another entry in that "Give-it-a-chance" category. I don't know why more people don't about this film, as it does provide some action-packed scenes and a very creepy lead wolf.

Today's Rating; PG-13: Vicious Werewolf attacks, very minor gore, and a brief view of a mangled corpse
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Don't see what everyone else sees in this movie!
booklady200727 June 2020
This movie was extremely slow and boring, not remotely scary. Well Clint Walker is a bit scary on his own but for a short movie it took forever to get through. Great use of the dog machines but it was often hard to see anything in those dark sceens.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Slow-burning atmosphere
Leofwine_draca12 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
SCREAM OF THE WOLF is one of many horror-themed TV movies produced and directed by DARK SHADOWS creator Dan Curtis during the 1970s. This one's based on a short story by David Case (who I really rate, incidentally) and a teleplay by the legendary Richard Matheson. The story is rather slight, with an ex-hunter on the trail of wolf killings which might just be the work of a werewolf, and mainly it's a battle of wits between two diverse personalities.

Peter Graves is the dependable hero, a bit bland compared to the dark and brooding Clint Walker character, inevitably named Byron. Walker is the best thing in this and perfectly case as the urbane suspect. Despite a few atmospheric killings and the like, this is generally a mystery rather than a horror flick. It's a slow-burner that gradually builds to an outcome both expected and unexpected, a film with a short running time that doesn't outstay its welcome.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Another Dan Curtis "classic"
jmix6615 June 2017
For those who might not know, Dan Curtis created the classic Dark Shadows and Kolchak: The Night Stalker. Basically he "ruled" televised horror films during the 1970s and he influenced a number of directors whose work is popular today.

This film, however, was not one of his better works. Joann Pflug (at her most radiantly beautiful) is under-utilized as the love interest. Clint Walker and Peter Graves play a surprising pair of nominally straight hunters who engage in a bromance that is slightly less homoerotic than Brokeback Mountain, Slightly.

Everyone else is just along for the ride.

Slow (even at 80 minutes, dull and predictable. If you cannot guess who the "killer" is after the first 10 minutes, you need to go back to Hardy Boys novels. When the end finally comes, you'll wish that the film had end 10-15 minutes earlier when your interest in it did.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good Made For TV Horror-Thriller
Rainey-Dawn22 May 2016
A big-game hunter has come back to town and he helps to hunt down a notorious wolf in the area but he soon believes that the wolf has two legs - a werewolf.

This is one of the better made for horror-thriller TV films. It's always fun for me to watch a good werewolf movie and yes this one is good. This one is not overly graphic or bloody - it's just a good "hunt down the werewolf" tale.

If you want a good double feature watch "Scream of the Wolf (1974)" along with "Moon of the Wolf (1972)" (another good made for TV werewolf story).

8.5/10
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Only one redeeming quality for this tv movie
faunafan23 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This made-for-tv movie screams 1970s, from the cars to the sets to the music to the wardrobe. So, for those born later, watch it and you'll understand why very few truly memorable television shows came out of that decade. Having said that, there are a couple of decent aspects to this production, and one exceptional one.

First, the not-so-decent aspects. The plot is mundane and the mystery is not very intriguing. Someone -- or something -- is decimating the population of a hip oceanside community, and Sheriff Vernon Bell is determined to find out who or what has set the town in a dither. He enlists the help of writer/hunter John Wetherby, who in turn tries to recruit his eccentric old friend and hunting companion Byron Douglas to help chase down the killer. Douglas, by far the most interesting character in this story, refuses, citing prior plans. He has an unconventional, some would say twisted, philosophy of life and death. It isn't until he once again bests Wetherby in an old-fashioned bit of arm wrestling that he finally agrees to help track down the vicious culprit responsible for the mutilation killings that are terrifying local denizens. Naturally, the term "werewolf" enters the general consciousness and, as it has for centuries, generates more irrational terror.

Well, I wouldn't say it's exactly terrifying to watch; more tedious than terrifying. Most of the attack scenes take place at night in poorly lit, misty forests and we never really get to see the perpetrator, except at the anticlimactic end when all is revealed. Impending mayhem is telegraphed by beastly grunts, usually in the murky dark, with ominous orchestral accompaniment and blood-curdling screams. We've been down that road too often before, so it's hard to become invested in the outcome. While decent aspects of this tv movie are hard to find, the formulaic script does have a few respectable lines delivered by stalwarts of 70s television, such as Philip Carey (Sheriff Bell), Peter Graves (Wetherby), and the obligatory lady-in-distress Sandy, played by JoAnn Pflug. But there is one surprising and redeeming element that makes this routine tv movie worth an hour and fourteen minutes of your time.

That element is the presence of Clint Walker as the somewhat creepy hunter, Byron Douglas. Playing completely against type, Mr. Walker conveys a sense of understated yet palpable menace unlike anything anyone would have ever thought him capable of. Those blue eyes that have so captivated fans from his "Cheyenne" days and beyond take on a sinister glint belying the smile adored by multi-generations of fans; the combination is positively bone-chilling. It's such a departure from the generally heroic characters he played throughout his career that even non-fans must admit that Clint Walker was a much better actor than he was given credit for, and if given the opportunities he deserved, he would have been a superstar in the eyes of more than just his enduring fan base numbering in the untold thousands. Thanks to INSP and H&I, that number is growing by the day.

While I prefer the heroic over the psychotic, I admire the man's ability to inject an unexpected aura of attractiveness into what is essentially a very scary character, and that's not just because he maintained his tall, dark, and handsome stature throughout his career. When he tells Sandy not to worry, that he'll take care of John, the smile and that wink are diabolical, yet curiously charming. The only reason the movie itself deserves as many stars as I gave it is, in two words, Clint Walker; without him, it'd be worth maybe three.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't be fooled......this stinks!!!!
spencejoshua-227366 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Yes! This movie feels more like a spoof of a "real" movie! It begins with a decent hook, but quickly succumbs to tactics that didn't even work well in the Silent Era. These would be clearly revealing the murderer too soon. I figured it out after six minutes into the film. Repeat scenarios that gave us nothing more than dead bodies. An entire community of characters with inadequate decision making skills, which results in not caring what happens to them.

This TV movies rocks on with this weird back-and-forth among the characters that is laughable. Clint Walker's script and delivery is like something out of a comic book. It is horrific by any decade's standard. The ending is atrocious! Oh my gosh ......it's is so ridiculous. Clearly the creators didn't want to commit and were successful at creating a dud.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed