Carnival of Souls (1998) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
90 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
bad horror not scary
SnoopyStyle12 November 2015
Alex Grant (Bobbie Phillips) is haunted by carnival clown Louis Seagram (Larry Miller) who murdered her mother in front of her as a child. Seagram gets out and ambushes her in her car. It turns out to be a dream. She runs her mother's dockside bar with her sister Sandra (Shawnee Smith). Sandra is always pushing Alex to sell the place. She falls for a mysterious stranger (Paul Johansson).

This horror has nothing scary at all. It's a series of dream after dream after dream. Larry Miller could have been a creepy scary clown if the movie actually tried to be good. This movie doesn't try. The bar set looks cheap. It's suppose to be on a dock and yet it has a brick-lined basement. The whole thing looks bad. I also hate that it's sold as "Wes Craven Presents". I don't know how much he got paid but it's not enough no matter what. I've seen worst but this is pretty bad.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Avoid like the plague
Leofwine_draca3 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
CARNIVAL OF SOULS is a crude, ridiculously bad and ill-advised remake of the early '60s arthouse cult classic. Being a 1990s film, everything has to be now explained, so there are rapist clowns on the prowl and all kinds of nonsense assailing our uninteresting heroine. It's a badly-edited, poorly-scripted kind of movie that just kind of muddles along aimlessly, and the only surprise is just how young Shawnee Smith still looks a good decade after she appeared in the excellent remake of THE BLOB. As for this remake...avoid like the plague. Why Wes Craven had anything to do with it, I have no idea.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
one of the most pointless remakes ever
stalkingwolf8315 January 2008
It's hard to find a remake that actually does justice to the original,but this one is almost downright insulting.

Thre story has very little,if anything,to do with the one of the original.And whos idea was it to cast Larry Miller as the bad guy ?He is so terribly miscast.

One thing I noticed about all the positive reviews is that they say the movie should be considered a 'drama' instead of horror.Please tell me,why name it after a horror movie if it's supposed to be a drama ? I would never believe a 40 year old original could still outdo a modern remake but apparently it can.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
GODAWFUL
kamikaze-44 April 1999
Oh well, It was bound to happen. I finally saw the remake of Carnival of Souls. Was it worth it? In a word, NO! Forget the original set up about the lone survivor (Candace Hilligross) of an automobile accident, moving to a small town, and seeing visions of ghoulish people from the other side coming for her. This time around, A young woman (Bobbie Phillips), a victim of sexual abuse by a pedophile clown (comic Larry Miller) when she was younger, encounters the clown years later. He forces her to drive to the river and she deliberately crashes her car into the river.......you know the rest.

This movie is so terrible. It plays like a dirty USA made for TV movies of the week. The acting is similar to anything you would encounter while watching Melrose Place, etc. Wait til you get a load of what the people from the other side look like this time around. Whooo-boy. No expense was spared for the make up effects for these creatures.

I can just imagine the congratulatory slap on the backs the film makers received from each other. These bums probably think the remake of Psycho was better than the original. I think the audience for this movie is for those who think Urban legend, I Know What You Did This and Last Summer, etc. are great classics. I hope those "12 year old of all ages" enjoy the film. I sure as Hell didn't

I read a few months back, that Candace Hilligross was supposed to have a hand with the remake, but those around the making of the film back stabbed her off the production. I hope she has the last laugh when she sees the critical raspberries this film will rightfully receive.
36 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Borrows the Title and a Small Part of the Original Storyline
claudio_carvalho29 July 2016
The eleven year-old girl Alex Grant witnesses her mother being raped and killed at home by the carnival clown Louis Seagram (Larry Miller). Many years later, Alex (Bobbie Phillips) works with her younger sister Sandra Grant (Shawnee Smith) in the Mermaid Inn that was owned by their mother. Out of the blue, Alex is attacked by Louis that was hidden in the backseat of her car on the day of the anniversary of the death of her mother. She struggles with Louis and drives her car into the sea to protect her sister. Then she swims back to the shore on the area of a carnival. From this moment on, Alex has nightmares and daydreams with Louis. What is happening with Alex?

"Carnival of Souls" (1962) is a low-budget cult movie with a story that seems to be an episode of "Twilight Zone". "Carnival of Souls" (1998) is not a remake and only borrows the title and a small part of the original storyline. The plot is boring and totally predictable, sort of a combination of "Jacob's Ladder" with "Carnival of Souls". The result is an average and forgettable horror film. My vote is five.

Title (Brazil): "Parque Macabro" ("Macabre Park")
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh no it's got "Wes Craven presents" in the title :(
tamp6 February 1999
The pits! God knows why Wes Craven insists on slapping his name on the front of drivel like this, it's only going to ruin his reputation.

I've not seen the first film that this was based on so I can't compare them.(please someone do the honors & tear this film to pieces)

Far too many prolonged dream sequences got me reaching for the fast forward button, characters you don't really care about, gorehounds will hate it & a naff ending just about sums this film up. one out of ten.
26 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dreadful
skipoc1 March 2021
What a waste of perfectly good film stock. This movie tried far too hard to be artsy instead of concentrating on finding a good script, director and actors. The performances were abysmal and wooden. This was a remake in name only incredibly misleading. I found my concentration drifting constantly because this mess wasn't worth my attention span. I admit I'm a huge fan of bad movies but this was worse than bad-it was completely uninteresting.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A complete waste of time...
jerlenbu11 June 2001
This is perhaps the worst movie I have seen in my entire life, and I have seen some really bad films. This movie was extremely boring, had zero plot, and no decent acting to speak of. The limited special effects are nothing noteworthy, either. I had a hard time staying awake, and when it was over, I wished I had fallen asleep instead of subjecting myself to such torture. I can't believe that Wes Craven would put his name on such a dismal failure. If you were thinking of watching this film, don't waste your time or money. Rent something better, such as the original Carnival of Souls (1962).
22 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Worst Movie I Have Ever Seen
lhgreard28 November 1999
there aren't many movies that are so bad you can not even have fun watching them and laughing at obvious mistakes or bad taste. This movie is way beyond the Ed Wood kind of bad movie. I mean I would rather spend two hours watching the summer family vacation video of someone I don't know that having to endure this again.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Save your soul from this!
BillPipper25 March 2002
A movie couldn't have gotten worse than this. It was boring and very very dumb. It had a lot of potential but it all went down the drain. The ending was also very stupid. The movie was hard to understand. Skip it. I saw it on TV and I wish I could have been surfing the net for those two hours.

Rating: 0/10

Note: After viewing this movie it will make you want to vomit.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Carnival of Potential
PinkPurple9 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I've just recently seen Wes Craven's Carnival of Souls and I thought that it was pretty good, not great. It was marketed badly and shouldn't have bared the same title as the original as it's not much of a remake as it is its own tale. Although Wes Craven's name is shamelessly attached to the movie despite little to no involvement beyond seemningly giving his consent, ironicly the storyline actually has more potential than most Craven movies put together whether his own or just bare the name. And thats coming from a guy who loves Craven as much as the next horror buff.

The potential of the story itself is one of the two main positives which outweigh such negatives as dodgy special effects. It's sort of a complex psychological war fair tale with a touch of the Sixth Senses' style.

It appears to be about a tortured young girl whom is haunted by a tragic childhood where she watched as her mother was murdered by a guy whom had been a friend of the family and worked at a carnival as a clown and her evidence got him life in prison. Then of course years later he gets out and comes after her, but surprisingly in a struggle both seem to die and it seems as though her ghost is trapped in a land of the dead limbo where she appears to be living her life as normal in her mind yet the presence of ghosts and all the familiar faces of everyone in her life are trying to convince her to except her fate so she can pass over, everything they say and do seems geared to her situation, including a kind of guardian Angel figure who looks like he's stepped off a romance novel cover, which would fit with a young woman's creation of the imagination too. "Sometimes you have to face your demons before you can see the angels"

At the same time the demonic ghost of the clown invades her mind, tormenting her seemingly trying to keep her from being able to move on and except her fate etc, possibly to avoid passing over himself into hell as she ascends to heaven: "The Longer you hold on, the more we get to play!" or maybe he's a sinister form of her inner demons: "Funny thing about guilt Alex, it can haunt you as real as any ghost" All in all it seems really open to interpretation. There are many interesting possibilities. My personal view is that it's just a movie about letting go and moving on. certainly points must be given for such effort to at least attempt at something complex rather than just going with the usual typical horror movie traditional slasher formula.

The other biggest positive is the performances, the lead actress is convincingly haunted looking but particularly the serial killer clown character Lewis. He's quite effective in a distinctly well drawn role, which is wisely used sparingly and well portrayed by a cast against type Larry Miller. He has a great presence, is genuinely creepy and has a real sense of mystery to him. Larry Miller, another comedian character actor in an unknown, his performance was destined to be overlooked.

Just remember, don't be fooled by all you read, judge it for yourself.

Will you, won't you, join the dance?
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Interesting film...marketed COMPLETELY WRONG!
tropicthunderhead8 July 2003
I completely understand why so many people did not get what they expected from this film. It WAS NOT what you would expect seeing WES CRAVEN's name and with the "horror" marketing.

I actually liked this film and agree with those that call it a "psychological thriller". That's EXACTLY what it is. Very understated. It deals with the mind set of Alex (Bobbie Phillips) and her coming to terms with a traumatic childhood. It is not a teen horror movie...NOT EVEN CLOSE. But I would highly recommend it as a psychological thriller for more mature and intelligent viewers.

Also, I must add, I thought it was a terrific remake because why would they copy the original exactly? The main character is dealing with the same kind of internal demons as in the original but it's a New story...If you want the original...Watch the original!
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very highly misunderstood film.
jhpstrydom15 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Of course I know it doesn't come close to the original film. I saw it years ago and didn't think much of it. Then a few years later I bought it on DVD as part of a set along with LEPRECHAUN and two of David Cronenberg's movies RABID and SHIVERS. When I revisited CARNIVAL OF SOULS the plot made a little more sense. But when I read the reviews on it's IMDb web page I noticed that this film was somewhat misunderstood.

1. Like in the beginning of the film where Alex (Bobbie Phillips) drives her car into the ocean with Louis (Larry Miller) the man responsible for her mother's murder in the backseat. Right after this scene the film cuts to Alex waking up in her bathtub. Many seemed to have assumed she dreamed about the crash but that is not the case. When the film cuts to this scene it actually goes back a few days meaning Alex didn't dream about the crash it happened a few days later.

2. There is another scene where Alex goes to see a psychiatrist and she talks to him like they've had several sessions together. But the psychiatrist reveals that he has never met Alex before. This is representative of the reality setting in of what really happened after that crash that took place which would lead us to the final revelation or the big twist ending. Of course at one point Alex is shown climbing out of the ocean and on to the pier she drove off where she sees the abandoned carnival grounds. In fact this is really Alex's soul climbing out of the water and on to the pier. The whole part between the crash and the twist at the end is really what we think is reality that slowly turns into what is actual reality.

This is how I understand or interpreted it. CARNIVAL OF SOULS is really a thinking man's horror movie. You have to pay close attention to certain parts of the dialog to grasp what certain phrases actually refer to. Many plot elements are not presented in a very straightforward manner so it requires a long attention to figure out the plot.

Overall, it's not the worst film I've endured. I also agree that the original is way better. But since this film strayed from the original I didn't really try to make comparisons.

There is also an unofficial German remake entitled YELLA which is also better. and had it been an official remake it would be considered the more faithful of the two.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
If you like the original, you'll probably hate it. I thought it was OK.
BA_Harrison21 July 2006
I saw the original Carnival of Souls many years ago, when the film was re-released with some additional 'lost' footage reinstated. I remember being severely underwhelmed by the movie, finding it tedious in the extreme. I know I am in the minority for disliking this 'classic', but I truly think it is highly over-rated. I haven't seen it since.

When this 'reimagining' was lent to me on DVD, my initial reaction was 'no thank you', but I changed my mind on seeing Shawnee Smith's name in the credits (I've been a fan of hers since The Blob in '88). On seeing the words 'Wes Craven Presents' I almost changed my mind again, but I decided to give it the benefit of the doubt. And, whilst it may never be revered as a classic, this version has enough going for it to make it worth a viewing. The story may be confusing, the ending lacklustre, and the main 'baddie' not scary enough, but I still found this to be more enjoyable than the original.

Eleven-year-old Alex witnesses her mother's murder at the hands of a kiddie-fiddling carnival clown named Louis. Her testimony puts him in jail for twenty years, but you can't keep a bad clown down and two decades later he shows up wanting revenge. Held hostage in her car by Louis, knowing that after he has dealt with her, he'll go after her younger sister, Alex floors the gas and drives herself and her captor at top speed into the sea. Then things get weird.

From this point on, director Adam Grossman mixes reality and fantasy, blurring the boundary between the two and confusing the audience in the process. Sequences snap from reality (or what we perceive to be reality) to fantasy in the blink of an eye, and vice versa. Alex has strange hallucinations; hideous demons pop up in the strangest of places, as does her old pal Louis.

These strange goings-on don't make a lot of sense, but they are quite entertaining, and at no point did I find myself regretting my decision to watch the film. Both Bobbie Phillips (who plays the grown-up Alex) and Shawnee Smith (who plays her sister) are easy on the eye and give reasonable performances. The demonic creatures that appear out of nowhere are very unsettling and the film is worth watching for these alone (they reminded me of Chris Cunningham's disturbing videos for Aphex Twin). If only Louis the carnival clown had been half as frightening as the demons; his blonde wig and crappy make-up are lame and as creepy movie clowns go, he is a disappointment.

Fans of the original have slated this film, describing it as a travesty. Although I wouldn't exactly recommend this version myself, those who haven't seen the original may find enough to like to warrant giving it a go.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A pale imitation of the original...
mizuno6823 July 2001
Spare yourself and see Herk Harvey's original film. The director's cut is particularly good. This movie loses the ideas of the original, and I'm sorry, but Larry Miller is not menacing. I'm not sure whose idea it was to try to 'reimagine' this movie, but it certainly doesn't work on any level. If I hadn't seen the original, I would have been very confused by what they were trying to say with this one.
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
BEYOND SIMPLY BAD
mjshannon4 June 2000
Worthless time waster that has a central character whose predicament is so obvious from the get go that what follows can only be described as interminable! Add to the mix a horrible script,ham fisted direction and some of the most inane and ludicrous dialogue ever put to film and you have one of the worst remakes ever made--make that one of the worst movies ever made,as this has little to do with the original!! See the brilliant original instead of this abomination. Executive producer Wes Craven has done much to destroy the horror movie genre and this is his piece de resistance. Again, this is totally worthless and completely absurd!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How to ruin a favorite film
First, learn why a good chilling film is interesting. Watch the original COS after midnight with the lights out and on an old cold tube driven b&w TV. Goose pimples rise up, chills navigate your back, and the popcorn was really good.

Now watch the remake. Begin sticking your fingers down your throat at any time. The feeling is identical to watching this mess. You will realize instantly that the taste in your mouth is not a dream, but nausea, now do your comparison.

Lesson learned, leave well enough alone or don't mess with classic material and stick with making remakes of The real housewives of NJ.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Boring, overlong and repetitive
Keltic-28 February 1999
This film was a horrid waste of a dollar. The whole film can be "understood", if that's the word, by watching the first and last fifteen minutes. Apparently a remake of an earlier film, but it's so much like _Jacob's Ladder_ it's uncomfortable - some of the visuals could have been dubbed directly from it.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
"Carnival of Crap"
johnnyohno27 May 2002
Make no mistake; I'm talking about the remake of one of my all-time favourite films, not the original, which I cannot recommend viewing strongly enough. There's a kid involved, the kiss of death if there ever was one. And I guess Larry Miller is supposed to be the evil lead ghoul. He looks more like the banker who won't give you that second mortgage you need, which is certainly not nice, but it hardly qualifies as a job description for one of hell's minions. And while the titles say "Wes Craven Presents...", it shouldn't stop there. How about, "Wes Craven Presents "Wes Craven's Carnival of Crap""? Featuring some banker or someone equally scary. Thanks a lot Wes. Great carnival.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Confusing and Pointless. How Can Wes Craven Be Involved With This?
drownsoda9023 December 2004
Seeing that this remake of the cult classic was coming from Wes Craven, the director of such classics as "The Last House on the Left", "The Hills Have Eyes", and "Scream", I thought it might be okay. But I was so very wrong. If I learned anything from this, it is that titles with "Wes Craven presents" at the beginning of them usually aren't very good movies.

The film centers around a woman who is in a car accident whose life is turned upside down and everything around her seems to be dreamlike - her life completely spins out of control. What's real and what isn't? "Carnival of Souls" is one of those movies that has the protagonist caught up between flashbacks, dreams, and reality, which irritatingly confuses the viewer time and time again. These flashback sequences to the main characters childhood (and the murder of her mother) happen so frequently, that the audience has no idea what's going on. One minute, the main character is in her house, the next she's running from a rottweiler in an abandoned carnival, then she's on a boat having sex with some guy she barely knows. What is that? Don't get me wrong, flashback and dream sequences are okay in movies, but they have to fit in with the rest of the movie. They can be effective if used properly, but in Carnival of Souls the only effect it has on you is to make you want to stop watching, because by the middle of the film you are completely confused and have no idea what's happening.

I will say that this movie had some potential, but just completely lost it. I've heard the original is brilliant, I hope it's much better than this garbage. An extremely confusing mess. 3/10.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh, dear!
Spike-7110 September 1999
When I saw this on the shelf at my local video store, I thought, "Oh, it's Wes Craven, the director of Scream, one of the best films of the 1990s, and it's a horror as well. It's got to be good!" How wrong could a young lad be? This was a horror but for all the wrong reasons. I do not think I have ever been more bored in my entire life. You can really overdose on the hammy acting, the extremely unscary clown and the annoying music in the background. It has a plot that was so thin and lame that you could hardly be aware of its existence at all. For most horror films that I watch, you can guarantee that they won't scare me, but at least they are funny!! "Carnival of Souls was not even that. It was pitiful and had no redeeming qualities at all, apart from the end credits when the pain was all over. I have watched some garbage in my time so it is unbelievable to hear myself say that this is the worst film I have ever seen.If someone paid me to watch this film again, I think I would prefer to keep my sanity.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Soulless
utgard144 August 2014
In-name-only remake of the classic '60s horror film. The original was a unique, atmospheric film that had some genuinely creepy and scary moments, made on a shoestring budget with no frills. This one is just a generic bland '90s horror flick with nothing to recommend about it unless you are fans of the cast. Bobbie Phillips is very attractive and I can't fault anyone wanting to look at her for 90 minutes. But beyond that, she brings very little to the table. Genre favorite Shawnee Smith is a little better and even gets to sing, but that's not enough to save this mess. Larry Miller, more known for his comedic roles, plays a disgusting cliché killer clown. Director and writer Adam Grossman clearly spent a total of five minutes thinking the plot to this one up. If you have seen the original, this movie will just tick you off. If you haven't, this will likely put you to sleep. Avoid at all costs. "Presented" by Wes Craven, which is rarely a good sign as he'll put his name on just about anything.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not bad, but be careful!
josedahoui26 January 2003
This film is not bad at all. But, if you want to really enjoy it, you'll have to keep in mind these two recommendations:

a) FORGET THE COVER. It is not the usual Wes Craven horror film, not even the typical horror film. Don't expect a creepy movie (although there are several creepy scenes, perhaps the worst part of this movie). The horror comes from inside, from the unseen and the unsaid.

b) FORGET THE CLASSIC (the 1962 `Carnival of Souls'). Do not compare this film with the original one, since it's an high percent unfaithful to the 1962 version. The 1998 Carnival is not a real remake. Perhaps it has a similar final idea, but it's not the same story.

Follow this recommendations and take your prejudices off. Perhaps then you'll enjoy this well-acted movie.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
psychological
rapmasterwd4012 February 2007
The film is a journey through the psyche of a woman (Alex) with a traumatic past and emotional scars. There are numerous switches between realities which result in Alex thinking she is losing her mind. Viewers can be forgiven for not understanding what is going on, but that is kind of the point! What you are supposed to understand is the emotional roller-coaster ride... It kind of reminded me of The Butterfly Effect, but without any control and more random (continuous) jumping through memories/realities.

Also worth noting is that I watched the movie a second time and realised that there are several cryptic messages in the dialogue throughout this movie, which help make the ending easier to accept.

Bobbie Phillips was great in this movie and she had to be as the entire plot is driven towards the viewer having sympathy towards her character. The rest of the cast was adequate (excpet the guy who played Michael, he was pretty bad). The effects weren't great and should have been better for a movie made in 1998. I wouldn't say it was a bad ending, but it definitely could have been better. However, it was generally well scripted and well directed.

This film isn't really scary at all, so I wouldn't recommend it to traditional horror fans. It's not by any means "easy viewing" either, so I would recommend it to people who like to think about what they are watching and have patience to let a story unfold. Also fans of psychological thillers.

Not a classic by any means, but I enjoyed it a lot and will most likely watch it again in the future. 7/10
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sort of slow paced and boring...
paul_haakonsen21 January 2022
I remember my brother having this 1998 movie on VHS back in the day, but oddly enough I never got around to watching the movie before now in 2022. Why? Well, I never did really find the movie's cover all that interesting, so I never took it upon myself to sit down and watch it.

Then in 2022, I had the chance to do so, and I figured well since it said "Wes Craven presents" on the movie's cover, then I might actually have missed out on something, so I opted to give "Carnival of Souls" a chance.

Turns out that I hadn't been missing out on anything grand here. The storyline told in "Carnival of Souls", as written by Adam Grossman, was just so-so. I mean, sure it was archetypical late 1990s, or at least had that particular vibe to it. But the storyline just never really sunk its claws into me, and thus I never really got fully into the movie.

There just wasn't much proper contents to the storyline. In fact, the storyline turned out somewhat befuddled and semi-confusing, as if there wasn't a proper red thread throughout the entire movie.

The movie had Bobbie Phillips, Shawnee Smith, Larry Miller and Paul Johansson on the cast list, among others, so there are some familiar faces at least. A shame, however, that the script and storyline didn't really offer the performers all that much material to work with.

I found "Carnival of Souls" to be a mediocre movie, watchable for sure, but it is by no means a movie that I will be returning to watch a second time. And it certainly was not a movie that had anything grand to offer, so I hadn't really been missing out on anything here. Not is "Carnival of Souls" a movie that I would recommend fans of the horror genre to dash out and get their hands on.

My rating of "Carnival of Souls" lands on a three out of ten stars.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed