Just another kids defeat the burglar home alone rip off. Pure claptrap. Nothing to see here folks
5 Reviews
Home alone Rip off
bucky-2713 June 1999
Imagine if a "Home Alone" remake was written and directed by children...then you'd understand what to expect from this film.
planktonrules4 January 2024
I'll cut to the chase..."Boys Will Be Boys" is a ripoff of "Home Alone". Its plot is just too similar, but unlike "Home Alone", it lacks cleverness and is about as good as you'd expect for a film written and directed by children! Yes, it's pretty bad.
Two obnoxious boys beg to be allowed to stay home alone...and their hard as nails father agrees to this, even though the boys have apparently been pretty awful even when watched by baby sitters. The film then cuts to a police station where an illegal interview is being done with the kids (since the boys' parents are NOT present nor do they have a lawyer). Apparently SOMETHING bad happened...and it turns out, well, that they did a "Home Alone" on some jerk who was trying to break in their house.
So is this any good? Heavens, no!! The writing and characters are the main problem. The people in the film are all one-dimensional, such as the younger 'brainiac' kid who talks like a college professor and the workaholic father (played woodenly by Randy Travis). I cannot see any adult enjoying it (which makes the one overly glowing review quite confusing)...and it might be a rough sell to kids as well because the boys are pretty unlikable. Plus, they could just watch a "Home Alone" film instead...which is what I recommend you do.
My score of 2 might just be generous! Do yourself a favor and think twice about watching this one.
Two obnoxious boys beg to be allowed to stay home alone...and their hard as nails father agrees to this, even though the boys have apparently been pretty awful even when watched by baby sitters. The film then cuts to a police station where an illegal interview is being done with the kids (since the boys' parents are NOT present nor do they have a lawyer). Apparently SOMETHING bad happened...and it turns out, well, that they did a "Home Alone" on some jerk who was trying to break in their house.
So is this any good? Heavens, no!! The writing and characters are the main problem. The people in the film are all one-dimensional, such as the younger 'brainiac' kid who talks like a college professor and the workaholic father (played woodenly by Randy Travis). I cannot see any adult enjoying it (which makes the one overly glowing review quite confusing)...and it might be a rough sell to kids as well because the boys are pretty unlikable. Plus, they could just watch a "Home Alone" film instead...which is what I recommend you do.
My score of 2 might just be generous! Do yourself a favor and think twice about watching this one.
...which is why single people are the luckiest people in the world...
mark.waltz8 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I'll give this juvenile comedy credit for one thing. It assembled together a huge cast of comic geniuses together, everybody from Ruth Buzzi and Charles Nelson Reilly to husband and wife Dom De Luise and Carol Arthur, Oscar winner Jon Voight, airplane stewardess Julie Hagerty and the legendary Mickey Rooney. It's a combination of intentional camp (always a bad sign), and genuinely unfunny gags that make this more like "the rip-off movie", starting with that "Pee Wee Herman's Big Adventure" through the blatant theft of ideas from the past it's prime "Home Alone" movies.
The obnoxious Randy Travis and Ms. Hagerty are the parents of two terrors whom I never expect to see on screen again. It's like watching a marathon of those hideous family related commercials that think they are clever and make TV breaks bathroom time. OK, I did find myself chuckling at them a few times, but honestly, the urge to fast forward to the older actor cameos is more appealing. There's Rooney as Travis's big boss, De Luise as (what else?) a temperamental chef, Voight as the intimidating detective, Catherine Oxenberg as an obnoxious, hideously over the top vixen, Arthur as Rooney's Janet Reno look-alike secretary, and get this, Ruth and Reilly as a married couple living next door and commenting on all the goings on.
But most of all, besides the rip-off plot theft, it's a huge Toy's r Us advertisement that falls flat pretty much from the start, even stealing some Danny Elfman sound alike music. The scheming young couple (Oxenberg and Michael de Luise) remind me of the villains on the "Beverly Hillbillies" movie, proof once again that this was nothing but patchwork. Reilly gets a great line that kept me interested...in what he was going to say. "With neighbors like these, who needs cable?" But, I'll refer to this as the type of film you do not lend to friends...unless you want to get rid of that friend.
The obnoxious Randy Travis and Ms. Hagerty are the parents of two terrors whom I never expect to see on screen again. It's like watching a marathon of those hideous family related commercials that think they are clever and make TV breaks bathroom time. OK, I did find myself chuckling at them a few times, but honestly, the urge to fast forward to the older actor cameos is more appealing. There's Rooney as Travis's big boss, De Luise as (what else?) a temperamental chef, Voight as the intimidating detective, Catherine Oxenberg as an obnoxious, hideously over the top vixen, Arthur as Rooney's Janet Reno look-alike secretary, and get this, Ruth and Reilly as a married couple living next door and commenting on all the goings on.
But most of all, besides the rip-off plot theft, it's a huge Toy's r Us advertisement that falls flat pretty much from the start, even stealing some Danny Elfman sound alike music. The scheming young couple (Oxenberg and Michael de Luise) remind me of the villains on the "Beverly Hillbillies" movie, proof once again that this was nothing but patchwork. Reilly gets a great line that kept me interested...in what he was going to say. "With neighbors like these, who needs cable?" But, I'll refer to this as the type of film you do not lend to friends...unless you want to get rid of that friend.
This is FUNNY!
ajnrules13 August 2000
The plot of this movie is not very rigid, but that leaves lots of room for more hilarious antics than the first two Home Alone movies put together. (I'm not going to talk about 3 because I haven't seen it yet.) Except poor Skip (who looks a lot like Matthew Perry) suffered a lot more torture than Harry and Marv because it's two on one other than one on two.
Julie Hagerty wasn't really allowed to have as funny of a part as she did in Airplane!, and I was disappointed when the fight between Patsy, the Wellingtons, and the Clauswells ended so early. But oh well. This movie isn't called "Adults will be Adults." And I watched this movie at 3 in the morning, so it was constantly interrupted by infomercials. But what the heck. It's not the movie's fault, it's those ad companies.
Since this movie is mainly all antics, it didn't get much attention because most moviegoers don't like movies with all antics. Oh well.
Julie Hagerty wasn't really allowed to have as funny of a part as she did in Airplane!, and I was disappointed when the fight between Patsy, the Wellingtons, and the Clauswells ended so early. But oh well. This movie isn't called "Adults will be Adults." And I watched this movie at 3 in the morning, so it was constantly interrupted by infomercials. But what the heck. It's not the movie's fault, it's those ad companies.
Since this movie is mainly all antics, it didn't get much attention because most moviegoers don't like movies with all antics. Oh well.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
