Happy Polo (1932) Poster

(1932)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Polo at its strangest
TheLittleSongbird21 January 2018
Van Beuren cartoons are extremely variable, especially in the number of gags and whether the absurdist humour shines through enough (sometimes it does, other times it doesn't), but are strangely interesting. Although they are often poorly animated with barely existent stories and less than compelling lead characters, they are also often outstandingly scored, there can be some fun support characters and some are well-timed and amusing.

The previous 1932 Aesop's Fables/Van Beuren cartoons were generally not bad at all, apart from the lacklustre 'The Cat's Canary'. 'Happy Polo' is by no means not one of the best of the 1932 batch or the best Aesop's Fables cartoons, but it's far from being one of the worst. It's mildly entertaining in an odd sort of way, having said that calling it strange is being kind.

Its best asset, as is the case for pretty much all of Van Beuren cartoons, is the music score. It is typically peppy and great fun to listen to. It is so beautifully and cleverly orchestrated and full of lively energy, doing so well with enhancing the action.

The gags also deliver enough. There's a lot of them and they're amusing and decently timed, not imaginatively absurdist but not bland or too sweet either. The characters and pace are lively mostly and there is a lot of energy and action. Some synchronisation is neat.

Against all this, 'Happy Polo' also feels rather hectic. This is apparent in the visuals, where the visuals tends to not match and be at odds with the audio, the non-stop relentlessness (a lot of fun at first but then got uncomfortably dizzying and confused) of the pace and the story which makes very little sense to the point of near-incoherence. If the cartoon was two or three minutes longer it would helped make things feel less choppy.

While it is laudable for 'Happy Polo' to include some kind of story with the girlfriend and villainous cat, it was very formulaic and predictable the moment it was introduced and actually it served very little point in the cartoon. As to be expected (seeing as it's rarely been a strong suit even in their best efforts), the animation is far from great, or even good. Most of the time 'Happy Polo' has erratically sloppy character designs in particular and there is a lack of fluidity and crispness. Credit is due though, Van Beuren showed here and in previous 1932 cartoons in the Aesop's Fables series that they were becoming more ambitious with their backgrounds.

Overall, watchable and oddly entertaining for a one-time watch but too uneven and strange for repeat viewings. 5/10 Bethany Cox
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Non-Stop Lunacy At A Polo Match
ccthemovieman-116 August 2007
This is the first cartoon on the "Aesop's Fables" DVD, a collection of early 1930s Van Buren animated shorts. I love the inventiveness in these old cartoons. The black-and-white actually makes me concentrate more on the sight gags....and there are plenty.

For instance, a minute into the story we see a jockey preparing his horse for the day's polo matches. He opens up the neck, pours gasoline in the horse, oils and greases his hoofs, cranks up the tail and the horse is ready to go!

Most of the action - and it's non-stop with an accompanying music score that will wear you out - revolves around the doings of the actual polo match. You see crazy stuff like one shot going out of the stadium and demolishing a skyscraper or one goal post scratching it's other post after the ball hits. Horses go from real to mechanical back to real.

A subplot involves the jockey's girlfriend being mauled in the stands by some big cat and the latter running off with her until our hero comes to the rescue. By the time six minutes are up, you are exhausted!

The artwork is basic, yes, almost like a silent movie. Well, actually it is because there are only sound effects and reactions.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed