The Racing Scene (1969) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Actually interesting even for non-race fans
DaveP-421 March 1999
I saw this on SpeedVision, which usually bores me to tears. A year in the life of James Garner, his car, and his racing team. Garner's narration really lets you know the strategies, the problems, the stresses of running such an operation. Note: these are endurance races, where mechanics and engineering count for at least as much as drivers.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Garner and racing
SnoopyStyle2 February 2024
James Garner decides to take up racing. First, he's doing an off-road race through dusty Baja. It is a documentary following Garner's racing team, the inbetween, the garages, behind-the-scenes, and everything else. Next, he's in England and Silverstone. They eventually start racing Formula-A.

This is a buffet of racing with James Garner as the waiter. They are doing a lot of different styles of racing, mostly endurance races. I thought Garner would be the one racing, but that's mostly not the case. This is good for racing fans and Garner fans. I'm more the later and his easy charms come easily. There is a constant stream of cars although I can't always spot his car. It's a slice of the racing world with Garner doing lots of narration.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great Film Footage
deancapetanelis7 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This is the kind of documentary best saved for a rainy day when there is literally nothing else to watch. It can be slow moving at times. There's also a raw grittyness to it that distracts from the story. Many shots, especially at the beginning, are hand-held and very shaky. The film literally follows James Garners interactions with the cars. There is almost no mention of what else Garner had going on in his life. There's no sense of how Garner balanced racing with the rest of his life. There's no sense of how Garner interacted with the team off the track. It may well be that Garner simply wrote checks and showed up on race day. That's not a very compelling story.

If you're not into cars there might not be much for you here. If you are into cars then the race track footage from the drivers perspective and the track side footage of one hell of a crash make it worth seeing.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I really enjoyed this movie.
trashmail0011 January 2005
No, this is not LeMans, nor is it Grand Prix or the original Gumball Rally, but if you are a die-hard road racing fan, this is a great movie.

Sure, I read the prior remark - yes, it does have Garner doing Garner stuff - and that's what makes it a great show for those of us that chase road racing, and can identify with what Jim does in this movie. This takes us back to a time where yes, money was important, but unlike today, you could get by without a multi-million dollar budget, you could hang out with the race teams - they were just like us - and today you don't have that.

If you are looking for a slick Hollywood production loaded with stars, this isn't for you, but if you are looking for a great show that borders

on being a PBS documentary - you will love this show.

I'm trying to find a tape of this, I enjoyed it that much.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Why?
boblipton6 February 2024
Andy Sidaris directed this documentary about the racing team that James Garner sponsored. Garner narrates.

I'm not terribly interested in automobile racing, but I watched this, first because it was a movie I had never seen before, and second, to understand the attraction of it. I have known some people so into horse racing they have bought shares in a race horse, and I can understand an enthusiasm for the sport -- even though, like auto racing, it doesn't appeal to me. But my friends spent a few thousand dollars, while Garner spent hundreds of thousands of 1960s dollars. Millions by current standard. And while he talks about his enthusiasm, the calm measured tones of his narration amidst near wins and disastrous crashes, the quotes from Walt Whitman, they reveal an enthusiasm, but no clear impression of why.

I suppose if anyone asked me why I looked at every movie I can, I would be hard pressed to explain that.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Inside view
maryrountree11 July 2020
We get a real look into all that goes into a racing team. Love the racing and all the behind the scenes action. Great, informative documentary.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Garner's best role
michaelchager5 February 2024
Garner's motorsports quest gave him a life of real intentionality. Here he is immersed in a community that shares his passion that oh by the way comes with the risk of death. From the love of the sport, teamed with experts he trusts, captured in close ups. Nothing is missed of the drama unfolding. And most of it happens as just matter of fact like a home movie in the Garner narration. This quest for elite performance with his team leads to a a notable denouement in Quebec. Talk about living with breakdowns. The inside story is these performers have a very short time frame to prepare anything and nothing is for certain.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
the racing scene
mossgrymk16 February 2024
Sports docs don't come duller than this James Garner vanity project, which was the first film directed by Andy Sidaris. He would go on to helm some very diverting B movies but diversion is about the last thing in evidence here as the movie is basically a series of monotonous and unremarkable races with second and sixth place finishes (kinda like this film). I bailed somewhere between the contest in Connecticut and wherever the final race was after becoming officially sick of Garner's droning narration which thinks it's funnier and more perceptive than it is, even dragging in poor old Walt Whitman for poetic validation. I also wearied of the film's draggy pace that makes the races seem like they're being run under water. And if an auto racing pic cannot move at a good clip, with a sense of danger in the air, which is also absent in Sidaris' vision, then why bother making it? To flatter its star, I suppose. Solid C.

PS...I also could have done without the film's sexism which renders women as either eye candy or clueless, poky drivers.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
My last Andy Sidaris movie to check off
BandSAboutMovies3 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
James Garner was a huge star in 1969, coming off the TV series Maverick and roles in films like The Great Escape, Support Your Local Sheriff! and Marlowe, a movie in which he fought Bruce Lee. He also made the movie Grand Prix for John Frankenheimer, which was the sixth movie of his that didn't do well at the box office. It hurt his career but gave him a passion for racing which he turned into starting his own crew and entering multiple races. This movie documents that time.

I'm so happy to have watched this, because it finally allows me to have seen every single movie that was directed by Andy Sidaris. You can tell Andy directed this because of how much attention is paid to Miss Continental Racing Queen Majken Kruse.

This movie was written by Willam Edgar, who would one day write Stacey, the movie that would begin Sidaris' world of gorgeous women and men who can't shoot a gun to save their lives.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
yawn
jstuit31 December 2000
This film has some great in-car racing footage in it, but between the racing scenes, we're treated to James Garner walking around and doing a bunch of self-important stuff, some of it racing related. A ten minute scene devoted to Garner getting out of bed, showering, and shaving is just one of the ridiculous non-events that add up to make this film a major bore.
4 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed