It's All Over Town (1964) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A Pleasant Trifle
j-z-o21 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
It's not really a movie, more like a TV variety show shot at MGM's London studio when there was down time. But because it was shot there, the production set design qualities are quite high and this is a cultural artifact window into pre-Beatles British pop music. It's corny and goofy, but also contains a sincerity that early 60s variety thrived on. Too much Frankie Vaughan, but he was a big star then, which might seem inexplicable today (but then try explaining Acker Bilk's stardom). You get Dusty with her Springfield brothers and Graham Nash with the Hollies, so historical enthusiasts might appreciate these early appearances. The nightclub scene had some surreal qualities pursuing visual jokes, but in a silly British manner rather than artiste French cinema. If you want to pass an hour looking at nice sets and listening to inoffensive pap music, not all that unpleasant for killing time if you are streaming Netflix/Amazon VOD.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Cross Section of the contemporary entertainment scene.
malcolmgsw10 August 2013
This is a review not a film as such.It was clearly made to support a British Lion "A" feature.It probably would have been paid for by the Eady Levy.Lance Percival and Willie Rushton are featured.This is about the time when "Private Eye" was founded by Rushton with others.Both Rushton and Percival were appearing on the famous satire show "That Was The Week That Was".Frankie Vaughn was big star at the time.He was appearing in his own TV show.He was a great performer and I managed to see him late on in his career in the West End in 42nd Street.Dusty Springfield would of course go on to international stardom.Acker Bilk was having his 5 minutes of fame.There is also a rather strange reverse striptease.All rather dated and uninspiring.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
That's entertainment
wilvram22 August 2020
A quirky variety revue featuring popular artistes from 1963. Among things you wouldn't see today are bunny girls, and April Olrich dancing to Acker Bilk's arrangement of 'The Volga Boatmen' with a live bear in attendance. (Incidentally I don't see why some are so disparaging of Mr. Bilk; he was a superb musician with a great sense of humour.) Other enjoyable acts include The Springfields and the young Clodagh Rodgers. Frankie Vaughan, who contributes five numbers of varying quality may seem desperately 'uncool' to many now, but he was immensely popular back in the day, especially with female audiences. I recall him turning up to do a show at a local theatre a good twenty years after this film was made, when he was mobbed by ladies of a certain age. I liked the Scottish- accented dry commentary and the amusing Lance Percival at the centre of it all. All in all, thoroughly entertaining.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Corny But Nice
richardchatten22 August 2020
If knowing that it starts with bunny girls doing the Twist at Raymond's Revue Bar doesn't put you off (it's easy to see why it carried an 'A' certificate in 1964), then this film is for you.

Frankie Vaughan and 'Mr' Acker Bilk having already demonstrated that they couldn't act in 'My Teenage Daughter' and 'Band of Thieves', that problem is skirted by including them as performers only and leaving the thesping to TV funnymen Lance Percival and William Rushton.

Plainly shot on half a shoestring but ravishingly and enthusiastically shot in early sixties Eastman Colour (within fifteen years assistant art director John Barry won an Oscar for his work on 'Star Wars'), a young and big-haired Dusty Springfield - billed simply as one of 'The Springfields' - is just one of the treats crammed into less than a hour.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The credits claim it has a scriptwriter with additional material by others.
grunsel15 February 2021
This has a few good points, MGM London Studios,nice photography now revealed in the digital age and a lush backing score by Ivor Raymonde but that is where it ends.Two boring contemporary celebs that use to turn up all the time on TV for some reason or other link the musical numbers using a script (if there was one) that could have been scrawled by a 10 year old on his/her own let alone three grown men mentioned in the script credits. It must have looked dated even at its premier with perhaps its high spots being 'The Springfields' and Frankie Vaughan doing his sea shanty celebrating the fact it was nearly over. Poor old Cloda (Clodagh) Rogers does not even get a close up.You have to ask how on Earth did they get the money for this when at the same time people like Harold Pinter were out with the begging bowl trying to get his 'The Caretaker' financed.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed