Twist (2003) Poster

(2003)

User Reviews

Review this title
30 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
good idea, but falls a little flat
Krasnoludek24 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I thought the idea for this "modern update" was pretty in tune with Dickens' examination of the humanity in the castaways of society. However, the execution of this idea all but forgot about showing the humanity. The casting was pretty good, especially with the innocent Oliver (Joshua Close), and much of the script was written rather well. My big problem with the movie is the lack of development. We learn a lot about Dodge (at least enough to explain his actions), but it really felt like his complicated past wasn't treated in enough depth. The scenes with his brother were not written too well, or perhaps not acted very well, because you really didn't get enough of a feeling for what tormenting emotions these two were going through. Many of the characters don't get enough development, so you don't get to see glimpses of their humanity and compassion shining through the squalor. In fact, other than Oliver, the only character that even shows an inkling of caring for the welfare of others is Nancy. The other boys, including Dodge, just do their own thing, and there isn't a sense of them banding together to survive. Fagin doesn't get to show any of the underlying compassion he's supposed to have.

This movie comes across as depressing, and with good reason. While more faithful adaptations of Oliver Twist have the uplifting quality of people trying to leave their bad conditions, this movie just shows people sinking deeper into the muck. Perhaps this was intended by the writer/director, but the execution makes the movie less than memorable. 7/10. The movie had potential, but didn't use it.

*******************SPOILER ALERT**********************************

Another commenter mentions that Dodge goes off in the end to kill the Senator. Dodge doesn't kill the Senator, he kills Bill. He kills the man who caused all this turmoil for him and the other characters. He kills the man who has essentially filled the role of his father as abuser.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Twist not so much of a twist...
kergillian25 March 2005
I was not impressed. the film showed flashes of brilliance, and certainly Tierney shows promise as a director - but the film lacked depth and story. What did this film tell me? There was no growth - and I don't mean the characters; stagnation of life is a concept that can be delivered successfully in film - but the story has to DEVELOP. And there was no development here.

One major hindrance in this regard was the Oliver Twist connection. Using Oliver Twist is fine and dandy, but these characters represented the Dickensian characters in name only. Their personalities were lost. And although there were a few visual allusions to Dickensian London (the street lamps and wrought-iron cots come to mind), the feel of Toronto just doesn't cut it atmospherically.

As well, the story of Oliver Twist was filled with satire, wit, sexual innuendo...it also had mystery and tension. This film lacked every one of those characteristics. All of the potent factors of the novel disappeared - and even the lack of a 'perfect' ending - which was the one aspect that rankled me in the novel - didn't help the film, as this ending lacked resolution, and all but lacked a point.

I also felt the characters did not keep to character. I don't mean to Dickensian character (although they certainly didn't keep to Dickensian character either), but merely to believability as characters. I don't believe that Dodge's brother acted as he did. I don't believe that the Senator reversed himself as he did - and speaking of the Senator - what was with the entire locket/parental connection? It was completely ignored in the film, though it clearly alluded to the scenario in the novel where Oliver is discovered to have a connection to a wealthy family...

I could go on and write a deeper dissertation on this film, but sadly have no patience to do so. Suffice to say that this film is a major disappointment because of its sheer potential and its failure to live up to that potential. 5/10
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Half A Twist
B2414 April 2005
It goes without saying that updating and reinventing a classic tale is a minefield of potential mismatches, and anyone familiar with the original is disinclined to suffer fools gladly. In this case, even if the viewer tunes out Dickens, the best that can be said of it is that some of the acting (particularly Stahl) scores and the technical values are at least adequate.

Because none of the characters is fully developed, there is no opportunity to judge much beyond that. And because the plot is therefore weak and wobbly, the only thing left for comments is trying to find isolated bits of action or notions relating to one's own experiences. For example, I found the scenes involving heroin use strangely devoid of release, merely technical and prophylactic. In order for a screenplay to succeed, it needs to draw the viewer into the feelings of the actors. That happens only rarely here in spite of what one senses is good dramatic potential.

I think I'll stick with Dickens.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
lot of truth
evena00118 October 2004
I would say that most people are not aware of and are very naiive about street life, and that that might influence their perceptions of this movie. I enjoyed it and thought it touched on a lot of issues that very rarely get touched on, and thought that while some portions were a little overdrawn, overall it was a very moving pieve of film that had a lot of truth embedded in it.

I would say that the people here that say that they have seen "too many movies about hustling" have probably never had the experience themselves. One cinematic exploration is surely enough for them, I suppose.

However, if you have not been exposed to "too many" hustler movies already, I would encourage you to check it out.

The acting is superb and I especially liked Joshua Close.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
promising new twist on Oliver is a slow screw
jcian4 June 2005
I wanted very much to like this film. The premise is compelling, the too-close relationships that grow out of necessity for the down and out who basically do whatever they must to continue to be able to get by and get high. Unfortunately, the most intimidating character is kept off screen and is just someone we hear through the phone conversations of other characters. Because this part of the drama remains unseen, it appears that there are 3 related but somehow unmotivated deaths. The scenes between dodge and his brother are poignant but it all takes too long. Every shot is long and slow. Plenty of long drawn-out track shots. Even the establishing shots of exteriors and interiors are lingering. I managed to go and make lunch between crises. Still, there's some real juice in this one.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Twisted!!!
Boggman14 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Poor naïve Oliver. Mommy has passed away and he never knew his daddy. After a series of misfortunate events, he has found himself to be a 16 year old orphan/ runaway on the streets of Toronto. Lucky for him, while hanging out in a local café, he is discovered by Dodge, who seems to have a little experience in recognizing poor lost souls with no where to go.

Dodge is rather street wise, after all; he has been pounding the pavement nightly for quite sometime as a hustler himself. He offers Oliver some food and a place to stay and, which Oliver gladly accepts.

Dodge and a few of his cohorts live in a ramshackle abandoned building with their "supervisor" Fagin watching there every move. Fagin reports to Bill (whom we never see); who runs his stable of boys & girls with an iron fist.

Dodge also has quite a nasty heroin addiction, which he relies on to get the job done every night. Dodge decides to train Oliver in his wicked ways, which the young Oliver seems more than up to the task of learning.

So is the story of Jacob Tierney's adaptation of the classic Dickens novel "Oliver Twist". This is NOT the Oliver that I remember growing up; but it is still a decent movie nonetheless.

The movie chronicles the lives of these young men & women in a gritty and depressing fashion. The movie centers around Dodge, who is played quite skillfully by Nick Stahl. Oliver (Joshua Close) just happens to be the catalyst that could bring the whole business crashing down…..

Will he survive the clutches of Dodge, Fagin, and Bill? Well, you'd have to watch to find out for yourself.

Dodge himself is quite an interesting character, and we get to find out about his family background and what has led him up to this point. It's quite a downer of a story, but an intriguing one as well.

If you like movies that depict stories of sexual abuse and addiction, then "Twist" should be right up your alley. However, there are scenes in "Twist" (one in particular that is SO disturbing and so pervasive that it's barely watch able) that really make the movie hard to stomach.

The film is finely acted, written, and directed. "Twist" balances a fine line between reality and sickness in our culture. Worth seeing once; but this reviewer would have trouble watching Twist again due to some of it's content (especially the scene mentioned above). Some things, I do not feel need to be depicted just quite yet on film, no matter how brutally honest their intent may be.

Recommended, but only for those audiences who like there movies harsh and unforgiving. By the time Twist has concluded, this reviewer doubts that you'll be asking "Please sir, may I have some more"?
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
think again the humanity and its excess
jkindeep26 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The movie set in the back street and the subject was the male prostitutes, a modern version of oliver twist with homosexuality as a subject matter. The movie has a tone of indie film, low budget, well-acted, well-directed. The main 2 character's acting was superb, very convincing as roles they play, one nihilistic, another as innocent.

There were questions opened in the film, social injustice, prejudice, poverty and sexual trade for living. The humanity, moral, cruelty and social injustice. Nothing justified here in the film, only questioning and narrating the matter, as there's no solutions perhaps. Simply at it is, thus, the director was doing a fine job.

The movie is very enjoyable, camera work has its tone right, the characters are isolated in the scene, the background were mostly empty and cold as reflection of the character's inner self. The music's lyric was relative to the subject and quite creates echoes in suitable tune.

A relation of opening scene and closing scene was impressive, one of the most memorable scene in years. That let you think of the subject, its endless, vulnerable situation.

Overall, it is very much a good film. However there are few things I didn't really follow the direction. It has too much sensitivity in the film. The characters are all too mellow, even the Faign's ...spoiler...death wasn't so convincing and it didn't build it to the climax. It was simply unexpected but not in a convincing way.

Also when David was forcing the oral sex performance, the transition between characters were too unrealistic, they never had those master and slave relations, it wasn't so convincing why David was crying, if he was simply displaying the cruelty.

When I said it was too mellow, I am not referring the graphical content, I quite like the fact that there's not much actual sex scenes, however, it was all too quiet to feel the volt, its poetic mood was harming the content and its intention. Like watching a protest on the street without the scream or bombing noise muted. There's no enough bang in the film to creates the echo, it was all too quietly disappearing when the movie finished, failing to create an howl to live on. As though you are walking out from the school play with a touch of adult context.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Just how influential was "My Own Private Idaho"?
moonspinner5526 March 2006
In the last ten or so years, there has been a rash of movies starring young, white, straight-seeming actors portraying bedraggled streetwise hustlers, with all scenarios (it would seem) stemming from Gus Van Sant's "My Own Private Idaho". This one has the conceit of being a gay updating of Dickens (!) with Nick Stahl as sort of an Artful Dodger of Queer Toronto. The trouble with "Twist" is...that's the only twist, and it isn't a groundbreaking one. These kids, who seem to turn tricks for coffee, cigarettes and the occasional needle, have nothing much to offer us except their names. We see the seedy side of life yet we're given little explanation why Stahl and his friends are so belligerent against hope, without any imagination or the drive to get out and succeed. *1/2 from ****
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic
Prettylittlelie9 December 2004
Nick Stahl's desperate stare sold the movie for me, I rented it based on the cover, having never heard of it. This is one of the best movies I have ever seen. Joshua Close's performance wasn't all that good, but Nick Stahl's was phenomenal. The movie was really emotional but really subtle. It has an excellent soundtrack, matching every scene to emotional perfection. It's a twist on Oliver Twist but set in modern day Toronto and with male prostitution and heroin instead of pick-pocketing. Don't get hung up on the comparison, look at it as it's own movie. It has the best ending to any movie I've ever seen. Essentialy it's about the blurry lines between affectionate contact, sexual contact, and violent contact. The movie forces you to bottle your emotions by never actually showing explicit sex or violence, it keeps you from getting any release. I think the method worked perfectly. The only two problems with the movie in my mind, are that Joshua Close was cast, and that although the subtleness is excellent, it's sometimes hard to hear every word of the dialogue, so keep it up load and pay close attention.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
True to the Dickens style-updated (possible spoilers)
vldazzle1 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I was favorably impressed by this movie (which I watched because it was based on Dickens). I greatly disagree that Dickens was like a Disney of his day (as one reviewer stated). He was trying to emphasize the wrongs of society at his time as this film also does. It is also very good to base a new plot on a real classic. I was pleased that I did not have to witness graphic scenes (while still knowing what occurred).

I do not consider this a classic, so have not saved it to my collection (most of my friends/family would not appreciate it -but many of them also do not read/enjoy Dickens). It had the horrible taste of poverty and all that it can bring as well as the evil characters that he liked to point out. The "senator" although making an attempt to contact- it was never clear to me just what he hoped to accomplish, as he ultimately made no attempt to provide any alternative to Oliver, but return to that life.

Another reviewer made light of the fact of Oliver's life (father unknown) but made no mention of the many foster homes (some probably unmentioned) before he arrived there. I understand from my studies how immensely difficult all that could have been for a young man with no real roots.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
R.I.P. Male Hustler Films
ianmhart25 June 2004
I saw this as part of the '04 San Francisco GLBT film fest. The description seemed interesting enough, and Nick Stahl has made a couple good movie choices, so I figured it was a safe bet. Wrong-o. Can we please put an end to the male hustler genre? This Dickinsian train wreck could have been just as easily made by piecing together scenes from the fair "Johns," the violent for violence-sake "Bully," and the utterly stupid "Speedway Junkies."

The movie had a couple nice shots, but any art of the film was wasted by the story. I also really liked the soundtrack. Those two highlights do not justify the 98 minutes of my attention that I gave to this film. I couldn't get out of the theater quick enough, and considered walking out more than once.

Anyone who feels the slightest tug toward this movie should just rewatch "My Own Private Idaho" (if you want a hustler movie) or "In the Bedroom" (if you want a Nick Stahl movie) and buy an Alison Kraus album (for the alt-country/bluegrass soundtrack).
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Film - Dark and Powerful
jshaw3-117 August 2004
I really enjoyed the film. Although the production was not up to par the film was done well. The acting was incredible, Nick Stahl has gone up in my opinion and the way the darkness of the story was told without being in your face about it was re-freshing.

The music at the end of the movie was incredible and I can't wait until the soundtrack comes out.

Does anyone know of any the artist that perform the music in the movie?

I do not understand why some people do not like the picture. From a story book perspective I do believe that the movie measures up to Private Idaho, although I would put the production quality at a lower level.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Twist
weberpr17 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Twist is an up to date repeat of Oliver Twist about a gay confused young man and his wrong fall in with hustling and drug abuse, set in the streets of Toronto.

Twist stars (Nick Stahl)as Dodge a hustler on the streets living in an abandoned warehouse with other young hopefuls. (Joshua Close) plays the innocent Oliver who is taken under the wing by Dodge to become a street hustler. Set in a divey area in Toronto, the story is all about the life of Dodge and his drug addiction and problems in life, struggling to find answers he meets Oliver who is a sad boy as his mother and father passed away and he is confused about his purpose in life.

Twist was an interesting eerie film, Nick Stahl is one of the best young actors, everything he has performed in I have enjoyed. Stahl did sell the role of Dodge, Nick has even commented how he loves playing the strange roles and really getting into his character. Although little nudity and graphic sexual content was shown I still found this film difficult to watch, and I am confused as to why I don't think it's as simple as because there were gays in it, I can't watch because i am not prejudice against that.

Strange film, I liked the set and the area's filmed and Stahl's performance was top notch but I think the point was lost about mid film, last 20 or 30 minutes, I don't know can't explain it see for yourself.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gutwrenching!
batik_jenny22 November 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Dickens' is known as an author who wanted to change society and make people aware of the problems the workingclass suffered in London at that time. He was especially concerned about children, but his intention was often ruined by the fact that Dickens couldn't help writing happy endings that badly fit his dark stories. This movie, an updated version of Dickens' classic "Oliver Twist" is a little like an effort to do the darkness in Dicken's stories justice. It's "Oliver Twist" but without the unnaturally happy ending.

Jacob Tierney has changed the story slightly to adjust it to our time. For example Fagin's boys are not pickpocketers but hustlers who work for the mysterious and dangerous Bill, never seen throughout the movie. Also, focus is more on The Artful Dodger, here called only Dodge, than on Oliver. The darkness in the human wreck that is Dodge is nicely explored. You kind of get the picture of what happened to him for him to become the person he is, and you do understand from the beginning that he will probably go down on the streets due to the life he is living. Still, you hope until the very end that the happy ending Dickens provided will somewhere be present here too. But you still knew all along: there are no happy endings in real life. In real life, a homeless orphan does not by mistake find his rich relatives who gladly take him in. In real life, the Oliver Twists out there on the streets live and die the life of a homeless junkiewhore. In real life, the Dodges of the world crumble under the haunting memories of a painful childhood.

This is a great but dark and sad movie. The actors are all fantastic, especially Michèle-Barbara Pelletier as Bill's wife Nancy and Nick Stahl as Dodge. I watched "Twist" partially because it sounded like a good movie, but mainly because I admire Nick Stahl so much. Here he gives a great performance of a young man literally going under before your eyes.

***SPOILERS**** There is especially one scene that is extremely hard to watch. Dodge's older brother comes looking for him, and it's hard to really understand his motives. You understand that Dodge ran away, probably because he was sexually abused by their father, and blames his brother for not interveining. His brother is sort of looking for forgiveness, but then turns cold and harsh, saying he made the right decision, trying to secure a good future for himself and therefore having to let Dodge down. He says he will get married, get his masters and live a happy life with kids and everything he wants. Dodge on the other hand "will probably lay face down on a street having OD'd". He knows Dodge is hustling, and after having promised him 400$ to help suddenly says "Show me what you do". Dodge doesn't understand at first, but when it hits him he can't believe it. "Why are you doing this to me?" he asks and cries desperatly. The scene is gutwrenching as Dodge's older brother forces him to give him a blow job to get the money, and Dodge has no choice but to do it, because if he comes home without money again, Bill will kill him. A scene that will go down in moviehistory, at least in my book. ***SPOILERS OVER*****

Anyway, it's a superb movie, with a dark and frustrating ending. You know this is how it is in real life, but you can't help hoping there is a happy Dickens ending for some streetkid out there, somewhere, sometime.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Highly unoriginal
triplebiker30 January 2004
Looking at this movie, I wondered if I did not already see it. The theme is not original (anymore), we have seen the setting in other movies, the acting is poor, as is the story. So, there is no reason why I should recommend this movie to anybody.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Thought provoking, moving, dark yet magnetic
flyboyrob16 September 2003
You cannot help but get sucked into this film... Beautifully acted, exquisitely filmed. Throughout the film, you want to jump on the screen and rescue Oliver. The audience at the Toronto International Film gasped in unison throughout the film...

A fantastic adaptation of Dickens' masterpiece; who knew that today's Toronto could be as darkly sinister as Dickens' London?
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I was supposed to get taken in
Lucky-639 September 2004
When I walked in, I wondered why the theatre was empty. I wanted to like this movie. Hey, Gary Farmer's a funny guy. I hoped to see something balanced, lifelike, with ups and downs. Instead what I saw was a "scared straight"-style, here's-how-bad-it-can-get cliché without any relief, either humorous or realistic.

I was supposed to get taken in by the comparison of this movie to Dicken's story. Except it was nothing like Dicken's story, except for the names and the squalor. The Victorian gentleman had a handle on reality; this paternalistic and uninspired film wants to paint everything outside the mainstream worldview as endlessly fear-driven and hopeless. It's as if the writers wanted to us to think that Dickens was a pollyanna and wanted us to know how bad things *really* are.

Do such awful things actually happen? For sure. Do -all- of these things happen to real people in the real world? No. Which makes Twist a horror film -- if that's what you're after.

Maybe someone wanted kids to know what they might face if they ran away from abusive homes to the big city. In that case, they should have found out what kids face -- verisimiltude anyone? -- instead of throwing together an orgy of dark imaginations.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A heart wrenching experience
SphericalTime20 September 2004
Jacob Tierney does a wonderful job in this movie simply by playing to his actor's strengths. This movie drags the audience through a Arnofskesque journey through a world where there is never a happy ending, and does a fantastic job of it.

The play between the boys (and girls) stuck in Vancouver's shadowy underbelly of sex and drugs illustrates just how lonely the sex industry is for the de facto children caught in it.

The character of Dodge is particularly well played by the often typecast Nick Stahl. Despite typecasting (which is often a sign of true talent in at least one area), he pulls the bitterness of the role right out into the open and twists it slowly between his hands.

Tierney's auteurship of the piece does create a uniqueness that might otherwise be subsumed by various facets of previously done works.
20 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Dirty Boulevard
Lechuguilla31 March 2008
What this low budget film has going for it is a terrific performance by Nick Stahl. He plays Dodge, a young and straight hustler who works the streets in a gay area of Toronto. Dodge does drugs to quell the emotional pain of having to work at something so debasing. He spends his time alternating between walking the streets, living with fellow hustlers in a dilapidated loft, talking with a diner waitress (well played by Michele-Barbara Pelletier), and teaching a new recruit named Oliver the ins and outs of the "business".

The script is not well written. Questions are left unanswered. And there's lots of downtime wherein not much happens. The result is considerable tedium and boredom, not just for the characters but for viewers as well. The story is depressing because the characters are all so hopeless.

Another problem here is that the concept is not original. We've seen all this before in other films, like "My Own Private Idaho". I'm not sure what the point of "Twist" is, apart from being a contemporary update of the Oliver Twist story. I do like the music at the film's start, and it recurs off and on throughout.

Low-key, and very slowly paced, with long camera "takes", this bleak story would have been better with a little more substantive action. Other than Nick Stahl's fine performance, the movie does have atmosphere, albeit dreary, but not much else.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Tainted Love
jeebusenroute23 June 2005
What an original title for my comment. It was what I thought of in a pinch. Anyway . . . the film is based on Oliver Twist, using basically, only the name of the characters and their abject living conditions to parlay a story about male hustlers and their life in Toronto.

The atmosphere created is pitch-perfect, and the audience really gets the feel of the weather in Toronto during winter. It's dark, damp and freezing cold, much like the the world the boys live in. And in the hollowed eyes of the hustlers, you can feel their hopelessness and exhaustion.

It is told in the view point of Dodge, rather than Oliver, and focuses on his life. Dodge is played by Nick Stahl, who does a great job of evoking the scared, hungry, cold and insecure young boy, who has seen too much. Joshua Close plays Oliver, who seems a little too one-dimensional for my liking, but is really effective in scenes with Stahl (especially the alley scene), perhaps a testament to Mr. Stahl's talents.

The film is definitely disturbing. There is no sugarcoating, and yet, there is no sex in the film, only mild violence. Most is left to the audience's imaginations, even the face of the Bill character, who plays the "pimp" in the film. His anonymity may have been used to increase the scariness of the character and his intentions, but almost became a shtick in my eyes, especially after his deplorable actions after finding out his "woman" had betrayed him. Bill was almost too bad to be a "real bad guy."

The lines are blurred between affection, power, violence and sexual need, perhaps most effectively in the one scene, it is all mixed up into one degrading act for Dodge. Some might have found it grotesque or perverted or used for shock value. However, I found it necessary to understand Dodge's actions and his character. It also helps to underline the pervasive cycle of abuse.

The ending is dark and bleak, and full of symbolic undertones. There are many questions left unanswered. I found the film to be very engaging, bittersweet and a good portrayal of how love is the most complicated emotion of all.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
On the technical side
cmmescalona24 September 2006
I'd love to invite all viewers of this film to watch it again and try to exact what made it so good. There's the obvious: a great script, great acting from Nick Stahl and "Fagin", great music to paint the moods and a subject matter that holds its grip 'til the end.

But there's the not so obvious. Why were we so absorbed by this film in a way that is quite unusual? Maybe, it's because it's not the monthly Hollywood thriller. But maybe we could watch it again and realise that the way it was shot is the main reason why we were glued to the screen.

For those who like cinematography as art, you can find certain clues of what will happen in the way the story is told from the very first scene: wide angles, proscenium-like framing, rock-steady shots, events not depicted but imagined, lingering images of the gritty places we go with the characters. All these things are unusual in recent film-making (not only American, but from any Country). It's difficult to do and very effective in Twist.

The lighting was kept to its minimum so all the darkness and cold that actually surrounded the real action is transmitted. The possible close-ups were discarded for the framed versions of the character and his surroundings, giving the whole idea of the situation, and not only of that of the character himself.

This film is a daring and very intelligent approach to a new way of doing things. From the adaptation of the novel and the creation of a modern Toronto-from-London-filth-town-to-gritty-city approach to the use of 16mm film instead of the common 35. The selection of format that wouldn't give the super-wide view of Panavision and the blow-up process of the 16mm negative to the theatrical 35mm release, make of this film a truly new way of looking at things. Even the use of sound. When someone is far away from the camera, so is the sound (with some exceptions on several street shots). This makes you get even closer to what's happening, because you must be really attentive if you don't want to lose a word.

All in all, I think this is a film that rose the bar for newcomers and offered a lot to analise, something we now can do in the comfort of home.

Last reflection: Nick Stahl is as chilling as he was in A Man Without a Face, remember?
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
lonely boys trying to survive and looking for love and warmth
kridas29 January 2004
I've just seen this movie on the IFFRotterdam, and was impressed by the acting performance of Nick Stahl. Also the very good camerawork was a very pleasant surprise. It's quite a dark film, not only because it's a film about hustling boys, but also most of the film is shot in darker periods of the day, and i found it really well shot and well use of the diafragma of the camera. The story it's self was nothing special because it's based on Oliver Twist, but with a modern touch. The performances of the actors made it really worthwhile. Nick Stahl is a actor of a kind i expect to last long, and will be able move ahead in his career. He alone is worth viewing this film, very convincing, the way he walks, his look into the camera, his emotion when he has to do his brother....go and see it
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
knipp is knuts
samzpan31 July 2004
I just read the review of TWIST by this knut knipp and I would advise him to stick to mainstream movies, dude go check out the new spidey movie, it rocks! Twist is no fun movie, but being a teenage male hustler is no fun thing either, unless you have a rich sugar daddy willing to take care of you. And i have known a few guys in that situation. But I guess if you're in Toronto, things can't get much worse, but a bus to LA would be a welcome change. I really don't see why the writer/director used Oliver Twist as a plot guide, it really is sort of absurd. A movie on hustling in bleak Canada doesn't need a "fagen" or an "oliver" to make it work. The performance by Nick Stahl is truly astounding, this guy is a great actor and could give the young River Phoenix a run for his money. There is no happy ending, like there was in the original Oliver, but I suppose Dickens had to keep his publisher/editor happy and the books had to sell. Actually he was the equivalent to today's Disney movies, where such banal exercises as Holes, has to conclude with everyone living happily ever after. If you like niche movies and are not into the general crap that comes out of Hollywood, then i say check out Twist.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dickens classic revisited
jezzdogg7 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Charles Dickens' classic tale of lost children is given a gritty, inner city update in this film from Jacob Tierney. Nick Stahl plays Dodge, a heroin addicted street hustler, who befriends runaway Oliver, played by Joshua Close. Dodge lures the love-struck Oliver into a life of prostitution and crime, while rebuffing his clumsy attempts at seduction.

The boys work for the pimp, Fagin, who reports to the shadowy Bill, a source of terror to all of the characters, yet who is never actually seen in the movie. Although they are at the bottom of society's scale, escape from their lot is presented to them in very different fashions, although unlike in Oliver Twist, there is no happy ending for anyone in this film.

This is not a tidy package. A lot of questions remain unanswered at the end of this film. The writer/director trusts his audience to understand the numbing reality, that bad lives rarely end in good ways. The exact opposite message of that presented by the Dickens book.

Viewers who have read Oliver Twist will have a deeper understanding of the nuances of the story presented here. The scenes between Oliver and the Senator, and the scenes involving Bill might not make as much sense to a viewer unfamiliar with the Dickens story. Not to mention the somewhat comical scene where Oliver blurts out his life story in a seeming single breath, causing Dodge to question whether he was on something besides coffee.

The actors all turn in solid performances, particularly Close, who is flawless as Oliver. He plays the naive waif to perfection. Nick Stahl, who has never given anything less than an excellent effort in any film he's appeared in, again shines as Dodge. He delivers a believable, yet sympathetic, strung out whore. You almost wonder why he bothers waking up in the morning, his life is that miserable. The supporting cast is also superb, especially Gary Farmer as Fagin, who shows he actually has a heart when we least expect it and in the most shocking way.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The best small, gay independent film I've seen in awhile.
rensignkrogh15 December 2004
For a small independent film I thought it was good. I kept comparing it--in my mind--to "Love and human remains" and "Eclipse" probably because it too was distributed by Strand and that Strand intro always catches me. I'll agree with others that it was overlong, or would have benefited from tighter editing; some scenes should have been tightened up. But the overlong scenes are probably there because those making the film were really eager to get a point across or create an atmosphere.

Each reviewer seemed to get a different message, as is true of just about all the films reviewd at this site. I was impressed with the way the hustlers absorbed and accepted the opinions others have of them; I've sort-of gotten that same opinion watching boys at work at a local mall and transit depot. Society thinks of them as lepers or diseased or garbage and they begin to think of themselves that way. I often get the impression that they've come to think of themselves as so dirty that even if help were offered they would just say that it's "too late for me." I have heard one-or-two say that, by the way. Someday I'd like to meet one who didn't accept the role society assigned him and actually developed a positive self-image. That's the important gift my mother gave me.. "you're as good as anybody."

Being an romantic old fag I was, of course, much taken by the character of Oliver before he became angry and bitter. Thank God I've become too old to think that I can save anyone who's become hard, angry and bitter; that's for the experts.

The character of Fagan was interesting just because he was played as a person who seemed to have moments of caring that came across to me as sincere; I hadn't expected that. I know I've seen that actor somewhere else, but I can't remember where.

I really thought that the final scene with Oliver in the motel got the film's message across forcefully. It's a shame that the film maker didn't stop there; the empty bed scene over stated the obvious.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed