Shankara (1991) Poster

(1991)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Sunny's bad phase
superindrajit24 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Sunny Deol after the super-hit Ghayal had a career phase low point. After Ghayal, all his movies in 1991 except Veerta and Vishnu Devaa were flops. Shankara has a similar story to Veerta and it is too based around the suburbs or India. Shankara is a story which follows the same elements on attacking the problem like the super hit Arjun in 1985. 90% of the movie is a flashback and many movies are made like this where the hero has to remember the whole story in order to know is identity. This idea is copied from the Bourne Identity. Anyways, the movie is nothing great. Its just about Sunny Deol as the macho man who beats villains up after learning problems. These kinds of movies I really like but the same idea is remade to many times so I can't really bother to give this movie a high rating. The acting is average, everyone except the gorgeous Neelan hams. Action is good, I always like Bollywood movies for their action no matter how lame the movie is. The term editing is missing in this movies because scenes just pop in and out making it a poor movie. Even the action is good enough to solve all these other problems. Overall, another flop in Sunny's career in the early days after his super hit Ghayal.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Best Film Ever Made!
Emmelzemus14 September 2005
This can be said to belong to a genre popular during Indian's turbulent 70s and 80s; the archetypal example of which is Sholay (Ramesh Sippy, 75). I suppose you could loosely call it action orientated, romantic melodrama; it was heavily influenced by westerns but is as different from Clint Eastwood's better films as it is possible to be. If you can suspend your dramatic tradition as well as your disbelief you'll enjoy this film.

Firstly, you have to stop worrying about petty things such as shot balancing, maintaining a coherent shooting arc and invisible editing. This is melodrama not realism, and as such these concerns need not apply. Secondly, expect dancing, in the romantic tradition dance and song are used to express emotion, so don't expect them to drive the plot forward. This is not an opera.

Thirdly, remember this is romantic, comic, action, melodrama and you should be ready to slew wildly between these diverse aspects. You might have been watching a badly choreographed, accidentally comic, fight scene a second ago but now we are singing in a giant birdcage.

Finally, here everything is curved. Not in the way a number of complementary character arcs bend together to provide a satisfying, complete ending. Oh no, here there are only circles. This film begins with a woman searching for the love she has known throughout countless lives. The ending only guarantees this search will inevitable begin again. Consequently, the flash back, a seemingly random 20 minute digression, is not so much a meander as a concentric circle.

I think I have dutifully proved this is the best film ever made, give me a second and I'll unify the world religions. But seriously now, Indian cinema is wonderful precisely because it is true to its own indigenous philosophical, dramatic and musical traditions; so please don't criticise it simply because it does not play by the rules of western film-making.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed