Shogun: Total War (Video Game 2000) Poster

(2000 Video Game)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
A very good game
hotspur955 January 2006
This is the game that started off the Total War series of games, which now include a Medieval version and a Roman Version (as seen on BBC2!). It is available on budget now and is a little dated but still good fun. There are two main sections to the game. The first is the main game area which represents a map of feudal japan. From here you can build up your forts and towns and move your armies around.

When you meet an enemy force you go to the next part of the game which shows an area of terrain and the two armies. Incredibly at the time the game could represent about 3000 individual soldiers making for some fairly large scale battles.

It feels very realistic as well. Height, terrain, troops morale and tiredness all making a difference, and how your army was made up - spear men, archers, samurai etc.

Still, the way to win was always to make sure you had twice as many troops on the field of battle as the enemy, so after a while the battles could get a bit repetitive.

Worth a look if you haven't tried it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Promising Beginning
bs3dc18 January 2007
Even though successive 'Total War' games get increasingly impressive in terms of graphics and game-play, this was much better than the other strategy games that came out around the same time.

The campaigns are rival clans battling it out in a (closely) historically accurate setting set in 16th Century Japan, or in the expansion pack you can be fighting as or battling against the Mongol hordes lead by Kublai Khan. The range of units for the real-time battles is impressive, though there is less difference in ability between units than there is in later games e.g. technically the weakest unit in the game is the Yari Ashigaru, but they are far more useful than the weakest unit in Rome: Total War, the peasants who are just arrow fodder.

You are rewarded for using the correct tactics in a battle, so that samurai archers on a hill will fire far further and be far more deadly than those marching uphill. Charging cavalry into the rear of a unit of Yari Samurai will be much more effective than charging them in the front. You can also easily see the value on the battlefield of upgrades such as improved armour, morale and weapon deadliness.

Diplomacy is an important aspect of the game, even though your allies are not to be trusted much of the time. Assassination is an important weapon, as you send your ninjas and Geishas out to murder out enemy generals of high ability or the clan leader and his heirs. It is a weakness of the easier difficulty settings that your ability to win depends a good deal on just surviving long enough to create Geishas who can win the whole campaign for you far quicker than you will be able to by force of arms (as enemy clans break down when there are no suitable heirs left). There are some entertaining movies as your assassins kill (or attempt to) something that is sadly missing from the series until Medieval 2.

There are other weaknesses in game-play in that there are no naval units so there is no chance to blockade ports as you can in later Total War titles. Also the graphics look extremely primitive compared to the latest incarnation Medieval II. On the other hand if you are looking for a good quality strategy game that will run on a machine with much lower specs than the more recent 'sequels' then you need look no further. There is plenty of re-playability due to the different abilities and focus of each clan.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed