"The Alfred Hitchcock Hour" The Life Work of Juan Diaz (TV Episode 1964) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Worthy of an operatic setting
lrrap9 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
As a young man, Ray Bradbury hitched a ride to Mexico to see the famed "Mummies of Guanajuato"---mummified corpses that had been unearthed to make room for new "tenants", as a result of delinquent payments on their graves (the custom was outlawed in 1958). Bradbury was horrified yet fascinated, and "The Lifework of Juan Diaz" was one of two short stories that resulted from his pilgrimage to Mexico.

First published in the September, 1963 issue of PLAYBOY, Bradbury himself adapted JUAN DIAZ a year later as an hour-long teleplay for Hitchcock's TV series. It is one creepy and unsettling story---but, as the author said to me "It's a LOVE story", and in that respect, it is absolutely unique: a tale of a man whose deathbed pledge to help feed his family from the afterworld is fulfilled only after a battle of daring, wits, and legal maneuvering between the deceased man's courageous widow and the malevolent, deceitful gravedigger, the "keeper of dry souls."

Bradbury's lyrical, dreamlike original becomes somewhat padded and clichéd in terms of its ethnic portrayals, but these flaws are quickly overshadowed by the very effective art direction, set (and mummy!) design, pitch-black b&w photography, tour-de-force performance by Frank Silvera AND -- let's not forget--- Bernard Herrmann's tragic, wearying processional-like musical score, with a ponderous accompanying rhythm ingeniously derived from the famous Habanera from Bizet's opera "Carmen."

Unfortunately, some of the major dialogue scenes are flat and totally lacking in tension, especially the crucial, decisive scene between the gravedigger, Maria, and her brother Riccardo, the chief of police, as they argue over the legal ownership of Juan Diaz's mummy. This is the sort of character-driven, intensely interactive scene that could benefit from a well-paced, high-voltage OPERATIC setting (hint, hint--check Amazon.com under "Music.")

But any quibbles about the slack pace and occasional padding are brushed aside in the final moments of this episode, as Maria Diaz, having done her part to bring her husband's deathbed pledge to fruition, approaches his corpse (a remarkable likeness of actor Alejandro Rey), and quietly, reverently begs for his forgiveness. It is only then--in the very last seconds of the show---that Herrmann's music changes from its mournful dirge and blossoms into a radiant, liturgical "Amen"...as the dulled, lifeless eyes of the mummy seem to glow, thus affirming celestial approval for Maria and her deed.

It is stunning...one of the most emotional moments on film that I know of; should we be repulsed?..or should we burst into tears at the beauty of this most touching and transcendental ending? That's the brilliance of what the master-author Ray Bradbury, director Norman Lloyd, and composer Bernard Herrmann accomplished in this intriguing piece of mid-60's weekly TV fare.
26 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Creepy episode
donofthedial11 January 2007
Lots of the AH Presents hour long shows are not all that good, but this is one of the better ones that I have seen. It's just plain eerie and creepy and if you shudder when looking at dried corpses all lined upright on both sides of a catacomb, you will freak out! Nicely directed by Hitchcock favorite, Norman Lloyd (the man who falls from the Statue of Liberty in the AH film, "Saboteur").

The program has a bit of humor in it - very dry humor....and rather light...like the dried mummies it delves amongst.

I recall seeing a bit of this one when it first ran back in 1964. I was but a lad back then and I deemed this episode to spooky to watch by myself. Tonight was the first time I have seen it in more than 40 years.

The eyes of the mummy......don't let your impressionable children watch. Too freaky.
18 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dark ,atmospheric entry
darrenpearce11114 August 2017
A lot of care obviously put into this episode that has some nice suspenseful moments in the catacombs. Not one to watch if you're recently bereaved, but this macabre entry is an atmospheric and singular one from the pen of the great Ray Bradbury.

Slow building and often with repetitive dialogue about the jurisdictions concerning life and death.

I expected perhaps a little more from the ending, however the ride is enjoyable if macabre.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More Horror Than Suspense
dougdoepke16 February 2016
Ghoulish, but very well thought out episode. Juan's (Rey) having trouble providing for his hardscrabble family in rural Mexico. Worse he's ill and on the verge of dying. Seems the local undertaker Alejandro (Silvera) runs his graveyard like a used car lot, with all the scruples of a dodgy salesman. You get to "rent" a grave by the year, and if you don't pay-up, the cadaver is used as wall paper in an underground catacomb where loony Alejandro talks to the skeletal "residents". Anyway, poor Juan eventually expires, and the unscrupulous bone man cheats Juan's wife (Pellicer) in the burial such that Juan ends up a mummy in the catacomb. But Juan has sworn he will provide for his family, even after death. So what will happen now.

The episode is cheaply but artfully produced, the cadavers especially. Juan's mummified remains are worthy of an expensive A-production, and lend the hour its most memorable and ghoulish feature. I thought Silvera's performance was questionable since he opts for an over-the-top that lends the undertaker a near ludicrous impact at times. Then too, the pacing lags at times. Nonetheless, the entry's highly unusual with a nicely ironical ending that Hitch fans expect.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
VERY creepy episode and the three principal actors died untimely deaths
ezfinders3 January 2012
Creepiest episode of the series.

Script by Ray Bradbury but it is rather ghoulish.

Death and dying

Exhumations and mummies and all in front of the children!

Even worse is what happened to the three major characters in real life:

Frank Silvera, who played Alejandro,the crypt keeper, was accidentally electrocuted repairing his garbage disposal at age 55

Alejandro Rey, who played Juan Diaz, died of lung cancer at age 57

Pina Pellicer, who was Maria Diaz, died tragically of a suicide at age 30
22 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
one of the best
vironpride28 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this a few nights ago for the first time in many years, and it retained its impression on me. It is not just one of the creepiest teleplays I have ever seen (and there ARE such mummy displays in Mexico) but one of the most moving. Lovely Pina Pellicer plays a widow with young children who must come up with a way to support and feed her and her children after her husband dies. The most moving part occurs just at the end when she stands before her home mummy display and speaks to her husband, begging him to understand and forgive her for what she has had to do to survive. What happens then is reminiscent of the scene in the Boris Karloff "The Mummy" when Im-Ho-Tep is recalled to life when the young Egyptologist reads from the Scroll of Thoth. One of the most memorable of all the Alfred Hitchcock entries!
20 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
More creepy than suspenseful...or good.
planktonrules8 June 2021
"The Life and Work of Juan Diaz" is one of the creepiest episodes of "The Alfred Hitchcock Hour". Oddly, however, despite being very creepy, it isn't all that interesting.

To understand the context of the episode, you must know that in parts of Central America, grave sites are rented, not owned. This means that if you have no family to keep paying or if they cannot afford it, you are evicted! In the case of "The Life Work of Juan Diaz", however, the gravekeeper likes to exhume the bodies and keep them in his own personal collection. And, while the dying man paid to be interred for two years, after a year, Alejandro told the family the rent was due...and they couldn't pay. So, poor Juan was added to the jerk's collection. How does Juan's widow deal with this?

Other than the unusual cultural aspects of the film AND some cool looking fake mummies made for the show, I didn't find any of this particularly compelling or even interesting. A bit of a dud, actually....an episode I even had trouble sticking with as it was a bit dull.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superb/Standout Episode
myemail33399911 January 2007
A real treat for series' fans! The keeper of the graveyard is actor Frank Silvera who convincingly plays his part to the hilt. His domain is both atmospheric and eerie. His friends are the mummified bodies of dead "tenants" whose rented burial plots are in arrears, so he unearths them and lines their corpses along the walls of his catacomb, deep below the graveyard. He brags that it takes only "one year in the dry earth" to produce his companions.

A scene to keep you on the edge of your seat is when Juan Diaz's son and wife venture into the depths of darkness to put into action their scheme of revenge. Photographed in shadows and back-lit silhouettes, this scene exemplifies the beauty of black and white photography, and it's perfectly edited to create intense, cinematic suspense.

Even though this episode is filmed on a Universal sound stage with a few back lot locales thrown in for good measure, the art department did a convincing job in its depiction of a poor, Mexican village.

Definitely one of the TEN BEST episodes in the series.
30 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Many Layered Presentation
Hitchcoc24 May 2023
When I saw Ray Bradbury's name attached to the story, I know it would be better than most. He is an utterly unique author who doesn't get the credit he deserves because people see him as one of those "sci fi/fantasy" writers. Yes, he is, but he has the delicate brush that focuses on the trapping that mortals deal with, the imperfections and weaknesses. I remember first being introduced to the celebration of the dead when Bradbury talked about those little sugar skull that are available everywhere. I never knew that there were rental plots for graves and that failure to make payments by the family resulted in the corpse's expulsion. The catacombs still exist in some places. This is so different but so captivating.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"If you could speak, what would you tell me?"
classicsoncall29 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
A dishonest cemetery caretaker 'rents' gravesites to the families of departed loved ones, and if they can't pay, the bodies are exhumed and committed to his own personal catacomb display. That's the premise for this eerily creepy story set in a small Mexican village where the graveyard is running out of space for future burials. Knowing that his end was near, Juan Diaz (Alejandro Rey) negotiated a forty-peso price for a two-year plot rental, but after only a year, caretaker Alejandro (Frank Silvera) came calling on the deceased's wife Maria (Pina Pellicer) to renew the space. Unable to do so, Alejandro digs up the corpse, and brings it to his underground tomb. Juan's young son Jorge (Larry Domasin) is taunted by his playmates to visit his father, and he reluctantly does so, taking care to place a rose stem in the corpse's lifeless hand. It may not have been on their mind at the time, but when Jorge and his mother are almost caught by Alejandro in the darkness of the catacomb, they sneak the body of Juan out as the caretaker flees in terror. In the light of day however, Alejandro drags the chief of police (Valentin de Vargas) to the Diaz residence to reclaim the body. It helped that Chief Ricardo was Maria's brother, but it was more her complicated logic that helped persuade both her brother and Alejandro that the body of her husband was a papier-mâché 'toy', and that the likeness belonged to her family. The repeated use of the term 'toy' bothered me somewhat, as if it trivialized the dire situation, but in the end, Maria's argument, backed by her brother, convinced Alejandro to drop the matter. The closing scene revealed how Juan Diaz, poor throughout his life, was able to provide for his family's meager existence via the few centavos tourists were willing to pay to view his corpse in the 'Juan Diaz Museum', a promise he made to care for his family after his death.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uncertain episode titled Juan Diaz by Hitchcock
carpclasssub4 December 2020
It could a been a lot of things but the writing of this episode finally pins it to being about making a living as a corpsey amusement park . Is there anything supernatural going on ? The music certainly says so. And its rather poetic. It has great actors doing fascinating jobs. But past an early certain point it gets heavy handed in trying to be many things . The music gets oppressive trying to scare us.Its a ride thru a house of horror, wanting to scare with pop-up ghouls... However , it's only one thing, a tourist trap. Which is not to say its a bad episode- no it's different and interesting .Too bad .If only it knew what it is or where it is headed without faking it. It makes me think writer Ray Bradbury had a jumble of many ideas and failed to pick one. But if was fun until it started being over the top then flopped into stupid. The actors performances were each jewelled gems on their own. Like tryouts for hamlet or some fine classical play. Performances sparkled ...glittered, but curiously bore no connection to the plot. Which failed to surface until late late later when it was a dissappointing let down from what was apparently promised. The actors seemed unconnected to the story of film. They were so good as if each had a poem they were acting out. I'd almost call this experimental filmmaking.
  • the experiment was fun to attempt but failed.


CTA 12/4/20
0 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed