"The Alfred Hitchcock Hour" The McGregor Affair (TV Episode 1964) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Partially Based On Real Life
rms125a6 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Based on real-life occurrences of the decidedly illicit use, in the 18th and 19th centuries, of cadavers for medical research (the subject of the 1945 film 'The Body Snatcher') -- although I don't know if in real life people were actually murdered for this purpose or if the corpses were otherwise obtained illicitly. The episode is a tad sluggish but Andrew Duggan as McGregor (he is called McGregor by everyone not by his forename) is touching as the unhappy husband who ferries the above-referenced cadavers (under the euphemistic pretense of hauling "tanbark") and Elsa Lanchester, more than two decades older than Duggan (!), manages to make her shrewish, often mean-spirited wife, Aggie, somehow seem nicer than the sum total of her qualities would indicate. (She does spend much of the time asleep snoring.)

The closest the film gets to black comedy is a series of daydreams McGregor has, imagining being outside with a happy, active, dancing Aggie (who actually has not left their cottage in two years) as he tries to kill her, by bludgeon, drowning, hanging, all to no avail as she is impervious to these attempts. Not to give away the ending but suffice to say McGregor and Aggie do manage to share something poignant -- separate but interconnected -- by the time this story comes to an end.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining, though a little over the top.
pnolname26 March 2022
This was fun to watch, despite its flaws. I particularly liked the innuendo surrounding the match girl and her pursuer. I wonder what percentage of the audience knew what she was really selling. Sure, the accents were fake, but if they had been real, I could never have understood them without subtitles.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Only fair....and it could have been so much more.
planktonrules9 June 2021
The story of Burke and his partner, Hare, is a famous one....and it's not surprising "The Alfred Hitchcock Hour" would base an episode on their evil deeds. Burke and Hare were real men who procured bodies for the local medical college in Scotland. The problem was that getting LEGAL bodies donated was tough and the school needed cadavers. So, the pair found they could supplement their supply by simply killing folks and selling the murder victims to the school. They were eventually caught....and Hare turned evidence on his partner and Burke was executed...and dissected. A grisly true story...and one that was retold many times in films and TV shows.

What makes this version of the Burke and Hare murders is that the story really focuses on a third party, a peasant who worked with the killers. John McGregor (Andrew Duggan...sporting a ridiculous wig) eventually realizes what Burke and Hare have been doing. So what does he do next? And, how does his awful wife (Elsa Lanchester) play into all this?

I know some reviewers hated the bad Scottish accents, but what I noticed more was Lanchester's over-the-top performance as a drunk. She was not exactly subtle! As for the story, it's only okay....nothing more. That, combined with the lack of subtlety make it a bit of a klunker.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Exotic Tale
dougdoepke16 October 2015
I sure hope those feral snoring sounds were from the effects department and not from actress Lanchester. No wonder husband John (Duggan) is thinking about a bachelor's life. No wonder also that the strapping Duggan was hired for the part. As a slow-thinking coffin carrier he better be strapping since the anatomy class needs lots of deliveries for its prospective doctors. It's a different Hitchcock entry, set in early 19th century Scotland. Coffin carrier John's pretty well fed up with his lazy alcoholic wife, so we know the story's direction. Of course no production with the goofy Lanchester can afford to be passed up. Here she's appropriately ditzy between swigs from the bottle. Good thing John can only think out loud; that way we know what's passing through his slow-moving brain—Duggan's excellent in a difficult role. Fortunately I had no trouble understanding the dialog through the thick Scottish accents. There's not much story development, but the characters are colorful enough to hold interest. All in all, it's a rather exotic entry, maybe not to everyone's taste, but with a number of compensations.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Classic Tale
Hitchcoc25 May 2023
Andrew Duggan pairs with Elsa Lanchester (The Bride of Frankenstein) as a long suffering husband of a hopeless drunk. He is sad, works very hard, is quite naive and a bit daft. He unwittingly brings cadavers to the medical laboratory where they are dissected by students. He thinks of ways of doing away with his wife, but never can act on it. Then comes the old switcheroo. It's a pretty cool story of the macabre and Duggan is quite a good actor, we would remember from the television of the Hitchcock era. Lanchester is simply disgusting in her character, more of a living corpse than a real character. It creates a time in history a little Dickensian (Oliver Twist-like). Not a bad episode, but it has been done before.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Andrew Duggan and Elsa Lanchester
kevinolzak5 January 2012
"The McGregor Affair" is the Hitchcock hour's take on the grisly doings of Burke and Hare, the 19th century graverobbers who supplied their own murder victims to the respected Doctor Knox (Boris Karloff's THRILLER did the same story with George Kennedy in 1962, "The Innocent Bystanders"). While the basic setup remains the same, including the three main protagonists, this version centers around simple minded John McGregor (Andrew Duggan), who earns easy money delivering the corpses from Burke (Arthur Malet) and Hare (Michael Pate) to Doctor Knox (John Hoyt), who tell him the boxes are full of tanbark, used to 'spread around.' Most of his bounty goes for booze for his fat spouse Aggie (Elsa Lanchester), who spends most of her lazy time sleeping off her hangovers, leaving her lonely husband with nothing to do but daydream about bumping her off (even in his own mind, he proves a miserable failure). When McGregor notices a lock of hair sticking out of his latest delivery, belonging to a young woman he had seen alive only hours earlier, he realizes that the boxes contain dead bodies, and soon devises a way to provide Burke and Hare access to his eternally slumbering wife. Much of the running time is padded out with the lead character talking to himself, not the best way to engage the audience with an already familiar tale whose outcome can easily be predicted. Among the supporting cast is William Smith, still a year away from his co-starring role on the Western series LAREDO, and already a Hollywood veteran of more than two decades. Playing a medical student is Michael Macready, son of character actor George Macready, best remembered as both actor and producer of 1970's "Count Yorga,Vampire" and its 1971 sequel "The Return of Count Yorga."
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a rare TV episode that approaches theatrical quality
grizzledgeezer7 August 2015
Yes, "The McGregor Affair" is talky, and yes, the ending verges on the unavoidably predictable. But it has the strikingly handsome Andrew Duggan (in a ridiculous Dutch Boy wig to make him look retarded), and the always wonderful Elsa Lanchester as his slovenly alcoholic wife. (William Smith is in it, too, but the director apparently couldn't think of an excuse for him to take off his shirt.)

The acting and directing are so good you almost think you're watching a theatrical film. The fantasy sequence, with Duggan pondering different ways to off his unwanted spouse, is particularly well-done.

Perhaps the best element is the outstanding score, which actually adds something to the experience. (I could go on for several pages about the empty mediocrities that are most TV scores, but won't.) It's from Bernard Herrmann, but sounds nothing at all like "Bernard Herrmann".

This "Affair" is "too long", but given the Procrustean nature of TV production, it's a forgivable sin, when everything else is so good.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Wouldn't it be a good thing now, if things was different?"
classicsoncall3 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Ah yes, another Burke and Hare story, and it's only fitting that Hitchcock would take another stab at one. Actually, the characters are only bystanders in this episode, as poor John McGregor (Andrew Duggan) shuffles through the story bemoaning the fact he's married to a lay about alcoholic wife, admirably portrayed by Elsa Lanchester. McGregor's occupation of hauling wooden boxes, presumably filled with 'tanbark', to a medical college run by Dr. Knox (John Hoyt) eventually gives him ideas for what might become of wife Aggie (Lanchester) if only he could find a way to orchestrate her demise. To my thinking, any of those dreamlike sequences would have worked, but McGregor talked himself out of them, preferring to leave the dirty work to Burke (Arthur Malet) and Hare (Michael Pate), who were real historical figures self-employed in the body snatching business of 1828 Edinburgh, Scotland. It's not too hard to figure out how this one would end, seeing as how Burke and Hare could allow no witnesses to their chosen profession. Which left me to ruminate on the frequent mention of tanbark in this story, a term I'd never heard before, and wondering if there was such a thing. But yes indeed, tanbark is the bark from oak or other trees from which tannin is extracted, and then left to cover the ground for walking, playgrounds and gardening. So, even though it sounded humorous when Dr. Knox mentioned it, it was indeed used for 'spreading around'.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not a so unusual scheme...
searchanddestroy-120 August 2015
Have you ever seen Robert Wise's BODYSNATCHER, Freddie Francis's DOCTOR AND THE ASSASSINS, Vernon Sewell's BURKE AND HARE or the most know of all: John Gilling's FLESH AND THE FIENDS? If not, of course this story will seem terrific, and it actually is, but if you have seen at least one of those films, well this tale will sound familiar to you. A doctor who always need fresh corpses to use them for autopsies, asks to outlaw undertakers to provide him with recently buried corpses. But the problem happen when the body snatchers run out of fresh corpses. So the simplest way for them to provide the doctor is to provoke deaths... Get it? So this story for this episode is based from those movies where for, at least one or two of them, the very same characters Burke and Hare are used. So in this episode too... See for yourself folks
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad accents
weavethehawk8 December 2020
I never heard so many ridiculously bad accents. Hitchcock must have known how bad they were. Some American actors can do accents, some definitely cannot, and it seems that all the one's that cannot are gathered in this episode.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the worst episodes in the series
SteveGreen16 February 2021
There have been many versions of the infamous Burke & Hare killings, on both television and the big screen, but this stands out as one of the most laughable. Not only does the plot play fast and loose with historical facts, the script is lamentable and the direction indifferent. As for the acting, it's difficult to focus upon individual performances when the majority are buried beneath some of the worst fake accents ever committed to tape.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed