Mass (2004) Poster

(2004)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Can be watched once
aditya19894 October 2007
As a fan of Nag I bought a VCD and watched this movie but it was extremely disappointing. The story is very predictable and it took lot of patience from me to watch the entire movie. Nag's performance can at the most be said to be average. The only good points in the movie was Rahul Dev,Raghuvaran's Acting an a couple of good songs by Devi Sri Prasad. The action part of the movie is also decent.

The trend of choreographers becoming directors may not be healthy. Prabhu Deva had started this and others have followed suit. I am very surprised how this movie became a success. 100 days in 74 centers!!! Unbelievable.

To make the whole thing clear, this movie can be watched once and that too only if you are completely jobless on a weekend.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The beautiful acg
bhaiofficial-5220728 August 2018
In this movie nagarjuna play an important role . satya a gangster who is ruled on whole city . And anjali as jyothika is the daughter of his . who fell love with mass as nagarjuna . Mass as nagarjuna is the person who is the orphan he is fight with satya and satya s son is as rahul dev. In between the public nagarjuna fight with rahul dev . And the ruling of satya is gone after the fight . And satya is killed his son .

It is nicely act by the all actors
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Long lost script , but worth watching
mohit_sinsniwal26 May 2019
I really wonder if the real intention behind the movie was to pay tribute or 1980's era of movie-making or give Balaiyyah a stiff competition. Every possible dose of masala you would find in a movie of 1980 is incorporated. Clearly Paruchuri Brothers are still living and enjoying their old era where cinematic liberties are at its best.

Nag's performance is OTT. A sensitive, sensible person like Nag succumbing to such levels is indeed pathetic state of affairs. One should appreciate the guts of Nag to believe in the story, produce it and even act in it. Should seriously get back to RGV and Mani Ratnam.

Raghuvaran does a la Rober De Nero including his signature smirk. In 1980's that was viewed as good acting, by today's standards it loud acting.

Rahul Dev is alright. Probably using this opportunity to keep himself busy and earn bread and butter in the process.

Suneel is turning into v2.0 of Kota.

PS: what kind of city is this? Where the pretty girl's brother is a goon?

I really wonder if the real intention behind the movie was to pay tribute or 1980's era of movie-making or give Balaiyyah a stiff competition. Every possible dose of masala you would find in a movie of 1980 is incorporated. Clearly Paruchuri Brothers are still living and enjoying their old era where cinematic liberties are at its best.

Nag's performance is OTT. A sensitive, sensible person like Nag succumbing to such levels is indeed pathetic state of affairs. One should appreciate the guts of Nag to believe in the story, produce it and even act in it. Should seriously get back to RGV and Mani Ratnam.

Raghuvaran does a la Rober De Nero including his signature smirk. In 1980's that was viewed as good acting, by today's standards it loud acting.

Rahul Dev is alright. Probably using this opportunity to keep himself busy and earn bread and butter in the process.

Suneel is turning into v2.0 of Kota.

PS: what kind of city is this? Where the pretty girl's brother is a goon?
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This movie is love.
manishkmr-6995723 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is my childhood emotion. I can watch this Many times.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Long lost script of 1980's re-discovered in 2004
AvinashPatalay30 March 2009
I really wonder if the real intention behind the movie was to pay tribute or 1980's era of movie-making or give Balaiyyah a stiff competition. Every possible dose of masala you would find in a movie of 1980 is incorporated. Clearly Paruchuri Brothers are still living and enjoying their old era where cinematic liberties are at its best.

Nag's performance is OTT. A sensitive, sensible person like Nag succumbing to such levels is indeed pathetic state of affairs. One should appreciate the guts of Nag to believe in the story, produce it and even act in it. Should seriously get back to RGV and Mani Ratnam.

Raghuvaran does a la Rober De Nero including his signature smirk. In 1980's that was viewed as good acting, by today's standards it loud acting.

Rahul Dev is alright. Probably using this opportunity to keep himself busy and earn bread and butter in the process.

Suneel is turning into v2.0 of Kota.

PS: what kind of city is this? Where the pretty girl's brother is a goon?
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nag overacts and bleeds arrogance
auntybiotics23 September 2006
The production values of this flick seem good enough but its not enough to justify watching this. You can probably watch it if you have absolutely nothing to do on a lazy afternoon. Nag appears to think too much of himself and constantly overacts in this movie, acting like a badass but only ends up putting an embarrassing performance which will make you cringe. His charmless and extremely arrogant acting is perhaps reserved only for the die hard Nagarjuna fans. He is so powerful that even the villain fails to intimidate. There's nothing new in the story and its basically Boys trying to make Girl fall in love with him and the bad guy is somehow related to the girl. There are one or two twists and the fight scenes have at least been choreographed decently to point after which they become the regular ridiculous fare.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Unlimited Entertainments
lovehumanji7 May 2021
Perfect masala movie with everything included for audience.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Epic MASS .. Oh I mean MESS
rock_rishab16 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
What was that, ...... a Plane? a Bird? or just another crappy South India movie that just doesn't make any sense...

1st of all, why does Nagarjuna keeps repeating (in Hindi) that he is only the real MARD (MAN).. and then blah blah blah, I mean the guy is so full of gas, he just may fly away.

And which girl in her right mind would fall for a guy, who is so full of himself. Cmon now.. making Typhoons with their legs. I can understand the exaggeration by Kung-Fu movies, but this is ridiculous. The Chinese at least have a base. Show the same stuff with Kalaripattyu and I can understand, but a person who is as strong as Lord Hanumana himself. This is just an utter piece of crap I have no idea how this even got 6+ starts
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
U really should read the entire comment.
kreitcher20 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
OK so we have a car mechanic who all of a sudden manages to become a weapons and explosives expert with no apparent training whatsoever. Once you've placed these things out of your mind, you can start wondering as to why in heavens name jyothika really fell in love with Nag. OK once you've put that also out of your mind. You can actually watch some good action. Some of the fights are actually well made. There are a few good twists in the movie. Rahul dev has put in a good performance. He looks mean enough to be a good villain! ;) Raghuvaran of course does ample justice to his role. I however felt he went out in a very simple way at the end of the movie. This one is meant to be watched only if you have nothing better to do on a Sunday evening (which I would assume is a rare thing!).
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed