"The Golden Girls" The Truth Will Out (TV Episode 1986) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Rose's daughter arrives.
Sleepin_Dragon16 November 2022
Rose's daughter Kirsten arrives, Rose is apprehensive about going through her will with her.

Slightly more serious than previous episodes, it's not exactly a laugh a minute, but it has some funny moments. I'm surprised by some of the negative reviews for this one, and whilst it is different, it's a fine watch, it's a very plausible scenario, with every character playing their part.

I thought Dorothy had some very funny moments, her stares and put downs were put to good effect, but this was very much Rose's episode, again.

Christine Belford was rather good as Kirsten I thought, a very beautiful woman, I wonder if we'll see her again, she didn't land particularly well here, she needs to redeem herself.

7/10.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Truth Will Out (#1.16)
ComedyFan20109 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Rose's daughter and grand daughter come for a visit. Rose shows her daughter her inheritance and she is shocked that it is not as big as she expected. She is angry at Rose and wants to leave, while Rose has to confess to her daughter that Charlie wasn't such a successful businessman after all.

The episode is a bit of a drag. The story is not too interesting. Don't get me wrong, there are some great jokes and cute moments (such as Rose listening to the national anthem), but they don't improve the episode too much. Also Rose's daughter doesn't seem so nice, a bit too materialistic. Which also makes it weird how fast she accepted that he father wasn't a successful businessman.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Family and Money...
fritali0411 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Rose's eldest daughter Kirsten and granddaughter come for a visit. Rose is making Kirsten executor of her will and wants to have her review the documents. Rose always led her kids to believe their father was very successful as a traveling salesman and that he left them a sizable estate upon his passing. Kirsten is shocked to discover there is little left and tears into her mother, accusing Rose of squandering his hard-earned fortune. Rose just takes the abuse and offers no defense. Knowing Rose to be responsible with money, Blanche and Dorothy have a hard time believing she lost it all on bad investment choices, but Rose doubles down. What is Rose hiding about the money and her dear departed husband, Charlie? Not wanting Kirsten to leave angry, Rose finally comes clean and reveals Charlie was, of course, a wonderful husband, father and very generous to all who needed help. Where he was lacking was his skills in money management and she somewhat embellished his financial successes. Since his work had him away from her and the kids often, Rose didn't want her children growing up with a negative image of their father. Kirsten understands her mother's noble motives for lying and they make peace.

I get why this episode rates lower. Not a lot of huge laughs here. Kirsten comes off as a typical shallow, greedy and entitled offspring expecting a big payout when daddy and mommy die. Her anger at Rose basically reads as: "How dare you spend MY inheritance!!". The fact that all Kirsten's child seems to know about grandpa Charlie is that "he was very rich" is troubling.

The casting of Christine Belford as Kirsten didn't help. Her personality is too icy...more believable as a Carrington or Ewing than a Nylund.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Rose deserved better as a daughter than Kirsten.
mark.waltz22 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
If there are ever times when you want to strangle a fictional character, chances are it is over an ungrateful child who believes that they are entitled to money from their parent's estate. The visiting Kirsten (Christina Belford) doesn't really have much of a personality, as if she had eaten too much of the honey maple sugar log and was having a sudden crash. The moment she begins to lay into her mother Rose for allegedly squandering the late Charlie's estate, she becomes one of the most dislikable characters in "Golden Girls" history and it is one of the hardest episodes to watch outside of Dorothy's reaction to getting one of the oversweet logs from Kirsten as a gift. In fact, it is ironic that probably my least favorite "Golden Girls" episodes has one of my favorite lines.

Rose doesn't really stand up to her daughter, and considering how she had treated her mother in a previous episode, this shows a lack of character consistency. As for the younger Charley (Bridgette Andersen), she seems to have more of Rose's fun loving personality and it is easy to hope that she doesn't grow up to take after her mother. By the time that Kirsten learns the truth, it is a case of "too wittle, too wait", to quote a later episode, and other a brief appearance played by another actress much later on, it is a blessing in disguise that Kirsten really isn't a part of the story other than to be mentioned on occasion.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Here we go again...
NotAFakeReviewer3 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
People saying this dull or dark, no its not. Its dealing with genuine family relationships. I'm sorry that this is not saccharine, mawkish drivel like Full House but you have that in that show. This was different and people didn't get 'depressed' at anything less sugary than Disney. What has happened to the world? Yeesh!

Good episode and Charlie was delightful, shame what happened to the actress.

Keirsten was quite right to enquire what happened to the money, Rose lied. She also seemed to be more concerned that Rose was silly and got taken advantage of which wouldn't be unreasonable given how naive and gullible Rose can be.

Not only was it important that Keirsten found out the truth it was important that Rose got a weight off her chest.

The B story with Blanche was a parallel but if people weren't too marshmallow brained they'd have noticed that.

Particularly good acting from Betty White here.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dark and depressing
patrickkeown9 August 2018
This episode is more awkward than funny. Who cares about the surprises in a person's will? Talk about depressing! Plus it doesn't paint Kiersten in a very good light; she comes off greedy and not very likable, though part of it is the actress' fault. Better acting and funnier storyline could've saved this episode. Also- The subplot about Blanche following the Duncan-Osgoode trial is uninteresting and an example of lazy writing.
8 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed