"Hawaii Five-O" Loose Ends Get Hit (TV Episode 1976) Poster

(TV Series)

(1976)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Some recycled plot elements and a poor ending make this a sub-par episode.
planktonrules22 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This episode begins with Billy Maynard agreeing to testify against his mob boss. Shortly after, a gunman shoots at Maynard and the cops escorting him from the district attorney's office--and McGarrett is hit but is only grazed. But, because of this he's assigned a sassy female police officer to be his driver. In the meantime, Five-O tries to determine who tried to shoot them and it seems pretty obvious who it was.

A few years earlier, there was a very similar episode in which a trashy woman agreed to testify against a mob boss--only to have it turn out she was toying with the police and district attorney. And, in the end, her plan to milk the state out of all kinds of cool perks backfired and the mob boss (her friend) decided to really have her killed--just to be certain. Well, in light of this, I anticipated all this would happen in this show and it did! It was obviously a recycled plot with a few changes. One of the changes was the ending in which McGarrett (with little real evidence) accuses his sassy driver of being on the side of evil--which seemed very uncharacteristic and ungrateful considering how hard this cop had worked during the episode. Clearly not one of the better episodes of the show--too predictable and too familiar...and a bit sloppy.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Far-fetched and bad law
VetteRanger13 June 2023
Here's a Five-0 episode which was just poorly thought out and badly researched, plus a 'guest character' thrown in, why?

A mob boss (evidently one of thousands in Honolulu ... since it seems every third or so episode is about a crime boss who controls drugs and prostitution and other criminal activities) has committed a murder for which there is no evidence, so he wants to get himself put on trial and acquitted so he can't face double jeopardy. Why?

A friend and confidant offers "State's evidence" and is promptly the target of an assumed attempted assassination ... which incidentally wounds McGarrett in the arm instead.

Enter the spunky woman police rookie as his driver, and a key investigator in the case, as she goes out on her own.

Then we have an absurd scene where she forces bad guys off the road, causing a collision with an innocent civilian's vehicle. That's after the bad guys follow them, so of course McGarrett directs her to drive at high speeds into the middle of nowhere, instead of merely radioing for backup. Makes sense, right?

But the worst part is the "informant" recants his story on the stand, leading the DA to state he may have to "dismiss" the case, so the crime boss couldn't be tried again. There's the bad law. Double jeopardy doesn't attach on a dismissal of charges, unless a judge orders them "dismissed with prejudice", which means they can't be refiled. A judge will only do that in a case of dire prosecutorial misconduct, which did not happen here.

Otherwise, double jeopardy only attaches on acquittal, and only for the charges being prosecuted.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed