User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A Tragic, cruel crime.
Sleepin_Dragon25 February 2023
Evelyn Foster stops to give a lift to a man who's missed his bus, Evelyn is tragically found badly burned, her car on fire, and she'd been sexually assaulted.

This is such a tragic story, one of a most heinous nature. Poor Evelyn, she stopped, she did the good citizen act in stopping to pick someone up to help, it's just a shame she didn't take somebody with her on that journey.

Some of the information we're given may be a little sketchy, not much info was given about the car that followed. I don't fully understand why the witnesses were ignored.

It exposed the gaps that existed in The Police at the time, definitely a degree of incompetence there. A shame nobody from CID attended, maybe the outcome would have been different.

I thought both Gina McKee and George Irving were excellent here, the latter has always made the most wonderful of villains.

Some pretty effective use of makeup here. Well produced as you'd expect.

8/10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Balance of probabilities
oliveralexander-9967720 January 2024
This is one of the great mysteries of the 20th Century.

To try to understand the story you have examine the background. The brief account as told in 'The Man Who Melted Away' is a short dramatisation using the known facts. In the 1930s policing was much more of an ad hoc affair and the local police did not have access to much in the way of proper premises or vehicles and they had to rely on landlines to communicate by phone.

Given also that the inspector in charge of the investigation did not believe that Evelyn had been murdered or that any strange man had been involved or even existed, it is small wonder that the wilful suppression of witness statements in order to support the theory that Evelyn had set fire to herself either wilfully as an act of suicide or accidentally led to a deeply flawed investigation.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Ought to Burn" or "Otterburn"?
theowinthrop17 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
In November 1930 there was a famous murder on Guy Fawkes Night: the Burning Car Mystery. Briefly Mr. Alfred Rouse, facing ruin from numerous paternity suits, decided to disappear in a car fire. He found a stranger, killed him (to this day we don't know who he was) and put the body into his car which he set up to be a blazing fire. He had chosen a country lane near Nottingham for the murder, but by mischance he was seen in the glare of the fire by two witnesses. As a result he had to explain why he did not try to save the passenger, and he ended up tried, convicted and hanged in 1931.

Shortly after this case occurred near the town of Otterburn. Evelyn Foster was a bright young lady who was running her own taxi service in the area. She got a call for a fare, and went to pick him up. Hours passed, and then came bad news to her family. Evelyn's car was found ablaze, and she was very badly burned. Her parents and siblings went to her at the hospital, and were with her when she died.

The Foster Case has become known as the great "What was it?" homicide of the 1930s. To this day we don't know if it was an accidental death (if Ms Foster was trying to collect insurance on her car by setting it on fire, and literally got burned to death as a result) or was it a murder. Evelyn insisted to her dying breath she was attacked (sexually) by the man she picked up, and she even described him. Her family and friends knew her and believed her. Unfortunately, nobody really could be found who saw this man that she carefully described in her dying hours (hence the title of the episode).

For some reason the County High Sheriff, an anti-deluvian dolt, got into his head that it was death by misadventure while committing an attempted insurance fraud. The inquest was dominated by his attempts to overawe the jury to find death by misadventure. To their credit the jurors said Evelyn was murdered by person unknown. The High Sheriff shrugged his shoulders, said he never liked the girl, and did nothing further about this decision!

In his book THE BURNING OF EVELYN FOSTER, Jonathan Goodman found an interesting sequel, worth considering although too weak to do anything further with. In 1934 Eric Brown, a groom on a farm in the area of the Foster tragedy, killed his employer Frederick Morton, and terrorized his employer's wife and a female servant for a number of hours before being captured. He had tried to burn the body of the employer to cover the shooting (as Evelyn was burned). Evelyn described her attacker as dressed in a top hat and tails (one of the reason that the High Sheriff dismissed her story as a lie). Goodman pointed out that a groom wears such a suit of clothes. Brown had a female friend who lived near Otterburn, and she could have hidden him for several days after the crime. And on the way to his execution in 1934, when asked if he had anything to confess, Brown thought a moment and mumbled (we will never be able to say what he actually said), either "Ought to Burn!" or "Otterburn!" If the second it may mean that justice did catch up with Evelyn's murderer at the end...but we cannot really say.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed