"Little House on the Prairie" Welcome to Olesonville (TV Episode 1982) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Welcome to Olesonville...Turn Back While You Can!
ExplorerDS678924 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
One fine morning, Nels was playing a friendly game of checkers with Lem McCary, a kindly old drifter, when Harriet was preparing to head out to Lars Hanson's old house and go through it...wait, I thought Mr. Hanson's house became the blind school and it burned down in Season 6 (courtesy of Albert Ingalls), so did Hanson have a second house somewhere? Anyway, Harriet had the intention of selling it. So after rudely making Lem get lost, she gathered up Nels, Willie, Nancy, and a boatload of supplies and they headed out. While cleaning the staircase, Harriet came upon a secret compartment containing paperwork that Lars had left behind presumably. One of which was a bearer bond for Walnut Grove, stating that the benefactor be paid 10% of annual taxes, dating back to 1835 (I thought the town was founded in 1840?) and benefactor is Harriet Oleson since she swindled the estate. Not wasting a moment, Harriet called a town council meeting to bluntly tell them in a round about way that they owe her over $14,000. Why Harriet left that meeting with her head still intact is beyond me. But it gets worse: in lieu of the money, she wants not only a street named after her, but the whole bloody town! Walnut Grove is dead (again), Olesonville is born.

The one most effected by this change was Lem McCary. See, he and Hanson go back a long way. He helped him start the town. Yeah, I'd say Lars is spinning in his grave about now, as Harriet puts her next plan of action into effect: elect a mayor, and whom does she nominate: Nels, but since he lost his backbone a few seasons ago, Harriet would technically be mayor (the Bush/Cheney effect). But, an opposing candidate was soon found, and he didn't know it yet. After getting the idea from John, ol' Lem went out and told Edwards that Almanzo Wilder was considering running for mayor. Edwards told Anderson at the bank, who told Etta Plum, who told Doc Baker and Mrs. Foster, who told some...unnamed extra; Almanzo found out from Harriet, who stuck her foot in her mouth and gave him the drive he needed. Almanzo is running, and Lem becomes his campaign manager. After a short campaign, Almanzo decided he couldn't take the pressure and drops out. Determined not to give up, Lem has one more trick up his sleeve: he talks Harriet into letting he and his friends hold a social at the old Hanson house, offering to fix it up good as new and in turn make Harriet look good. She jumped at the chance, and after the fact, Lem joined in the election. And what a turn out it was. After giving a heartfelt speech on how he intended to restore Walnut Grove to its former glory, Lem McCary won the election by 3 votes. And as for Harriet's bond, it turns out it was one of two, the first was owned by Jess Moffat, Lem's old pal, so he would be paid long before Harriet, at a dollar a year. So, Harriet Oleson was foiled and Olesonville was dead...Walnut Grove was back, and stronger and closer than ever.

Needless to say I think Lem McCary would make a great mayor, but whether or not he did we don't know because, typically, after this episode we never see his ass again. What's the deal, Little House?! As mayor of Walnut Grove, you'd think he would have at least been there for "The Last Farewell" when they blew the town right the hell up! Oh well. "Welcome to Olesonville" is an okay episode. It's loaded with plot holes, but it's still good. Lew Ayers was excellent, as was Charles Lane, and Katherine MacGregor was terrific as that woman we all love to hate. It's not great, but it's a fun episode. Check it out if you're a Prairie fan.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Almanzo Wilder for Mayor?
mitchrmp26 November 2013
First of all, the episode begins with the Olesons' getting ready to clean out Lars Hansen's house to sell it. This is pretty funny considering his house was donated to be a blind school, then burned to the ground. With that sat aside, I don't really understand why the Oleson's have acquired the house. I don't see Mr. Hansen leaving it to somebody like Mrs. Oleson for sure!

Anyhow, apparently Mrs. Oleson finds an old bond that's fifty-three years old. It's compounded annually and the total amount owed is an unbelievable amount of money. In order for the town not to pay her back, she wants her daughter to sing a solo in church on Sundays, name the main street after her, and name the town Olesonville.

I'm not quite sure why Laura is on the city council. Back then, I'm guessing that women wouldn't be allowed on such a council. Mrs. Oleson I can see, but it just seemed a bit odd to see Laura there. I know she had to be on the council for drama reasons - just seemed odd.

Then Harriet gets an idea that the town needs a mayor to enforce law. She decides Nels would be a perfect fit - that way SHE can make the laws. Laura convinces her husband to run, but he soon drops out. Someone else runs in his place.

And if you want to know the results, you'll have to watch the episode!
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Noted error in a major plot device
georgendoukas17 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
While this is a classic episode featuring the Olesons there was a huge flaw in the writing. Lars Hansons' house was a huge yellow mansion that was turned into the Harritette Oleson School for the Blind barely a season or two before this, it burned down when Albert and a friend stole a pipe and Hester Sue chased them out of the cellar. As far as we know, they never finished reconstruction of the new house because the school could not get the funding they expected from Adam's father and they relocated the school to Sleepy Eye.

This being the case, I have to wonder how there is a second Lars Hanson house or the fact everyone forgot the first one burned down, killing Grace Garvey and Mary's baby... This is perhaps the most annoying of the continuity blunders in the entire series besides the fact that this season's introductory episode features Royal, Zalmonzo (as Mrs. Oleson called him at times), father of two bratty boys that stayed with Laura and Manly the season or so before. How that is ten years between episodes is a mystery, also what happened to the two boys and the mother? It is possible that Jenny was the baby mentioned by the mother on the raft trip in that previous episode but still, ten years passed and suddenly Laura as amnesia about having met Royal and his two "never existed boys" is a HUGE HUGE HUGE blunder! A little hard to get past if you want to watch the series from start to end...
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Mr Hanson's House?!
audio_until29 July 2020
I'm watching this today July 29 2020 on Vision tv (Canada); and when they were talking about fixing up Mr Hanson's house I thought well didn't they fix it up for the blind school in an earlier season? Little House fandom website seems to think so. Came in here to see if any other fans of the show noticed this and was glad and gratified that most did! Do the writers just think we fans are stupid and/or forgetful?! - or are they just lazy and couldn't think of any other way to do the story? I have no other relevant comment(s) to make. Other than the above, I enjoyed the episode.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Olesonville
chamoismom8 October 2023
Did the show ever make a mistake here... Mr. Hanson house was donated for the blind school and it burnt down.

That house was also used for the old man that Laura befriended... who worshipped his wife even tho she was dead and long gone.

I love it when someone gets the better of Mrs. Oleson.

That bond paper... was hysterical.. not only she couldn't possibly cash in on that bond.. but she has #2.

I have always felt sorry for Nels Oleson poor guy.. having to live with Harriett.

I'm sure if I lived back in that day.. she would have been a thorn in my side. For sure.

I am pretty sure ai wouldn't have got along with her.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
It's funny season 9 has no attachment to the other stories
ohhioh30 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The house they got to clean was turned into a blind school seasons ago. And Albert accidentally burnt it down. Sooo there is no house left to be cleaned. And also Lars left his house and Mill to Charles. That paper would have been the ingalls not the Olsen's.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The best of Harriet Oleson
dbdumonteil2 March 2008
I have always thought that the best episodes of this series was these where the Oleson family plays a prominent part.This one is a delight from start to finish.An old piece of paper is proof positive that Walnut Grove owes a lot of dough to Mrs Oleson.But as she is ,like everybody know,a generous sensitive person,she will not ask for her money ...provided that WG becomes "Olesonville" and that Nels become the mayor .But as we live in democracy ,there will be an election..

As always, Harriet's ominous plans backfire against her .Katherine (Scottie) Mc Gregor is at top of her game and reluctantly,Nels (Richard Bull) is at her beck and call
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Another re-write in history
awarlock-1770320 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
They changed yet another part of Walnut Grove history. The Lars Hanson house which was converted into the school for the blind has miraculously reappeared. A few seasons earlier, it burned down. Anyway, in this episode, Harriett Olsen had purchased the house and was refurbishing it for resale. While cleaning it, she found a bond worth after interest, around $14,000. Instead of cashing it in, she decided to use it as leverage in renaming Walnut Grove into Olsenville. After being disturbed by someone riding their wagon on the street her house is on after 10pm, she decided to have Nels run as Mayor, so he can enforce city ordinances; Such as no driving after 10pm. Anyway, at one point, Almonzo was going to run against Nels, then decided against it because his lack of political experience. Lem McCary then decided to run instead. He won the election and as expected, Hariett Olsen decided to cash her bond in, which would bankrupt the town. Then out of the shadows, Jess Moffet appeared. He pointed out to Harriett how there was a #2 on her bond. Jess had a same bond at home, but with a #1 on it. If he decided to cash it in, his would have to be paid first. Then Jess asked the new mayor if it was ok to pay him $1 a year. He agreed, making Hariett's bond worthless. Hariett storms off, throwing her bond to the street. The end.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
On the one hand, the story itself is hilarious.
drfernandogil27 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
On the one hand, the story itself is hilarious. For a document to appear saying that Mrs. Oleson is a creditor of US$14,000 (by then a fortune) without anyone discussing either the legitimacy of the paper or the amount thereof, is a major absurdity.

Then, the competition to be commissioner... Although many do not like Mrs Harriet, there is no doubt that Nels Oleson is an impeccable man. I see no reason why he could not be elected commissioner. Although I certainly can't imagine Nels wielding weapons chasing criminals.

Hanson's house? Hadn't it completely burned down when Mary and Alice Garvey's child died? Or am I crazy? It seems that the house was the same!! The inconsistencies of the series are notable, the writer must think that people forget everything and that each chapter starts a new life Finally, they choose a Commissioner, and curiously then that commissioner never appears again in the series.... As we said, the script is written as if it were a film that begins and ends and not a series of several continuous chapters.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed