"Penn & Teller: Bullshit!" Conspiracy Theories (TV Episode 2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
If only logic and reason would prevail.
Ddey6531 July 2014
Penn & Teller's Bullshit documentary series is designed to try to kill the myths of what a lot of people believe about the world around us, so naturally those who believe in such myths are going to get upset. The former magicians had to know this would happen, and in the case of those who believe various popular conspiracy theories, this is no exception to the rule.

The first conspiracy delusion mentioned is the 9/11 conspiracy advocates, who we all know insist on denying that Al-Qaida was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. The people who made this crap up are motivated mainly be demoralizing us into losing the global war on terror. Whether it's for hatred of America, hatred of our allies (one of them being Israel), sympathy for the third world people of the Middle East, and Muslim World, the false notion that we'd be better off trying to isolate ourselves from the rest of the world, or just that idiotic "oil war" line, it's still a lie, and it still desecrates the victims of the attacks. One IMDb user boasted of the "thousands of architects and engineers" who "disagree with the official report." Really? Is that supposed to impress me? A small group of pseudo-intellectual rebels claiming to be architects & engineers who signed a petition written by a political cult leader, who himself fell for the lies of other cult leaders, and uses his own status as an architect to give this lie credibility? Sorry, but I'm not buying it. In fact, to even consider such a possibility is as idiotic as denying the holocaust. If anybody's mad because the hosts make the allegations of the twoofer cults look ridiculous, that's their problem. They're already ridiculous. And if they're bothered by Penn Jillette's vulgarities aimed at them, they can kiss my ass as well!

Then there's the moon landing conspiracies. In truth, nobody really denied that we landed on the moon until around the mid-1970's and one of the first major advocates of this notion were organizations like the Flat Earth Society. Such an notion was far too ludicrous. Both sides of the cold war knew we landed on the moon, and so did the Arab and Muslim World, and even KKK/Neo-Nazi/Orange Order types. As the cold war was ending, and some of our not-so-stellar activities on how we won it began to surface, the denial gained a little more support among people who claimed to be open minded to "new ideas," even if logic and reason disproves these ideas. One of the "questions" asked by the moon-landing deniers is that if we went to the moon, why haven't we gone back. Perhaps the economic decline of the 1970's and the fact that there's very little reason to return to the moon might have something to do with this. Did those people ever think of that? That would be like me saying Merritt Parkway isn't a real highway because I haven't been on that road in a good 30 years! Or that the Pacific Coast Highway is fake, because I haven't been on the goddamn California Coast in my entire life!

The third conspiracy theory covered on this episode is the JFK Assassination, and this is the easiest of the conspiracy theories to believe. The world changed after his assassination mainly because we were getting more involved in the Vietnam War than before. Or course this was actually due to the fact that the Communists were turning up the heat in that region of the world. Penn Jillette and his sidekick successfully explain why the single bullet theory is NOT physically impossible, because it did not in fact go up right and left, and why even without military training it's not as difficult to fire two shots in eight seconds with a Mannlicher-Carcano Model 91-38 Carbine Rifle. What it doesn't deal with is the motive. The claim that JFK wanted to pull out of South Vietnam can be dismissed with his final speech reminding fellow Democrats of the consequences of doing nothing about the communist threat, whether in Southeast Asia, Europe, Latin America, or anywhere else. Other anti-communist speeches disprove this too, including one which many conspiracy nutters insist was against the Illuminati. Never mind the fact that the Illuminati has been dead since the 1780's and was never evil when they existed.

Meanwhile Oswald himself proudly admitted in a news report from a year earlier that he was a communist who was involved in the pro-Cuban organization "Fair Play for Cuba." Furthermore, the first group to suggest that Kennedy was killed by the feds was a Belgian Communist newspaper. This doesn't mean that everyone who doesn't think Oswald acted alone is a communist, but it explains the origins of the myth, and therefore the motive behind those who started it. Yes, there were people on the far-left and far-right who wanted him dead, but at this point, the only evidence contradicting the Warren Commission report is Oswald himself saying he was a patsy.

The bottom line is, while some of these conspiracies may seem valid (the key word in that sentence being "some") not all of them are, and it has nothing to do with whether or not you like the government, politicians, or anything else. The people who insist on advocating these conspiracies at all costs, also end up costing one other thing; Truth - the very issue they claim to stand for.
1 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Never have so few, said such garbage, spoiling so much, for so many!
joshyboy55313 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I don't think my opinion of someone has ever plummeted as dramatically as it did for Penn and Teller (mainly Penn) after watching this absolute embarrassment for anyone interested critical thinking! I mean honestly it was just abysmal!

With reference to my summarising quote, these two had a great opportunity to finish many conspiracy theories. The problem for so many people interested in conspiracies is that there are rarely any good debunking programmes or books, therefore some absolute garbage is allowed to "fester." Therefore when I saw that the magnificent Penn and Teller (I love their magic) have dedicated a whole programme to slamming conspiracy theories, (I am a fan of which) I was VERY excited. I thought it would be a good chance to see whether the things I had been watching could withstand some professional criticism. How wrong was I! So please read my rather pointlessly long review (which still won't cover all the garbage) and then watch this episode for yourself to see the "intellectual" arguments against conspiracy theorists.

We start with 9/11, the king of all CTs. The only one of the three I would say I knew anything about. Now there really isn't much to say about how unprofessional this part was. It pretty much consisted of Penn shouting and swearing to a montage of equally idiotic bigots who are clearly hand-picked to make the 9/11 argument look ridiculous. That was that! They didn't look at why the thousands of architects and engineers disagree with the official report, the fact debris of flight 93 stretched for miles across the landscape or anything which has any substance to it. I mean literally 5 minutes of the 10 minutes dedicated consisted of Penn shouting "these crazy f*cks!" Awful.

In part 2 (Moon landings) things went from bad, to extraordinary! I never thought someone could talk away their whole credibility in 10 minutes! (And I'm not talking about the conspiracy nuts!) I know nothing about this theory so all I have to go by is what they say, and they were so bad I actually left more convinced the moon is made of cheese. For a start the link to the moon landings conspiracy involved a nut who was talking utter nonsense earlier about 9/11, who then says, "Now those moon landings!" I mean come-on! They just revealed to us how they go to one crazy CT pub and pretend all conspiracy theorists are like this! Again this 10 minute slot involved Penn noticing how a man drinks water out of a vodka bottle, forgets the "n" in chimney and one good debunk. (Which shows the quality the show could have had!) It involved how a hair got on one of the negatives and made it look like a rock was a labelled prop. However talk of milking it! They reminded me of a child who for once was right and talks so much sh*t because of it! Anyway, moving on from this there was a point where they actually helped support the CT. They laugh at the man who says the flag moves while showing the flag moving on film! I thought they were going to then say why the flag moves but they just showed another shot of an astronaut holding the flag and spoke of how the flag only moved when someone physically touched it! Amazingly contradictory!

For the third part which is focused on the Kennedy CTs, Penn once again makes no sense when saying if the Government killed Kennedy, why don't they kill all the people making these conspiracy videos and books? Ridiculous. I am then shown (after a few minutes of milking his non point) how the bullet in the official report seems to have an unrealistic path, hence why conspiracy theorists call it the "magic bullet." Not knowing anything about the Kennedy assassination I thought that the two may redeem themselves by debunking what ostensibly appears to be a fascinating point. No! They literally just say, in fact so & so was sat slightly to the left so its not true. Wow! Despite showing us how the bullet appears to go down then up then right then left, apparently being sat to the left explains this. Idiots. This wasn't the first time they actually gave better evidence for the conspiracy then against it. So the next point someone said (which btw I'm sure are not the best pieces of evidence for the CT) was that this man couldn't shoot the rifle 3 times in 5.6 seconds. Interesting point, probably not true, lets see what Penn has to say. So get this, he uses the same rifle and with no bullets (not even blanks) and without aiming at all (let alone at a moving target 60m away from a bath tub) pumps out 3 rounds in 3.5 seconds. Do I really need to say any more? They then do the only semi piece of critical thinking of the whole day by debunking why Kennedy's head jerks back. Bra-f*cking-vo.

So I too have probably lost my credibility by swearing etc like Penn also, but trust me if you watch it for yourself you will realise how terrible it really is! It was summed up when Penn goes, "If they couldn't cover up Water-gate, they can't cover up anything." I could write a thousand world essay on why that isn't true, but you probably know why. It's amazing how they wish to promote critical thinking and not to be spoon fed garbage when that's all they do. Penn and Teller should be ashamed for producing such tripe and If they read this I would love for them to respond! joshyboy553@gmail.com

P.S: I've seen less "Bullsh*t" on Psychic Sally.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed