La France (2007) Poster

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A musical about a company of soldiers during WW I
rasecz6 April 2008
I would not have watched this film had I known it was a musical. Not my genre. There are only four songs and they are mercifully not too long. They were recorded live while shooting and the compositions have an odd unpolished quality.

It's 1917 in northern France. A company of eleven French soldiers, including a lieutenant, are moving through the countryside. A woman impersonating a man succeeds in joining the company. While the mission of the company is not immediately revealed, the woman is on a quest to find her husband, also a soldier at the front, whose whereabouts are unknown. The film is taken up by the journey of those twelve characters.

The war is near but battles don't make it to the screen. You may see some smoke, hear the sound of cannons and explosions, and see a few dead bodies. The war is context but it's depiction is not central. The stress is on the men of the company and the interloper they have adopted.

The musical numbers are surreal interludes. Out of the blue makeshift instruments appear, mostly string, a piano once and a clarinet. Obviously the soldiers are not carrying them around. It's fanciful and it rubbed me in the wrong way.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
the strangest war movie you will ever see
LudwA6 June 2011
I'd just finished reading J.D. Salinger's Nine Stories, when I watched this movie, and they seemed to make a good pair. This is one of the most unusual war movies I've ever seen. There's no war/battle action at all! Even more so, the soldiers seem to have been wandering around, aimlessly, for years and years, in a desperate attempt to deal with their experiences in The Great War. Trying to make sense of the horror, by telling each other stories of the mythical Atlantis and singing songs. It's hard forgetting the pain and horrors they endured though (and that's what made me think of Salinger's depressed post war heroes). The group of soldiers traveling through endless dark-green and misty blue woods (apparently without ever reaching a village) is joined by a woman, played by Sylvie Testud, posing as a young boy, Jean d'Arc-style. For a long time it seems her secret will never be revealed, which fits the mood of the movie. The others are too lifeless (spiritless even) to notice she's a woman, even when they are dressing her wounds. Another good example of the beautiful alienation of this movie already takes place in the first scene. We see Sylvie Testud, standing on a hill close to her home, staring in the distance, hoping to see the front line of the War probably hundreds of kilometers away. (as if such a thing was possible, like a miracle). The woman receives bad news in a letter, and starts her journey, eventually meeting the soldiers, who grumblingly let her join their group (even though the woman pays a 'handy' price). The soldiers almost immediately tell her she can never really become one of them, and never does she join the group in their musical intermezzos. Yes, there are a handful of sixties influenced psych-folk songs, played by the soldiers on self-built instruments (even a piano, God knows where that came from). And why not? Everything is possible. Every time they play a new song, the mood seems to gets even sadder and more beautiful. Fine movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Willful Suspension of Disbelief
wxmanj29 August 2018
A curious little picture of fantasy that think was for the most part well done. Not super compelling or anything to rave about but completely watchable. Clearly not for everyone esp. those who need a more concrete narrative with absolute believability.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Lost souls skirting the field of battle
Chris Knipp3 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This peculiar musical war movie about a woman disguised as a man in search of her soldier husband in World War I France has the courage of its oddball convictions--or does it? It was disconcerting, at least, to hear from director Bozon that his original intention was a film about Arabs in the French-Algerian war of the Sixties. For a French art film you need public money, he said, and to get that the dialogue has to be in French--so voila!--no Arabs, and the dial was turned back to WWI.

'La France' is the kind of thing that truly delights some of the most ardent festival attendees: a film that's genuinely weird and original, that comes from left field, is quite sure of itself, and is sustained by some of the best actors in its country of origin, good cinematography, and unusual music used in an unexpected way. To others, this is likely to seem merely remote and inexplicable; a long slog even at only 102 minutes. To me, it evoked memories of Robert Bresson, or the Eric Rohmer of 'Percival,' while still seeming a cluster of missed opportunities. Opening in France last November, it received a respectful critical reception and the occasional rave. It also ran in Lincoln Center's New Directors/New Films series early this year and was singled out for special praise by the Village Voice's Nathan Lee.

Bozon and his scenarist, Axelle Ropert, deserve credit for following their own path in constructing what French reviewer Christine Haas called "a melancholy ballad and a humanistic fable."

Here's the premise: a young woman gets a strange letter from her loving husband at the front: "Stop writing me, you will never see me again." She cuts her hair, binds her breasts and, posing as a seventeen-year-old boy, joins a unit whose members she finds sleeping in a field. Of course they try to get rid of him/her, but "Camille" (Sylvie Testud)--she can use her real name, because it's a boy's as easily as a girl's--each time does something so risky and dramatic (gets shot in the hand, jumps off a bridge) that they have to rescue her and keep her in tow a while longer. Eventually her initiative saves them, and she's accepted, even though the Lieutenant (Pascal Greggory) has declared on her first appearance that he/she has the face of somebody who's "seeking death." The surprise is that the essential unmasking will be not of Camille but of the unit she joins. Guillaume Depardieu comes in for an appropriate cameo at the end looking suitably hopeless, pretty, and shattered.

Good use is made here of Testud's androgyny and Greggory's habitual hangdog look. This scrawny, determined "Camille" really resembles a boy, while the Lieutenant's soft, sad visage hints at something very wrong.

Every so often--and this is what the film will be remembered for--the soldiers take out a bunch of handmade junkyard musical instruments and in unprofessional but harmonized falsettos sing a Sixties-style ballad, which is always from a woman's viewpoint--and has, by intention, absolutely nothing to do with the action. Bozon claims that it's a Hollywood tradition and not purely his avantgardism to make war movies with songs that are anachronistic and not plot-related.

The resulting effect, anyhow, lacks any sense of the actual, without slipping over into a purely conceptual or fantastic framework that might have given the themes of loss, loneliness, failure of nerve, and sexual identity (or whatever all this is about) really free rein. Camille is an interesting character with rich picaresque possibilities that are insufficiently explored. Testud seems to give so much, yet get back so little from the film. Greggory's sick-soul character never develops or changes. The other soldiers never take on real personalities. The essential mechanism of most war movies--the sounds and effects of battle--is absent. Instead, violence comes from an unexpected quarter. The resolution is bitter-sweet.

Seen at the San Francisco International Film Festival 2008. It won the Prix Jean Vigo in France for independent spirit and originality of style.
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
No, You're Not Crazy
pak-hanafi15 June 2008
I aim the title at any who have seen this movie and had friends remind them that their mouth was hanging open as they viewed. To potential new viewers, let these remarks serve as a warning.

I will say that the musical element of the film was actually quite charming and wonderful in an absurd sort of way. It had absolutely nothing to do with the story line and initially contributed to our confusion. We soon abandoned all hope of understanding why anything occurred, but the musical interludes were always welcome.

Heaven forbid you are amongst a group or encounter others who feel the movie is worthy of analysis or discussion beyond: "What the hell was THAT all about?" It had some interesting moments, but since they never really contributed to understanding, I had to limit my rating to 3 stars.

I saw this with a large audience at the Seattle Int. Film Festival, a fairly sophisticated and accepting group of aficionados. Many still had mouths agape even as we filed out of the theater, as their disbelief and confusion was not easily overcome.
7 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Frank, sad, genuinely romantic, very WWI
tushania20 January 2012
I am extremely surprised at most of the reviews submitted here. It is as if the Americans are really as our (stupid) stereotypes paint them: unimaginative, uneducated, dull, practical.

Questions spring to mind: would they enjoy "The Little Prince" by Saint-Exupery? Would they say that it's silly? Did they ever read or heard a poem of any kind? Did they ever read Remarque or Dos Passos or saw Deer Hunter or anything good? Did they literally took apart every fictional movie or book they saw by the criteria of factual consistency, realism and strict adherence to genre? I really, really don't understand people that criticize a movie about war because there were not enough explosions or bomb craters in it. I refuse to believe that they never had seen a good movie about war without action heroics (we certainly have, Soviet cinema did a lot of nice and gentle (and popular) dramas and humane comedies about war). It's like criticizing a comedy for the lack of good old-fashioned clowns in it.

And most of all it surprises me that even the social context doesn't push them in the right direction. A couple of guys here saw the film at an art-house festival. I imagine that they would be OK with the most absurd and gory things if someone put a "trash" and "experimental" and "surreal" stickers on the poster. But war films, they are about tactics and M1s, right? I think the musical numbers in the film are the most beautiful part of it: they set the tone for the lengthy and disjointed dialogue about Atlantis and whatnot. They are obviously efficient at 1) bringing out the sensitive in young soldiers without heaping macho melodrama; 2) exploring the androgyny of a soldier (an interesting theme); and 3) just evoking the "war is a silly, strange place to be for all of us, but were are here" Vonnegut kind of feeling.

I wonder if other reviewers read Vonnegut.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Memo to France: The USA likes you again so quit sending us movies like this.
johno-2127 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I recently saw this at the 2007 Palm Springs International Film Festival. It's one of those films where I have to ask three questions. Why was this film made? Who was it made for? And why would a popular film festival choose to select it? I guess they chose it because they learned it had won the prestigious Prix Jean Vigo award for 2007 in France for feature film by director Serge Bozon. This film will certainly dramatically diminish the clout that such an award can bring. This is one of the worst films I have ever seen. Set in 1917 France as World War I rages, Camille (Sylvie Testud) is a young woman who receives a letter from her husband who is stationed at the front telling her is ending their love affair and she will never see him again. She cuts off her long hair and dons mens clothing to give her an appearance of a young man of maybe 17 years of age who is heading off to join the army so she can confront her husband in person. She immediately meets up with a platoon of a dozen men led by Lieutenant (Pascol Greggory). Lieutenant is referred to by no name other than his rank. He has only the clothes he wears and carries no backpack. The 11 other soldiers carry meager backpacks but suddenly out of nowhere they produce an array of musical instruments, some hand made, and break into a song. It's not in the style of songs of the early 20th century like French music hall songs but rather is in the style of music of the mid 1960's with harmonies like the Beach Boys or the Beatles. The instruments disappear at the conclusion of the song and it seems like a fun little sight gag and music spoof and I had had hopes this film may turn into a comedy but it never does and they repeat this gag several more times in the film and the amusement of it all kinds of wears off after the third time. The lyrics are bizarre too since they are meant to be sung from a woman's viewpoint but 12 men are singing them. The platoon are actually deserters on their way to the Dutch border. Serge Bozon directs this low budget mess and co-wrote the screenplay with Axelle Ropert. At least the music gave this movie something a little worthwhile as to not be a complete disaster and I would give this a very generous 3.5 out of 10.
6 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Yentl Come Home
writers_reign27 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Don't see this if there are no subtitles and your French is sketchy at best to non-existent otherwise you'll drive yourself crazy trying to figure out if it's a fantasy or what. It's 1917 and the war is in full spate. In the North East of the country Sylvie Testud gets a Dear Jean letter and instead of murmuring philosophically, c'est la vie, c'est l'amour she chops off her hair, finds a pair of pants and lights out for the front to ask the guy who done her wrong just what he thinks he's doing. Before long she runs across a raggle-taggle unit led by Pascal Greggory, tags along and winds up with a uniform - they just happened to have a spare in her size as you do - but no gun and becomes part of the group. They march, and march and march some more but strangely enough in the middle of a major war they never run into any actual fighting though they do hear gunfire on one occasion. Even more bizarrely they keep breaking into song, complete with an quintet/sextet of soldier/musicians at a time when one would have thought discretion would dictate silence. Eventually Testud's errant mate shows up, they put in some sack time - in pajamas yet, presumably from the same quartermaster's stores that laid the uniform on Testud - and the group moves on leaving them to it. It's actually a beautifully shot and engrossing film a sort of hybrid of Yentl, Victor Victoria and A Very Long Engagement. Sylvie Testud is clearly brave enough to play a role in which she is seen as androgynous whereas she is actually a very lovely and very feminine actress and she works well with Greggory although virtually all the actors turn in fine performances. Not really multiplex fodder but no worse for that so if there's an Art House near you lobby them to book this.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
At Least Try to Simulate War
anthony_retford29 April 2010
I am just not sure what this movie was about, or if there was a point. We have this woman, Camille, who joins up with a band of actors dressed as soldiers in WWI in France. They wander around in very nice countryside that has not one hint of the war that raged and scarred the countryside in France. Time after time the group walks through fields and woods which are painfully obviously not affected in any way from war. The only time we get any idea that there could be a battle going on is when they are all in a boat and there are some sound effects and everyone ducks now and then. One other time they were in a small area where there had been a fire, but that area was very small. Where were the artillery-shell craters, the torn vegetation from small-arms fire,the front line? Where was any of it? I think the director was very lazy or broke and could not even simulate a war environment.

When Francoise appeared from nowhere that took the cake. He wanders across a field like a spirit. Nothing was settled. He wrote a letter at the beginning of the movie but that was not addressed.

Horrible movie. Waste of time.
5 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Journey through World War 1 as fought by Camille the wife of a soldier
mjwshipshore30 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
La France. Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant. Fighting the war after the war. Symbolism is there, and it all makes sense as the soldiers of the past disappear, and a veteran emerges from the past after the struggle Camille takes part in to help him become present.

The musical component of the movie seems to pop up from nowhere, but does it? The poetry enveloped within these quirky lyrics probably are apt to be brushed aside as artistic, but tied in with the movies symbolism become a great story of struggle against something other than the enemy soldiers of World War I. Pay close attention as the movie moves on toward the finishing scene, because it is that point that the movie begins again anew once you realize the parallels of what happened on the battlefield, and in Camille's life after war.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bizarre French deserter band platoon
evony-jwm22 May 2021
That wanders aimlessly behind WW1 lines. Almost zero signs of WW1, No rations, No water, three sightings of Germans how did she get behind German lines? The woman faking kills a German lookout? WTF. And it gets even more cray cray after that.. Faker woman is/was going to the front to get her husband to desert. And best goof was cadet shot found floating down the river to next scene completely dry. Or the random meeting husband escaped from Belgium prisoner of war camp..
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
admirable work
Kirpianuscus31 October 2015
the different image of war. heroic but in special form. cruel in a profound sense. but, more important, delicate portrait of love, duty, sacrifice and happiness. the grace. to present the small details of life, without victories or fight scenes. to use symbols and vulnerabilities of characters - only ordinary people. to use each level of story for image of fragile, vulnerable and beautiful universe, a woman and few men in middle of strange events, the emotions are only tool for define the sense of existence, the frame of hope. more than a film, a splendid poem . one of the rare pieces who do not has ambition to impress. only create seed for reflection.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed