The Third Saturday in October Part V (2022) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
its not THAT bad...
ops-525358 May 2023
If youre the one controlling the playspeed at the theater. Somewhere between 1.25-1.5 ffwd youll get a real crimson southern redneck horror comedy to chew on...

its a low budget film about a reoccuring beast that returns every 3rd saturday of october, turning heaven into hell for all them screamers out there. The story and plot is unlike the others the very same, youre doomed to blood and gore anyway and how...

its time era is the early 1990's, the art and dressing department along with the makeup and stage units have done a decent job and reflects very well life 30 years ago.

They even hit the bells of the comedy central too, had a good laugh herenthere. But its not a state of the art a-level horror, rather b or c level when pickinbg the individual parts out of it. But alltogether at high speed it works therefore a small recommend from the grumpy old man.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Another Saturday in October.
DoorsofDylan18 December 2022
Charmed by the sincere tribute to Grindhouse cinema with the Horror comedy The Third Saturday in October (2022-also reviewed), I was happy to find that the other film in the series was being shown at the Soho Horror Film Festival, this led to me counting down to the third Saturday.

View on the film:

Recorded as the fifth in a series where parts 2-4 don't actually exist, returning editor/writer/director Jay Burleson & cinematographer Chris Hilleke slam the franchise into the pre- Scream (1996) early mid-90's, which they wonderfully capture in flat, plainly lit for video, wide-shots, limited sides of Slasher set-pieces, and extended takes for attempts at Comedy sequences, which stumble on the dead-end that the Slasher had hit by this point.

Along with emulating the visual state of Slasher flicks from this period, the screenplay by Burleson sadly strays a little too close to the writing style of this era, with the playful riffs on Grindhouse from the earlier movie, being replaced here with plodding, witless dialogue tangled up in a Slasher series which had overstayed its welcome by the third Saturday in October.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Curse you, statewide pepperoni shortage!
Otkon9 March 2024
It's definitely better than the original and that's saying much. Wait, is "saying much" a thing? Well, if it is, that is what I am saying.

For a sequel it plays up the humor and less of the homage of the first one. And speaking of that, those films are listed in reverse order here with The Third Saturday in October Part V (2022) being the original and The Third Saturday in October (2022) being the sequel.

But I think for continuity and thematic purposes, The Third Saturday in October (2022) is the first movie. And The Third Saturday in the October Part V (2022) is the only extant sequel. The Third Saturday in October Part II, The Third Saturday in October Part III and The Third Saturday in October Part IV are all explained as being lost. So perhaps, when those recreations are found and released they can be ranked in comparison to the two films in the series that are viewable in regard to their intentionally questionable qualities.

I did find the bed foot guy the best part of this movie. That was fun.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Being bad at filmmaking does not qualify as "Parody"
spottylittlegit29 November 2023
Logged on and couldn't believe this thing had 100% positive... then I realized that's because it only has 5 votes, lol. That tracks. I saw this and it's prequel being really pushed by Bloody Disgusting this October for some reason. My guess is that someone on the staff is related to these folks, because this movie is ROUGH. I'm sure it is intended as some sort of parody, but it doesn't feel nearly clever enough to pull it off. It just feels like a bad, low budget effort. Not so bad it's good, just so bad it's... mid?

I also feel bad for several of these actors. The little girl in particular, because you can tell that they are new to acting, which is fine (everyone has to start somewhere), but they also aren't being given much direction, so it feels like they are just tasked with filling in their own dialogue for much of their scenes, and the result is extreme unnatural awkwardness. The little girl has nonsensical, overly long bits where she's basically making small talk with cats (or a picture of a cat in one part) but was given no instructions on what to say, so she's just rambling on to fill time, like "i like catfish, do you like catfish? You are a cat... do you like fish? Maybe you are also a fish? Are you a catfish?", or asking a picture of a cat if it's "hungry" and "about ready for dinner?"... then just meowing repeatedly after she runs out of things to say to it. She (and the babysitter) are also obviously instructed to dance to music in several scenes, but it's clear they hadn't locked down the music selection yet, so they are dancing to a completely different beat, and/or just awkwardly making fists and unnaturally jerking them in the air to simulate "dancing", ala Elaine from Sinefeld, lol

The special effects are also rouuuuugh. So far (i'm only like 30 minutes in) i've seen a very bad, photoshop style cartoonish animated "rip" as a head comes off, some off screen awkward kills, horrible dialogue like "make like a gravy train and get those greased wheels down the road and outta my face boy!" and an awkward guy in "gameface" makeup unenthusiastically walking out of the bedroom singing "do the commonwealth shuffle. The commonwealth shuffle. Come on yall, do the commonwealth shuffle" in a monotone, while his daughter responds (also in monotone) "stop being embarrassing".

And the killer, isn't ominous, and honestly doesn't even make sense. He just casually, almost lethargically drives from house to house, blandly walking in without any real purpose and killing people in the most unenthusiastic, color by numbers way, before shuffling off to repeat, He also seems to be immortal, which is demonstrated in the most uninteresting way. A guy points a gun at him and tells him to leave, then oddly, and unemotionally just shoots him anyway, the killer doesn't react, or even flinch, a really cheap after effects, subdued blood spray plays, the guy opens fire several more times, same cheap special effect, no reaction, then they both just sort of stand there looking at each other, presumably waiting to be cued on whatever the next line is lol, this isn't intentionally bad, despite what you've heard. This is just plain of middling bad.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Poster is Cool. That's All the Praise I Can Give.
gsuplee22 May 2023
Contrast the reviews for this film against the "first" film, and you'll raise your eyebrows. Just saying.

The poster for the film is great. That is the only positive contribution I have to make. There's no homage here. There's no tribute to slasher flicks...its one nonsensical kill after another.

The mask is not interesting in the least. All of the mystery about the killer is nullified in the first 20 minutes. None of the characters are likeable.

I have no idea how the filmmakers got any funding for this enormous waste of time. If you're on the fence about watching The Third Saturday in October, hopefully this review helped you make a decision.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
You're Only as Good as the Sum of Your Parts
arfdawg-124 May 2023
The dude who directs these flicks has a lot of potential. He sets up the scenes real well and the edits work to keep the suspense.

Unfortunately, this sequel is plagued by the same problem as the first. The dude who plays the killer can't act. He's horrible.

In this film he walks around with a skull like plastic mask mugging inside it like an imbecile. It really brings the movie down bug time.

Too bad because this actually could have been a classic with better actors (especially the killer) and a wee bit more story.

Instead we get a thinly drawn storyline of some maniac killing people with a 2 inch pocket knife! WHAT?

Sad.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A solid if somewhat problematic follow-up
kannibalcorpsegrinder2 April 2023
Preparing for a big party, a group of friends gathers at a friend's house to celebrate the town's massive football rivalry game where they use the opportunity to score with their girlfriends, but when they find the festivities crashed by a supernatural killer must try to survive the night against the being.

This was a solid enough sequel if just a slight step down from the original. One of the bright spots here is the rather fun setup that introduces some workable storylines for this kind of film. With the introduction of the killer returning and appearing on the outskirts of town in a rampage that goes unnoticed until it's too late serving this well enough to start the film, the continuation of the town's obsession with the particular football game being played on that date and the build-up of the relationships at stake between the main group of friends present, these pieces all combine together to make the first half here quite fun. The few bits of the friends hanging out with each other and preparing for the game before the party show a genuine sense of friendship that's quite effective at building sympathy for them which plays into the finish quite nicely. That provides the basic grounding for the film to go through a solid series of stalking scenes with the killer's brutality coming to the forefront quite nicely. With the encounters following suit of the first film with a slew of brutal, hard-hitting sequences that are made all the better for being practical effects. This one manages to strike just as impactful an impression here with the encounters and confrontations here. Featuring the first ambush at the farmer's house, the later scenes stalking their parents, or later coming up to the house while everyone is unaware of him being there, this one starts off well enough while also setting up the rampage that takes place at the party where he starts taking out the group as they split off from the others at the party. These are usually fun enough and filled with enough action to make for a likable and wholly enjoyable time. There are some issues to be had with this one. The main drawback to the film is much the same as an issue ins the first one in that the killer is somewhat more comical than he should be which makes him less imposing than he should be. Once again missing the sense of motivation for the rampage that was found in part one, here the whole thing is taken up a notch by the constantly utilized inability of everyone to notice he's there with people looking at the scene he's left behind and failing to notice or react to the obvious unnatural look of the scenario causing them to fall victim. These features combine together to make this killer feel quite underwhelming which is somewhat disappointing, much like the low-budget nature of this one standing out which is pretty frequent throughout here despite not being overtly detrimental but still stands out enough to hold this back.

Rated Unrated/R: Graphic Violence, Graphic Language, and Brief Nudity.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Golden Corral vs. Ruth's Chris
kevincraig-1263929 May 2023
If you were expecting your steak to be seared at 1,700 degrees fahrenheit, you came to the wrong place. This flashback to a great decade in horror was ideal for those who enjoy a well-stocked buffet, however. Before you review this future cult classic, be sure to study up on the genre first. Understand the masterful way in which the producers not only filmed Harding's angst, but also the thematic touches from the early 80s. It was meant to be watched on VHS; not Blu-Ray.

The manner in which they intertwined "the big game" was outstanding, although I'm not sure any true football fans would leave for catfish or any upstairs hijinks. Hackleburg is a dangerous place for teenagers; IMDb is similar for those not privy to past slasher films and how well they captured the essence of the era in a mere 89 blood-soaked minutes.

Appreciate the steak and all the sides for what they are. I left the smorgasbord feeling quite satisfied and plan to return.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Exactly what I expected
tjonesmktg12 May 2023
As suggested, we watched Part V first and then watched the prequel. This was exactly what I expected and enjoyed every bit of it. The acting and storyline is true-to-form with the horror films of that era. The props and attention to detail to create that realistic feel of a movie made in the late 70's - 80s is fantastic. I enjoyed the familiar additions to recreate the boogie-man, babysitter, and unsuspecting group of friends. The diverse group of spectators for the "big game" make for amusing interactions and some instances of humor. There are several points in the film that we couldn't resist laughing at because it's just too ridiculous and that was by design; which makes it even more enjoyable.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
For Third Saturday part V
lisa-6922715 May 2023
For Third Saturday in October part V

"Don't know that I've ever experienced a better homage to classic 80's slashers than when I watched Third Saturday part V. I was instantly transported back to the video store days of my youth. Bowling and Cunningham's on screen chemistry carries the movie full steam ahead, supported aptly by the Hilarious Bart Hyatt, Taylor Smith, and Robert Hill. Burleson's insistence on starting the franchise with Part V isn't marketing...it's pure genius"

For Third Saturday in October-

For a movie with a micro budget like this one, I was totally unprepared for my great experience..check out my review ...
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Masking mayhem
daijones-0706612 May 2023
Our indiscriminate masked killer is at it again creating mayhem but never quite masters parking his chosen mode of transport - the ever so ominous hearse. He clearly revels in hanging out at people's homes before dispatching them with a psychotic air reminiscent for me of Joaquin Phoenix's Joker performance. It's hard not to laugh out loud at some of the killing scenes. In most horror films it seems the pre-murder build-up tension is the most unsettling. I don't think this film achieves that (again . . . He seems to spend an awful long time doing what exactly before getting down to the bloody action!) but hits the spot when it comes to the killer's post slasher indulgences . . . Humorously unsettling and weirdly compelling viewing! Give it a go I say.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed