While the series started out with an interesting premise, it also spent a great deal of time getting lost in its own subplots, most of which never go anywhere. It spends half of the series building up at a steady pace, followed by a rapid descent into increasingly implausible scenarios and plot twists all thrown in at the last minute which really let the rest of the series down.
Whoever did their research on NATO should also be fired - while neither Finland or Sweden are NATO members, both have agreements in place to allow member nations to deploy troops in their countries in response to external threats pursuant to Articles 5 and 6. The US is also not in a position to unilaterally veto such action (except perhaps via the UN security council, but this still would not prohibit individual countries from enacting a response). The analogue to the US-Iceland defense agreement is also disingenuous - Iceland has no military and relies entirely on US forces on behalf of NATO to fill this role. A risk considered so low in reality that they don't even have troops stationed there anymore. Neither Finland nor Sweden have such a problem - if they've been capable of taking care of their own interests outside of formal NATO membership, the motivation for an even more restricted defense agreement makes no sense whatsoever.
The entire premise of a Russian attack over being spurned is also preposterous - they did absolutely nothing when they were booted from the G8 over Crimea, which has far wider implications than being booted from a committee negotiating a treaty they had no intention of signing in the first place, especially when it later becomes clear they were erroneously ejected under a false pretense anyways. There might be some ejecting of diplomats and calling each other names, but absolutely no one is going to war over such a non-issue.
If there is to be a second season, I do hope they do a little more research and make the pacing somewhat more uniform.
Whoever did their research on NATO should also be fired - while neither Finland or Sweden are NATO members, both have agreements in place to allow member nations to deploy troops in their countries in response to external threats pursuant to Articles 5 and 6. The US is also not in a position to unilaterally veto such action (except perhaps via the UN security council, but this still would not prohibit individual countries from enacting a response). The analogue to the US-Iceland defense agreement is also disingenuous - Iceland has no military and relies entirely on US forces on behalf of NATO to fill this role. A risk considered so low in reality that they don't even have troops stationed there anymore. Neither Finland nor Sweden have such a problem - if they've been capable of taking care of their own interests outside of formal NATO membership, the motivation for an even more restricted defense agreement makes no sense whatsoever.
The entire premise of a Russian attack over being spurned is also preposterous - they did absolutely nothing when they were booted from the G8 over Crimea, which has far wider implications than being booted from a committee negotiating a treaty they had no intention of signing in the first place, especially when it later becomes clear they were erroneously ejected under a false pretense anyways. There might be some ejecting of diplomats and calling each other names, but absolutely no one is going to war over such a non-issue.
If there is to be a second season, I do hope they do a little more research and make the pacing somewhat more uniform.