Alexis and Billy investigate the tragic case of David Camm, a former Indiana State Trooper who was wrongfully convicted of murder, which exposes them to a crisis within the United States court system.
Through examining the murder trial of Utah doctor, John Wall, Alexis and Billy discover what can happen when two experts look at the same evidence and come up with opposite conclusions.
Alexis and Billy investigate the surreal case of Brad Jennings, and the circumstances that led to him being charged with murder based on the opinion of one questionable expert.
Bill Richards, a California man who spent 23 years behind bars for a crime he did not commit, tells his harrowing tale - and in the process - reveals what passes for science in a court of law.
Attorneys, academics, and a former judge propose some radical ideas to fix the problem of expert testimony and stop the endless cycle of wrongful incarceration.
Billy and Alexis expose serious problems with forensic experts' testimony in the U.S. court system, citing multiple cases in which people were charged with murders they didn't commit, based largely on expert's opinion.