Streets of Plenty (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"Steets of Plenty "Ultimately Lets You Down
dreadym25 October 2021
There were some dubious aspects as to the direction this film would go from the outset - the priviledged Vancouver kid trying to experience homelessness, the naive pre-dispositions about homelessness he has goig in, and what he's about to find out by experiencing things first hand. He vows to stay on the street for 31 days, though in truth he can bow out and end the experiment any time he wants.

There's a few good things about this film - you see some footage with real people that illuminates what it's like to use the shelter system, and many reasons there are (especially health and basic safety) for people to prefer living on the streets.

In the end, the big, overriding idea the kid comes up with is that "addiction" is the number one, over-all common denominator for the homeless, and that if addiction is not addressed they'll be no solution for homelessness. Wow..huge insight that addiction and homelessness are linked. The question is...what are the root causes of addiction for all of us as a society? The film points out, although briefly, that we are a society addicted to oil, addicted to consummerism in a way that is ultimately as self-destructive and unsustainable as a drug addiction, but even worse - we're destroying the planet because of it. We pass the buck off on the homeless and drug addicted. But the film misses the mark in not developing that idea further.

In the end this film fails, and no one privileged is really going to learn anything new from it, (much like the guy who made it) it will just reinforce their already privilege-biased views on the subject. -MR.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
See it for what it is
needfultosay23 November 2019
I understand why people would think this is narcissistic and not showing the problem properly, but you can't expect that. As a whole the film gave me a better sense of the world of the homeless than I know how to find anywhere else. What I understand better is the curiosity to know what homelessness actually is like and understand where it comes from. I have no idea where to find this kind of information so I'm glad this guy went out and saw that world from his specific perspective. Of course there is more to the problem and of it's not a cinematic masterpiece, but you can't expect that from a regular guy like him. Also, it's not as if this one month of using the homeless facilities is going to change anything in the bigger picture. I can't blame him of doing anything bad before I find a better way of learning about this problem.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
horribly narcissistic and simply talentless in all respects.
johzerbe29 May 2017
Created an account just to vent for the last 10 wasted minutes of my life. I watched two parts of this intensely self obsessed manchild's 'documentary' on youtube and all I can say is I'm disgusted by his lack of any understanding whatsoever of the situation in Vancouver. His acting shows the worldview of a 9-year old child, and while the viewer is exposed to some of the shelters and 'behind the scenes' footage of life as a homeless person in the DTES, it all seems done only to support this dude's overblown ego. Unfortunately this piece of garbage remains at the top of google searches for 'Vancouver Homeless Documentary' (somehow), and anyone wanting to learn about the issue will be unpleasantly surprised when they see this.

Would love it if he could attempt to right his wrongs by removing this offensive material from Youtube, IMDb, and all physical copies of the film in his parents' westside basement.
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
at first, its a conservatives view legitimized, then some of the real world is shown
waptek222 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
the first part deliberately shows the cynical side of the debate. then at about the end of his first week . reality hits him in the balls. this is the part when most of the conservatives will tune out. since it tells everyone what it IS like this is. maybe the best one out there accept. he Really should have NOT injected at all. and the 4 basic types of homeless . (insane, drugged, lazy, normal). are not described explicitly. By the way . i am a mostly-homeless computer tech' in Portland Oregon. i KNOW this existence and. i am not insulted by this project .

dear reader . please ignore the useless punctuation in the review ,, i am trying to get IMDb to take the damn thing! dear IMDb . a 10 line requirement forced on a person who NEEDS to write small efficient code is an insult. why is a brief description punished. this is stupid!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very well done
keithmac0712 March 2010
I'm giving this a 10 because of the sheer courage involved in the making of this documentary. I'm from Vancouver and have lived here most of my life, and I'm from an upper-middle class family, like the guy in the movie. Like him, I see homeless people on the streets every single day and I feel frustrated and impotent about the problem. The black-and-white contrast between Vancouver's so-called "best city in the world" status with the Downtown Eastside is appalling, to say the least.

What this documentary has done for me is given me a safe but realistic fly-on-the-wall look at the epidemic on my streets. Some may criticize this man as being a spoiled rich white kid who could have gone home anytime he wanted to, but you can't criticize him for what he has done - bringing attention to Vancouver's biggest problem.

There are three kinds of people in this world. The people who look at something and think: "Man, I would love to do that", but don't do a thing. The people who look at something and criticize it, but don't do anything or offer anything better. And then, the people who go out and DO it.

This guy went out and did it. I'm the guy who would "love" to do it, but I don't have the courage to do it.

So, this documentary and the people behind it have my respect. It's a powerful documentary and it's striking in its bare-bones approach to a decades-old problem that just seems to be getting worse every day even when the Olympic Games came around.
10 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Artificially constructed to mask as documentary
jenseto15 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Like another user, I had to create an accoun just to write a review and vent . It took me a while to identify the emotion I felt watching this but it was anger. It upsets me the actor is trying to make us believe he is the same as those who are truly homeless.

Here are the obvious differences:
  • he's had a lifetime of good dental care.
  • he likely was supported by one or both parents and definitely by his brother (who held the camera).
  • he never walked the streets alone to be victim and aaa always in the company of his brother.
  • he always knew he would be done in 31 days. Having this to look forward to changes everything. He had hope always and knew the conditions were temporary.


I could go on and on. The drug use was gratuitous-he had to learn how to use a crack Pipe and how to shoot up. He wasn't even close to being addicted.

It turned those who are homeless around him the supporting cast of eccentric characters and himself the star where it was the other way around.

It's a shame that he put his dignity, compassion and health aside to sensationalize A very important problem-how do we care for those who are vulnerable and provide a very basic need: a safe place to call home.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A fascinating real life experiment
mmformanek5 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
As someone who arrived in Vancouver as an immigrant more than 30 years ago, I often wondered how so many people end up living on the streets of our beautiful city. From my own experience I know that lack of money, language skills and having no family and friends doesn't destin one for a life on the streets but, as this film pointed out, addiction or mental illness definitely does. It's a reality which Alex's experiment successfully highlighted. Addiction is an extremely complex problem for which we are quite obviously failing to find a solution considering this film is more than 10 years old. Unfortunately, although this film offered a lot of questions it didn't attempt to look for any answers or solutions. Alex had a unique opportunity to find out what insights those living this incredibly uncomfortable life could offer to us regular folks with a roof over our heads. Other than, "don't get addicted", there wasn't much content obtained from the homeless. Too bad because the only way to help them would be to understand them better. Still, a fascinating experiment which I felt compelled to watch until the very end.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Completely misses its intention
travisdionne-8902216 August 2019
Any attempt at empathy was overshadowed by the narcissistic, self indulgent presentation by the narrator/main actor.

Disgusted to see such an echo chamber of what is passed as acceptable social commentary and insight about real people with real problems.

Absolutley ridiculous this movie is rated like it is. The truth is in the user comments.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
FAKE RATINGS
The_Boxing_Cat9 December 2019
I gave this film 2 extra stars because of all the fake low ratings. Almost all of those low rated scores have only rated and reviewed this film. Probably by one person who created fake accounts.

As far as the erroneous claims (made by the fake reviewers), I did not see the filmmaker be unsympathetic or unaware of mental illness. Watch it and decide for yourself.

Good job and thanks for exposing Vancouver's dark secret!
3 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disgusting view of mental health and homelessness
jenniferlynnburke24 July 2018
Don't support this film. It's saddening to see someone who just does not get it' try to act as though living with mental illness, and homelessness and poverty, could be easy. Zero empathy, or understanding from this film. It's truly sad.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible
rayg-891931 July 2020
Extremely disrespectful to people that actually need real help. Very distasteful
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great way to being awareness of the DTES
icetroy11 March 2020
The movie pictures well the tough reality of the streets of the downtown east side - a neighborhood few people would dare spend a night in. The story seems a little bit improvised which helps make it more realistic. I would watch it again !
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What a sick joke!
travisconnelly-5043029 March 2021
This peice of trash is an insult to the people who are surviving on the DTES. This spoiled rich kid is implying that its an easy romp, and everything is taken care of for you, free food, and shelter, valet service,etc. What you dont see is the poverty, bed bugs,police harrassment, violence, and the scourge of mental healthcare budget cuts. I wont even get into the drug deaths happening a dozen a day. I cant believe this trash was nominated for anything but Insult of the Year. It does more damage than good by implying the homeless got it easy. Just sickening. Signed....a real DTES survivor.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
You must watch!
mcklutz-448693 June 2022
It gives you an insight into the world of living on the streets you'll hopefully never have to experience. The main guy is pretty brave going above and beyond to show the reality of where bad choices can take you. From beginning to end... I couldn't stop watching. I just needed to know what was going to happen next.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
👎
robertconnelyfarr24 January 2021
It's unfortunate that this has been released. But it does stand a testament to how misunderstood this epidemic is.

But yeah. Just unfortunate...
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disgusting, Ignorant
kalikingstierle7 April 2021
The person who made this is ignorant. This can hardly be called a documentary. It is disgusting to watch this privileged narcissist frolic around the DTES and then actually pretend that he has exposed himself to any real risk. And then he acts like he knows anything about what it's like to live that life.

If you are interested in learning anything about homelessness, drug addiction, or the DTES, talk to someone who has actually LIVED that experience. Trust me, we are here and we'd love to share our story.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Starting point, negative zero empathy....
tamara-1326731 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I applaud his attempt at experiencing homelessness first hand to understand these issues in Vancouver. If you are going to explore anything, it's best to challenge yourself with what makes you uncomfortable. But, I do agree with the reviews that call it self indulgent. Or, at least, lacking awareness of his privilege. The very fact that he comes from upper/middle class privilege is a HUGE factor in his experiment. He can go home at any point (and even says he's about to while doing heroin), and knowing he has this safety-net stops him from ever really facing the same dangers and risks as other people on the streets. I suppose it's good he finds some empathy towards the end, but the starting point is (below) zero, with such a callous perspective that these people are just con artists and sub-human. And after having a negative drug experience, this film concludes, overly simplistically, that the problem is entirely drugs. Even the mayor explains what a hugely complex problem it is. I suppose this film might be useful as an eye-opener to others that think like he did, and have no empathy towards the people of the DTES.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This review is real
pattie_cakes3 January 2020
All the previous reviews are in fact true. Waste of time. Someone else please make a better one.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horribly offensive and insensitive
hayleighrebecca1 May 2021
Completely missed the mark on what should be a great and informative documentary on Vancouver's homelessness/mental health crisis which most Canadians turn a blind eye too. This man is so distasteful and couldn't have made a bigger joke out of it.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The dude is a terrible actor.
danielmcaleer-5706715 December 2021
This documentary is so fake. His "meltdowns" where he was threatening to go home were so staged. He has not future in acting. Adds those bits in for dramatic effect.

It started off mildly fascinating and drops off pretty fast. After half an hour I was bored and also irritated by the guys awful acting.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Look At Life In Vancouver's Downtown East Side
sddavis6312 July 2018
Misha Kleider decided to make a documentary about the plight of Vancouver's homeless. He sets it in the context of Vancouver having been awarded the 2010 Winter Olympics and repeatedly being named one of the best cities in the world to live in. And his goal is to expose the other side of Vancouver - the 10 square block nightmare of the Downtown East Side, where homelessness, violence, drug addiction and prostitution are common. There's some value in pointing out the distinction between the two sides of Vancouver. I'm more familiar with Toronto - living only about an hour from that city - but the cities are in many ways similar. There's a lot of affluence, and there's a lot of poverty. Basically, to live in either you have to be either wealthy or poor, because the middle class is being squeezed out by the lack of affordable decent housing. But I have to confess that I also had a knee jerk negative reaction going into this. Kleider seems to be a relatively affluent white kid who thinks he'll learn about homelessness on Vancouver's Downtown East Side by pretending to be homeless on Vancouver's Downtown East Side. Not really the same thing - since Kleider could choose to call it quits anytime he wanted. And in spending his month on the streets he uses resources that could have actually been used by the real homeless. And I have to confess that I found his ultimate learning from his experience to be underwhelming to say the least - there's a strong connection between homelessness and drug addiction. I probably could have guessed that.

I was concerned by the beginning of the film - for a while it looked like it was going to be a "slam the poor" sort of film, blaming them for their own situation and suggesting (as many do) that they actually have life pretty easy. Thankfully, that seems to have been a bit of a set-up, because the tone changes dramatically once Kleider has been on the streets for a few days and really starts to see the situation closer up. He did help shed light on what to many people is a mystery - why do some homeless people choose to stay on the streets even when there are shelter beds available? Turns out Kleider learned that in a lot of ways (especially health-wise) the streets are actually safer than the shelters. Point taken. And there really is no simple answer to the problem of homelessness - the point made by an interview he had with Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson, who took office with a promise to end homelessness and then - like so many politicians who make grandiose promises - realized that he wasn't going to pull that off. Kleider also made some questionable and even disturbing choices in the course of filming. I realize he wanted to experience the plight of people living in the Downtown East Side - but actually trying crack and heroin was too extreme for my liking - and, frankly, his brother (who was doing the filming) should have walked at that point and refused to be a participant in Misha's stupidity. In doing the experimentation with heroin, mind you, he did give us a look into what's it's like in a supervised injection site. It's a controversial idea, and I can see both the pros and the cons of the concept - and what I saw here really didn't sway me to either side.

This isn't a total waste. It does point out the problem of life on the streets - and it's likely similar in all large cities, and not just Vancouver. But my gut reaction to this was simply not positive. (4/10)
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Feels like a class project
chube99219 January 2019
Mildly interesting and could have been so much better. So much naivety throughout the film. They completely ignore mental illness as a factor in homelessness. I do give the main character credit for trying. He certainly had courage to follow through on lots of things. Still, the lack of self awareness and empathy makes this a mostly uninteresting film that misses the point.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Very poorly done
ukuleleamy13 March 2022
A poorly made mockumentary. A very naive and privileged young man ignores the realities of addiction, mental illness and homelessness, and films himself trying hard drugs for fun and mocking people. Doesn't even last 30 days and learns absolutely nothing.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed