I was moved by the realism of story. The precise construction of each of two main characters. A hungry homeless , a video editor. Their meeting in New York subway station. One is determined to obtain some money for food, selling no matter what, the other is in hurry.
And each of them sustains , in admirable manner, a large circle of tension, suppositions, limits and tries to obtain more.
The beautiful acting is a great virtue of film.
In same measure, the dialogue.
But the precious good point is the art of director to feel the limits of Graham , not different by the limits of kindness- generosity defining many from us and the aggresivity , the desperation, the balls of Hashim to force his helper give to him more and more. The last scene is the fair resume of story.
In short, a film ewho I like very much, in many occasions being in the skin of Graham, that mix of fear, prudence, dark suppositions about the intention of the other and the decision to help him.
Indeed,Alex Rollins. Berg did a great job .
And each of them sustains , in admirable manner, a large circle of tension, suppositions, limits and tries to obtain more.
The beautiful acting is a great virtue of film.
In same measure, the dialogue.
But the precious good point is the art of director to feel the limits of Graham , not different by the limits of kindness- generosity defining many from us and the aggresivity , the desperation, the balls of Hashim to force his helper give to him more and more. The last scene is the fair resume of story.
In short, a film ewho I like very much, in many occasions being in the skin of Graham, that mix of fear, prudence, dark suppositions about the intention of the other and the decision to help him.
Indeed,Alex Rollins. Berg did a great job .
