My Perestroika (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A good rundown of Russian society from the past thirty years
Nat6416 September 2012
A bunch of children strolling around during the first day of school : the beginning and the end of the movie are similar in form, but not in substance. Indeed, the whole movie is about how the Russian society was before 1991 and how the USSR collapse impacted people's lives.

We follow Borya, Olga, Andrei and others through their childhood and present lives : it's funny how they were similar during the first period but how they differ now; through the film, you understand that although the perestroika allowed people to leave freer, it also gave them a sense of instability, or as one of the characters say, a sense of inutility.

This movie may appeal to people interested in contemporary Russian history, but also those who are into psychology issues. There is a lot of thinking coming after you've seen Olga looking blankly at the window...
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Soviet Seven Up
Daneel-223 September 2011
Combining vintage footage with modern interviews gives an informative glimpse into the everyday life of children in the Soviet Union and how different things are today for both the children and the adults. The interviews with the now-adults about their childhood were, in my opinion the most enlightening and interesting, as well as the portions about what it was actually like going through perestroika and glasnost. I thought it could have had a stronger theme tying the people together, but it may have just been a product of what the premise of the film was. Anyone interested in what Communism was actually like should definitely watch this.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Understanding the misunderstood
raptor499828 March 2011
Robin Hessman's "My Perestroika" is an interesting view of a world unknown. For these people, growing up during the time that they did was something completely new, and because of this they had no one to turn to. This film helps you to understand what growing up in a different world is like. As their government collapsed and the Soviet Union was no more these individuals found their lives becoming more and more awry.

From a production standpoint, this film is well made despite Hessman's lack of equipment and crew. She conducted the interviews herself with her camera in hand, and while it's not as stylized as many recent documentaries, it fits the tone of the film perfectly. This method also brings the audience closer to the individuals and allows for a more personal connection with them. The archival footage in the film is used in a creative way; similar shots of archival footage (such as the first day of school) juxtaposed with current shots. This method works as a metaphor for the generation gap between these individuals and the following generation.

Finally, I am amazed with the understanding that Hessman has of this situation not being from Russia. It shows that this documentary was well research and was cared for every step of the way.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Two decades of Moscow life
olga-day5 June 2011
Life goes on. Political systems change. Economies provide wealth for all, or not. We ring the bell to start the school year, and life goes on.

This documentary takes the five graduates of PS 57 in Moscow through the wild changes of Perestroika and the end of the Soviet Union. The "money" line for me was "No sausage, but we were happy". In the old days they had less but life felt good. The film addresses the complicated question of Socialism vs. Capitalism, but not directly. And that's a strength. The lives of the five subjects are sketched out., The huge drama of the Soviet Union collapsing is reported succinctly. We get to see the outline of these lives. We get to ponder the tense present of some, the placid present of others, and compare it to the stable and happy but less prosperous earlier life.

A life on potatoes but without sausage seems grim to a materialist. A prosperous life without joy seems grim to a spiritualist. Both the Soviet Union and America were mixed economies. Both had socialist and capitalist elements. What's the right mix? This film is excellent background material for those pondering this question. It's also a great review of the last two decades of Moscow life.

Minor complaint: though the entire film is in Moscow, and the "no sausage" line seems more like a description of Perestroika outside the major cities.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A general story about a nostalgia that all of us sympathize with
kkimsin8026 March 2011
It's a unique story related with a particular period of political upheaval, and at the same time it's a general story about a nostalgia that all of us sympathize with. It's a Nostalgia for the days that we didn't have to worry about severe competitions, untrustworthy policies, unfair present and ambiguous future. It was the time we could find a peace of mind from the passivity and obedience. We were not ready enough to deal well with an unexpected freedom. We're also not ready to accept numerous choices and the results that we're responsible for.

We don't even know how to explain clearly, if someone asked us why that time was better to us. We just know it was better. We're still not sure about the present. However, sometimes we found ourselves surprisingly living well in the present without any distinct understanding about it.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A nice historical look back as well as insight into uncertainty...
planktonrules22 July 2012
For the last couple decades, the US has had very, very little interest in Russia. It seems that after the Cold War technically ended, most Americans just wanted to assume everything was fine and go on with our lives. However, while the old regimes are gone, in its place is a lot of uncertainty--and this documentary does a great job of discussing the historical context for the new Russia as well as the vague dissatisfaction many there feel today. It's all enlightening--even if there are no clear answers.

The film consists of the filmmakers following several 40-something Russians and just letting them talk. You have no narration--it's just like the folks are talking to you. Much of the film is a discussion of the old Soviet Union and its fall. I liked how the filmmakers juxtaposed this footage with old propaganda film from the Soviet government--it did a good job illustrating the old regime. The rest of the film concerned present-day Russia which is NOT such a clear picture. While the participants generally felt things are better, they were VERY jaded and seemed to have no faith in the current Putin government. However, how they react to this and the new sense of capitalism varies and is quite interesting to see--such as the idealistic man who has sort of dropped out of society. An interesting historical portrait of the old and a confusing view of the future--which is probably indicative of the average Russian's view of life in their country. It was the most telling when one said "What has really changed?". Fascinating and well made.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Glad to have made an exception to my I-hate-documentaries rule
JvH485 February 2011
Documentaries are rarely powerful enough to let me watch to the end. Firstly, the voice over usually has an I-know-all, scholarly tone of voice that makes me cringe. Secondly, when famous scientists are invited to say a few words, they are commonly limited to (indeed) a few words, since too many long words may tick off the average viewer. Should I go on??

This time I gladly make an exception to my rule. The chosen format is perfectly suited to bring the mixed message across. It does not "feel" like a documentary at all. The idea to round up a handful of average people, and letting them picture their own past, is very good. This is mostly due to the fact that a real cross section of the Russian people does the talking, supported by photos and film fragments, partly from their past and partly from television.

The concept was not immediately clear from the start, and it required some time to take off. The talking heads (in the positive sense) were filmed in their own environment (home, school, their business, etcetera), and were just themselves telling us about their past and present ideas. This works perfectly, also providing us with some insight in the circumstances these people live(d) in.

All in all, I'm glad that I overlooked the fact that this film was announced as a "documentary". This is a format for which new terminology should be invented.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My Perestroika
nuanchen8630 March 2011
I like this documentary, which recalls my memory in China. In some level, Russia is the big brother and father of China. We have the same faith, the same society mode, the similar party history and the similar memory about the past at once. Although the opening day of school in China is not as special as Russia's, it's also very important for every kid who is ready to begin their school life. We have the same red scarf, the young pioneer, the group activity out of campus, and a heart that is ready for constructing our country and socialism. We also have the firm faith of socialism, the three-years difficulty period, and finally have to learn how to confront the history and the collapse of the faith. Every September is the time for school to open. Every year, countless students come to school and begin their new life. Every generation has their difference and shares the similar experiences. They are the hot-blood young people at once. The school life for them is the perfect memory forever. Although society is changed, the leader is not the same one yet, they grew up, became rich or poor. They have suffered the pain and happiness. Their youth has been past as well as the heavy history. But the life is going on and the youth is going on.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great, Insightful Documentary
richryan31630 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
My Perestroika is a very strong documentary because Robin Hessman really connected with her characters. Characters drive the story, and by immersing herself in their world she was able to fully portray their feelings before, during and after the Russian revolution of the 1990's.

My favorite part of the film is that it starts and ends with the first day of school in Moscow. The cyclical nature of this speaks volumes to the struggles in Russia and the nature of life itself. Problems do not simply disappear, their whispers remain in society.

I was lucky enough to hear Hessman speak about her film, and she went out of her way to say that Moscow, like New York, cannot represent Russia as a whole. This is a very key point that, if misinterpreted, can change the way you look at the film entirely.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Review, "My Perestroika"
MilladoN826 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I was lucky enough to see "My Perestroika" at NYC's IFC Center, where director Robin Hessman answered questions following a screening of her film. She stressed that her documentary isn't so much representative of all Russians, but rather a cross-section of "ordinary Russians living in extra-ordinary times." Hessman focused her lens on five childhood classmates who entered school in communist Moscow but came of age during the fall of the Iron Curtain. She had incredible access to her five subjects: punk rocker Ruslan, single mom Olga, successful businessman Andrei, and married history teachers Borya and Lubya. By shooting solo (instead of relying on a cameraman), Hessman was able to develop a rapport with her subjects, prompting them to open up. Although they seemed nostalgic about their idyllic childhood, they also appeared to wish to leave it in the past. By the end, they all seemed nonchalant about the current government. The film's strength lies in its use of the subjects' own 8mm home movies (juxtaposed alongside vintage propaganda films). This film could easily have been constructed with talking heads waxing poetic about the fall of the USSR, but it wouldn't have been as compelling. By focusing on (relatable) characters, Hessman puts a face on the (last generation of the) Cold War, which until now had been a nebulous concept for me.

By the end, I wanted to down vodka shots with Ruslan and Borya! My only gripe is that I wanted to see more interaction among the five childhood classmates. Olga lived around the corner from Borya and Lubya, but we never see them interact. We know Borya and Lubya still keep contact with Ruslan, but do any of them still keep in touch with Andrei and Olga? I suppose that is another strength of Hessman's storytelling...that she painted these protagonists in such a way that I wanted to know more about them. May I suggest a follow-up documentary?
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Storytelling
slopez-media30 March 2011
My Perestroika successfully portraits personal impressions about the Soviet Union offering a refreshing counterpoint of ideas between characters. Perestroika can be understood for many as a Russian word connected with an important moment in Russian history. I can say that after following the stories of these 5 friends in Moscow I have a deep sense of human connection and respect for people who was dramatically affected in the process that Russia held around the 90s. I have an understanding of what Perestroika meant for them.

Parallels between how these characters grew up and how their children are growing up nowadays allow audiences to perceive the contrast between communism and capitalism. This humanist film is a refined documentary full of cinematographic details and relevant opinions about an important historic issue.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Propaganda from the Ford Foundation (CIA)
Prolecenter21 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This propaganda brought to you by the big three corporate charities: Ford, Hewlitt and MacArthur Foundations. All three can easily be suspected of being CIA fronts, but there is solid evidence that the Ford Foundation has served as a front and a means of funneling money from the CIA to fund psychological warfare to sell the American brand to the world as well as to demonize socialism, communism and third-world liberation movements. They promote pro-capitalist and pro-bourgeois "values." One of the individuals followed in the documentary, a teacher, refers to Lenin as "basically a cannibal" and all of the interviewees are really down on their country - both as the Soviet Union and Russia today. At least 4 out of the 5 individuals express explicitly anti-Putin views; not a good sample of the Russian population given that Mr. Putin's approval rating in Russia is something like 87% as of this writing.

The documentary even tries to whitewash the abominable actions of Gorbachev and Yeltsin, the first a naive idiot and the second a scoundrel and a criminal who privatized everything in sight, usurped power in the name of "democracy" and destroyed the country. On the other hand, Putin is hated by the U.S. today because he has made Russia a great power again.

As an American citizen, I watched this hoping to see some old footage of Soviet times and maybe hear at least one favorable account of life in the USSR, but I was to be very disappointed. I have read other accounts of people who grew up under communism and while some heap criticism on it, others remember the good outweighing the bad. They say that although the communist party leadership kept a firm hold over the society, things like the absence of crime, guaranteed housing, free healthcare and education and even subsidized transportation and cultural activities were not something to just scoff at.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very heartwarming and enlightening
mraydun31 March 2011
I was blown away by how easy it was for me (as well as for my husband) to relate to this film but I don't think you have to be of similar background in order to find this film fascinating and enlightening.

I loved that the film wasn't solely political, but focused more on these people's lives instead. This was an excellent little window into people's lives. Of course, this cannot be representative of all Russians, but these five people have very different lives and it was interesting to see what choices or happenings led them to where they are today.

There is much nostalgia present in this film, although I do not think that this nostalgia is for the Soviet regime. Like all people, these subjects are nostalgic for their childhoods, when everything seemed better and one simply did not have to deal with any real, mundane problems. Their reflections are very heartwarming.

All in all, I highly recommend this film.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Reflection and Remembrance
ieisha8129 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
My Perestroika is a film that documents the lives of five people from the USSR to modern day Russia. Hessman takes us through a time span of over two years through the personal lives and experiences of these characters. Hessman shows the lives of a single mom (Olga), a musician (Ruslan), two married History teachers (Borya and Lybia) and a businessman (Andrei), all ordinary people living through an extraordinary time. They move from the innocence of childhood to the awareness of college and young adulthood to the challenges of adjusting to capitalistic Russia.

It's a powerful film because it's told through their eyes. A few characters use family footage to demonstrate their perspectives. Many lament on the nostalgia of communism and find difficulties living in an unfamiliar capitalistic society. They share their opinions of politics and politicians (especially Putin and the recent election); ironically they all have a common opinion about politics in post-modern Russia.

They give their views of a childhood in USSR, their feelings about parenthood and give their predictions for the future of society. The audience can see a unique juxtaposition of traditional and modern, old and new as the last generation in USSR and first generation in capitalistic Russia seem to struggle to balance conflicting ideologies. Their children will grow up only knowing the impact of the west and Hessman clearly demonstrates this documenting Lybia and Borya's son listening to his ipod and watching American movies.

The black and white footage has a particularly special impact that brings a unique realism and validation to the film. Hessman seeks to shatter the American myth of soviet Russia, that the world there was a horrible place until the west intervened. Most of the characters (except the businessman) in the film share the opposite opinion. Andrei looks at capitalism from the perspective of many in the west because he has benefited from it. In reality, they realize that both communism and capitalism have its positive and negative impacts.

The film begins as it ends, with the first day of school. This monumental and unforgettable experience creates a strong connection between the audience and characters. We all remember our first day of school. The beginning of an era that encompasses our childhood and has a significant impact on our lives. It is the one thread that all of the characters share, classmates and childhood friends that reflect on their childhood and its memories, 20 years later.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Probably the least biased documentary on the soviet times and their aftermath
aninatr26 October 2014
The documentary centers on 5 characters who were classmates for many years and belong to the last generation of Russians having spent their entire education in the soviet system. Through the sometimes very different outlooks of our 5 characters and inter weaved propaganda archive documents the viewer can see the contradictions of the life in USSR, but also the hardships of the brutal transition to a capitalist society. This film is truly objective in this sense that it narrates several divergent points of view, without imposing an editorial line, and we can see these points of view meet on many subjects. The Russians I know who watched the film (including my wife) all agree that it portrays accurately their society and their parents. I think anyone even remotely interested in Russia should watch this.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed