Hunted by Night (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
You can make fun of this movie from beginning to end
carol-abella6 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this movie coz my hubby said he saw that it got a rating of 7.3? i suspected it was probably the cast & crew who voted. for some reason it was also tagged as a horror movie so i kept watching until I made it to the end of the movie. I couldn't help making fun of the bad acting, the story which didn't make sense, and why the writers would forcibly add a supernatural touch. slow motion sequences only work when used limitedly, otherwise its just baaaad - and this movie is full of slo-mo! quite honestly this was a waste of time, i give it a 2 for effort on the action. don't be fooled by ratings here, always check the number of critics who actually rated the movie!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not bad. Really bad
andresplaza1710 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The only reason i can think why this movie has a 7.3 rating is because all the cast and crew voted, and not even they could give it a 10 rating, because even if you had a part in this movie u understand what a terrible film this was. This movie was a disaster from beginning to end, it had some awful camera shots, horrible lighting and production. For gods sake there's a fight scene when is raining during a bright sunny day!!, and another part where u can clearly see the camera crew in the reflection of the car, or the high-speed chase at 10MPH or the over using slow motion effect in every scene, not to mention the horrendous acting by the whole cast and i mean everyone (including the dog). There are plot holes all over this movie, to many to go over, i would recommend this movie only if you wanna have a good laugh criticizing it, otherwise do not waste your money or valuable time on this film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not Bad
albrechtcm31 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This just missed being a really good action film. The story line was good and the characters, locations and action were fine too. Some really up and coming actors here. Okay, being from Sacramento I couldn't help noticing how much Paco resembled Sacramento's very own bounty hunter, Leonard Padilla. The sour note that really put me off was the constant and overlong use of slow motion effects. Personally, I think the little supernatural element did nothing to help either. I would have preferred something more like allowing the dying Paco to see the cross (which we're never allowed for one moment to forget), and realize it belonged to the woman he killed, the mother of his presumably dead child. Still, there's never a dull moment.
7 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good action scenes and interesting subplot
palmbeachoffice9 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Movie has plenty of flaws, but overall not bad. The action fight scenes were interesting and fast moving, and it is was interesting to see Latin stars cross-over from Spanish and novelas to an action genre.

The main plot was OK. But there is a subplot that was never really developed properly, which could have made it more interesting.

A few of the actors were mediocre, while others were more experienced. Probably the fact that most actors in this movie are actually well know Spanish language actors makes it interesting to see. Overall not bad....and I only wish they developed the subplot with the elderly African American character.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed