Christmas with a Capital C (2011) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
35 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
A slow, suffering seasonal film with scenery
SimonJack29 November 2018
The title for this film is somewhat clever from the plot, but otherwise, "Christmas with a Capital C" has very little original. With Christmas movies being made every year, originality in the plot is quite important. Some of the acting is good while most of it isn't.

The story has some well-worn small plots. One is about a school days feud and later reconciliation. Another is about a modern battle of secularism with religion. Here, it's over the display of a traditional Christmas scene on public property, because it is connected to religion. There's a third smaller plot about two young teens - a boy and a girl, competing and discovering mutual attraction for one another.

But with all of this, the story just isn't very interesting. The screenplay is weak and choppy. The actions of the townsfolk seem forced or contrived. The character of Mitch Bright is stiff and strange in the smugness that Daniel Baldwin gives it. On the other hand, the Greg Reed role by Brad Stine is over the top goofy in his staged belligerence. And, the teens aren't at all convincing.

Ted McGinley as Dan Reed and Nancy Stafford as his wife, Kristen, are the only roles done well and that seem like real people. The film was shot entirely in Seward, Alaska. For the scenic shots, the movie is worth five stars.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A brave Christmas subject that is handled with some grace
nickel197629 November 2023
First of all: I'm not a person of faith or belief. That means I pretty much abstain from organized religion and spiritualism in general. Having said that, the impact faith has had on human society has always polarized people (excuse the pun). That's undeniable.

I approached watching this film with the "aw, what the heck, I'm bored, let's see if this film adds any substance to the argument of how to greet people at the end of the year". Surprisingly, it did.

Despite the fact that Brad Stine's character was so annoying that - after awhile - I muted him anytime he came on screen (subtitles are the way to go), the acting was pretty typical for your low budget 90 minute Christmas flick. That is, with my apologies to Ted McGinley. I can't get him out of his "Married...with Children" role in my head. Truthfully, I don't think I want to. Overall the acting left much to be desired. The argument about public funds paying for a decoration that would have spiritual meaning to fewer people than the population represents is a tired one.

Nevertheless, there were a few refreshing things in this movie. 1) The pastor wasn't a pulpit-based "fire and brimstone" motivated individual with tunnel vision. He spoke with fairness and respect. 2) The scenery. Oh, man, the scenery. I have to hand it to the cinematographers for allowing the absolute freezing beauty of Alaska be a main character. If only I liked the cold more. 3) There's probably a reason why we see Danny Baldwin in this flick instead of Stephen Baldwin: it's not a film that has a 'born-again or irredeemable' feel to it. 4) If I were to read a biography of the individual that inspired New Testament Christianity instead of The Bible, Jesus would be described as a man who loved and was in service to his people without ceasing. Period. That's a big part of the sentiment the film is trying to portray. I'm good with that. Many Christians are Christians who aim to be inspired by this behavior. Note I said many, not all.

I gave it a 3 because the old argument we've heard too much about already is rehashed, the acting was forced, the plot was predictable, and I fell asleep halfway thru it and had to watch it later. The script was very disengaging. But the refreshing parts made up for a good portion of that.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Baldwin the Grinch
bkoganbing18 July 2016
I will say that Christmas With A Capital C has one undeniable value. If you want to know the kind of place that spawned the Palin family and inflicted them on the world than this film is a must. Wasilla where Sarah Palin was mayor was just the kind of place you see here with Ted McGinley as chief executive.

This looks like a most homogeneous community when McGinley's old rival Dan Baldwin comes back. He's seen the great big world outside and made a small fortune doing it. For some reason he's decided to be the Grinch and is starting a lawsuit to get the nativity scene removed. The 'war' on Christmas is a big theme in the evangelical circuit where this played.

Baldwin does have ulterior motives and they are discovered, of course. I only thought that Stephen Baldwin went the Christian route. I've always said Thanksgivings are most interesting when the Baldwins gather. Now more than ever.

Nancy Stafford late of Matlock plays McGinley's wife and part of the reason for Baldwin's Grinch like behavior is as always beautiful. Christmas With A Capital C is not overtly preachy and could be enjoyed in a theater as well as a church.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another awful anti-atheist bashing film
jamht11 July 2015
Awful, simply awful. The atheist who returns to the town after 20 years, seems like an embittered and angry man, out on a personal vendetta against the heroic Christian mayor.The premise is that the mayor is building (and using some city funds) to build a stand outside of the town's city hall, for Christmas. There will be Christian decorations displayed along with more secular Christmas decorations. So this evil atheist type files an injunction to stop work on this stand.

Now, atheists aren't the only people who support keeping government and religion untangled, many Christians (though usually not evangelical types) also favor that. Atheists aren't out on personal vendettas against some Christian mayor or politician when we do so. Also, the "Merry Christmas" banner is moved because of this injunction. Frankly, no atheist has ever objected to a "Merry Christmas" sign, even in front of a courthouse.

In fact, I don't know if any church/state or atheist group would even object to this stand, unless it solely has Christian symbols. Atheists just want neutrality or at least, an open forum. Have Christian symbols such as a nativity scene, fine, but allow a display of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

The Christian mayor in one scene recites the free exercise clause of religion, which for some reason makes this evil atheist type, say touché. That seems to imply the atheist knows he is violating the free exercise rights of the residents, but there is of course no free exercise right to have the government put up a display, even if not centered around Christian images solely.

This movie was produced by people who seem to have never met an actual atheist in their lives. Full of fear and straw man. If I could give a negative star, I would.
35 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One Really Sour Note. Other Notes are Really Beautiful
mahleresque7518 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This is a movie where the protagonists actually act like adults at the end: They agree to disagree. How refreshing!

The sour note is the "performance" of Christian "comedian" Brad Stine, who (as I heard from people who were involved in the making of the film) refused to follow the script, and insisted on improvising his own lines, which are neither funny nor do they advance the plot in any way.

It's obvious from seeing this film that Stine also refused to take direction and the result is that every time Stine appears on the screen, the film comes to a screeching halt while he pontificates about this and that.

The film would be much improved if it could be re-edited and Stine's "performance" left on the cutting room floor. The film would be tighter and more coherent without Stine's bloviating, ego-centric ranting.

One thing that no one has mentioned is the lovely score by Edwin Wendler. Sadly, the manager of the group which sings the end credits song (and on whose song the plot is loosely based) refused to allow Mr Wendler and his representatives to issue a soundtrack album for this film, which is a real shame. Apparently the manager thought that someone might confuse his fifth rate song with Wendler's first rate score.

Those who are interested can hear four excerpts from Wendler's score here: http://www.edwinwendler.com/?p=408. (I don't know Mr Wendler, and I have no financial interest in his music, I just think that it's a shame that this lovely music should go mostly unheard.)

9 out of 10 if Brad Stine were to be removed from the film.
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
worst movie ever
vmarler141 December 2012
Most offensive piece of crap I've ever seen. Why didn't they just cast the Palin family and call it a day. Some of My favorite lines..."what we have to include all religions now! A menorah and whatever symbol Kwanzaa has.." and "98% of America is Christian so I will continue to say merry Christmas"

I loved Baldwin's character and couldn't agree with his viewpoints more...turns out he is the scrooge character because he does not want to be MADE to celebrate Christmas.

This movie makes an ass out of itself, the actors in the film, and Christians in general. Terrible acting...terrible story...and terribly offensive.
30 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Was pleasantly surprised by Christmas with a Capitol C
vanlieu28 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
In this culture of everyone demanding their rights, I believe this movie helps to break down some misconceptions and help focus on the real reason for Christmas. The trailer seems to be causing some anger from other reviewers but if you watch the whole movie, you will see a lot of the concerns resolved in a very positive, all-American way. A Christian's focus at Christmas and all year round should be based on our faith in and love for God and His love for mankind, and not on protecting our traditions and pushing our rights on others. The movie is well-acted and the conclusion is very touching. I encourage everyone to watch the whole movie.
38 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Alaska's reality is the opposite of this film
drjimberger10 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Having been a pastor in Alaska for 15 years, I can tell you that this state is the most un-religious state in the union. This movie portrays it as Texas-North. Sorry Brad Stein and the rest of the cast, but the reality is that you do not re-write reality for the sake of a screenplay. Yes, there is the conflict between church and state. But nowhere is that more evident than in Alaska.

My experience was far different from that of the scriptwriters. The reality is that the Christians were fighting to get the creche on to public land. We learned to put it on church property, and ask the public officials to come to the dedication. In return, we would give an invocation at the community Christmas tree lighting. And yes, we use inclusive language, since we have Christians, Jews, B'hais and atheists in attendance. In towns of 4000, or 3000, you know who believes what. And you can choose to respect that, enter into dialogue and work on long-term evangelism, or shout at them in the local cafe, and go backward for the next 20 years. In a small town, there are long memories. And the stupid tirade of a pastor at the funeral of tragic death of a family, or the histrionics of a Brad Stein-character are remembered far longer than the loving grace freely given in a time of tragedy or crisis.

The conflict between church and state portrayed in this film is a Texas or lower 48 phenomenon. The norms are reversed, to fit the screenwriters' ideology, not the reality of Alaska.

Contrary to the characters' wishes, the First Amendment is still the First Amendment. Because Alaska is part of the United States of America. And we abide by the Constitution of the United States of America. In Alaska and the lower 48. Do you? Rev. Dr. James R. Berger Fort Myers, FL
23 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
In and out in 5 minutes
ExiledInCali25 December 2010
In an America that has an increasingly diverse population, it is astounding that people do not GET IT. Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims, and atheists all pay taxes and are citizens. Seasons greetings is appropriate. Merry Christmas and religious displays paid for with my tax money, not OK. Unless the city also wants to fund Hanukkah, Quanza, Winter Solstice and Ramadan displays as well.

In five minutes of watching, the mayor quickly displays a stubborn streak that can be a disaster in a public official. He mayor completely ignores all his civic responsibilities to serve his private believes. Being set in Alaska, I guess this explains Sarah Palin.
51 out of 112 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I'm an atheist and I loved this movie
stulau-17 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I'm an atheist and I loved this move, if you're surprised to read that, well you're not half as surprised as I was. I watched this film for one reason, and one reason only, I wanted to laugh at what I imagined would be a film so bad it was good. That's not what happened though, instead of caricatures of good Christians being beset by evil Atheists, what we got was a film biased in favour of the Christian viewpoint but also one which was careful to make sure that every character was shown as a real human being. It was heartwarming to watch a group of people struggle to overcome their differences and find some resolution to the problems they faced. There was no cop out ending, sure, "lessons were learned" in that hokey way you often see in TV movies but so what, sometimes we need a little hokeyness in our lives. This is a lovely movie to watch at Christmas, or the Holiday Season if you prefer. Whether you're a believer or an unbeliever, set aside your prejudices (we all have them) and enjoy a great movie.
27 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Christmas message
DonandLiG8 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The antagonist, Mitch Bright, turns out to not be as prosperous as the viewer initially thinks. He's is just bitter about how his life is playing out. I central issue is the continuing attack on Christmas nativity scenes in public view. Businesses, of course, love Christmas and the revenue it brings. Who doesn't love free enterprise. The main attacks come from various legal courts who seem to be more interested in pleasing the few at the expense of the many. Some complain in their review that this is a silly premise in view of some recent court rulings against such displays. But that argument misses the point of the movie. Watch the movie and see how it moves you.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Straw-man Argument Made Into a Film
splumer17 December 2018
Why is it that Christians don't seem to get the long-settled Constitutional issue of not putting religious displays on public property? And that said issue doesn't affect private property, including privately-owned stores? The very premise of this movie is based on a lie. It doesn't matter if it's a "tradition" to put a nativity scene on the grounds of city hall; the Supreme Court ruled decades ago that it violated the First Amendment. Also, not even the most hardcore atheist is "offended" by Christmas; pointing out that it's unconstitutional is NOT the same as being offended.

In the film's defense, though, it does feature a drug-addled Daniel Baldwin attempting to act, Ted McGinley acting out every "regular Christian guy" trope and Brad Stine acting like a crazy homeless guy. I assume he's just aplying himself.

Rather than actually watching this movie, I suggest watching Hugo & Jake's review of it on You Tube. They explain the issues in a much more entertaining fashion than I.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Literal propaganda
david_ghunt19 December 2018
Even the main character comes off as abrasive, because you can't be a nice and identifiable character who also says "The holiday season can only be all about me and my beliefs and traditions". It's propaganda, plain and simple.
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A disgrace.
Morshu10131 August 2022
What in the name of cheez-its were they thinking? You have to be trying to make a movie this bad. But the fact that some people like this movie is interesting to say the least. In this garbage, an atheist guy comes back to his old town and tries to "ruin" Christmas for his old high school rival . His plan? Take down the nativity scene in front of the church for some reason. Quick question... why does he still have a grudge? It's been probably many years since they were in high school, just get over it dude. Throughout this movie, he continues to jump the shark. Heck, he even calls the police because a 6 year-old was singing in town. This caused me to laugh harder than ever before, I swear this dumb movie makes zero sense. Spoilers I guess ahead, but who even cares? In the end the town feels bad for him and line up at his house and burn it down. The End. Jk, they instead help him by giving him goods. Heh? Didn't see that comin'. And so, the huge bully is stopped because of love, cool, whatever. If you like this, whatever, it just makes me cringe.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst Christmas films ever
NickGagnon9423 March 2020
Christmas with a Capital C is a mean spirited film that exists to bash people who have different views as the filmmakers. The film is about Mayor Dan Reed (Ted McGinley) and his family including his very annoying brother played by Brad Stine getting offended by people saying things other than Merry Christmas. His past rival played by Danial Baldwin returns to town to run for Mayor with his political correctness rubbing off on the town. Dan gets offended by all of this including a scene where he gets upset because he may have to put Hanukkah or Kwanzaa decorations up in town. This film is anti Hanukkah or Kwanzaa. Its a mean film that shows the holidays wrapped in a persecution complex package. What is to like here? Its a hard film to watch because of its stupidity and mean spirited agenda. It even shows horrible stand up from Brad Stine to a routine that everyone should just say Merry Christmas. Just say what you want, celebrate Christmas how you like and best not to watch horrible films like Christmas with a Capital C.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Don't miss the point
strongdoors28 December 2010
I loved this movie... The trailer does not give justice to the true message in the story. Christians can compromise, but not on their beliefs. All people, of every religion, are encouraged to watch this movie all of the way through with open eyes. I believe the movie gives equal views from both sides. However, I must say, I am a Christian & I was very touched by the movie. It is an Excellent movie, and not just one that gives a Holiday message, but a message that should be reflected in the Christian life daily. Love others as Christ loves us. Be tolerant, compassionate, and giving. Those who comment on the politics of the movie are missing the entire point. It has nothing to do with politics. Politics are a medium for the true message being heard. I recorded this movie on my DVR and have watched it at least three times in the last two weeks. It is touching, and a lot can be learned by both "sides". The writer, Andrea Nasfell, has captured true heart felt feelings in her writings, and they are portrayed by the actors with true conviction. TWO THUMBS UP!!!!
37 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An Honest Review Here
Christmas-Reviewer23 January 2017
BEWARE OF BOGUS REVIEWS. SOME REVIEWERS HAVE ONLY ONE REVIEW. WHEN ITS A POSITIVE REVIEW THAT TELLS ME THEY WERE INVOLVED WITH THE PRODUCTION. IF ITS A NEGATIVE REVIEW THEN THEY MIGHT HAVE A GRUDGE AGAINST THAT PRODUCTION. NOW I HAVE REVIEWED OVER 200 Christmas MOVIES. I HAVE NO AGENDA. I AM FARE ABOUT THESE FILMS.

This film is not a love it or hate it film. What this film is passable entertainment with a lesson about??

In this film Christmas has always been an exceptional time of love and tradition in the small town of Trapper Falls, Alaska. Hometown of Mayor Dan Reed (Ted McGinley) looks forward to each year with enthusiasm. Together with his brother Greg (Brad Stine), they dedicate time away from their adventure tour company to drape the town is Christmas cheer. When Dan's old high school rival Mitch Bright (Daniel Baldwin), a mean-spirited and embittered militant atheist returns home after 20 years, Dan is immediately suspicious. Mitch is a highly successful big city lawyer who has never wanted anything to do with Trapper Falls. The rivalry re-ignites when the frustrated Mitch takes offense to what he sees as the town's violation of his rights. Mitch wants the Nativity scene removed from the front of City hall and the word Christmas switched to Happy Holidays on all signs. Fifty years of tradition are now challenged not by an outsider but a former member of the community. As the conflict escalates it goes beyond one person's opinion but magnifies into an entire town problem when Mitch enters into the mayoral race to have Dan replaced.

Now I am very liberal. I liked this film. Its not great but it is sweet. The motivations of everyone in this film is understandable. Now people who made this film had an agenda to say that there is a war on Christmas which is not true.

"Retailers Love Christmas". I worked all over the USA and have always said "Merry Christmas" and nobody said "I shouldn't" and no customer ever complained.

Now my Christians readers would you get mad if a Jewish Person said to you "Happy Hanukkah"? I doubt it. Normal people would say "Thank you" or "Same to you".

Happy Holidays came about only because it was cheaper for stores to have a window painted with just one message and no re-paint for Hanukkah. That's all. When I worked at stores I never got in trouble for saying "Merry Christmas".

Now back to the film. AS film the plot is passable. the film moved quickly along. The film has a conclusion that I find almost laughable but the message isn't laughable.

Small Children will be bored. Some adults too. But what comes through is that "Christmas is a time where we should open our minds and our hearts"
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A wholesome and original Christmas movie
marcijimlove11 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I have posted this review because I rented this movie and enjoyed it very much. I find it interesting that the reviews that have been posted so far include the same type of sentiments or arguments that are presented in this movie. We have people who more then likely are not of a Christian faith that are highly offended and use somewhat vulgar verbiage to express their views. Then we have those of a Christian background that vehemently defend their faith. Does that not prove the timeliness of this movie? I love the reminder (presented in the film) that it is important to love those that disagree and even love them when they treat you harshly or criticize you strongly. This movies reminds us that Jesus was criticized and that we should not be surprised when we (or our godly films) are criticized in the post-modern society we live in. I do not believe you have to be a Christian to appreciate the reminder that love can warm even the hardest heart...so I believe all can enjoy this movie.
27 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Heart-Warming
jenniferk1621 September 2010
I really enjoyed the movie. It doesn't officially come out for awhile, and I think it's too bad. I think it would be well received this Christmas season (2010). A good reminder that there is more to Christmas than just commercialism. I think it would be obvious that there is a Christian theme to the movie, but I think it does a nice job of not being too preachy. It kind of reminds me of a good Halmark flick. Good acting, but not over the top. I will certainly be promoting this film when it comes out! It was inspired by a Christian song by the group Go Fish. I have also seen a preview for the movie on Youtube. Check it out!
32 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good Christmas movie
rob-sibley15 December 2011
The message of 'Christmas with a Capital C' was timely and important. Where many Christmas movies are heartwarming, this program presented definable ways to deal with those who call Christians simple, narrow-minded, and ignorant but who themselves are mean-spirited, arrogant and intolerant. I thought using the example of how Christ treated others as a guide for these townspeople really embodied the spirit of Christmas.

Acting was solid in the leads a little weak in the supporting players. Daniel Baldwin was great in his role. I'm sorry to say, I know people just like him.

On the whole, I thought this was one of the better movies this season.
16 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Atheists Are the Most Intolerant People
Dark_Lord_Mark11 November 2016
This movie was good. Nothing wrong with a good natured family film.

I see many atheists are bum-hurt over the movie message about belief and miracles. What I have come to realize is atheists are the most intolerant folks on the planet. They especially hate Christians but some reason love Islam.

This movie had a message of hope and has a family theme. It has the familiar TV characters and if you do not like a Christian family movie, avoid it. It's funny that atheists preach tolerance but if anyone dares oppose their view, their proverbial fangs and character fault shows.

Good movie for what it is 7 out of 10. This movie shows the follies of non-believers and why hope is better than none.
10 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Adore!!
Luvhallmark3 February 2020
I absolutely adore this movie for the meaning is very deep and important. Even though Christians are constantly persecuted, do not repay evil with evil!! It's a good thing to practice even if you're not a Christian. I love the cast, the setting (absolutely beautiful) and the entire premise of the movie! Well done cast & crew.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Haven't seen it but...
ectogwarb17 December 2011
I haven't seen this movie, but I have to comment on the others reviews here. I hate how people are so quick to criticize and become "offended" at every little thing they can get their hands on these days. Christmas may have started as a Christian holiday, but now it is a secular holiday. It's Hanukkah, Kwanza, Christmas, and every other winter gift giving season in one. There are a lot of people of every faith that celebrate Christmas. It's a time to set aside to be nice to each other, spread a little more love than the rest of the year, give and get gifts that say "you're special to someone" and generally feel better than the rest of the year. There's not a lot to feel nice about these days, and the fact that people attack the celebration of Christmas because it happened once to be a Christian holiday is abhorrent. It didn't even start as a Christian holiday. It used to be a pagan holiday and was turned into a day to celebrate Christ's birth because it was convenient for the church because everyone was celebrating at that time anyway. It has changed again. Ask almost any child who they think of when they think of Christmas and they won't say Jesus, they'll say Santa Claus. I would say you should be ashamed of yourselves for denigrating something that should make everyone feel better about everyone else, but it's Christmas time, so I'll just say Merry Christmas to you all, regardless of religion, and consider this message strongly the next time you think about badmouthing Christmas.
8 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Grinch Goes to Alaska
srlucado-319668 December 2020
Fairly cute Christmas movie, with the rarity of actually involving Christmas as a religious holiday.

Leading cast is good, production values decent, scenery beautiful.

Story-wise, it's How the Grinch Stole Christmas, updated and moved to the 49th state. There's even a Cindy Lou Who.

Overall, not bad. Worth a look.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fantastic message!
Zoooma13 August 2014
Ted McGinley v. Daniel Baldwin in a 1st Amendment showdown over a Nativity scene being displayed on public property. Baldwin, of course, is the "bad guy" against Christmas. He is, like many, changing the 1st Amendment to how he sees fit: "Putting the Nativity on public property establishes a state religion." No, it doesn't because no one is forcing anything on you under any kind of punishment for not taking part. Anyway, a very good Christmas film with excellent production value compared to endless slew of Made-for-TV Christmas movies made every year. This one rises above and filmed in Alaska it is definitely a breath of fresh air! The message is fantastic and it would be nice if people would watch this with an open mind rather than pretend it's all garbage because it most certainly is not. One of the best Christmas movies there is.

7.5 / 10 stars

--Zoooma, a Kat Pirate Screener
9 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed