(2009 TV Special)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Unorthodox methods brings Jack the Ripper to America!!
elo-equipamentos13 January 2019
The unsolved famous case "Jack the Ripper" continues to defy the most major top researchers around the world even almost 130 years before, intriguing and quite challenging case has been studied for a long time without success due the clues were collected when the forensic medicine still weren't allowed in 1888 in England, now the Detective Edward Norris put on table by unorthodox methods a new light on the case, based on a suspects's profile he simply makes a discarding of some prime suspects and focusing in only one with a mental disorder called James Kelly, after he has killed his wife, and moved to America after Jack's case got the higher publicity campain by newspapers in London, meanwhile in New York had two muders with some similarities over such ruthlesness applied on the victms, so that is, one more theory over a endless Jack the Ripper case!!

Resume:

First watch: 2013 / How many: 2 / Source: DVD / Rating: 7.5
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Another Jack the Ripper documentary that brings nothing new to the investigation.
halcyonbear10 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
First things first, this isn't awful. If you don't know a lot about the story of Jack the Ripper and investigations into the mystery, there will be much to hold your attention.

The problem is that a lot of the theories regarding possible suspects have already been discredited elsewhere. It places too much importance upon the fact that after the killings in London, prostitutes in New York were murdered and mutilated. Sadly, misogynistic killings have occurred across different countries in the past, they needn't be the work of one maniac. At one point Ed the investigating detective says experience has told him not to believe in coincidence, but it's certainly no stretch of the imagination to believe that two violent killers whose modus operandi is slicing their victims up are operating independently thousands of miles apart; there's even a very believable theory that London killings may not have all have been the work of one killer.

Does the letter X carved into a victim of the NY killings indicate them being a 10th victim (X being 10 in Roman numerals)? It's likely if you are carving someone up, a couple of slashes are going to form this very basic shape without it having any meaning.

Let's do a computer image of one of the suspects. How might he have looked 40 years previously when the murders happened? Let's give him a hat and a moustache like in one of the eyewitness accounts from the time! My dog could be made to look like a generic suspect if you did that! Let's make the evidence fit the hypothesis!

Ed Norris the investigator is certainly a man on a mission with a great deal of interest in the case, but in the earlier episodes he really does come across as someone who feels it is his personal mission to solve a mystery that has endured for over 100 years. Unless Scotland Yard has documents that will be declassified at some point, this is an enigma that will continue to perplex. The very most anyone can hope to do is either discount someone from the investigation or throw another possible name into the mix.

That isn't to say it doesn't have moments of interest, but if you have already watched and read a lot about Jack the Ripper there'll be little of any genuine interest.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed