Councillor Baker continues on the stand, he is griller Jonathan Fry QC, who accuses him of manoeuvring the law and Miss Crawley in order to make a huge profit on the land. After a big revelation, Miss Crawley gives her evidence.
I was truly hoping for this story to spring into life, episodes one and two were well made, well acted drama, but just lacked a little sparkle, I had hoped for a little pizzazz here.
There was one quite startling revelation, which made the story a little more gritty, adding a bit of spice.
The verdict that I'm sure we all expected, but none of use believed.
It was the best from the trio of episodes, pretty good, but somewhat more on the melodrama side of things, not as good as some of the earlier, gritty episodes. I think the best element here was perhaps Jonathan Fry QC, quite a big role for him here, he changes the whole story.
7/10.
I was truly hoping for this story to spring into life, episodes one and two were well made, well acted drama, but just lacked a little sparkle, I had hoped for a little pizzazz here.
There was one quite startling revelation, which made the story a little more gritty, adding a bit of spice.
The verdict that I'm sure we all expected, but none of use believed.
It was the best from the trio of episodes, pretty good, but somewhat more on the melodrama side of things, not as good as some of the earlier, gritty episodes. I think the best element here was perhaps Jonathan Fry QC, quite a big role for him here, he changes the whole story.
7/10.