"Supernatural" Man's Best Friend with Benefits (TV Episode 2013) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Dumb Characters
danajs243 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This was a boring episode. I don't know if we've seen this Frampton guy before, but I don't remember him and glad I don't. Something about this guy just bugged me. Maybe it was because he was sleeping with his dog. I'm also bummed they didn't explain the history or lore behind familiars. Another thing, I never much like the witches episodes. They seem to have no limit to their power, but not in a cool god like way, as they are usually just regular people. Why don't Sam and Dean start using more witchcraft like things? They would be way stronger to kill demons and monsters? Also, this was entirely outside of the main story line, which typically happens about this time during the seasons. Hopefully this is the last joke of an episode before they get serious about extending the plot towards the finale.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Boring and confusing lore
shwetafabm26 June 2020
I just didn't care much for the characters. Spn does usually do a good job at that, something that is pretty hard to do. The mystery is fine but it feels kinda clear who is behind it. The lore is just weird, the witches we have met have been great and powerful and interesting, they didn't have these whatever half animal things, so weird, i can't see why such a creature would exist.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's alright but not quite fitting in
saphira-2845410 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I love Familiars and I love this kind of witches. However these are not the witches we have been shown up to this point or after this point in this show. Sam and Dean don't even acknowledge any difference so I wonder if the writers expected the viewers to just overlook this. These witches have powers closer to the pagan gods than the witches in the show. Their lore is not even explained properly so how are we supposed to connect them to the show?

The characters are yet again dumbed down for the plot. Sam and Dean are ready to kill James despite the pile of evidence that it's not him doing the murders and that he is using his abilities only for good purposes. Why witches are inherently and always evil in their mind goes unaddressed despite the fact that this episode is all about a good witch. No, actually this episode is about Portia, the witch's Familiar. I do like Portia, but she was not a good character to focus on, despite the fact that all the murders were committed for a lame reason connected to her. Neither her or James learn anything in this episode and they are not interesting enough on their own.

The one thing that really fit the episode was the subplot involving Dean trusting Sam to finish the trials, but it felt half baked. Dean's motivation to want to take on the trials himself was never just that he doesn't trust Sam or anyone else (except Benny for some reason) but that he wants to keep Sam safe as always and that he doesn't care if he suffers and dies himself. The reason Dean changed his mind about trusting Sam was ridiculously simplified and not even shown directly to the audience, ignoring all the details that make their brotherly bond so complicated and interesting. Also Dean already accepted last episode that Sam will be the one taking on the trials, him showing valid concern over Sam's health should not be the catalyst for a discussion about trust. Dean not trusting Sam has often been a problem between the two of them, but this time it didn't feel like that would be the case.

It was an enjoyable episode overall and Sam and Dean had likeable interactions with each other and with Portia, but that doesn't excuse it for not fitting into this show's lore and atmosphere.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
boring!
mm-3921 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Boring! As Supernatural tries to reinvent itself Man's Best Friend with Benefits is the mixing of Vampire diaries, and Supernatural. Supernatural's Man's Best Friend with Benefits had genre of clichés, up tight scornful characters, jealous rivals, and lovers who sacrifice for each other. The lighting and directing exactly was like Vampire diaries. The episode involves helping a cop that helped the boys before. I do not remember the character at all in any other episodes. . Is there a discrepancy here? I found the story and direction too soap operaish, but my wife loved the episode. I give this episode a 3 and my wife gives it a 7. Cut it down the middle the above mentioned episode is a 5 out of 10.
12 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fantastic episode of Supernatural
magscadar4 September 2015
I work in the film industry and write for TV and film myself. I'm an award-winning scriptwriter, a director, and jack-of-all-trades in the film industry. I also watch a LOT of great TV. This is what I wrote about this episode:

Just finished watching one of the best TV episodes I've ever seen. Supernatural, season 8, episode 15. Brilliantly done. Incredibly intelligent writing. Excellent dialogue full of rich subtext, sometimes as much as two layers deep. Great story that works well as a standalone package, fits the series episode format, doesn't give too much away, has surprising twists, and some plot events that leave you on a cliffhanger with two equally possible scenarios of what's actually happening, then comes back later, advances them both further and yet still keeps you hanging. Same level of complexity with subplots. Showed solid development in the main plot arc and the main season arc. Introduced a solid advance on a major shift in the character dynamic between the brothers over the last couple of episodes, and shows their relationship go through a very strong arc within the episode and come out much deeper and better for it. Shows the brothers working at cross purposes, so that they are competing rather than cooperating, and that creates a whole lot of plot and character and relationship impact through the conflict in scenes through the entire episode. Referenced the critical events in the characters story arcs, kept the characters completely in character, introduced some very clever new ones, brought out superb performances from all the main cast. Even the guest stars had a relationship arc that worked well, full of depth, a picture of two people in love but beset not only by events, but also by internal conflict in themselves and also internal conflict in their relationship. Lots of excellent, truly funny and intelligent humour that references in-jokes running through the series. Plenty of reward for fans who have been watching the series, because there's so much depth. Strong conflict, nail-biting climax that really hits hard with the characters being forced to face deepest fears. Surprising story twists that are fully explained and never demand suspension of disbelief. Some extremely clever devices that work within the context of the episode plot to resolve the main story arc.

Boom. Pretty much as close to a perfect piece of TV writing as I've ever seen. Truly a superb script.
12 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Some dialogues are enjoyable
roadbytheriver19 April 2024
My favorite episode of season 8

While Sam was trying to explain the dog in the room by telling his older brother to listen before getting angry, Dean's reaction when he saw a beautiful lady instead of a dog was very funny.

The Winchester brothers are doing an interesting astral travel with the male witch. Even though some characters are given too much space within the plot, there are still enjoyable dialogues.

In this episode, Dean is worried that his brother will not pass the difficult exams. Sam, on the other hand, thinks that his older brother does not trust him. They realize that the only way to be successful is to face challenges together.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Mediocre episode of a totally different show?
crwilley5 January 2014
...because it was a truly awful one of Supernatural. If I didn't know the writers credited for this episode have credits on episodes dating all the way back to the first season (including some I really liked), I'd accuse them of never having watched the show before. The "witch community" featured in the episode a) comes out of nowhere, and b) isn't consistent with what we've seen of witches on Supernatural at any point in the preceding 7.5 seasons... was this a script for a different show where witches do hang out in an underground bar and sling lightning bolts around?

And even if that were the case, putting it back into its "native habitat" wouldn't erase some highly troubling things pertaining to the character Portia.

If I were advising a friend who was starting the show from the beginning, I'd probably point out a few other episodes that fell a little flat and could probably be skipped. This is the one I'd tell them outright not to waste 40 minutes on. It gets a 3 based on "production wasn't too bad", but I kind of want my time back.
24 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A weaker script that is poorly realized
CubsandCulture7 September 2020
This episode contains the only Ackles performance that I don't think is any good. He seemed bored, stiff in this episode and without his usual sense of comedic timing. "Wiccan from Detroit" was labored line and overused. And the fake sneezing was terrible. (Also since when is Dean allergic to cats?!?) It is not just Ackles however. You could tell no one was really feeling the script and all of the performances are either stiff or overcooked. It may be the worst acted episode in the show's run.

I cannot really blame them. This is a very silly script that is without much merit on the page. The Winchesters are sidelined and the witch grudge story is just forced. I especially hated the Philippe character
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Confusing but interesting.
bpvalentine18 November 2015
Just saw this episode again on a TNT repeat. I forgot about it, frankly. I remember disliking it because as others have mentioned, it wasn't a Winchester story. In fact, it felt like one of those Supernatural episodes that you find out was supposed to be a back door pilot. I don't think that is the case here, but I think I might have liked it if this had become its own show. The detective is intriguing and well cast. Almost perfectly Gothic noir. Reminded me a LOT of Mike Carey's LUCIFER comic (that happens to me a lot watching Supernatural).

But the problem is that it feels so OFF as a Supernatural episode. We're told these characters have history with the boys, and that right there for us die hards is frustrating. Because we're sitting there trying to remember and it turns out it is a one and done situation, not a call back.

We're also asked to care about characters to a level I think is unrealistic since we don't know them. We're not invested. It's as if we're supposed to be just because we are TOLD the Winchesters are invested (at least Sam is).

Without getting all rambling, I'll just say it felt like a half baked premise that could have been so much more. Last few seasons we keep hearing how CW is trying to get a Supernatural spin off going and I'm thinking, hell, this would have been a good candidate. Just give us a couple more episodes with these people and then let them go on their merry way.

That ship sailed, I suppose.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed