"Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey" Standing Up in the Milky Way (TV Episode 2014) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Amazing Intro to a Much-Needed Series
anmolkohli0115 November 2014
I have recently developed an interest in astronomy. What better show to watch, I thought, than Cosmos by Carl Sagan? I looked it up on this website, and found that a 2014 version has been made, by nobody other than the great Seth McFarlane(no sarcasm intended there).

After watching the first episode, I must say that Neil deGrasse Tyson's narration is great, and has made me really enjoy the show. A great addition indeed.

The episode starts off with Tyson introducing us to his TARDIS, if you will. He takes us from the edge of the Earth, to the edge of the Solar System, the Milky Way, and so on, until the end of the "Observable Universe"(which is not literally "observable"). He then shows us the dawn of the universe to the evolution of animals to the first appearance of the Homo Sapiens, all packed into one calendar year.

Solid stuff.

They show us old stories of the Vatican church killing scientists and commoners posing a threat to their faith a few centuries ago. A great story, but told countless times in countless shows.

The show ends the pilot by telling us about the great works of Carl Sagan and his influence to modern astronomy. I was not born when Sagan passed away, so I have never known much about him. This segment provided me knowledge on Sagan, and much of his research and discoveries.

The show may seem ambitious, but rightly so. If done correctly, this could be a huge influence for youngsters(including me) and make physicist jobs common again.

Exciting moments, stunning graphics, and powerful narration earns this pilot a 9 out of 10.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
When the unexpected meets the amazing
chino-116-40475111 March 2014
Being a science fan (or geek) by reading, watching and hearing everything I can get my hands/eyes/ears on these days, I was a little bit anxious about what could come out of these new series of Cosmos, because everything in it could make you think it ought to be something out of this world, somehow literally! Having one of the most famous scientist and science translators (science language to bus driver language) of our time, Neil deGrasse as host, and an amazing staff supporting him (like MacFarlane who seems to be really critic about the reality we live in and a really great comedian and producer, the producer of the Original Series and ex-wife of Sagan: Ann Druyan, and the cinematographer of Matrix: Pope, among others) I wondered if it would carry too much fantasy, would it be way too historical, would it be the same stuff that you watch and hear daily on science channels and pod-casts about stars and the universe... How could they handle this? Well, somehow they did it!! And nonetheless with an amazing first episode example. They were able not only to conjugate actual science with probabilities and possible past and future scenarios (talking about space-time past/future) but (and I think these has something to do mainly with MacFarlane, Druyan and deGrasse) they also made some critics on how the religion is and has been a factor on science (bad influence mostly, obviously, but also as a motivator for those who think out of the box and want to know more no matter what). But that's not all, they were able to present something different, even about history: they focused on an historical character to guide the story, that wasn't one of the famous, that wasn't that well known and these was one of the points that made it more interesting. Why? Because most of the people know about Galileo or Copernicus, and are familiar with their stories, so this little detail was able to capture even more my attention. About the science and the photography and special effects, well there's not much to say but it can't get any better (tough somehow I hope it will and I'm most certain that it will). It is a show that needs to be watched by these new generations, no matter if they like or don't like the science side of the TV programming, it is a must! Because they will end up liking some of it if not all.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A good intro to the series, but not without it's flaws
ghal41610 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
*For those reading this review, be advised that spoilers will be within. If you have not watched the 1st episode of "Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey", please go and watch it before reading this review. You have been warned.*

This episode introduces us to the narration of Neil DeGrasse Tyson, an accomplished astrophysicist and an individual tasked with taking us on a journey through the universe and helping us to know how we came to understand our origins and our place in the cosmos, much in the same vibe as the late astrophysicist Carl Sagan did when he took television audiences on a similar journey in the original Cosmos mini-series back in late 1980.

Overall, when focused on the ever bountiful knowledge of scientific establishment, the episode is mostly successful. Tyson takes the viewer on a new incarnation of the "Spaceship of the Imagination" through an overview of our "cosmic address", the Observable Universe. Later on, he also goes through a re-collection of the cosmic calendar, an aspect from the original series but more thoroughly explored here. Between various quips, and cool responses to events like the Cretaceous asteroid reveal, Tyson shows some depth of charisma and personality that fits the tone of the show and is a good followup to Sagan's presentation. I leave the comparison of both to the reader, but personally I feel such a thing would be a disservice to both. They are interesting in their own ways.

Unfortunately though, the episode isn't without it's flaws. The writing seems disjointed or paced awkwardly at times, which could be because the general sense of a connected narrative isn't present like in the original series. The music, composed by Alan Silvestri, is decent but definitely lacks the impact that Vangelis had for the original. This is a shame, since Silvestri is an accomplished composer with great work under his belt.

However, where the episode really falls flat is in it's historical recounting of a scientific individual, something that the original series was known for. Here, the Italian theologian and philosopher Giordano Bruno is discussed. However, such a recounting works against the scientific vibe of the show, as Bruno's ideas and eventual persecution and execution were mostly as a result of religious dogma and expression, something the episode doesn't make clear to the viewer. Tyson himself blatantly mentions that Bruno didn't have any scientific basis for his ideas, in fact just "guessing right". Once again, this is counter to the goal that the series sets out to accomplish, which is popularizing science and it's various steps. That isn't brought forth through discussing Bruno's life. Galileo Galilei or Thomas Digges, both of whom lived at around the same time as Bruno, would have been a more suitable individual to discuss. With such a missed opportunity, it leaves a question as to how the rest of the series will handle such historical sequences, but it remains to be seen. The idea to go with cartoon sequences isn't bad, as in fact the parts are well-animated, although overdone dialogue and potentially inflammatory snubs at religious symbols hinted in the animation could be nixed.

Despite these points, Cosmos is intent on focusing on scientific topics, and here it sets off on a good note. There is material here to intrigue viewers, and it will be interesting to see what the rest of the series holds regarding them. The final scene where Tyson recollects his meeting with Sagan in his earlier years, as well as the homage given to Carl, was poignant and touching and definitely serves to connect the series, and the host, with their predecessors. Despite the flaws, Cosmos looks like good potential to be beheld. We'll see what comes next.

Rating: 8/10
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic journey to our past
arberibr14 October 2018
Amazing documentary that explains perfectly our past
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ep 1 Standing Up In The Milky Way
radicalmoosegaming11 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Neil De Grasse Tyson's hit show " Cosmos : A Spacetime Odyssey"'s first episode "Standing up in the Milky Way takes us on the Ship of Imagination to take a quick visit of the planets of our Solar System. Then we take a quick look of Voyager 1. The viewers discover Earth's cosmic address. Neil brings us to the edge of our observable Universe. He explains how our Universes are bubbles in a waterfall.

Neil takes us back in time to Italy to meet Giordana Bruno. A former monk who believes Earth orbits around the Sun and is not the center of the Universe. Then he explains how we started developing only in the last couple of years. Finally, he shows us the space-time calender Everything that happened in the Universe like the Sun forming is recorded on the calendar.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Bit Too Ambitious; But We Have to Start Somewhere
Hitchcoc23 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I know that Neil DeGrasse Tyson is preaching to the choir in my case, so I expect things to be big and impressive. As is often the case with the first episodes of scientific mini-series, this one has a scope so enormous that it doesn't do justice to the specifics. What we have, rather, is an almost religious (forgive me) awe of what is the universe. We are introduced to those who began the movement from superstition to scientific exploration. Tyson shows us a kind of space ship (but so much more) that will help us to see all things universal. We will be able to enter microscopic events as well as interstellar ones. We will look at the great men and women who gave their time and often their lives to answer questions for us. We will watch species develop, thrive, and go extinct. We will see theories put forth with good intentions trampled by the light of new exploration and technology. We will, I am sure, see how the church and other cultural entities often stomped on the forward movement of science. Also, the jealousies among the those of the scientific community. Humans are often their own worst enemies and will come to an appropriate end as life goes on.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good but lacks new information
darryl_hj20 July 2018
So far I haven't learned much, many opportunities missed to add more information; like the continent at the start is Pangea but it's not mentioned, ditto the Kuiper Belt.

It's well produced but I feel it could crank a notch up on the science, but I'll keep watching.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Can't believe in my eyes!
dakuchonekobing21 March 2021
It's so amazing. I'm overwhelmed. I watched this episode with my family and it's a wonderful trip I couldn't even dream of. It's so fascinating. Great start. Although someone had talked about this show should be better or something, I can say yea maybe they're right but not every person in this world is genius so for the rest people like me, there's a simple way to love science, it's just watching this show.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
title and intentions too ambitious
esgardo0124 April 2014
After reading some of the "great" reviews I decided to watch some episodes...well, very disappointing. Neither the images are outstanding ( as one reviewer suggested to watch the series only in HD); nor the topics are well treated. Actually , the images looked like they used an old computer to made them. " Special" effects have nothing special about it... I gave it a 3 because the host is a nice,well-rounded, articulated guy who seems to know the subject very well. But the fact that he met Sagan in his youth ,doesn't make the series more interesting. The series doesn't "explain" much...some new info is thrown since the previous "Cosmos" , but nothing breathtaking or enlightening. Got the feeling that the info they try to explain "easily" ( aka, compress)runs short at the end of each episode. What a waste of money and time ( specially mine)!!
5 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Sequel start really wrong
chrihern11 September 2020
We know Television is not like in 1980 but making half of the visual narrative on a weird style cartoon make things look cheap and out of place. That overuse of cartoons was not a good departure from the original but in some way is tolerable.

The big problem with "Standing Up in the Milky Way" was choosing Giordano Bruno as a protagonist: honestly don't know why that character get in new Cosmos premiere episode. The series started with Tyson presenting himself as a successor of Sagan but that protagonist choice make you to doubt about these claims.

I was trully disappointed after seeing this first chapter: after 6 years i have seen 2 or 3 more episodes and were very unremarkable.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed