Survivor (2015) Poster

(I) (2015)

User Reviews

Review this title
201 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Very watchable
thtsme16 March 2021
Granted this movie may not be anything special and it does not deserve a great rate, but there are a lot of hater answers here which are anything but fair.

The movie is more than watchable. It's an action movie, with not that many twists, (and very few of them unexpected, if any) but has a reasonably good plot, great acting, ok special effects,...

Those rating this movie below 5 don't really know what a bad movie is. This is not. Many of the flaws some reviewers point out are actually no flaws at all.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So many good ingredients but the flavour is bland...
admtech6930 May 2015
I was really looking forward to this film, Director James McTeigue had made me an instant fan with "V for Vendetta".

Pierce Brosnan did an admirable job with the material that he was given, evoking the same ice cold villain persona that he had perfected in such films as "The Fourth Protocol" and "Don't Talk to Strangers".

Milla Jovovich is a decent actress but much of her role involves reacting to situations with close ups of shock/surprise. It was not a good fit.

Supporting actors including Robert Forster and Angela Basset round out the impressive cast but they are largely wasted.

I see 2 main issues with this film:

1) The storyline is very clichéd, especially the predictable 3rd act and much of the dialogue is very stilted. 2) The CGI in many parts is sub par and takes you out of your suspension of disbelief.

Having said all this, I still found it to be a competent thriller worth watching with these caveats.
65 out of 97 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Preposterous and exciting
blanche-223 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"Survivor" is a 2015 film starring Pierce Brosnan, Milla Jovovich, Dylan McDermott, Robert Forster, Angela Bassett, and 'Vicious' star Frances de la Tour.

In London, a new State Department employee, Kate Abbott (Jovovich) has the assignment of examining all visas and keeping terrorists out of the U.K. There is a traitor in their midst, and her refusal to back down makes her a target for death, and she is framed for explosions and murders.

Kate goes on the run and soon learns of an attack to take place in New York City. She is being trailed by one of the most successful and ruthless assassins of all time, Nash (Brosnan), known as the Watchmaker.

Everyone in her office has turned against her except for Sam (McDermott) and Sally (de la Tour) who know she is innocent. In fact, one of the big bosses (Angela Bassett) wants her shot on sight.

Kate must get out of the country and go to New York and stop the attack. Will it be possible with the Watchmaker after her?

This is a very exciting film, especially the finale, but the story is absurd. First of all, why is it that the notorious Watchmaker can't seem to shoot this slip of a girl but he manages to kill everyone else he meets? And her escapes, particularly underneath the subway -- unreal.

Second - this woman is supposedly excellent at profiling terrorist subjects, so how come no one wants her to do her job and wants her to let people in she isn't sure about?

Also, anyone who watches modern British mystery or suspense films knows that the Brits have CCTV - so why can't they find her when she's above ground?

Another thing - her friend brings her money. She must have brought her an absolute fortune. I wish I had friends who had thousands of dollars hanging around their apartments. Kate manages to get the money and buys a London to New York ticket, and somehow gets her hands on a laptop - I must have missed that scene. And she didn't shop around for it either - she probably just grabbed it and paid full price.

When she gets to New York to singlehandedly stop this terrorist attack, she offers a driver $500 for the evening. She was rolling in dough.

I will admit the film was both scary and thrilling, with some remarkable chase scenes, and good London locations. And the last part is top-notch.

The acting is quite good. I have seen Milla Jovovich in films before, but frankly I wouldn't know her if I fell over her. I never remember who she is or recognize her. That's either a good or a bad thing, I don't know which. At any rate, she was excellent here except for a small thing.

Her fear, her terror, her horror was real in the chase scenes, and you felt it. One would think when she wasn't running she'd act a little traumatized, but she didn't. I put that down to Kate's training, but I'm not sure Kate was trained to be shot at and chased.

I kept remembering Genevieve Bujold in Coma coming home and telling Michael Douglas, "Someone is putting people into comas" and gradually becoming more and more hysterical. More realistic.

Pierce Brosnan is probably the only Hollywood leading man who hasn't had a face lift or dyed his hair. He looks every second of his sixty years. And mean as he was and good as he was in the role, it's time for him to put his gun and running shoes away.

I still don't understand why he, Harrison Ford, and Clint Eastwood get to keep doing these leads and most women their age are put out to pasture.

"Survivor" is a good rental. If you saw it in the theater, I think you would have been disappointed.
30 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A solid little thriller
Tweekums7 May 2022
This thriller is centred on Kate Abbott, a member of the Diplomatic Security Service, who has recently been posted to the US Embassy in London. Here it is her job to oversee visa applications for those wishing to visit the United States. One day she decides that a doctor hoping to attend a conference in New York warrants further attention... she doesn't know it at the time but he is a vital part of a terrorist plot. Others involved, notably an assassin known as 'The Watchmaker' decide to eliminate her. The bomb used in the murder attempt kills many of her colleagues but she survives. Unfortunately for her she is soon the chief suspect. Kate must now avoid the authorities and the killers if she is to get to the bottom of the plot and prevent the terrorist attack. She will have very few allies.

I thought this was a pretty solid thriller. The central idea of a protagonist trying to stop a crime while on the run from the villains and the authorities is hardly new but it is effective. Little time is wasted before the main action starts and once it does things remain tense till the finale. The action is nicely varied with chases, shooting, fights and explosions. Milla Jovovich is great as Kate and Pierce Brosnan is suitably menacing as The Watchmaker, without tipping into pantomime villain territory. The rest of the cast, which includes many familiar faces, is pretty good too. The film makes good use of London locations without finding a need to show the usual tourist sights. Overall I thought this was a good little thriller; it may not be a must see but it is well worth watching if you enjoy the genre.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Fair, The 5.6 Rating.
dhirajkakad8 February 2021
Not Fair for 5.6 Ratings, Had its Edge of Seat Movements even though it had some Flaws, But Would Definitely Recommend it to Everyone who Love's Spy & Homeland kind of Action Thrillers. Please Don't have a Second Thought of watching this one, it's Worth Your Time & Data.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Even with a stellar cast, Survivor defies all logic from its story to its execution.
LloydBayer27 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
No one ever said that a film has to be Nolan era cryptic to be appreciated. But that doesn't mean there should be a critical lapse in logic either. In the wake of increasing terror attacks around the world, Survivor might have timing on its side but precious little else when viewed as a straight-up action thriller.

A bulk of that problem lies with the severely disjointed story of a girl that cried wolf. That girl is Foreign Service Officer Kate Abbott (Mila Jovovich), newly stationed at the American Embassy in London. Abbott comes with an impressive resume but despite her commendable experience in profiling terror suspects, can't seem to convince her boss and Ambassador to the UK (Angela Bassett) that certain visa applicants to the United States have diabolical motives. One such applicant is a Romanian doctor who calls The Watchmaker (Pierce Brosnan), an accomplice and hit-man, to eliminate Abbott. Their plan – bomb a restaurant she's dinning at. Of course, Abbott survives, and just minutes later, appears to have killed an embassy official thanks to social media. It's the first of several laughable face-palm moments. Now going from the frying pan into the fire, Abbott is targeted by British authorities, American authorities and The Watchmaker himself, before trying to single-handedly foil a massive terror attack on US soil.

By now you must have noticed a string of inconsistencies that are not only illogical but absurd. Why would a skilled hit-man blow up a restaurant just to kill an unarmed office worker with no field experience? With CCTV coverage at every nook and cranny in London, why would the US Embassy implicate one of its own without a shred of evidence? As an Embassy officer with diplomatic immunity, why is Abbott hiding? Even if there are justifiable theories to those questions, nothing can prepare you for the ludicrous nature of how the entire story is penned. Pacing is an even bigger issue coming from James McTeigue, the same director responsible for the fantastic V For Vendetta. Except for Abbott's unbelievable escapes every time The Watchmaker strikes, the rest of the film comprises of time filling goose chases from one plot point to another. It doesn't register and neither does Brosnan's villain who goes from brutal to clumsy in direct reference to the title.

Documenting a movie experience is never easy when you have certain expectations, only to be let down by poor execution, lazy scripting and wooden performances. At best, Survivor is a film with a bunch of talented actors struggling to bring out an honorable tribute to law enforcement agencies thwarting terror attacks since 9/11. Although that message is intrepid, the film isn't and anyone watching this film won't remember what it stands for.
169 out of 271 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kind of flat thriller
Wizard-813 July 2015
I am pretty sure that if you have seen your share of thrillers, you will have a great feeling of deja vu while watching "Survivor". The same basic plot has been done many times before. To be fair, there are a few fresh touches, like the fact that the heroine of the movie is not a superwoman, just very smart. And Milla Jovovich does do pretty well in this role. And for what was just reportedly just a $20 million budget, the movie generally looks pretty good. Anyway, I wouldn't have minded that fairly predictable script had the main problem I had with the movie not existed, and that problem is that the movie isn't very exciting or tense enough. There's almost a matter-of-fact feeling throughout. We don't sense that the heroine is in real danger or that something very bad is brewing that could bring a major disaster. Maybe had the budget been higher, the production could have not only put in a few more action sequences, but made them more elaborate, which might have gotten the blood really pumping. This movie really isn't bad, but it's without much needed bite. By the way, fans of Angela Bassett and/or Robert Forster should be warned that they are given precious little to do.
17 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth the time
BiplavAcharya6 June 2015
I was expecting too low from this movie because it's ratings and reviews weren't colorful. But I developed a different perception after watching the movie. It's worth the time at-least.

I dislike how countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and other Islamic countries are portrayed in cinemas. Can't Americans, Europeans Mongols or Aryans be terrorist? Big head movie makers- knowingly- unknowingly- around the globe are promoting that Islam oriented citizens are dangerous. I don't understand, are we trying to shape a culture here?

This is not just about this movie, instead, I hate it every time when one offends or accuses the other no matter in what direction it flows.

If I keep aside those feeling, I will have to state that I liked all other aspects of this movie. But maybe bonding a little more between the viewer and Abbott (Milla Jovovich) would have had made the movie even better.
68 out of 149 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring and not believable
lily_vdk24 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I couldn't even finish the movie. She is supposed to be a security expert and doesn't know anything about keeping herself safe. I'm certainly not a security expert by any means but I do have some common sense. She doesn't put the scarf around her head to mask her face, she knows cameras are there but looks straight into them. She goes to predictable places, finds her friends to help her making them targets. She doesn't get rid of the tracking chip that's in her ID. She doesn't show an ounce of actual emotion throughout any of the movie. After running from the Ambassador, almost getting shot and then almost getting killed by the Pierce's character, she runs home and then cuddles with Sam. She seeks him get killed and barely reacts other than running away. Sure she can make the phone jiggle when she's "scared" but that's as believable as it gets. Yikes.
42 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty solid, but the first half is a little better than the last.
Finfrosk866 June 2015
The beginning of Survivior is very good. I was excited, and caught myself thinking this is gonna be one of the really good ones.. Unfortunately, it sloped downwards a little bit after a while and towards the end. Not that it was bad at the end, but it didn't keep me that entertained through-out the whole thing.

Not that it is bad in any way, really, it is pretty exciting, but for some reason the second half is just a little less entertaining than the beginning. Real shame. This could have been an 8, maybe even a 9!

Milla Jovovich is pretty good, although she does this weird thing with her mouth at times, which I can't remember her doing before. Maybe it is just more noticeable now that she is a bit older. (my eyes are drawn to peoples mouths, so that's why I see stuff like that) Anyway, she did a pretty good job. Same with Pierce Brosnan, he was convincing. A little unlikable, actually, but I think he was supposed to be.

The action is pretty good, it's not excellent, but good enough. There are some minor plot holes, er things that don't quite add up, didn't bother me though.

There are a couple of explosions, and one of them was kind of unpleasant to watch. Not that it was graphic, but it just made an impact on me. The scene really got through the raw power of an explosion. I like stuff like that, stuff that stick with you. I have seen hundreds of explosions in movies, and very seldom do they stick with me.

Survivior is a pretty solid, entertaining thriller, keeps you entertained for the most part. Also I like seeing a woman in a part like this, because we have seen it with men just about a squadrillion times.
30 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not sure if I should be yawning or laughing
pachrick31 August 2015
It's difficult to put time into writing a review of a movie that the writer/ director didn't put time into doing basic research. My first hint that this would be incredulous was the very first scene which was a pre-dawn raid in Afghanistan at '05.02 UTC'. Well, that's actually 9:32 Afghan time and the sun has long been up. The next scene took place sometime in the morning in London and gave the 'GMT' timezone. Hmmm.. GMT and UTC are the same thing for practical purposes. OK, enough about timezones... However, the rest of the movie was full of the same type of nonsense - it would have been enjoyable if the writer/ director had at least some sort of clue about government protocols and procedures (I'm no expert, but I at least have a clue): Visa clerks are relatively low-level employees that don't warrant expert international terrorists to try to kill them because they denied a visa to someone. Senior embassy staff don't give the OK to host countries to kill their staff because of shallow and questionable evidence. Host nationals cannot demand that a US embassy gives a visa to anyone. Ah... enough already. I didn't finish the movie it was so bad.
53 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Great "Wrong (Wo)Man" Movie!
morpheusatloppers11 December 2015
"Survivor" is a classic "wrong man" movie – a wrongly-accused hero, generally being chased and/or shot at for most of the movie – Hitchcock made a number of them.

This particular genre of suspenser is hard to bring off successfully, as it requires the actor, director and writer(s) to develop a central character with whom ALL audience members will empathise, regardless of their individual personalities – and sexes.

In the case of "Survivor" the sex is female; Milla Jovovich. Although many release posters suggest the psychotic hit-man who spends most of the film chasing and shooting at her – Pierce Brosnan – is actually the central character. I wonder why – NOT.

But apart from a minor editing screwup in the final dénouement (which I cannot describe, as it will constitute a "spoiler") this was the only cloud over a hugely entertaining film.

Although if you read the critiques – both professional and amateur – of this piece, you could be forgiven for thinking it a major turkey. Which it certainly is not. Perhaps a diet of comic-book movies has softened the brains of said critics.

However, I must mention a CURIOUS thing about this film – its GROSS.

After more than half-an-hour of exhaustive research on the Interweb, I could NOT find the movie's "domestic" (American) or most of the Rest Of The World's BOX-OFFICE (half of which ends up as the net).

All I know is that despite most of the film being shot in London (by whom gawdnose – the film's credits gloss OVER those details) with exteriors in New York and interiors in Bulgaria, the budget was surprisingly small for such a production – just 20 million USD.

And that it took half a mill in China, a few grand elsewhere and a couple of mill from DVDs, TV and so on. In fact, I myself saw it on HBO, screened just six months after its theatrical release.

But of its all-important US and UK gross, I could find ZIP (and believe me, I tried). Those figures are being kept as secret as the formula for Coke.

The only clue came from Wiki, who said the movie had been released in both markets – but in The States, only as a LIMITED release. HOW limited? Five hundred screens? Just FIVE? We do not know.

Furthermore, after the critical mauling it received, it appears to have had NO backing from its distributors.

Which is sad, because an INVOLVING film like "Survivor" is RARE these days, in a business now geared primarily for mindless CGI blockbusters for KIDS.

Also sad is the fact that Welsh actor Roger Rees made this film while suffering from brain cancer – he died shortly after.

I am only glad that I discovered all of the above AFTER I had watched this EXCELLENT film. Catch it if you can.
30 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad for what it is
pnkstr7 May 2020
After reading some of the negative reviews i felt that this particular movie deserves a more positive rating. Although some events depicted here are a bit over the top but isnt that what these movies are about? This isnt supposed to be real life otherwise it would be as boring as bat shi!t. This particular viewer was entertained and at the end of the day thats all i ask when watching a film such as this. I rate this movie for what it is. The story is easy to follow, has some good action scenes and doesnt go to far overboard with the plot twists like some other movies.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
ridiculous
RMS19499 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Good actors with an absolutely moronic script.. !!!!!! After the first 30 minutes you want to pull your hair out. Professional people who can't seem to put an coherent sentence together to explain what they are doing.or why. People who are in high places who want to risk it all to kill someone who actually no longer can hurt them ?? The entire plot starts to feel like a three stooges adventure on steroids.. Everyone becomes either incoherent, non functional, or just an out right idiot. Love Milla's acting and I usually think highly of Pierce Bronson's work but he seems as if he's uninterested and on Valium throughout this film.. I've seen worse films but when you expect at least an effective thriller and all you get is an insult to your intelligence, well it can anger you.
32 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth Your Time
prairiewalker6 January 2019
Writer could have done a little better. Good acting though, particularly by Milla, Pierce, and Dylan. Overall worthwhile.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not Unworthy Of Your Time
rupak_speaking22 January 2018
It is certainly not as bad as the ratings and majority of the reviews suggest. Yes, there are lots of plot holes to find, but I believe a movie should be judged by its entertainment quotient rather than its bullet-proof plot. This one keeps you interested. Brosnan, I felt, was pretty sharp in his role as the assassin and Mila does what she does best, run for cover and retaliate. As I always keep stating, a movie is half as good as its climax, this one though left much to be desired on that front, pretty low key to say the least. I go with a 6/10 for this one.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Too daft to laugh at
doorsscorpywag12 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Where do they get the ideas for such nonsense.

Security chief at the US Embassy in London Milla Jovovich discovers something fishy and as a result the worlds most feared hit man for no sensible reason is sent to kill her and makes a horses arse out of himself blowing up a restaurant and then showing how useless he was at shooting at her from about 10 yards away.

The acting is poor and the script laughable. One nonsensical scene has Dylan McDermott walk up to a major crime scene and simply says 'American Embassy' to a policeman, as if that would magically grant him access. But of course it does without the copper even bothering to ask for some form of ID. And the policeman in charge is referred to as 'inspector' rather than detective inspector or detective chief inspector which are real police ranks here. Does America know anything about the real world? It seems not!

Then Milla becomes the worlds most wanted after 'killing' traitor Robert Forster in a public place. Then after discovering a dastardly plot to blow up Times Square instead of telling her bosses she impossibly is able to just wander onto a flight to New York on New Years Eve. Followed by the now worlds most useless assassin Pierce Brosnan who has had so many attempts to kill her fail he should have just gave up and had a cup of Horlicks.

Then some other stuff happens and the worlds most, by now, inept assassin gets his ass kicked, by what is just another bureaucrat regardless of her fancy title, and falls off a tall building.

Milla vindicated her boss tells her he had faith in her judgement and all's well that ends well.

As we say here in England. 'What a load of b#llocks'. Giving it 1 is too kind. If you want to see how to do this really well take a look at Dirty War (2004) from BBC and HBO.
17 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Unexceptional thriller
neil-47612 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Kate Abbott (Milla Jovovich) processes visa applications at the US Embassy in London. She narrowly avoids death in a restaurant explosion which kills her colleagues, following which she finds herself on the run for two reasons: one, the authorities (including the US Ambassador) believe this to be her work and, two, the real assassin, The Watchmaker (Pierce Brosnan) still needs to kill her.

This is a workmanlike suspense thriller, with good location work in London. Jovovich makes an efficient, though not particularly likable, protagonist and Brosnan is excellent as The Watchman. The action is quite well done.

There are no huge surprises, though, and the film is essentially one long chase. And the wilful stupidity of Angela Bassett's Ambassador becomes annoying.
15 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lazy. And not in a good way.
seanhimdb25 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
From the cliché ridden 1-dimensional plot to the 2-dimensional cardboard cutout non-characters, this movie amazingly lacks even a single redeeming feature. Should come with a disclaimer - "the presence of well known actors in no way implies that any skill or talent was involved in the making of this movie." There are many ways to approach this kind of story - lone protagonist wrongly accused and hunted by the authorities, and by the bad guys, who is the only one who can prevent Something Bad Happening. This movie approaches it by lazy scripting, indifference to any kind of realism, not bothering with dialog or scenes that might have added a touch of individuality to any of the characters. Each character is a cliché to him/herself, and does/says nothing to personalise the role. Each scene either directly furthers the single-track plot, or fills time until the next plot point is reached. Without these empty scenes, the whole movie would be over in about 15 minutes.

Now, if it had a seriously agile kick-ass protagonist and an endless supply of kung-fu baddie henchmen instead of one tired looking former 007, then it could have been a wonderful Jacky Chan movie, despite the lack of plot and characters, just get the director to plant cameras on tripods and let the fight scenes unfold before our astonished eyes, and make sure the editor goes easy on the cuts. That way you could have 75 minutes of action and 15 minutes of obligatory (but don't take it seriously) plot to frame it, and everyone would have been happy.

Ah, maybe that's what it was. They found a script for a martial arts vehicle and thought they could skip the martial arts, too hard, too expensive, can't be bothered. In a word, lazy.

As a film-school assignment, it would earn an F.

Some nice shots of London, I suppose.
40 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Did you ever thought of how would a fight between Alice and Mr. Bond would look like?
gilberto-965026 August 2015
Well, this film might give you a glance of it. We've seen Milla playing on action films like the Resident Evil saga, and how to forget Pierce Brosnan from Bond movies like GoldenEye and Die Another Day. So when it comes to choosing the cast, these guys nailed it. So all along the film, as most action movies, you may expect some chasing scenes, fights, explosions, and cops. Now you might think, "ok, so what could possibly go wrong?" no? The Story!

Don't take me wrong, the story is not bad at all, as a manner of fact I did like it. I loved watching Milla running through the streets and becoming stronger, and what could you possibly ask to Pierce? Elegance, power, class, a ridiculously good profile? Well he has it all. But there's nothing you haven't seen before, and that was the problem, nothing you haven't seen before. Come on guys, we've seen hundredths of films like this before, good locations, effects, actors, but if someone wants to make a film to remember, he must blew our minds off the earth, and this film didn't make outside the atmosphere.

So if you wan't to spend the night watching a good action film to pass the time, this might be the best option in the market at the moment. But in my personal opinion, do not expect something superb.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Jovovich Excels, The Film Not so Much
JamesIan20219 July 2015
Similar to another recent action film "Everly", Survivor gets by thanks to an utterly convincing, magnetic and devoted performance from lead star Milla Jovovich, I'm a big fan of hers and it's great to see her take on an action role. That being said, there isn't an awful lot of action or thrills. The first explosion in the restaurant is actually well shot, intense and very dramatic. Jovovich' character Kate runs around London fleeing a hit-man played by a charismatic Pierce Brosnan. There are a few well staged yet short-lived shootouts, but nothing to get your heart racing.

The real issue with Survivor is the hammy and sometimes unusual dialogue, as well as a rather bland story that focuses on betrayal and the ripples of 9/11. I was in it for performances and the impressive all-star cast who do what they can. 5 stars go towards Milla Jovovich, the other star goes towards the film being able to hold my attention despite it being a rather generic action vehicle, so I award a 6/10 rating.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Exciting action
TdSmth527 July 2015
In the intro, two US chopper pilots are taken captive in Afghanistan. Presumably both are burned alive.

Kate is a star in the intelligence community. She ends up getting a post at the American embassy in London. Because there was some event at an airport involving a scientist, she wants all visa-applicants who have a science background to be flagged. That day, one such scientist shows up for a visa. She wants to check his background further. Another agent, Bill, who runs that section at the embassy is willing to give this guy the visa. Sure enough, the scientist is up to no good. He meets with a bad guy and tells him about Kate. The bad guy offers to take care of her. There's a trouble at the embassy because the scientist also has connections at the English government and they talk to the US ambassador. But Kate sticks to her guns.

Next day, when the embassy staff goes to a restaurant a bomb explodes killing all of them. Luckily Kate went to buy a gift across the street and survives. When she stumbles onto the scene she runs into another bad guy, the one who build the bomb. He is ready to kill her, but she manages to escape. The British authorities are now also after her, thinking she's responsible--diplomatic immunity be damned. But so is Sam, her mentor, who is looking to help her. She goes to a safe extraction zone and runs into Bill who is ready to kill her but in the scuffle he ends up dead. Now the bombmaker, Sam, and the Brits are after her.

We learn more about the plans of the bombmaker and the scientist which will involve an operation in New York. So not only does Kate have to escape from all the bad guys, she has to stop this terrorist attack at the same time. She works with a friend inside the embassy and manages to make it to New York in time for New Year's when the bad guys plan to carry out their attack. And eventually we do learn what the intro has to do with anything.

Survivor has a great cast and a good story even though it's not entirely believable. It's fast-paced and has plenty of action. The poor score and negative reviews here make no sense. As mentioned, things are less than believable, but so what? It's not a documentary and the purpose is to advance an exciting story. There's a bit of political intrigue which is always interesting and provocative. What if a bad guy who knows someone who knows someone in high places had some bad intentions? Could the entire system designed to cater to the rich, powerful, and famous, the VIPs, allow for something like this to happen?
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Good Thriller
sri_charan226 June 2015
It's a good thriller movie. I didn't understand the negative responses, nor the logics about the scenes many are writing. This is a movie, well, I prefer everyone to watch and judge by themselves. My verdict: I liked this film, it's one time to watch, good movie. Milla Jovovich action is always good to watch, and Pierce Brosnan can never be disappointing with his roles. This is the work of a nice script and direction. Although the film could be better in many ways if we put intense logics in every scene and action. But who cares, for a normal average viewer (i.e. not the critics or someone who looks for the flaws in any movie), this movie will be a good time pass.
16 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
far-fetched piece of nonsense
gods-lov4617 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
what a horrible, unrealistic movie...

So Pierce is supposed to be The Watchmaker, one of the top assassins in the world, BUT it's just toooooo hard to catch Milla, a worker in the embassy issuing visas lmao...

of course all the British cops, NYPD, and the US Marines are retarded and can't catch her either...but then again cops all over the world are portrayed in every movie as idiots and can never catch anyone...

Personally I didn't know that Pierce was playing a bad guy in this movie otherwise I might not have watched it... I prefer him playing the hero since I think he is much more suited in that role than as the antagonist... still that wasn't the reason why I rooted for Pierce to kill Milla throughout the movie. It's that Pierce Brosnan and Dylan Mcdermott were the only 2 believable, or even likable, characters in this movie...

I only felt bad for her coworkers who were killed in the beginning of the movie in the restaurant, but, never once, did I feel bad for Milla's character.. She was practically Jason Bourne in this movie anyways... Never mind that she doesn't have any sort of training or background in this movie to make that even remotely believable in the storyline...

The fight near the end of the movie is, of course, once again, ridiculous... Pierce Brosnan, as the Watchmaker, one of the most wanted assassins in the world, couldn't beat Milla in a 1 on 1 physical combat... I mean why should he win? He's only the top assassin while she is a super embassy worker....

so yeah the movie can be described in pretty much one word...

"WHATEVER"
21 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Negative reviews far too harsh, watch if you like underdog pics
catanniegwyn2 November 2022
Don't understand the reviews on here. I put off watching this one for ages because of them. I'm a huge fan of the wrongly accused/ spy/ revenge/ vigilante genre so I was happy to watch. Milla is a dream of an actress and the rest of the cast are good too. What's not to like? It was stylish, well acted with some good action scenes. A bit of romance would have made it even better for me but it was kind of hinted at with her coworker. Pierce Brosnan made a good villain. An enjoyable movie to sit and watch. Not every movie of this ilk is going to break the mould like the Bourne franchise or The Fugitive (two of my favs). But this is a wrongly accused exemplary government agent narrative, that works for a reason. It was enjoyable IMHO.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed